If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced Chicago personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation Chicago personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in Chicago, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced Chicago auto accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in Chicago, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our Chicago truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in Chicago or the greater Chicagoland area – you may be eligible to file a Chicago motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Chicago motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in Chicago at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file a Chicago bike accident lawsuit.
Contact a Chicago bicycle accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
Chicago is one of the nation’s largest construction centers.
Thousands of men and women work on sites across the city and metropolitan area on tasks ranging from skilled trades to administrative operations.
Unfortunately, construction site accidents are fairly common.
Contact TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options with an experienced Chicago construction accident lawyer, free of charge and no obligation required.
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced Chicago nursing home abuse attorney from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of Chicago, or the greater Chicagoland area, and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact a Chicago wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in Chicago you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact a Chicago slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact a Chicago daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced Edwardsville personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation Edwardsville personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in Edwardsville, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville car accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in Edwardsville, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our Edwardsville truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in Edwardsville – you may be eligible to file an Edwardsville motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in Edwardsville at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file an Edwardsville bike accident lawsuit.
Contact an Edwardsville bicycle accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville nursing home abuse attorney from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of Edwardsville and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact an Edwardsville wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in Edwardsville you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact an Edwardsville slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact an Edwardsville daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
If you or a loved one suffered injuries on someone else’s property in Edwardsville IL, you may be entitled to financial compensation.
If property owners fail to keep their premises safe, and their negligence leads to injuries, property damages or other losses as a result of an accident or incident, a premises liability lawsuit may be possible.
Contact an Edwardsville premises liability lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation case consultation.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced St. Louis personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation St. Louis personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in St. Louis, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced St. Louis auto accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in St. Louis, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our St. Louis truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in St. Louis or the greater St. Louis area – you may be eligible to file a St. Louis motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced St. Louis motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in St. Louis at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file a St. Louis bike accident lawsuit.
Contact a St. Louis bicycle accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
St. Louis is one of the nation’s largest construction centers.
Thousands of men and women work on sites across the city and metropolitan area on tasks ranging from skilled trades to administrative operations.
Unfortunately, construction site accidents are fairly common.
Contact TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options with an experienced St. Louis construction accident lawyer, free of charge and no obligation required.
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced St. Louis nursing home abuse attorney from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of St. Louis, or the greater St. Louis area, and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact a St. Louis wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in St. Louis you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact a St. Louis slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact a St. Louis daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
Suboxone, a medication often used to treat opioid use disorder (OUD), has become a vital tool which offers a safer and more controlled approach to managing opioid addiction.
Despite its widespread use, Suboxone has been linked to severe tooth decay and dental injuries.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuits claim that the companies failed to warn about the risks of tooth decay and other dental injuries associated with Suboxone sublingual films.
Depo-Provera, a contraceptive injection, has been linked to an increased risk of developing brain tumors (including glioblastoma and meningioma).
Women who have used Depo-Provera and subsequently been diagnosed with brain tumors are filing lawsuits against Pfizer (the manufacturer), alleging that the company failed to adequately warn about the risks associated with the drug.
Despite the claims, Pfizer maintains that Depo-Provera is safe and effective, citing FDA approval and arguing that the scientific evidence does not support a causal link between the drug and brain tumors.
You may be eligible to file a Depo Provera Lawsuit if you used Depo-Provera and were diagnosed with a brain tumor.
Tepezza, approved by the FDA in 2020, is used to treat Thyroid Eye Disease (TED), but some patients have reported hearing issues after its use.
The Tepezza lawsuit claims that Horizon Therapeutics failed to warn patients about the potential risks and side effects of the drug, leading to hearing loss and other problems, such as tinnitus.
You may be eligible to file a Tepezza Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Tepezza and subsequently suffered permanent hearing loss or tinnitus.
Elmiron, a drug prescribed for interstitial cystitis, has been linked to serious eye damage and vision problems in scientific studies.
Thousands of Elmiron Lawsuits have been filed against Janssen Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturer, alleging that the company failed to warn patients about the potential risks.
You may be eligible to file an Elmiron Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Elmiron and subsequently suffered vision loss, blindness, or any other eye injury linked to the prescription drug.
The chemotherapy drug Taxotere, commonly used for breast cancer treatment, has been linked to severe eye injuries, permanent vision loss, and permanent hair loss.
Taxotere Lawsuits are being filed by breast cancer patients and others who have taken the chemotherapy drug and subsequently developed vision problems.
If you or a loved one used Taxotere and subsequently developed vision damage or other related medical problems, you may be eligible to file a Taxotere Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Although pressure cookers were designed to be safe and easy to use, a number of these devices have been found to have a defect that can lead to excessive buildup of internal pressure.
The excessive pressure may result in an explosion that puts users at risk of serious injuries such as burns, lacerations, an even electrocution.
If your pressure cooker exploded and caused substantial burn injuries or other serious injuries, you may be eligible to file a Pressure Cooker Lawsuit and secure financial compensation for your injuries and damages.
Several studies have found a correlation between heavy social media use and mental health challenges, especially among younger users.
Social media harm lawsuits claim that social media companies are responsible for onsetting or heightening mental health problems, eating disorders, mood disorders, and other negative experiences of teens and children
You may be eligible to file a Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit if you are the parents of a teen, or teens, who attribute their use of social media platforms to their mental health problems.
The Paragard IUD, a non-hormonal birth control device, has been linked to serious complications, including device breakage during removal.
Numerous lawsuits have been filed against Teva Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturer of Paragard, alleging that the company failed to warn about the potential risks.
If you or a loved one used a Paragard IUD and subsequently suffered complications and/or injuries, you may qualify for a Paragard Lawsuit.
Patients with the PowerPort devices may possibly be at a higher risk of serious complications or injury due to a catheter failure, according to lawsuits filed against the manufacturers of the Bard PowerPort Device.
If you or a loved one have been injured by a Bard PowerPort Device, you may be eligible to file a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products for injuries, pain and suffering, and financial costs related to complications and injuries of these medical devices.
Over 100,000 Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits have been filed on behalf of women injured by vaginal mesh and pelvic mesh products.
If you or a loved one have suffered serious complications or injuries from vaginal mesh, you may be eligible to file a Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit.
Parents and guardians are filing lawsuits against major video game companies (including Epic Games, Activision Blizzard, and Microsoft), alleging that they intentionally designed their games to be addictive — leading to severe mental and physical health issues in minors.
The lawsuits claim that these companies used psychological tactics and manipulative game designs to keep players engaged for extended periods — causing problems such as anxiety, depression, and social withdrawal.
You may be eligible to file a Video Game Addiction Lawsuit if your child has been diagnosed with gaming addiction or has experienced negative effects from excessive gaming.
Above ground pool accidents have led to lawsuits against manufacturers due to defective restraining belts that pose serious safety risks to children.
These belts, designed to provide structural stability, can inadvertently act as footholds, allowing children to climb into the pool unsupervised, increasing the risk of drownings and injuries.
Parents and guardians are filing lawsuits against pool manufacturers, alleging that the defective design has caused severe injuries and deaths.
If your child was injured or drowned in an above ground pool accident involving a defective restraining belt, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.
Recent scientific studies have found that the use of chemical hair straightening products, hair relaxers, and other hair products present an increased risk of uterine cancer, endometrial cancer, breast cancer, and other health problems.
Legal action is being taken against manufacturers and producers of these hair products for their failure to properly warn consumers of potential health risks.
You may be eligible to file a Hair Straightener Cancer Lawsuit if you or a loved one used chemical hair straighteners, hair relaxers, or other similar hair products, and subsequently were diagnosed with:
AFFF (Aqueous Film Forming Foam) is a firefighting foam that has been linked to various health issues, including cancer, due to its PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) content.
Numerous AFFF Lawsuits have been filed against AFFF manufacturers, alleging that they knew about the health risks but failed to warn the public.
AFFF Firefighting Foam lawsuits aim to hold manufacturers accountable for putting peoples’ health at risk.
You may be eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit if you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer.
Paraquat, a widely-used herbicide, has been linked to Parkinson’s disease, leading to numerous Paraquat Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits against its manufacturers for failing to warn about the risks of chronic exposure.
Due to its toxicity, the EPA has restricted the use of Paraquat and it is currently banned in over 30 countries.
You may be eligible to file a Paraquat Lawsuit if you or a loved one were exposed to Paraquat and subsequently diagnosed with Parkinson’s Disease or other related health conditions.
Mesothelioma is an aggressive form of cancer primarily caused by exposure to asbestos.
Asbestos trust funds were established in the 1970s to compensate workers harmed by asbestos-containing products.
These funds are designed to pay out claims to those who developed mesothelioma or other asbestos-related diseases due to exposure.
Those exposed to asbestos and diagnosed with mesothelioma may be eligible to file a Mesothelioma Lawsuit.
Studies have found a link between toxic baby formula and Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) — a severe intestinal condition in premature infants.
Parents and guardians are filing NEC Lawsuits against baby formula manufacturers, alleging that the formulas contain harmful ingredients leading to NEC.
Despite the claims, Abbott and Mead Johnson deny the allegations, arguing that their products are thoroughly researched and dismissing the scientific evidence linking their formulas to NEC, while the FDA issued a warning to Abbott regarding safety concerns of a formula product.
You may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit if your child received baby bovine-based (cow’s milk) baby formula in the maternity ward or NICU of a hospital and was subsequently diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC).
PFAS contamination lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers and suppliers of PFAS chemicals, alleging that these substances have contaminated water sources and products, leading to severe health issues.
Plaintiffs claim that prolonged exposure to PFAS through contaminated drinking water and products has caused cancers, thyroid disease, and other health problems.
The lawsuits target companies like 3M, DuPont, and Chemours, accusing them of knowingly contaminating the environment with PFAS and failing to warn about the risks.
If you or a loved one has been exposed to PFAS-contaminated water or products and has developed health issues, you may be eligible to file a PFAS lawsuit.
The Roundup Lawsuit claims that Monsanto’s popular weed killer, Roundup, causes cancer.
Numerous studies have linked the main ingredient, glyphosate, to Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, Leukemia, and other Lymphatic cancers.
Despite this, Monsanto continues to deny these claims.
Victims of Roundup exposure who developed cancer are filing Roundup Lawsuits against Monsanto, seeking compensation for medical expenses, pain, and suffering.
Our firm is about people. That is our motto and that will always be our reality.
We do our best to get to know our clients, understand their situations, and get them the compensation they deserve.
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Without our team, we would’nt be able to provide our clients with anything close to the level of service they receive when they work with us.
The THL Team commits to the sincere belief that those injured by the misconduct of others, especially large corporate profit mongers, deserve justice for their injuries.
Our team is what has made TorHoerman Law a very special place since 2009.
The JUUL lawsuit alleges that JUUL Labs marketed its e-cigarettes to minors and failed to warn about the potential risks of its products, leading to nicotine addiction and other health issues.
Multiple lawsuits have been filed against JUUL Labs, including individual, class action, and government lawsuits, with plaintiffs seeking compensation for injuries and damages.
JUUL Labs has faced criticism for its marketing tactics, which allegedly targeted young people, and for the high nicotine content in its products.
TorHoerman Law is currently not accepting new clients for the Juul Lawsuit.
Juul has started settling other lawsuits, especially those involving state governments, municipalities, and other entities.
Notably, Juul settled for $462 million with states like New York and California over their marketing practices targeting teens.
TorHoerman Law has filed lawsuits against the makers of Juul e-cigarettes.
Consumers have reported seizures, lung damage, and other serious injuries, including strokes, due to prolonged use of Juul.
Many e-cigarette lawsuits have also claimed that nicotine levels in vapes resulted in addiction due to misleading branding and marketing efforts by electronic cigarette companies, suggesting that marketing campaigns were targeted towards minors and that companies failed to warn their products may be more addictive than traditional tobacco products.
The marketing aspect was the primary allegation in the recent Juul Labs, Inc. Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability Litigation that settled in December 2022.
Another legal action, the Juul Class Action Lawsuit, was filed over over allegations that consumers paid more for Juul products than they would have paid if they were made aware of the highly addictive nature of their products.
This Juul Class Action Lawsuit was also settled in 2023.
TorHoerman Law is no longer accepting clients for these two litigations.
However, our law firm is actively accepting clients who have been diagnosed with popcorn lung due to vaping or e-cigarette use.
We are no longer accepting other JUUL-related cases at this time.
TorHoerman Law is NOT accepting new clients for the Juul Products Liability and Personal Injury MDL.
We are investigating cases involving popcorn lung and other serious lung injuries due to Juul and other vape products.
Contact our law firm with any questions or concerns about Juul products or about your Juul Lawsuit.
Watch our lead Juul lawyer, Jake Plattenberger, explain the facts of the Juul Lawsuit on NBC Nightly News With Lester Holt.
Our law firm is not accepting new clients for the Juul Lawsuit.
Other lawsuits filed against Juul are beginning to settle, mainly those involving state governments, municipalities, school districts, Native American tribes, and more.
Juul recently reached a $462 million settlement with New York, California and other states over the marketing of their products to teens.
Contact TorHoerman Law if you have any questions or concerns about the Juul Lawsuit.
Juul Labs has agreed to a $1.2 billion settlement with 10,000 individual plaintiffs for the company’s role in the youth vaping epidemic.
The landmark settlement resolves thousands of individual claims relating to marketing practices and severe addiction to Juul products.
The next steps in the Juul litigation will be the appointment of a Class Settlement Administrator and the implementation of a formal claims process.
Visit this page for more updates on Juul Lawsuit settlement amounts as they become available.
The Juul Lawsuit is ongoing and lawyers across the country are still accepting claims.
Juul has been ordered to pay a $438 million settlement out to 33 states and Puerto Rico for marketing their products to minors.
Recently, school districts, municipalities and states have joined lawsuits against the vape company for marketing its products to minors.
An $87 million settlement was agreed to in July, and Juul will have to pay out tens of millions of dollars to the states of Arizona, North Carolina and Washington.
Other states are also filing lawsuits against Juul: California, Colorado, Hawaii, Massachusetts and Minnesota.
Visit this page for more updates as they become available.
The Juul litigation is ongoing and lawyers across the country are still accepting cases.
The ban on the sale of Juul products in the U.S. is still on a temporary hold.
While the ban is on hold, the FDA has reportedly turned its attention to other nicotine vape brands and their marketing practices aimed at teens.
The Juul Lawsuit is ongoing and lawyers across the country are continuing to gather clients and file claims.
As reported in the June 2022 update, Juul is facing a ban on their products in the United States by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
The FDA officially ordered Juul to cease sale of their products in the U.S. on June 23rd, 2022.
This ban is on temporary hold after a Federal Appeals Court blocked it.
The temporary hold will last long enough for the FDA to review the appeal submitted by Juul.
According to the Wall Street Journal, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is preparing to order Juul Labs, Inc. to pull its products off the market in the United States.
The order to cease sale of Juul products in the U.S. could happen at any moment, says a source close to the matter.
The decision has been made based on a two year review of data submitted by Juul to the FDA.
One of the most popular nicotine vape brands in the country, Juul has been accused of unethical marketing practices, alleged to have been the catalyst in the youth vaping epidemic of recent years.
In April 2022, Juul Labs reached an agreement with the state of Washington on a lawsuit originally filed by Washington state Attorney General Bob Ferguson in September of 2020.
The lawsuit alleged that Juul Labs intentionally targeted minors with their marketing efforts.
Juul Labs has agreed to:
In agreeing to settle, Juul admits no wrongdoing.
However, Juul Labs did tell the Associated Press that this agreements marks “another step in our ongoing effort to reset our company and resolve issues from the past.”
In December 2021, Juul Labs and Altria reached a class action settlement with investors of Altria.
The claimants alleged that Altria Group and Juul Labs committed Securities Exchange Act violations leading up to Altria’s acquisition of a 35% stake in Juul Labs in December 2018.
The investors claimed that they were harmed by false and misleading statements made by Altria Group, Inc and Juul Labs, Inc regarding:
Juul Labs, Inc and Altria Group, Inc have agreed to:
In agreeing to settle, Juul Labs and Altria Group admit no wrongdoing.
In June 2021, Juul Labs reached an agreement with the state of North Carolina on a lawsuit originally filed by North Carolina Attorney General Josh Stein in 2019.
The lawsuit alleged that Juul Labs employed unfair and deceptive practices that targeted young people to use its vaping products, which deliver addictive nicotine.
Juul Labs has agreed to:
In agreeing to settle, Juul Labs admits no wrongdoing.
However, following the court hearing, Juul issued the following statement:
“This settlement is consistent with our ongoing effort to reset our company and its relationship with our stakeholders, as we continue to combat underage usage and advance the opportunity for harm reduction for adult smokers… we seek to continue to earn trust through action.”
Individuals, including teens with no previous smoking experiences, that were led to believe that Juul was “better than smoking” or “a safer alternative to smoking” are finding themselves addicted to Juul and are now suffering serious health issues.
Individuals who are fighting addiction and life-threatening health effects associated with Juul are currently hiring a Juul lawyer to file a lawsuit in order to receive compensation for the damages that they have incurred as a result of Juul’s negligence and false marketing.
The manufacturer failed to warn about Juul dangers, and now thousands of youth, adults, and individuals trying to quit smoking are suffering the consequences for Juul’s actions.
If you have suffered a lung injury because of Juul, you may be eligible to participate in a lawsuit.
These lawsuits are not included in the prior MDL or class action framework, as the products liability and over-payment cases have operated within.
Popcorn lung lawsuits due to Juul or other vape use are accepted individually.
Reach out to our law firm if you have developed a serious lung injury due to Juul.
Juul – manufactured by Juul Labs – is the popular USB-shaped smoking device that has recently captivated the e-cigarette market.
Its sleek, concealable shape and array of fruity flavors make it the favored choice for both adult and teen smokers.
Contrary to Juul Labs’ claims that Juuling is a safer alternative to smoking cigarettes, recent studies have found that Juul and other e-cigarettes actually expose users to a number of dangerous health risks commonly associated with cigarettes.
Researchers have also found links to risks not commonly associated with traditional cigarettes, such as e-cigarette users’ higher likelihood of developing bronchiolitis obliterans (more commonly referred to as “popcorn lung“).
While research into Juul is still in its early stages, experts are already warning personal injury law firms, such as TorHoerman Law, to be prepared for a massive increase in e-cigarette lawsuits.
With the continued rise in Juul’s popularity, paralleled by continued research illustrating Juul’s health risks, lawsuits are beginning to be filed on behalf of Juul smokers nationwide.
There is at least one lawsuit filed in a number of state courts by state attorneys, as well as individual lawsuits filed by private practices like TorHoerman Law.
If you use Juul or any other form of e-cigarettes, we urge you to read the following information as well as to conduct your own research on Juul dangers before you continue using these products.
In addition, if you find that you are now addicted to Juul or that you are suffering from any injuries associated with Juul, consider joining other individuals in fighting back against the company that should have warned you and file a lawsuit.
E-cigarettes have become extremely popular in recent years, with e-cigarette use increasing 10-fold between 2011 and 2016.
Juul currently holds more than 75% of shares in the e-cigarette market – a major market that is expected to be worth $86.43 billion by 2025 – making it by far the most popular e-cigarette available to consumers, with company futures expected to reach $43+ billion.
Juul was popularized within the last decade primarily due to the company’s aggressive online social media marketing campaign, which advertised its product as a “safer alternative” for individuals trying to quit smoking traditional cigarettes.
The general public, especially youth and young adults responded positively to e-cigarette marketing efforts, especially the deceitful tactics used by Juul.
Since the introduction of their marketing campaigns, Juul and other e-cigarette manufacturers have faced heavy scrutiny for these marketing tactics, with accusations that the companies were deliberately targeting youth in an effort to create an entirely new generation of smokers.
There is now an “epidemic” of Juul and e-cigarette youth smokers, which has raised concerns of communities, states, and even federal agencies.
Shocking reports have shown a continual rise in the number of youth Juul and e-cigarette smokers that has led the federal government to label youth vaping as a “nationwide epidemic”.
The initial state lawsuit, which was filed in North Carolina, contributed Juul’s popularity amongst teens to their advertising efforts that marketed teens and the fruity flavored pods that Juul sold.
In response, Juul removed flavored pods sales to certain businesses, such as gas stations.
The company also made an effort to minimize its presence on social media and put up additional hurdles to top underage youth from purchasing their product.
Despite these efforts, Juul’s popularity within the teen demographic has continued to grow.
During the span of Juul’s initial marketing campaign, the company was extremely successful in creating thousands of new smokers who are now extremely nicotine dependent.
They also succeeded in making Juul a social phenomenon, using their marketing campaign to establish an air of coolest around Juul, especially for youth.
Now, the company faces a state lawsuit in Illinois and other states who believe that Juul popularity amongst teens is a result of the company’s targeted marketing of youth.
There are a number of factors that can be attributed to Juul’s ability to break through the flooded e-cigarette market and establish itself as the leading brand for e-cigarettes, but one of the largest contributing factors is Juul successful campaign advertising Juul as a healthy alternative to smoking cigarettes.
Through their advertising campaign, Juul swayed public opinion to believe that Juul is a safer alternative to traditional cigarettes and an effective way to quit smoking.
But, according to a study published in the American Journal of Physiology, the chemical flavorings and additives in e-cigarettes can potentially cause more damage to the lungs than the damage caused by traditional cigarettes.
The FDA has stepped in to correct this claim, telling Juul that there is no evidence to substantiate that Juul is a safer alternative to cigarettes.
The FDA warned that, by making these claims, Juul is a direct violation of federal law.
Juul has been asked to provide evidence to prove these claims.
There are a number of serious adverse effects associated with nicotine dependence.
Juul users report experiencing:
If you are a Juul user and you have experienced one or more of these effects, you should stop smoking Juul right away.
You may also qualify to participate in a lawsuit if you have experienced any of these health effects.
Researchers now categorize all Juul, e-cigarette and vaping-related injuries as EVALI.
If you or a loved one has suffered an e-cigarette or vaping-related injury, you may be eligible to file an EVALI lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law to learn more.
The dangers of Juul and other popular e-cigarettes continue to make headlines.
While symptoms and health risks of vaping such as addiction, nicotine poisoning, and respiratory damage have been well documented, a Canadian teen was reportedly hospitalized because of a newfound vaping-related condition known as popcorn lung.
The illness is caused by inhaling vapors of the chemical diacetyl which causes damage to a person’s airways and makes it difficult to breathe.
According to the American Lung Association, popcorn lung (bronchitis obliterans) is a lung disease in which the alveoli, the tiny air sacs responsible for taking in oxygen and expelling carbon dioxide, become scarred.
This causes the thickening and narrowing of the lungs’ airways making it difficult to breathe.
Additional symptoms include a dry cough, fatigue, and wheezing that isn’t from asthma or a cold.
If left untreated, popcorn lung can develop into full respiratory collapse and is potentially fatal.
Popcorn lung is caused by breathing in diacetyl, an organic compound used to give foods and additives an artificial flavoring.
Diacetyl was most common in processed foods with a butter-like taste including popcorn, potato chips, crackers, and corn chips.
Diacetyl was removed from major popcorn manufacturers’ products after the workers became sick from breathing in the chemical.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services reported that breathing in diacetyl is extremely dangerous and can be fatal.
The ALA says the chemical has been responsible for deaths and hundreds of cases of bronchitis obliterans.
Diacetyl is present in many vaping products’ fluids.
A teenager in Canada who routinely used e-cigarettes developed a unique, near-fatal lung condition that does mirror the vaping-related illnesses sweeping the United States.
Brittany Shammas of the Washington Post reported that doctors said the 17-year-old’s condition resembles “popcorn lung,” an illness that was previously seen in popcorn factory workers who inhaled heated vapors of a toxic chemical used to produce butter flavoring known as diacetyl.
The teen was admitted to a London, Ontario, hospital for coughing, shortness of breath, and a fever.
He had been “intensively” vaping e-cigarettes for months and used flavored nicotine cartridges as well as THC devices.
His condition progressively intensified during his first few weeks in the hospital, and he eventually needed a ventilator to breathe and was placed on life support.
The teenager was sent home after 47 days in the hospital and could have sustained chronic lung damage.
Doctors at the hospital said the teen’s condition was not something they see often.
Practitioners initially suspected the patient had bronchiolitis, a lung condition usually caused by a viral or bacterial infection, but the tests returned negative.
His condition suggested a potential development of bronchiolitis obliterans, the medical term for “popcorn lung.”
Popcorn lung is a condition that affects the lungs’ airways, named after cases of workers who developed the ailment while working at microwave popcorn factories nearly 20 years ago.
Popcorn lung is caused by inhaling heated fumes of diacetyl, an artificial chemical flavoring agent.
Diacetyl is used in many e-cigarette flavors, causing concerns amongst health officials that popcorn lung could affect vapers.
The American Lung Association requested that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration call for the removal of diacetyl and other unsafe chemicals from e-cigarette cartridges.
The teens’ doctors said that the “exact mechanism of injury and causative agent are unknown,” but noted “the need for further research into all potentially toxic components of e-liquids and tighter regulation of e-cigarettes.”
Juul maintains that its products do not contain diacetyl, the chemical responsible for causing popcorn lung.
However, there has been at least one confirmed case of a Juul user developing popcorn lung, causing concern among users and health officials.
Researchers are currently studying links between Juul and popcorn lung to determine if the company’s products contain diacetyl and/or cause popcorn lung.
There is at least one confirmed case of a Juul user who developed popcorn lung, but there are other potential cases also being investigated as well.
Researchers are currently studying the possible link between Juul and popcorn lung.
Juul maintains that there are no dangerous popcorn lung-causing chemicals in their product.
But new Juul popcorn lung cases have caused concern amongst Juul users and health officials.
Learn more about Juul popcorn lung in our litigation update section below.
According to a report published in Environmental Health Perspectives, many e-cigarette liquids contain diacetyl, the chemical responsible for popcorn lung.
The study’s authors tested 51 flavored e-cigarette liquids and found diacetyl in 39 of them.
The findings worry researchers who noted the documented evidence that inhaling diacetyl is extremely dangerous and can be fatal.
The report said:
“Because of the associations between diacetyl and bronchitis obliterans (popcorn lung) and other severe respiratory diseases observed in workers, urgent action is recommended to further evaluate this potentially widespread exposure via flavored e-cigarettes.”
Research in the study was supported by the National Institute of Health, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences center grant P30ES000002.
The authors declared that they do not have actual or potential competing financial interests.
Independent researchers are conducting studies testing the validity of Juul’s claims that their products do not contain diacetyl.
The company said that in tests, the company has not found any measurable amounts of diacetyl in vapors emitted from its devices.
Juul’s e-cigarette liquid is currently known to contain:
Juul and e-cigarettes put users at risk of developing injuries associated with nicotine use.
Because, although some users are unaware, Juul pods do actually contain high quantities of nicotine.
In general, e-cigarettes contain a lower dose of nicotine:
However, Juul contains a much higher concentration of nicotine:
In fact, according to Juul, one Juul pod contains about the same amount of nicotine as one pack of cigarettes.
Experts argue that a Juul pod actually contains more nicotine than a pack of cigarettes because some of the nicotine in cigarettes is lost to filtration.
But Juuls do not have filters, so there is no nicotine loss through filtration when a user is smoking a Juul pod.
This high dose of nicotine puts users at risk of both nicotine-related injuries and nicotine addiction.
Although Juul is advertised as both a safer alternative to cigarettes and an effective way to quit smoking, neither of these claims are actually supported by fact.
There is no evidence to support the claim that Juul is a reliable tool for quitting smoking.
On the contrary, Juul contains as much, if not more nicotine than cigarettes.
Because nicotine is the substance responsible for giving cigarettes their addictive nature, there is no reason to believe that Juul will help alleviate addiction.
Some other e-cigarette brands offering lower mg/ml of nicotine may be more beneficial in lowering nicotine dependence, Juul cannot.
Juul users are reporting serious injuries resulting from both nicotine dependence while using Juul and nicotine withdrawal when trying to quit Juul.
Individuals suffering from symptoms relating to nicotine dependence and nicotine withdrawal may qualify to participate in a lawsuit.
A research study has revealed that high levels of nicotine concentrations found in Juul e-cigarettes are:
“Sufficiently high to be cytotoxic, or toxic to living cells when test in vitro with cultured respiratory system cells.”
Of the hundreds of electronic cigarette products analyzed by the research team, Juul was the only product with high enough nicotine concentrations to be toxic in standard cytotoxicity tests.
Of the eight different flavors manufactured and sold by Juul Labs, the study found differing levels of cytotoxicity.
According to the research team leader Prue Talbot, professor in the Department of Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology at the University of California, Riverside:
“We found some flavor chemicals, such as ethyl maltol, also correlate with cytotoxicity, but nicotine seems to be the most potent chemical in Juul products, due to it very high concentration.”
Although federal regulations limit the sales of Juul products to individuals 21 years and older, Juuling still remains prominent among adolescents, primarily middle-school and high-school-aged youth.
James F. Pankow, a professor of chemistry as well as civil and environmental engineering at Portland State University, Oregon and a member of the research team, explained that experts are still unsure of the long-term adverse health effects with chronic Juul use.
There is a growing concern amongst experts and the FDA that high doses of nicotine found in Juul products could affect the still-developing adolescent brain, especially when considering the cytotoxic effects Juul products have been found to have.
Like Juul, e-cigarette manufacturers often advertise their products as being a safer alternative to cigarettes and free of the many harmful chemicals found in cigarettes.
However, what most e-cigarette companies fail to warn consumers of is that their products contain diacetyl:
The most common injury associated with diacetyl vapor exposure is bronchiolitis obliterans (popcorn lung), a rare condition that damages your lung’s small airways, making it difficult to breathe and causing individuals to experience aggressive coughing spirts.
If untreated, popcorn lung can degenerate into total respiratory collapse, which can be fatal. Also known as coffee lung, it can also be found in manufacturing facilities that produce animal food, gum, or other food products.
In its natural form, diacetyl is a harmless additive, used to enhance the flavoring of e-liquids.
But when heated in an e-cigarette, diacetyl is transformed into its hazardous vaporized state.
The health risks of e-cigarettes differ depending on which brand you choose.
If you choose to Juul, you are choosing to use a product that has a higher concentration of nicotine than normal cigarettes but does not contain dangerous diacetyl.
If you choose to use most other e-cigarettes, you are choosing a product that has a lower concentration of nicotine compared to cigarettes, but you are likely also putting yourself at risk of developing popcorn lung.
Either way, you are still putting your health at risk because e-cigarette dangers are apparent in all e-cigarette products.
The American Journal of Physiology study found that other chemical additives found in e-cigarettes previously thought to be safe, such as propylene glycol, may be responsible for causing respiratory inflammation and other pulmonary problems.
While some e-cigarettes, such as the popular Juul e-cigarette, do not contain diacetyl, almost all do contain propylene glycol and other potentially harmful chemicals.
A number of the flavor chemicals used in most e-liquids also contain aldehydes, which, when inhaled, can irritate the mucosal tissue in the respiratory tract.
The new research linking these chemical additives to lung inflammation may challenge Juul’s (and other manufacturers’) claims that their products are a safe alternative to conventional cigarettes.
The study published in the American Journal of Physiology, which was conducted by medical investigators at the University of Athens, Greece, found that when vaporized, the chemical flavorings and additives can cause considerable inflammation in the lungs.
According to researchers, even short-term e-cigarette use can induce significant inflammatory lung damage. Although this inflammation does not appear to pose a cancer risk, there are a number of other serious health risks associated with this kind of respiratory strain.
The study’s co-author, Dr. Constantinos Glynos, explained that:
“Electronic cigarettes are advertised as a less harmful nicotine delivery system or as a new smoking cessation tool. Our findings suggest that exposure to e-cig vapor can trigger inflammatory responses and adversely affect respiratory system mechanics.”
Experts in the field say that this first-stage exploratory research, which was conducted on lab mice, should have been initiated years ago before e-cigarettes gained market approval.
Dr. Patricia Folan, director of the Center for Tobacco Control, a division of Northwell Health in Great Neck, explained:
“They [e-cigarettes] hit the market around 2006, 2007 before research could be conducted to determine what the potential problems would be. The manufacturers were the ones telling us that these products were safe to use,”
These e-cigarette manufacturers never actually tested the potential health risks of their products but based their safety claims about these flavorings and additives on previous approvals made by the FDA for a variety of food additives.
As Dr. Folan accentuated in her comments, these flavorings and additives were deemed safe for consumption, but no tests were conducted on the long-term effects of inhaling these chemicals in their vaporized state.
Only now, more than a decade later, are the first third-party researchers exposing e-cigarette dangers and Juul dangers.
Unfortunately, it may now be too late.
The long-term effects of exposure to these chemicals could be detrimental to the millions of U.S. smokers who have made the switch to e-cigarettes and Juul.
With this new revelation of e-cigarette dangers, experts are calling for further research into the potential short-term and long-term effects of e-cigarette use.
Dr. Glynos stated that:
“The observed detrimental effects in the lung upon e-cigarette vapor exposure in animal models highlight the need for further investigation of safety and toxicity of these rapidly expanding devices worldwide.”
Cigarettes are bad for you – but e-cigarettes are by no means a lesser of two evils.
E-cigarettes, be it Juul or any other popular brand, still put you at risk of developing a serious and potentially fatal injury.
If we know about Juul dangers and e-cigarette dangers, why have the number of users been steadily increasing over time?
E-cigarettes feature two characteristics that make them appealing to smokers:
Juul has historically offered users a range of enticing flavors, such as fruit medley, mango, cool cucumber, and crème brûlée.
These flavors not only taste better but also reduce some of the social stigmas of smoking by eliminating the smoking odor.
Federal law prohibits cigarette companies from selling flavored tobaccos, citing flavored tobacco’s appeal to youth smokers.
These popular Juul pod flavors were discontinued in November 2018.
Juul and other e-cigarettes are able to circumnavigate these laws because they are not technically selling flavored tobacco, but rather a flavored e-liquid containing nicotine.
A number of advocacy groups, lawsuits filed against Juul, and even state and federal governments are currently challenging e-cigarette manufacturers’ ability to offer flavors other than traditional cigarette flavors.
While not all flavors include diacetyl, many do.
Diacetyl is most prevalent in both sweet and buttery flavors – flavors like:
Juul has also faced scrutiny for using its popular fruity flavors to entice youth.
Lawsuits that have been filed by state attorneys in numerous states claimed that Juul’s flavors are a major contributor to the youth vaping epidemic.
E-cigarettes vary in shape, size, and design.
But most e-cigarettes are either small enough to conceal from others or they designed to look more like an electronic device than a smoking apparatus.
Either way, it is hard for most non-users to distinguish an e-cigarette as a smoking device.
E-cigarettes almost never give off a smoky aroma.
Almost all e-cigarette exhalants are waterbased, so they put off a “cloud” of what is essentially water vapor.
For these reasons, e-cigarettes are easier to conceal and their use in public is more socially accepted.
Juul distinguishes itself from other e-cigarettes because it is the most easily concealable of all e-cigarettes.
Juul’s sleek shape is often confused as being a USB-drive – the fact that it is charged using a USB outlet only further aids in this confusion.
The device is small enough to fit in the closed palm of a person’s hand, unlike most other e-cigarettes which are much larger.
Juul vapor is water-based and almost completely odorless, so users can smoke it indoors, in public, or in group settings without others noticing.
Because it is so easy to conceal, youth have no issue with hiding the devices in public settings, including in school.
Some schools are facing such issues with students using Juul on the premises, they are now beginning to take action.
Schools have reportedly gone as far as removing bathroom stall doors to prevent students from smoking their Juul.
Companies are now selling products such as phone cases and hoodies specially designed to make it even easier to hide a Juul.
Nearly half of all Twitter users who followed Juul last year were between the ages of 13 and 17, according to a study published in JAMA Pediatrics.
Juul’s sleek & concealable shape, a range of enticing flavors, odorless vapor exhalant, and mischaracterization as a healthy alternative to cigarettes has led it to become the name-brand of e-cigarettes.
Juul has helped to end the social stigmas surrounding smoking.
This is unfortunate, especially for the anti-smoking advocacy groups who have been on a decades’ long mission to build those social stigmas around smoking.
Those stigmas were built on a foundation that emphasized the health effects of cigarettes, cigarettes off-putting smell, and the dangers of secondhand smoke.
Juul claims to offer a solution to all of these issues as their product is:
Unfortunately, the demographic that seems to be most susceptible to this false advertising is teenagers.
Until recently, nicotine use amongst teens had been on a steady decline since the mid-1990s.
But with the introduction of Juul and other e-cigarettes, nicotine use is once again on the rise amongst teens.
At least 11% of middle school and high school students admit to using Juul.
This number is also rising.
According to an analysis from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Food and Drug Administration, around 33% of these teen users say that the availability of flavors is the main reason that they use this product.
Another 39% attributed their use to a family member or friend who also used them.
17% claimed that they used Juul products because they believed them to be less harmful than other forms of tobacco – and the misconceptions about the health risks associated with Juul / e-cigarettes are rampant in the teenage demographic.
In fact, a majority of youth e-cigarette users think that they vaped only flavoring, not any nicotine, the last time they used an e-cigarette, according to a study conducted at the University of Michigan.
Another study, conducted by the Truth Initiative, found that:
Teens that find themselves addicted to Juul should consider filing a lawsuit while they now fight for their health.
Juul has come under scrutiny by a number of advocacy groups, state and federal healthcare officials who claim that Juul’s advertising campaign is devised to attract teens.
Both state and private action lawsuits have cited marketing techniques such as the use of bright colors, youthful imagery, and the promotion of fruity flavors offered by Juul as marketing efforts made by Juul to specifically target the youth market.
Juul has also become something of a social phenomenon, taking over social media platforms, such as Instagram, which is popular with youth culture.
On any given platform, you can find trending hashtags like #DoItForTheJuul, where teens post images of themselves using Juul and other e-cigarettes.
Admittedly, Juul has made an effort to reduce their social media presence, but only after public pressure and the initial lawsuit.
Juul’s concealable shape and odorless fume exhalant also make it attractive to teens, who have found it easy to use at home, in public, and even in school, under the watchful eye of adults.
Matt Myers, head of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, says that the youth’s fascination with Juul and e-cigarettes could quite possibly develop into a future health catastrophe – a whole generation of young adults could become addicted to nicotine for life.
Federal health officials are now calling youth Juuling a nationwide epidemic.
While Juul claims that the e-cigarette was designed specifically as a healthier alternative for adult smokers to curb their cigarettes addiction, experts continue to argue that Juul’s sleek & easily-concealable shape, odorless vapor exhalant, range of enticing liquid flavors, and early onset social media marketing campaigns indicate that these e-cigarettes were meant to appeal to a younger audience– and they have.
Matt Myers, head of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, said:
“I’ve never seen a tobacco-related product spread across this country as fast among young people as this product…Everyone was asleep at the switch, and by the time we woke up, we had an epidemic on our hand.”
Juul’s façade flash drive size and shape, paired with its odorless exhalant, allow teens to hide their smoking habits from adults in plain sight.
Kids are taking full advantage of the cloaked smoking apparatus, Juuling anywhere and everywhere that they can, without the knowledge of their parents.
You can find evidence all across social media, in classrooms, in close proximity to adults, and in public settings.
It has become something of a communal challenge within the younger generation, promoted through social media, where those who are willing to go the furthest to test the limits of smoking their Juul in public receive the highest praise.
In a way, Juul has made smoking “cool” again.
After years of advocacy efforts spent campaigning against the popularity of tobacco use, anti-smoking groups were able to create stigmatization around cigarettes.
Defamed for their off-putting smell and life-threatening health consequences, cigarette use amongst students began to decline beginning in the mid-1990s.
But with the introduction of odorless e-cigarettes, advertised as a healthier alternative to traditional smoking, Juul has made smoking socially acceptable again.
Student tobacco use is once again on the rise, an alarming trend for parents.
Even more alarming, Juuling has spread from high school-aged students, and now engulfs middle schools nationwide.
Stacy Laurent-Smith, a concerned parent & public school educator, explained that:
“Juuling is a huge problem for middle school and high school students.
When I walk into my local gas station, which is less than a mile from the local high school, there is a huge advertisement on the door and the Juuling devices and pods are kept on the front counter instead of back behind where the other tobacco products are located.
I’ve wondered ‘Why is this allowed for these devices, which contains nicotine just like a cigarette?’
These devices are so small and hard to detect when used it is making it even harder for adults to monitor.
Not to mention we have no idea what the long-term effects of using these devices are on young people.
It is truly scary the speed of which the popularity of these devices has grown for our youth.”
Juul’s market shares are booming. Even within an exploding industry full of competitors, Juul stands alone as the kingpin of e-cigarettes.
But, how do we face the problem head-on?
As lawyers, we see entirely too often the dangers of chemical exposures. E-cigarettes, as science and studies are beginning to show, will prove to be no different.
As parents, we can sit down with our children and have a conversation about Juuling dangers.
But, what do we say that will actually provoke our children to make good decisions and say no to Juuling?
First things first, know the facts:
The statistics are staggering. E-cigarettes are not good for you, despite all of the advertisements that portray otherwise.
Is it alarming that our children are falling prey to enticing marketing?
Yes.
But, one conversation could help save your child from harmful and potentially deadly side effects down the road.
Find a time to have a courteous, open conversation with your child.
They’ll have questions, and you may not have all of the answers, but most important is they become aware of the Juuling dangers and risks.
The companies that produce e-cigarettes copied the playbook of the tobacco industry from the 1950s.
The only difference?
We have social media that propels ideas into a phenomenon, but at the same time, side effects and dangers are quicker to be exposed.
Before the first lawsuit was even filed, experts had already been warning lawyers to begin preparing for a flood of lawsuit injury case intakes from Juul users.
Now, Juul attorneys are receiving countless new cases of teens and young adults suffering serious injuries because of Juul and other e-cigarettes.
So, please take the time to talk to your children about the Juul dangers and the dangers of e-cigarettes.
Subsequent to settlements in prior Juul Lawsuits, personal injury attorneys are continuing to engage with individuals who want have suffered severe lung injuries due to vaping.
Some of the injuries claimed in the teen Juul case are as follows:
TorHoerman Law represents previous non-smokers who believe they have vaping lung.
These individuals may have used an e-cigarette brand other than Juul such as Vuse, Njoy or Blu.
We need to hold Juul and the other e-cigarette companies accountable for their negligent actions, failure to warn consumers about dangers, and violations of consumer fraud laws.
The liability for your injuries falls on Juul and the e-cigarette companies.
The best way to do so is by fighting back and stopping companies like Juul, Vuse, Njoy or Blu from injuring more people, especially our youth.
If you or a loved one believe that you qualify to participate in a lawsuit, contact an experienced Juul lawyer at TorHoerman Law today.
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for anyone who has suffered an injury because of Juul.
If you are considering filing a lawsuit, or you have already signed a contract, there are a few steps that you can take to prepare your case.
Your Juul lawyer will go over these as well, but it is good to familiarize yourself with these steps and begin collecting information for your case as soon as possible.
The most important step:
If you have suffered injuries related to Juul, you should try to mitigate these injuries to the best of your ability.
One of the best ways to mitigate injury is to discontinue using Juul.
We understand that Juul is a highly addictive substance and it is not possible for some individuals to stop.
If stopping your Juul use causes you to suffer serious physical or mental injury, you do not need to stop altogether, but you should try to slowly decrease your Juul use.
After you have stopped or at least decreased your Juul use.
One of the next steps in legal action relating to Juul is gathering evidence.
In a lawsuit, some of the best evidence that you can provide your Juul attorney shows how often you used Juul products and how those products caused your injuries.
Evidence you should begin collecting right away may include:
* You should begin keeping a journal detailing the history of your Juul use, the progression of your injuries or addiction, and any other pertinent information regarding your case, including communications with healthcare professionals about your injuries.
After you have started to gather evidence, the next legal step will be to assess damages.
Many individuals involved in a lawsuit will claim both compensatory and punitive.
Your lawsuit damages may include:
Your Juul lawyer will be able to help you assess damages and fight to see that you receive compensation for the total costs of your injuries.
For free, no-obligation chemical exposure, Juul lawsuit, or e-cigarette lawsuit case consultation, contact the offices of TorHoerman Law today.
One of our experienced investigation team members would be happy to discuss your potential lawsuit, free of charge.
At TorHoerman Law, our Juul lawyer team is one of the most experienced representing plaintiffs in the ongoing Juul lawsuit.
If you have used Juul or similar products and have suffered an injury or illness, you may qualify to participate in a lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law to talk directly to our Juul lawyer team today.
A Juul lawyer would be happy to talk to you about your potential lawsuit, free of charge.
TorHoerman Law – Your Juul Lawyer
Yes.
Juul pods contain extremely high concentrations of nicotine, which is an addictive substance.
Juul pods contain a nicotine concentration of 59 milligrams of nicotine per milliliter of liquid, which is much higher than most other e-cigarette products.
Researchers have found Juul to have such high levels of nicotine that it is considered to be cytotoxic.
The FDA has publicly stated that there is no evidence that Juul or other e-cigarette brands are any safer than traditional cigarettes.
In fact, the high concentrations of nicotine found in Juul pods may possibly make them more unsafe than traditional cigarettes in some ways.
Juul – manufactured by Juul Labs – is the popular USB-shaped smoking device that has recently captivated the e-cigarette market.
Its sleek, concealable shape and array of fruity flavors make it the favored choice for both adult and teen smokers.
Yes.
Studies have linked Juul & nicotine use to a number of adverse health risks including:
Yes.
If you are a parent of a child under the age of 18 who has suffered injuries or other adverse health affects due to Juul, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit on their behalf.
If you are 18 year of age or older and have suffered Juul-related injuries, you may also qualify to participate in the Juul lawsuit.
As the FDA warning letter made clear, there is currently no evidence that Juul is safer than cigarettes.
Not only that, but the concentration of nicotine in each Juul pod is a major cause for concern – the concentration of nicotine in Juul is one of the primary issues made against Juul in lawsuits.
While there currently no guarantees on a settlement, the Juul Lawsuit compensation would include the total economic damages that you have already incurred, any expected future economic damages, and non-economic damages such as pain and suffering.
With that being said, in other Juul Lawsuits, Juul has already agreed to the following payout amounts for Juul lawsuit compensation:
All settlements referenced above were for allegations which accused Juul of:
Owner & Attorney - TorHoerman Law
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
In this case, we obtained a verdict of $495 Million for our client’s child who was diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis after consuming baby formula manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $20 Million for our client after they suffered a Toxic Tort Injury due to chemical exposure.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $103.8 Million for our client after they suffered a COX-2 Inhibitors Injury.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $4 Million for our client after they suffered a Traumatic Brain Injury while at daycare.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $2.8 Million for our client after they suffered an injury due to a Defective Heart Device.
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
You can learn more about the Juul Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
They helped my elderly uncle receive compensation for the loss of his wife who was administered a dangerous drug. He consulted with this firm because of my personal recommendation and was very pleased with the compassion, attention to detail and response he received. Definitely recommend this firm for their 5 star service.
When I wanted to join the Xarelto class action lawsuit, I chose TorrHoerman Law from a search of a dozen or so law firm websites. I was impressed with the clarity of the information they presented. I gave them a call, and was again impressed, this time with the quality of our interactions.
TorHoerman Law is an awesome firm to represent anyone that has been involved in a case that someone has stated that it's too difficult to win. The entire firm makes you feel like you’re part of the family, Tor, Eric, Jake, Kristie, Chad, Tyler, Kathy and Steven are the best at what they do.
TorHorman Law is awesome
I can’t say enough how grateful I was to have TorHoerman Law help with my case. Jacob Plattenberger is very knowledgeable and an amazing lawyer. Jillian Pileczka was so patient and kind, helping me with questions that would come up. Even making sure my special needs were taken care of for meetings.
TorHoerman Law fights for justice with their hardworking and dedicated staff. Not only do they help their clients achieve positive outcomes, but they are also generous and important pillars of the community with their outreach and local support. Thank you THL!
Hands down one of the greatest group of people I had the pleasure of dealing with!
A very kind and professional staff.
Very positive experience. Would recommend them to anyone.
A very respectful firm.
Edwardsville, IL
Chicago, IL
St. Louis, MO
Clayton, MO
Naperville, IL