Chicago
Case Types We Handle
Personal Injuries
Car Accidents
Truck Accidents
Motorcycle Accidents
Bicycle Accidents
Construction Accidents
Nursing Home Abuse
Wrongful Death
Slip and Fall Accidents
Daycare Injury & Abuse
Edwardsville
Case Types We Handle
Personal Injuries
Car Accidents
Truck Accidents
Motorcycle Accidents
Bicycle Accidents
Nursing Home Abuse
Wrongful Death
Slip and Fall Accidents
Daycare Injury & Abuse
Premises Liability
St. Louis
Case Types We Handle
Personal Injuries
Car Accidents
Truck Accidents
Motorcycle Accidents
Bicycle Accidents
Construction Accidents
Nursing Home Abuse
Wrongful Death
Slip and Fall Accidents
Daycare Injury & Abuse
Dangerous Drugs
Defective Products
Chemical Exposure

Bard PowerPort Lawsuit [October 2025 Update] - File A Claim

TorHoerman Law is helping injured patients join the Bard PowerPort Lawsuit.

Contact us today for a free consultation, or use the chat feature on this page to find out if you're eligible to file a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit.

Most Recent Updates:

  • More than 1,763 Bard PowerPort Lawsuits are pending in the federal MDL.

  • Claims involving the Bard Power Port devices focus on serious health issues allegedly caused by design and manufacturing defects.

  • Contact us today for a free consultation or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Bard PowerPort Lawsuit instantly.

Our Attorneys Can Help You File a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit

This page is intended for individuals seeking information about the Bard PowerPort Lawsuit, including current updates, eligibility, and potential compensation for injuries linked to the Bard PowerPort implantable port catheter device.

TorHoerman Law’s team of Bard PowerPort Lawyers are actively accepting new clients and helping them join the ongoing Bard PowerPort Litigation.

On this page, we’ll provide an overview of the Bard PowerPort Lawsuit, technical issues and injuries associated with the Bard PowerPort catheters, the current status of the Bard PowerPort MDL, the role of an attorney, and much more.

Bard PowerPort Lawsuit; Bard Power Port Lawsuit; Bard PowerPort Injury Lawyers; Bard PowerPort Lawyers; Bard PowerPort Lawsuits;

What is the Bard PowerPort Lawsuit and Who is Eligible to File a Claim?

The Bard PowerPort Lawsuit centers on allegations that Bard’s implantable port systems were defectively designed and manufactured, leading to serious injuries in patients who relied on them for long-term vascular access.

These devices, widely used for chemotherapy, long-term IV treatments, and other infusion therapies, have been linked to catheter fractures, infections, blood clots, migration, and vessel damage.

Thousands of injured patients across the country have filed lawsuits claiming that Bard Access Systems, Inc. and its parent company, Becton, Dickinson and Company, failed to properly warn healthcare providers and patients about these risks.

Plaintiffs allege that flaws in the catheter’s material and construction allowed the device to degrade inside the body, exposing them to life-threatening complications and emergency surgeries.

All federal Bard PowerPort catheter lawsuits have been consolidated in Multidistrict Litigation (MDL No. 3081) before the United States District Court for the District of Arizona.

This consolidation allows a single district court to coordinate pretrial proceedings, manage discovery, and set the stage for bellwether trials.

Through this litigation, plaintiffs are pursuing financial compensation for their medical expenses, pain and suffering, lost wages, and other damages resulting from defective PowerPort devices.

Do You Qualify for the Bard Power Port Lawsuit?

If you or a loved one have been injured by a Bard PowerPort Device, you may be eligible to file a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.

Contact a PowerPort injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation case consultation.

You can also use our chat feature below to receive a free, instant online case evaluation and find out if you qualify for a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit instantly.

Our law firm is committed to helping people harmed at no fault of their own seek financial compensation for what they’ve been through.

We aren’t afraid to take on large companies and manufacturers of potentially defective medical devices.

Reach out to us for more information and to find out if you qualify for legal action.

Table of Contents
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit; Bard Power Port Lawsuit; Bard PowerPort Injury Lawyers; Bard PowerPort Lawyers; Bard PowerPort Lawsuits;

Lawsuit Updates

September 18, 2025

September 18th, 2025: Bard PowerPort Lawsuit MDL Surpasses 2,100 Cases as Bellwether Trials Approach

As of September 2025, more than 2,100 lawsuits have been centralized in the Bard PowerPort multidistrict litigation (MDL No. 3081) in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, overseen by Judge David G. Campbell.

These cases raise similar allegations that design defects in Bard’s implantable port catheter caused severe injuries due to catheter fractures, migration, and related complications.

Key Litigation Developments:

  • The Bard PowerPort MDL was formed in July 2023 to streamline discovery and pretrial proceedings.
  • The lawsuits claim that Bard’s port catheters, often used for chemotherapy or long-term medication delivery, suffer from design flaws that allow pressure buildup and structural failure.
  • Plaintiffs allege these failures caused life-threatening injuries and that Bard knew or should have known about the risks but failed to act.

Bellwether Trials Scheduled for 2026

  • The Court has selected six bellwether cases for early trial, beginning with a lawsuit filed by Robert Cook scheduled for trial on March 2, 2026.
  • Additional federal trials are planned throughout 2026.
  • Separately, Arizona’s first state court trial is set for August 3, 2026.

Concerns Over Product Identification

Defendants have raised concerns that some complaints fail to properly identify the specific port device implanted.

Plaintiff leadership responded by noting that only six such cases lack product ID and were largely filed by the same firm.

This issue remains a point of contention as the litigation progresses.

Additional State Filings

  • 146 lawsuits are pending in New Jersey’s multicounty litigation.
  • 21 more cases have been filed in Maricopa County, Arizona.

While bellwether trial results are not binding, they are expected to significantly influence future settlement discussions.

If no global resolution is reached, Judge Campbell may remand individual cases back to their home districts for trial.

September 18, 2025
September 2, 2025

September 2, 2025: September 2025 JPML Update

The Bard PowerPort litigation saw a steady rise in case filings last month.

As of September, 1,972 lawsuits have been consolidated in the multidistrict litigation (MDL), up from 1,807 in August.

The lawsuits, centralized in the District of Arizona, allege that Bard’s implantable port devices are prone to fracture, migrate, or cause serious infections and vascular injuries.

These defects have reportedly led to severe complications for patients who relied on the devices for long-term treatment, including chemotherapy and nutrition support.

If you or a loved one has experienced a complication after receiving a Bard PowerPort, you may qualify for legal action.

For those experiencing complications, it is strongly recommended to consult with an attorney for a free case review.

Want to find out if you qualify for the Bard PowerPort Lawsuit right now? 

You can use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify in just minutes.

September 2, 2025

Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Updates and Overview

The Bard PowerPort Lawsuit consolidates claims that Bard’s implantable port systems were defectively designed and manufactured, exposing patients to preventable risks during long-term vascular access.

Plaintiffs argue that flaws in the catheter material, specifically the Chronoflex AL blend with barium sulfate, made the device prone to cracking, fracturing, and migrating inside the body.

These failures have been linked to severe infections, blood clots, pulmonary embolism, cardiac complications, and in some cases, life-threatening emergencies requiring surgical intervention.

Bard PowerPort Lawsuits claim that Bard Access Systems and its parent company, Becton Dickinson, failed to adequately test the device or warn patients and physicians of the risks associated with its use.

In August 2023, in response to growing litigation nationwide, the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation created MDL No. 3081 in the District of Arizona, assigning the cases to Judge David G. Campbell.

The judicial panel centralized lawsuits to streamline the exchange of evidence, manage expert testimony, and coordinate pretrial rulings across thousands of claims.

Since then, the Bard PowerPort multidistrict litigation has grown steadily, with over 2,000 lawsuits pending in federal court.

Quick facts about the Bard PowerPort litigation:

  • Court: U.S. District Court, District of Arizona (Judge David G. Campbell)
  • Process: Currently in the discovery process, including document production, depositions, and testing of explanted devices
  • Core Allegations: Design defects, failure to warn, and negligent manufacturing
  • Injuries Reported: Catheter fracture, device migration, blood clots, and severe infections leading to hospitalization or sepsis
  • Next Phase: Bellwether trials scheduled to evaluate representative cases and guide potential settlements

The discovery process has focused heavily on engineering analyses, company testing records, and physician testimony about complications observed in clinical practice.

Bellwether cases have been selected to move toward trial, where juries will assess whether Bard’s design and warnings were adequate under federal product liability law.

While verdicts in bellwether trials apply only to the individual plaintiffs involved, they play an important role in shaping the overall litigation.

Jury responses to evidence of design defects and corporate negligence will influence both sides’ settlement strategies and may drive the framework for financial compensation across the MDL.

What Is the Bard PowerPort Device and Why Are Lawsuits Being Filed?

The Bard PowerPort is an implanted port catheter system manufactured by Bard Access Systems and Bard Peripheral Vascular, subsidiaries of medical device conglomerate Becton, Dickinson and Company.

It is designed to provide long-term access to a patient’s vascular system for repeated intravenous treatments such as chemotherapy, antibiotics, and parenteral nutrition.

The Bard PowerPort Device consists of two parts:

  1. The Injection Port, implanted underneath the skin on an arm, or in the chest, the injection port allows easy access for injections and is made of a self-sealing material that allows multiple needle punctures.
  2. The Polyurethane Catheter is a small, flexible tube connected to the port, and is installed inside one of the large central veins that take blood to your heart.

To use the PowerPort, medical professionals need to use a special needle (the PowerLoc needle) to “access” the bloodstream.

From there, medicine and fluids can be administered through the needle and blood samples can be withdrawn.

While this medical device is intended to reduce the need for repeated needle sticks and support critical treatments, serious concerns have emerged about its safety and long-term durability.

Reports of Device Defects and Patient Harm

Thousands of patients have reported complications involving catheter failure, migration, and infection after receiving a Bard implanted port catheter.

In many cases, the polyurethane catheter—often made with a polymer blend called Chronoflex AL—has fractured or degraded over time.

Fragments of the device may travel through the blood vessels, leading to vascular damage, embolisms, and other internal injuries.

These failures have triggered emergency medical procedures and even permanent harm for affected users.

Experts argue that the material, which contains high concentrations of barium sulfate to improve imaging visibility, may weaken the structural integrity of the catheter over time.

How Many Bard PowerPort Lawsuits Have Been Filed? Current Status of the Bard PowerPort MDL

The Bard PowerPort MDL continues to grow, with more than 2,000 pending Bard PowerPort Lawsuits filed.

New Bard PowerPort Lawsuits are currently being filed by lawyers across the country.

If you were injured or suffered other Bard PowerPort complications, you may be eligible to file a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit and seek compensation.

Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit.

Bard PowerPort Settlement Amounts: Projections & Estimates

Bard PowerPort lawsuits are still in progress, and no settlements have been reached.

However, attorneys estimate that potential Bard PowerPort settlement amounts could range between $10,000 and over $250,000, depending on individual damages and the direction of the litigation.

These figures are general estimations and not guaranteed, as each case is unique and outcomes can vary.​

While exact settlement figures are not yet determined, attorneys have provided estimated ranges based on the severity of injuries:

  • Tier 1 – Severe Injuries: Cases involving life-threatening complications such as cardiac punctures, pulmonary embolism, or stroke. Estimated settlements may exceed $100,000.
  • Tier 2 – Moderate Injuries: Cases with significant injuries like deep vein thrombosis, catheter infections, or hematomas. Estimated settlements range between $50,000 and $100,000.
  • Tier 3 – Mild Injuries: Cases involving less severe complications requiring minimal medical intervention. Estimated settlements range between $10,000 and $50,000.​

These estimates are based on similar previous litigations and are meant to provide a general idea of potential settlement ranges.

For a more accurate assessment of your case, it’s advisable to consult directly with a qualified attorney.​

Serious Health Risks Linked to the Bard Power Port Device

The PowerPort implantable port catheter device was designed to simplify long-term vascular access, but serious injuries have been reported due to device failure.

The most common complication involves catheter fracture, where the tubing breaks inside the patient’s body.

These fractured components can migrate through the bloodstream, a phenomenon known as catheter migration, which can cause internal damage to organs and blood vessels.

Patients have required emergency interventions when fragments lodged in or near vital organs such as the heart and lungs.

Infections originating from the PowerPort site, or along the catheter itself, have also been reported, leading to bloodstream infections and sepsis in some cases.

Another major concern is deep vein thrombosis (DVT), which occurs when blood clots form around the device or its components.

These clots can travel and result in a pulmonary embolism, stroke, or other life-threatening events.

Allegations in Bard PowerPort Lawsuits filed suggest that the device’s material composition may weaken over time, making catheter infection, fracture, and migration more likely.

Serious Injuries and Complications Related to the Bard PowerPort Device include:

Complications From A Catheter Fracture

A fractured implantable vascular access device can cause significant internal damage with the catheter pieces circulating in the bloodstream.

In all cases, there is a high possibility of requiring emergency surgery to remove any fractured pieces and properly treat all affected organs.

Catheter Fracture injuries include:

  • Cardiac Arrhythmia
  • Pulmonary embolism
  • Cardiac Punctures
  • Blood Clots
  • Hematomas
  • Lacerations to blood vessels
  • Severe chest pain

Complications From A Catheter Infection

An infection could potentially cause serious complication as the body could possibly have more difficulty dealing with the pathogens that reside in the catheter.

If gone untreated, catheter infection can cause a number of serious and even life-threatening injuries.

Catheter Infection injuries:

  • Infections of the bloodstream
  • Swelling, tenderness, and soreness at the site of the Bard PowerPort implant
  • Necrosis of tissues around the Bard PowerPort implant

What Bard PowerPort Devices are Named in the Lawsuit?

Bard PowerPort devices are typically used in patients who require long-term or repeated intravenous treatments, such as chemotherapy, antibiotic therapy, or parenteral nutrition.

These implantable port catheter systems are inserted beneath the skin to access the patient’s vascular system more efficiently over extended periods.

However, certain models have been linked to severe complications, and multiple Bard PowerPort devices are specifically named in the lawsuits.

These models are alleged to contain design or material defects that may lead to catheter failure, migration, or serious injury.

Bard PowerPort Devices Named in the Lawsuit:

  • Bard PowerPort™ ClearVue Implantable Port – Commonly used in cancer patients; known for risk of catheter fracture and migration.
  • Bard PowerPort™ MRI Implantable Port – Marketed as MRI-compatible, but lawsuits claim it may be prone to cracking and failure.
  • Bard PowerPort isp M.R.I. Implantable Port – Frequently cited in complaints involving infection, thrombosis, and device degradation.
  • Bard PowerPort™ SlimPort Implantable Port – A smaller-profile device included in legal filings for similar safety concerns.
  • Bard PowerPort™ Dual-Lumen Port – Allows for multiple lines of medication but has been linked to complications from design flaws.

Each of these devices has appeared in Bard PowerPort Lawsuits due to alleged structural instability or unsafe materials that may put patients at risk.

Do You Qualify to File a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit?

Individuals who suffered complications after receiving a Bard PowerPort may be eligible to join the ongoing multidistrict litigation.

Reported injuries include catheter fracture, device migration, blood clots, and serious infections.

Lawsuits allege that Bard Access Systems designed and marketed a defective device, failed to conduct adequate testing, and did not warn patients or physicians of the risks.

New plaintiffs enter the litigation by filing a short form complaint that outlines their injuries and identifies the implanted Bard device.

Bard PowerPort cases are then reviewed as part of MDL No. 3081 in the District of Arizona.

If you or a loved one were harmed by a Bard PowerPort, contact TorHoerman Law to learn whether you qualify for the lawsuit.

Our attorneys have extensive experience litigating against major medical device manufacturers and are prepared to pursue accountability and compensation on your behalf.

Hiring A Bard PowerPort Injury Lawyer

The civil litigation process requires extreme attention to detail and can be overwhelming for someone who does not possess extensive legal knowledge.

An experienced Bard PowerPort injury lawyer can help you to:

  • Determine liability
  • Gather evidence
  • Assess damages
  • Build a strong case
  • Get you compensated for your injuries

Contact the attorneys at TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation legal consultation to see if you qualify for a Bard PowerPort catheter injury lawsuit.

Keep in mind, the statute of limitations limits the amount of time you have to take legal action after an injury, so do not wait to take the first step by contacting an attorney.

Gathering Evidence for a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit

Gathering strong evidence is essential for building a successful case in the Bard PowerPort litigation.

Plaintiffs must show a clear connection between their injuries and the Bard Power Port implant, supported by detailed documentation.

Medical records are among the most important types of evidence, as they help demonstrate the extent of harm and necessary treatments.

Additional forms of evidence can support claims of product failure and the manufacturer’s liability.

Evidence in a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit may include:

  • Medical Records – These provide proof of implantation, diagnosis, treatment, and complications linked to the Bard PowerPort.
  • Surgical Reports – Documentation of implantation and explantation procedures can help demonstrate how the device may have caused harm.
  • Imaging Results – X-rays, CT scans, or ultrasounds may show catheter fracture, migration, or related damage.
  • Device Identification Information – Details about the specific Bard PowerPort model implanted, including serial number and implant date.
  • Photos or Videos – Visual documentation of visible injuries, device fragments, or post-surgical conditions.
  • Personal Testimony – Written or recorded statements describing the pain, limitations, and emotional impact of injuries.
  • Expert Opinions – Statements from medical professionals supporting the link between the Bard device and the injury.

Thorough and well-organized evidence strengthens your claim and gives your legal team the foundation they need to pursue compensation.

Assessing Damages in a Bard PowerPort Lawsuits

In Bard PowerPort Lawsuits, damages refer to the financial, physical, and emotional losses a person suffers as a result of complications caused by the implantable port catheter device.

These damages form the basis of compensation sought in litigation and can vary significantly depending on the severity of injury and long-term impact.

Bard PowerPort Lawsuits allege that design and manufacturing flaws led to preventable harm, making injured individuals eligible to pursue both economic and non-economic damages.

A Port Catheter Injury Lawyer can help evaluate your case, calculate losses, and build a claim that reflects the full scope of your suffering.

Potential Damages in a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit may include:

  • Medical Bills – Reimbursement for past, current, and future expenses related to treatment, surgeries, hospital stays, and medication.
  • Lost Wages – Compensation for income lost due to time off work or reduced earning capacity.
  • Pain and Suffering – Monetary damages for the physical pain and emotional distress resulting from the injury and ongoing complications.
  • Loss of Enjoyment of Life – Recovery for limitations placed on hobbies, relationships, or daily activities due to the injury.
  • Permanent Disability – Financial recovery for long-term impairment or disfigurement caused by the Bard PowerPort device.
  • Out-of-Pocket Expenses – Includes travel costs, home modifications, or assistive devices required after the injury.

Bard PowerPort Lawyers can help you assess and calculate losses to advocate for the full amount of compensation you deserve.

TorHoerman Law: Bard PowerPort Attorneys

Our team of dedicated attorneys, with more than 100 years of combined litigation experience, have helped clients win more than $4 billion in verdicts and negotiated settlements for injuries suffered at no fault of their own.

If you or a loved one were injured by Bard PowerPort devices, you may be eligible to file a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit against the medical device manufacturer.

Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit instantly.

Our attorneys work on a contingency fee basis – so our clients don’t pay any legal fees unless they are awarded compensation for their injuries & other losses.

Reach out to us if you were injured by a defective device. We’re here to help you.

Frequently Asked Questions

Published By:
Picture of Tor Hoerman

Tor Hoerman

Owner & Attorney - TorHoerman Law

Do You
Have A Case?

Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.

Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.

Would you like our help?

About TorHoerman Law

At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.

Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?

Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!

$495 Million
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit

In this case, we obtained a verdict of $495 Million for our client’s child who was diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis after consuming baby formula manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.

$20 Million
Toxic Tort Injury

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $20 Million for our client after they suffered a Toxic Tort Injury due to chemical exposure.

$103.8 Million
COX-2 Inhibitors Injury

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $103.8 Million for our client after they suffered a COX-2 Inhibitors Injury.

$4 Million
Traumatic Brain Injury

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $4 Million for our client after they suffered a Traumatic Brain Injury while at daycare.

$2.8 Million
Defective Heart Device

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $2.8 Million for our client after they suffered an injury due to a Defective Heart Device.

Guides & Resources
Do You
Have A Case?

Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.

Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.

Would you like our help?

Additional Bard PowerPort Lawsuit resources on our website:
All
FAQs
Injuries & Conditions
Legal Help
News
Other Resources
Settlements & Compensation
You can learn more about the Bard PowerPort Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
Bard Port Catheter Lawsuit
Bard Power Port Lawsuit Settlement Amounts
Bard PowerPort Catheter Fracture Lawsuit
Bard PowerPort Catheter Infection Lawsuit
Bard PowerPort Migration Lawsuit
Bard PowerPort Thrombosis Lawsuit
Common Power Port Complications, Risks, and Symptoms
FAQ: What are Port-a-Catheter Migration Symptoms?
FAQ: What are the problems with Bard Power Port Devices?
FAQ: What Injuries Are Linked to the Bard PowerPort Implantable Port Device?
How to Report Bard PowerPort Injuries and Adverse Health Effects

Share

Other Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Resources

All
FAQs
Injuries & Conditions
Legal Help
News
Other Resources
Settlements & Compensation

What Our Clients Have To Say