If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced Chicago personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation Chicago personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in Chicago, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced Chicago auto accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in Chicago, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our Chicago truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in Chicago or the greater Chicagoland area – you may be eligible to file a Chicago motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Chicago motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in Chicago at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file a Chicago bike accident lawsuit.
Contact a Chicago bicycle accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
Chicago is one of the nation’s largest construction centers.
Thousands of men and women work on sites across the city and metropolitan area on tasks ranging from skilled trades to administrative operations.
Unfortunately, construction site accidents are fairly common.
Contact TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options with an experienced Chicago construction accident lawyer, free of charge and no obligation required.
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced Chicago nursing home abuse attorney from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of Chicago, or the greater Chicagoland area, and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact a Chicago wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in Chicago you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact a Chicago slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact a Chicago daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced Edwardsville personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation Edwardsville personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in Edwardsville, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville car accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in Edwardsville, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our Edwardsville truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in Edwardsville – you may be eligible to file an Edwardsville motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in Edwardsville at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file an Edwardsville bike accident lawsuit.
Contact an Edwardsville bicycle accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville nursing home abuse attorney from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of Edwardsville and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact an Edwardsville wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in Edwardsville you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact an Edwardsville slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact an Edwardsville daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
If you or a loved one suffered injuries on someone else’s property in Edwardsville IL, you may be entitled to financial compensation.
If property owners fail to keep their premises safe, and their negligence leads to injuries, property damages or other losses as a result of an accident or incident, a premises liability lawsuit may be possible.
Contact an Edwardsville premises liability lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation case consultation.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced St. Louis personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation St. Louis personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in St. Louis, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced St. Louis auto accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in St. Louis, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our St. Louis truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in St. Louis or the greater St. Louis area – you may be eligible to file a St. Louis motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced St. Louis motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in St. Louis at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file a St. Louis bike accident lawsuit.
Contact a St. Louis bicycle accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
St. Louis is one of the nation’s largest construction centers.
Thousands of men and women work on sites across the city and metropolitan area on tasks ranging from skilled trades to administrative operations.
Unfortunately, construction site accidents are fairly common.
Contact TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options with an experienced St. Louis construction accident lawyer, free of charge and no obligation required.
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced St. Louis nursing home abuse attorney from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of St. Louis, or the greater St. Louis area, and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact a St. Louis wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in St. Louis you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact a St. Louis slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact a St. Louis daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
Suboxone, a medication often used to treat opioid use disorder (OUD), has become a vital tool which offers a safer and more controlled approach to managing opioid addiction.
Despite its widespread use, Suboxone has been linked to severe tooth decay and dental injuries.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuits claim that the companies failed to warn about the risks of tooth decay and other dental injuries associated with Suboxone sublingual films.
Depo-Provera, a contraceptive injection, has been linked to an increased risk of developing brain tumors (including glioblastoma and meningioma).
Women who have used Depo-Provera and subsequently been diagnosed with brain tumors are filing lawsuits against Pfizer (the manufacturer), alleging that the company failed to adequately warn about the risks associated with the drug.
Despite the claims, Pfizer maintains that Depo-Provera is safe and effective, citing FDA approval and arguing that the scientific evidence does not support a causal link between the drug and brain tumors.
You may be eligible to file a Depo Provera Lawsuit if you used Depo-Provera and were diagnosed with a brain tumor.
Tepezza, approved by the FDA in 2020, is used to treat Thyroid Eye Disease (TED), but some patients have reported hearing issues after its use.
The Tepezza lawsuit claims that Horizon Therapeutics failed to warn patients about the potential risks and side effects of the drug, leading to hearing loss and other problems, such as tinnitus.
You may be eligible to file a Tepezza Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Tepezza and subsequently suffered permanent hearing loss or tinnitus.
Elmiron, a drug prescribed for interstitial cystitis, has been linked to serious eye damage and vision problems in scientific studies.
Thousands of Elmiron Lawsuits have been filed against Janssen Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturer, alleging that the company failed to warn patients about the potential risks.
You may be eligible to file an Elmiron Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Elmiron and subsequently suffered vision loss, blindness, or any other eye injury linked to the prescription drug.
The chemotherapy drug Taxotere, commonly used for breast cancer treatment, has been linked to severe eye injuries, permanent vision loss, and permanent hair loss.
Taxotere Lawsuits are being filed by breast cancer patients and others who have taken the chemotherapy drug and subsequently developed vision problems.
If you or a loved one used Taxotere and subsequently developed vision damage or other related medical problems, you may be eligible to file a Taxotere Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Although pressure cookers were designed to be safe and easy to use, a number of these devices have been found to have a defect that can lead to excessive buildup of internal pressure.
The excessive pressure may result in an explosion that puts users at risk of serious injuries such as burns, lacerations, an even electrocution.
If your pressure cooker exploded and caused substantial burn injuries or other serious injuries, you may be eligible to file a Pressure Cooker Lawsuit and secure financial compensation for your injuries and damages.
Several studies have found a correlation between heavy social media use and mental health challenges, especially among younger users.
Social media harm lawsuits claim that social media companies are responsible for onsetting or heightening mental health problems, eating disorders, mood disorders, and other negative experiences of teens and children
You may be eligible to file a Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit if you are the parents of a teen, or teens, who attribute their use of social media platforms to their mental health problems.
The Paragard IUD, a non-hormonal birth control device, has been linked to serious complications, including device breakage during removal.
Numerous lawsuits have been filed against Teva Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturer of Paragard, alleging that the company failed to warn about the potential risks.
If you or a loved one used a Paragard IUD and subsequently suffered complications and/or injuries, you may qualify for a Paragard Lawsuit.
Patients with the PowerPort devices may possibly be at a higher risk of serious complications or injury due to a catheter failure, according to lawsuits filed against the manufacturers of the Bard PowerPort Device.
If you or a loved one have been injured by a Bard PowerPort Device, you may be eligible to file a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products for injuries, pain and suffering, and financial costs related to complications and injuries of these medical devices.
Over 100,000 Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits have been filed on behalf of women injured by vaginal mesh and pelvic mesh products.
If you or a loved one have suffered serious complications or injuries from vaginal mesh, you may be eligible to file a Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit.
Parents and guardians are filing lawsuits against major video game companies (including Epic Games, Activision Blizzard, and Microsoft), alleging that they intentionally designed their games to be addictive — leading to severe mental and physical health issues in minors.
The lawsuits claim that these companies used psychological tactics and manipulative game designs to keep players engaged for extended periods — causing problems such as anxiety, depression, and social withdrawal.
You may be eligible to file a Video Game Addiction Lawsuit if your child has been diagnosed with gaming addiction or has experienced negative effects from excessive gaming.
Above ground pool accidents have led to lawsuits against manufacturers due to defective restraining belts that pose serious safety risks to children.
These belts, designed to provide structural stability, can inadvertently act as footholds, allowing children to climb into the pool unsupervised, increasing the risk of drownings and injuries.
Parents and guardians are filing lawsuits against pool manufacturers, alleging that the defective design has caused severe injuries and deaths.
If your child was injured or drowned in an above ground pool accident involving a defective restraining belt, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.
Recent scientific studies have found that the use of chemical hair straightening products, hair relaxers, and other hair products present an increased risk of uterine cancer, endometrial cancer, breast cancer, and other health problems.
Legal action is being taken against manufacturers and producers of these hair products for their failure to properly warn consumers of potential health risks.
You may be eligible to file a Hair Straightener Cancer Lawsuit if you or a loved one used chemical hair straighteners, hair relaxers, or other similar hair products, and subsequently were diagnosed with:
AFFF (Aqueous Film Forming Foam) is a firefighting foam that has been linked to various health issues, including cancer, due to its PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) content.
Numerous AFFF Lawsuits have been filed against AFFF manufacturers, alleging that they knew about the health risks but failed to warn the public.
AFFF Firefighting Foam lawsuits aim to hold manufacturers accountable for putting peoples’ health at risk.
You may be eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit if you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer.
Paraquat, a widely-used herbicide, has been linked to Parkinson’s disease, leading to numerous Paraquat Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits against its manufacturers for failing to warn about the risks of chronic exposure.
Due to its toxicity, the EPA has restricted the use of Paraquat and it is currently banned in over 30 countries.
You may be eligible to file a Paraquat Lawsuit if you or a loved one were exposed to Paraquat and subsequently diagnosed with Parkinson’s Disease or other related health conditions.
Mesothelioma is an aggressive form of cancer primarily caused by exposure to asbestos.
Asbestos trust funds were established in the 1970s to compensate workers harmed by asbestos-containing products.
These funds are designed to pay out claims to those who developed mesothelioma or other asbestos-related diseases due to exposure.
Those exposed to asbestos and diagnosed with mesothelioma may be eligible to file a Mesothelioma Lawsuit.
Studies have found a link between toxic baby formula and Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) — a severe intestinal condition in premature infants.
Parents and guardians are filing NEC Lawsuits against baby formula manufacturers, alleging that the formulas contain harmful ingredients leading to NEC.
Despite the claims, Abbott and Mead Johnson deny the allegations, arguing that their products are thoroughly researched and dismissing the scientific evidence linking their formulas to NEC, while the FDA issued a warning to Abbott regarding safety concerns of a formula product.
You may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit if your child received baby bovine-based (cow’s milk) baby formula in the maternity ward or NICU of a hospital and was subsequently diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC).
PFAS contamination lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers and suppliers of PFAS chemicals, alleging that these substances have contaminated water sources and products, leading to severe health issues.
Plaintiffs claim that prolonged exposure to PFAS through contaminated drinking water and products has caused cancers, thyroid disease, and other health problems.
The lawsuits target companies like 3M, DuPont, and Chemours, accusing them of knowingly contaminating the environment with PFAS and failing to warn about the risks.
If you or a loved one has been exposed to PFAS-contaminated water or products and has developed health issues, you may be eligible to file a PFAS lawsuit.
The Roundup Lawsuit claims that Monsanto’s popular weed killer, Roundup, causes cancer.
Numerous studies have linked the main ingredient, glyphosate, to Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, Leukemia, and other Lymphatic cancers.
Despite this, Monsanto continues to deny these claims.
Victims of Roundup exposure who developed cancer are filing Roundup Lawsuits against Monsanto, seeking compensation for medical expenses, pain, and suffering.
Our firm is about people. That is our motto and that will always be our reality.
We do our best to get to know our clients, understand their situations, and get them the compensation they deserve.
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Without our team, we would’nt be able to provide our clients with anything close to the level of service they receive when they work with us.
The THL Team commits to the sincere belief that those injured by the misconduct of others, especially large corporate profit mongers, deserve justice for their injuries.
Our team is what has made TorHoerman Law a very special place since 2009.
Our lawyers are accepting new clients for the Depo-Provera Lawsuit.
Use the chat feature on this page for a free case evaluation, or call our law firm today for a free consultation.
This page is intended to provide information on the Depo-Provera Lawsuit for individuals who have received a brain tumor diagnosis after prolonged use of the Depo-Provera contraceptive injection.
The Depo-Provera Lawsuit alleges Pfizer failed to warn users of the increased risk for brain tumors subsequent to long-term Depo-Provera usage. .
On this page, we’ll discuss the Depo-Provera Lawsuit, serious health issues including brain tumors linked to the Depo-Provera birth control shot, how to file a Depo-Provera Lawsuit, and much more.
Depo-Provera is a popular injectable contraceptive used by millions of women worldwide, offering long-lasting pregnancy prevention through quarterly doses of synthetic progestin.
However, recent research has raised serious concerns about its safety.
A groundbreaking study published in the British Medical Journal found that prolonged Depo-Provera use is associated with a 500% increased risk of developing meningioma brain tumors.
This evidence has prompted a wave of legal action against the drug’s manufacturer, Pfizer, for failing to adequately warn users about these risks.
Our law firm is actively investigating Depo-Provera Lawsuits on behalf of women who developed brain tumors after using the contraceptive.
TorHoerman Law is currently accepting new clients for the Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuit.
If you or a loved one developed an intracranial meningioma brain tumor after prolonged use of Depo-Provera, you may be eligible to file a Depo-Provera Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Reach out to the Depo-Provera Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
Use the chat feature on this page to find out if you’re eligible to file a Depo-Provera Lawsuit instantly.
Manufacturers of drugs like Depo-Provera have a responsibility to adequately warn users about the serious risks associated with their product, including the potential for life-altering conditions like brain tumors.
These health issues can have devastating effects not only on the individual but also on their families, who must deal with the emotional and financial toll.
Lawyers are actively investigating claims against Depo-Provera’s manufacturer, and individuals who have been harmed may be entitled to compensation.
If you or a loved one have questions about a Depo-Provera lawsuit, reach out to our law firm for guidance and support.
Women who have used Depo-Provera, an injectable contraceptive manufactured by Pfizer, are filing lawsuits after experiencing severe side effects, including brain tumor diagnoses.
Meningioma is a type of brain tumor that forms in the membranes surrounding the brain, often causing symptoms such as headaches, vision problems, and seizures.
The lawsuits claim that Pfizer failed to adequately warn users about the potential risks associated with prolonged use of Depo-Provera.
Depo-Provera was approved by the FDA in 1992 as a contraceptive, though its active ingredient, medroxyprogesterone acetate, had been used for other purposes since 1959.
The drug was marketed as a convenient birth control option requiring only four injections per year, targeting busy individuals who sought reliable and low-maintenance contraception.
However, plaintiffs allege that this convenience came with undisclosed health risks.
A March 2024 study conducted in France identified a 5.55-fold increased risk of meningioma among women who used Depo-Provera for one year or longer.
The study examined over 18,000 women who had undergone surgery for meningiomas between 2009 and 2018.
This research supports claims that prolonged use of Depo-Provera may significantly increase the likelihood of developing this type of tumor.
One plaintiff, identified as T.C. to protect her privacy, shared that she used Depo-Provera for three years and later developed a meningioma.
She reported side effects such as prolonged bleeding, severe headaches, and extreme fatigue during use.
Following her diagnosis, T.C. underwent regular MRIs and treatment to monitor the tumor’s growth, which she describes as a constant source of stress.
Plaintiffs and attorneys are now advocating for greater awareness of Depo-Provera’s risks, encouraging women to seek medical attention if they experience adverse symptoms and legal action if a brain tumor develops.
If you have used the Depo-Provera birth control shot and have suffered brain tumors or other serious health complications, you may be eligible to file a Depo-Provera Lawsuit.
Contact the experienced lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to get in touch with our experienced team instantly by completing a free case evaluation.
Plaintiffs lawyers have filed a motion to centralize all Depo-Provera Lawsuits into a federal multidistrict litigation (MDL).
Plaintiffs involved in these lawsuits claim that Depo-Provera, a hormonal contraceptive containing medroxyprogesterone acetate, significantly increased their risk of developing these tumors, with recent studies suggesting a fivefold increase in risk for women using the product.
These lawsuits allege that the drug’s manufacturers failed to provide adequate warnings about the potential risks to both users and the medical community.
Many of the affected women have undergone invasive surgeries to address their brain tumors and continue to suffer long-term effects, including vision loss, seizure disorders, and permanent neurological injuries.
On November 26, a motion was filed with the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML), requesting the consolidation of at least 22 lawsuits currently pending in eight district courts across the United States.
The proposed MDL would centralize these cases in the Northern District of California, where six of the lawsuits are already pending.
The plaintiffs argue that all the cases involve nearly identical allegations and similar questions of fact and law, making centralization essential to avoid duplicative discovery, inconsistent rulings, and unnecessary legal costs.
They also emphasize that the size and scope of this litigation are expected to grow rapidly, with many more women likely to file similar claims in the near future.
If the JPML approves the motion, all current and future Depo-Provera lawsuits will be transferred to a single judge for coordinated pretrial proceedings, including discovery and motions.
If you have used the Depo-Provera birth control shot and have suffered brain tumors or other serious health complications, you may be eligible to file a Depo-Provera Lawsuit.
Contact the experienced lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to get in touch with our experienced team instantly by completing a free case evaluation.
Six Manufacturers Named as Defendants in Proposed Depo-Provera Brain Tumor MDL
Attorneys representing 22 women have filed federal actions against six manufacturers of Depo-Provera and its generic equivalents.
The motion to consolidate these cases into a multidistrict litigation (MDL) lists Pfizer, Pharmacia & Upjohn Co. LLC, Greenstone LLC, Viatris Inc., Pharmacia LLC, and Prasco LLC as defendants.
If the MDL is approved, these companies could be held liable for producing and marketing a contraceptive alleged to be linked to brain tumor development in multiple women.
If you or a loved one developed a brain tumor after using Depo-Provera, you may be entitled to seek compensation through a Depo-Provera Lawsuit.
Our lawyers are still accepting new clients.
Contact our Depo-Provera Lawyers today for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to instantly find out if you qualify for a claim.
The Depo-Provera lawsuit is ongoing.
Plaintiffs in the Depo-Provera lawsuits have filed a motion with the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) to consolidate the cases into a single multidistrict litigation (MDL).
With 22 cases currently pending, plaintiffs have proposed the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California as the venue, citing its experience with major MDLs like Roundup.
The next hearing on this matter is scheduled for December 5, 2024, meaning this litigation will not appear on the JPML docket until 2025.
If approved, this could become the first mass tort of the new year.
Plaintiffs argue that the centralized pretrial proceedings provided by an MDL are essential for the complex Depo-Provera litigation, which involves claims of severe health issues such as meningiomas caused by prolonged use of the contraceptive shot.
However, defendants are expected to challenge the consolidation and may seek to move the cases to a District Court in New York instead.
If you have used the Depo-Provera birth control shot and have suffered brain tumors or other serious health complications, you may be eligible to file a Depo-Provera Lawsuit.
Contact the experienced lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to get in touch with our experienced team instantly by completing a free case evaluation.
Motion Filed to Consolidate Depo-Provera Lawsuits into MDL
On November 26, a motion was filed with the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) to consolidate at least 22 lawsuits currently pending across eight district courts nationwide.
The proposed multidistrict litigation (MDL) would be centralized in the Northern District of California, where six of the cases have already been filed.
Additionally, plaintiffs anticipate significant growth in the litigation, with many more claims expected to be filed in the coming months.
If the JPML approves the motion, all current and future Depo-Provera lawsuits will be assigned to a single judge for coordinated pretrial proceedings, including discovery and motion hearings.
If you or a loved one developed a brain tumor after using Depo-Provera, you may be entitled to seek compensation through a Depo-Provera Lawsuit.
Our lawyers are still accepting new clients.
Contact our Depo-Provera Lawyers today for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to instantly find out if you qualify for a claim.
Recent studies reveal that certain brain tumors associated with Depo-Provera use are inoperable due to their location or their involvement with critical brain structures.
As a result, affected women may need alternative treatments such as radiation therapy, hormone therapy, or participation in clinical trials.
The inability to surgically remove these tumors highlights the serious risks of Depo-Provera use and emphasizes the importance of thorough preoperative imaging to evaluate and plan potential treatment options.
If you or a loved one developed a brain tumor after using Depo-Provera, you may be entitled to seek compensation through a Depo-Provera Lawsuit.
Our lawyers are still accepting new clients.
Contact our Depo-Provera Lawyers today for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to instantly find out if you qualify for a claim.
Lawsuits allege that Depo-Provera, a prescription contraceptive drug manufactured by the defendants, caused severe injuries, and scientific studies have linked medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), the active ingredient in Depo-Provera, to meningiomas.
A database analysis revealed that injectable MPA increased the likelihood of developing meningiomas by 53%, with the risk escalating with prolonged use.
Additionally, trends in meningioma incidence between 2004 and 2015 indicate significant increases, particularly among females, African Americans, and younger individuals.
Plaintiffs claim the defendants had knowledge for decades but failed to warn patients and healthcare providers in the U.S. of this significant risk.
Unlike in the U.S., the European and Canadian labels for Depo-Provera now include warnings about the potential for meningiomas.
Some Warnings associated with Depo-Provera include:
If you have used the Depo-Provera birth control shot and have suffered brain tumors or other serious health complications, you may be eligible to file a Depo-Provera Lawsuit.
Contact the experienced lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to get in touch with our experienced team instantly by completing a free case evaluation.
A 2024 study provides critical support for Depo-Provera lawsuits.
The study found that discontinuing progesterone drugs like Depo-Provera can lead to the regression of meningioma tumors.
This evidence helps causation claims and supports the argument that Depo-Provera increases the risk of meningiomas and that it directly causes tumors in specific plaintiffs.
If you or a loved one developed a brain tumor after using Depo-Provera, you may be entitled to seek compensation through a Depo-Provera Lawsuit.
Our lawyers are still accepting new clients.
Contact our Depo-Provera Lawyers today for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to instantly find out if you qualify for a claim.
For nearly a decade, women in Canada who used Depo-Provera and other DMPA medications have been warned about the potential link between these drugs and meningiomas.
Since at least 2016, Pfizer has included a warning in Canada stating that prolonged use of Depo-Provera may increase the risk of developing intracranial meningiomas.
The Canadian product monograph for Depo-Provera explicitly warns: “Meningiomas have been reported following long-term administration of progestins, including medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA).”
Additionally, the accompanying drug information advises physicians to exercise caution when prescribing Depo-Provera to patients with a history of meningiomas and to discontinue its use immediately if a patient develops a meningioma.
In contrast, Pfizer has not included similar warnings or guidance about meningiomas in the prescribing information for Depo-Provera in the United States.
As a result, many U.S. women are only now becoming aware of the potential association between Depo-Provera and brain tumors.
If you or a loved one developed a brain tumor after using Depo-Provera, you may be entitled to seek compensation through a Depo-Provera Lawsuit.
Our lawyers are still accepting new clients.
Contact our Depo-Provera Lawyers today for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to instantly find out if you qualify for a claim.
Depo-Provera Settlements and Awards Could Reach High Amounts
Settlements in Depo-Provera lawsuits have the potential to be significantly higher than those seen in comparable mass tort cases. Several factors contribute to this outlook.
A study indicates a 5.5x increase in the risk of brain tumors (meningiomas) among Depo-Provera users.
This is one of the highest relative risk increases documented in large-scale litigation.
Brain tumors are life-altering and dramatic injuries, which often lead to higher settlement values due to their profound impact on plaintiffs’ lives.
According to CDC data:
From 2017 to 2019, about 2% of women aged 15 to 49 used Depo-Provera.
Usage was higher in previous decades: 4.5% of women aged 15 to 44 had used it by 1995, and 23% between 2006 and 2010.
Estimates suggest that several million women used the drug annually during its peak years.
This means approximately 1,300 meningioma cases per year, with the drug being in use for over 32 years.
Overall, between 5,000 and 30,000 potential lawsuits could arise.
However, not all eligible plaintiffs may choose to file claims, which could further enhance settlement values.
Given the strength of the evidence, severity of injuries, and manageable plaintiff numbers, average settlements are expected to exceed $100,000 per case, with some plaintiffs receiving significantly higher amounts depending on the circumstances.
If you or a loved one developed a brain tumor after using Depo-Provera, you may be entitled to seek compensation through a Depo-Provera Lawsuit.
Our lawyers are still accepting new clients.
Contact our Depo-Provera Lawyers today for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to instantly find out if you qualify for a claim.
A California woman, Anjanna Lawson, has filed a lawsuit against Pfizer and other associated companies after being diagnosed with an intracranial meningioma.
Lawson began using Depo-Provera injections at the age of 16 and continued until September 2024.
In July 2023, she underwent a right pterional craniotomy to remove the tumor. However, a residual tumor was detected in early 2024, requiring five sessions of stereotactic radiosurgery.
Despite these treatments, the tumor persists, leaving Lawson with debilitating symptoms, including vision loss, facial spasms, and a burning sensation in her face.
The lawsuit targets Pfizer, Inc., Viatris, Inc., Greenstone, LLC, Prasco, LLC, Pharmacia & Upjohn LLC, and Pharmacia, LLC. Lawson alleges that these companies failed to provide sufficient warnings about the risk of developing intracranial meningiomas associated with Depo-Provera use.
Key Details of Anjanna Lawson’s Case:
If you or a loved one developed a brain tumor after using Depo-Provera, you may be entitled to seek compensation through a Depo-Provera Lawsuit.
Our lawyers are still accepting new clients.
Contact our Depo-Provera Lawyers today for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to instantly find out if you qualify for a claim.
Depo-Provera Lawsuits continue to be filed in federal courts, with expectations of more than 30 cases by the end of November.
Filings are particularly concentrated in the Northern District of California and the Southern District of Texas.
The upcoming Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) hearing, scheduled for December 5, 2024, will likely address potential consolidation.
However, an official multidistrict litigation (MDL) is not anticipated before the end of the year.
An MDL is typically created when 25 or more related cases are pending in various federal courts, addressing common issues and involving similar defendants.
This threshold is expected to be met in the Depo-Provera lawsuits.
Although plaintiffs are likely to seek consolidation in California, defendants may oppose and recommend New York as the venue for coordination.
If you or a loved one developed a brain tumor after using Depo-Provera, you may be entitled to seek compensation through a Depo-Provera Lawsuit.
Our lawyers are still accepting new clients.
Contact our Depo-Provera Lawyers today for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a claim instantly.
A new lawsuit against the makers of Depo-Provera has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, alleging that the popular birth control shot led to the development of a meningioma brain tumor in a California woman after nearly 25 years of use.
The plaintiff is suing Pfizer, Viatris, Greenstone, Prasco, and Pharmacia and Upjohn, asserting that the companies failed to provide adequate warnings in the U.S. about the potential risk of brain tumors linked to Depo-Provera, a risk noted on Canadian labels since 2015.
The lawsuit claims that Jones began receiving Depo-Provera injections in 2000, with regular injections totaling 91 over her treatment period.
In 2020, after experiencing symptoms like headaches, blurred vision, vertigo, and ear itching, she was diagnosed with a calcified meningioma brain tumor, which later grew in size.
Due to the calcified state of the tumor, surgical removal has been deemed too dangerous, leaving Jones to endure chronic pain and other symptoms.
The complaint alleges that Pfizer and associated companies failed to thoroughly investigate and warn about the risks of long-term Depo-Provera use, which includes potential links to meningioma.
The lawsuit is part of a growing number of Depo-Provera lawsuits filed across the U.S.
If you or a loved one developed a brain tumor after using Depo-Provera, you may be entitled to seek compensation through a Depo-Provera Lawsuit.
Our lawyers are still accepting new clients.
Contact our Depo-Provera Lawyers today for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a claim instantly.
Pfizer and its co-defendants are facing nine allegations in a federal lawsuit filed in California.
The charges include Failure to Warn, Design Defect, Negligence, Negligent Failure to Warn, Negligent Design Defect, Negligent Misrepresentation, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Breach of Express Warranty, and Breach of Implied Warranty.
The lawsuit accuses Pfizer and its co-defendants of knowingly designing, manufacturing, and marketing a product that could lead to intracranial meningiomas without providing sufficient warnings to consumers.
If you or a loved one developed a brain tumor after using Depo-Provera, you may be entitled to seek compensation through a Depo-Provera Lawsuit.
Our lawyers are still accepting new clients.
Contact our Depo-Provera Lawyers today for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to instantly find out if you qualify for a claim.
The ongoing Depo-Provera Lawsuits have brought attention to legal nuances regarding the statute of limitations in these cases.
There are two main reasons why the statute of limitations should not significantly affect individuals filing lawsuits for Depo-Provera-related injuries at this time.
First, the “discovery rule” applies across states and can extend the statute of limitations.
The principle delays the deadline for filing a lawsuit until the injured party becomes aware of the injury and its connection to a specific cause.
In the case of Depo-Provera, recent scientific studies have revealed a potential link between the drug and brain tumors, an association not widely known before these studies.
Given the recent emergence of this evidence, plaintiffs could not reasonably have been expected to link their conditions to Depo-Provera until now.
Additionally, the doctrine of fraudulent concealment may also apply.
This doctrine states if a defendant intentionally conceals crucial safety information, the statute of limitations can be paused.
Plaintiffs allege that Depo-Provera’s manufacturers actively suppressed knowledge of the drug’s risks by manipulating safety warnings and product labeling, making it challenging for consumers to understand the potential link between Depo-Provera and meningiomas.
The alleged concealment of safety information means plaintiffs may argue they were prevented from learning of these risks, effectively extending the timeline for filing lawsuits.
This combination of the discovery rule and fraudulent concealment may give plaintiffs a strong basis to counter statute of limitations concerns in the Depo-Provera Lawsuit, allowing time to pursue claims linked to their injuries.
If you or a loved one developed a brain tumor after using Depo-Provera, you may be entitled to seek compensation through a Depo-Provera Lawsuit.
Our lawyers are still accepting new clients.
Contact our Depo-Provera Lawyers today for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a claim instantly.
A French study has identified a connection between Depo-Provera injections and meningiomas, tumors that develop from the protective membranes surrounding the brain and spinal cord.
Common symptoms of meningiomas include Headaches, Vision changes, Seizures, Memory loss, and Dizziness
Additional research is necessary to determine why Depo-Provera may contribute to an increased risk of tumor growth.
Given that 74 million women worldwide have used the drug, the potential scope of this litigation could be substantial.
If you or a loved one developed a brain tumor after using Depo-Provera, you may be entitled to seek compensation through a Depo-Provera Lawsuit.
Our lawyers are still accepting new clients.
Contact our Depo-Provera Lawyers today for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to instantly find out if you qualify for a claim.
A 2020 review of 47 meningioma lawsuits has drawn the attention of legal experts investigating claims involving women who used Depo-Provera.
The analysis revealed that failure to diagnose was the primary issue in 68.1% of these cases.
Should a connection between Depo-Provera and an increased risk of meningiomas be established, legal analysts predict that settlement amounts could reach several hundred thousand dollars.
If you or a loved one developed a brain tumor after using Depo-Provera, you may be entitled to seek compensation through a Depo-Provera Lawsuit.
Our lawyers are still accepting new clients.
Contact our Depo-Provera Lawyers today for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to instantly find out if you qualify for a claim.
Depo-Provera encountered numerous FDA rejections during the 1970s and 1980s before ultimately receiving approval in 1992.
Since then, the contraceptive has been linked to decreased bone density and notable side effects after discontinuation.
Recent studies have raised concerns about a possible connection between Depo-Provera and brain tumors, further amplifying the health risks associated with its use.
If you or a loved one developed a brain tumor after using Depo-Provera, you may be entitled to seek compensation through a Depo-Provera Lawsuit.
Our lawyers are still accepting new clients.
Contact our Depo-Provera Lawyers today for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a claim instantly.
The Depo-Provera Lawsuit centers on allegations that prolonged use of the injectable contraceptive Depo-Provera caused serious health issues, including intracranial meningiomas—tumors that form on the membranes surrounding the brain and spinal cord.
A recent study published in the British Medical Journal revealed a 550% increased risk of developing these brain tumors in women who used Depo-Provera compared to non-users.
Depo-Provera Lawsuits claim that Pfizer failed to adequately warn patients and healthcare providers about these risks despite decades of scientific evidence linking progestin-based drugs to meningiomas.
Depo-Provera claims allege negligence, defective design, and failure to warn, with some cases also bringing claims of breach of warranty.
Many Depo-Provera Lawsuits involve women who have used the Depo shot for years or even decades, receiving dozens of injections before developing debilitating symptoms.
Pfizer has updated Depo-Provera’s label in Europe and Canada to include information about the increased risk for brain tumors, but no such warning exists in the United States.
Plaintiffs also argue that the drug’s high dose of the synthetic hormone progesterone is unnecessarily dangerous, especially when Pfizer also manufactures a lower-dose alternative called Depo-SubQ Provera 104.
The Depo-Provera Lawsuit has brought attention to the profound impact on individuals who trusted Depo-Provera as a safe form of contraception.
Women filing lawsuits report suffering from severe and life-altering symptoms, such as severe headaches, vision loss, memory problems, and other neurological impairments caused by meningiomas.
Many have undergone invasive brain surgeries, radiation therapy, or other complex treatments, leaving them with permanent physical and emotional scars.
For some, the tumors are inoperable, requiring lifelong monitoring and ongoing medical intervention.
The financial burden has also been immense, with medical bills, lost wages, and diminished quality of life adding to the toll.
Women have expressed frustration and anger that these risks were not disclosed earlier, denying them the opportunity to make informed decisions about their health.
Their experiences highlight the devastating personal cost of corporate negligence and inadequate safety warnings.
As more women come forward with similar stories, the Depo-Provera Lawsuit aims to hold Pfizer accountable and seek justice for those affected.
If you or a loved one developed brain tumors or other serious health problems after using Depo-Provera, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit and seek compensation.
Contact our law firm today for a free case evaluation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Depo-Provera Lawsuit.
No, there is not a Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Class Action Lawsuit.
Lawsuits claiming that Depo-Provera caused brain and spinal cord tumors are currently being filed as individual cases, but a motion has been submitted to consolidate these lawsuits into a multidistrict litigation (MDL).
An MDL is a legal process used to combine similar lawsuits filed across different courts into one federal district court to streamline pretrial proceedings.
Unlike a class action, where plaintiffs are grouped together under a single representative and share a uniform outcome, an MDL allows each plaintiff to retain their individual case while common issues, such as evidence discovery and preliminary rulings, are handled collectively.
In a Depo-Provera MDL, one judge would oversee the litigation to improve efficiency, avoid duplicative discovery, and ensure consistent rulings.
However, each plaintiff’s injuries and damages would still be evaluated independently, with cases proceeding to settlement or trial based on individual circumstances.
This structure is more appropriate for Depo-Provera Lawsuits because the severity of injuries, such as meningiomas, and their impact vary widely among plaintiffs.
The motion to consolidate Depo-Provera Lawsuits reflects the growing number of claims and the need for centralized management of these cases.
The current Depo-Provera Lawsuits being investigated may claim that Pfizer, the manufacturer of the contraceptive injection, failed to adequately inform patients of the significant risks associated with the drug.
Patients may allege that Pfizer was aware of the potential for serious health problems but did not provide proper warnings or perform sufficient testing before marketing the product.
The cases being investigated are from individuals suffering from conditions like brain tumors after long-term use of Depo-Provera.
Plaintiffs may argue that had they been aware of these risks, they may have chosen alternative contraceptive options.
Legal claims may focus on Pfizer’s alleged negligence, misrepresentation, and failure to disclose vital safety information.
Depo-Provera has been the subject of lawsuits dating back to the early 2000s.
The first wave of claims centered around the drug’s link to bone mineral density loss.
Plaintiffs alleged that Pfizer failed to warn about the risk of osteoporosis.
In 2021, Pfizer settled a Canadian class action case related to the bone density loss side effects and related conditions for over $2 million.
The FDA had issued a Black Box Warning in 2004 about this risk, and subsequent lawsuits have claimed that Pfizer failed to provide adequate warnings to consumers and healthcare providers.
Now, with new research linking Depo-Provera to brain tumors, a second wave of lawsuits is being investigated.
Lawyers estimate that individual Depo-Provera Lawsuit settlement amounts could range between $100,000 and $500,000 or more, depending on individual circumstances.
Factors that could influence the settlement value include the severity of the tumor, the impact on the plaintiff’s quality of life, the cost of medical treatment, and whether the individual has suffered long-term or permanent damage
Additionally, lost wages due to an inability to work and the emotional distress caused by the diagnosis may also play a role in determining the compensation amount.
Please be advised that any projected or estimated settlement amounts mentioned on this page are general estimations and are not guaranteed. These figures are based on similar previous litigations, the nature of injuries sustained, and estimated costs of damages. They are meant to provide a general idea of what settlement ranges could look like and should not be taken as definitive expectations for your case.
Every legal case is unique, with its own specific circumstances that can significantly affect the outcome. This information is not legal advice and does not address the specifics of your situation. To obtain a more accurate understanding of the potential value of your case, it is best to consult directly with a qualified attorney who can provide personalized guidance.
Yes, authorized generic versions of Depo-Provera, known as depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA), are included in the current lawsuits alleging a link between the injectable contraceptive and brain tumors.
Depo-Provera Lawsuits claim that both the brand-name and generic forms of the medication have led to a heightened risk of serious health issues, including meningioma brain tumors.
Our attorneys have decades of experience representing people who have been harmed by pharmaceutical drugs, pursuing compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, and the pain and suffering caused by these injuries.
At TorHoerman Law, we understand the challenges present in cases involving harmful medications like Depo-Provera, and we are committed to guiding clients through every step of the legal process.
Our team will work to gather essential evidence, consult medical experts, and build a strong case that reflects the full scope of your injuries.
We aim to hold pharmaceutical companies accountable for their actions, seeking justice for those affected by inadequate warnings and potentially dangerous drugs.
If you or a loved one have developed health complications from Depo-Provera, our attorneys are here to provide knowledgeable, compassionate, and diligent representation.
Meet Our Depo-Provera Attorneys:
At TorHoerman Law, we work on a contingency fee basis, which means you pay nothing upfront and only owe legal fees if we successfully recover compensation for your case.
We believe financial barriers should never prevent individuals from accessing top-tier legal representation, especially when fighting for justice after serious injuries.
Our contingency model allows you to focus on your recovery while we handle the legal complexities of your Depo-Provera Lawsuit.
There are no hidden costs or unexpected fees—our firm is committed to transparency and fairness.
If you or a loved one has been impacted by Depo-Provera, contact us today for a free case evaluation.
Depo-Provera Meningioma Lawsuits are being filed by women across the country who developed brain and spinal cord tumors after prolonged use of Depo-Provera injections.
If you took Depo-Provera for an extended period of time and developed a brain tumor, you may be eligible to sue Pfizer and file a Depo-Provera Lawsuit.
Our lawyers are here to help you understand your legal options and the process for filing a Depo Shot Lawsuit.
Contact us today.
Our Depo-Provera Lawyers will help you through the entire legal process, beginning with the preliminary steps of gathering evidence to support your claims and assessing damages to understand the impact of these health issues on your life.
Building a strong case for a Depo-Provera Lawsuit requires thorough documentation and credible evidence.
Plaintiffs need to demonstrate both their use of the contraceptive and the health issues they have experienced as a result.
Gathering this evidence can be difficult, but it’s essential to establish a clear connection between Depo-Provera use and the development of meningiomas.
Your attorneys will help you through this process.
Evidence in a Depo-Provera Lawsuit may include:
Carefully compiling this evidence can strengthen your claim and help your attorney build a compelling case for compensation.
Damages in a lawsuit refer to the monetary compensation sought by plaintiffs to address the harm caused by a defendant’s actions or negligence.
These damages can cover a wide range of losses, including medical expenses, lost income, and emotional distress.
Depo-Provera cases seek compensation for the significant physical, emotional, and financial toll experienced by women diagnosed with brain tumors linked to the contraceptive.
Below are the types of damages plaintiffs may pursue in a Depo-Provera Lawsuit:
These damages aim to provide financial relief and hold the responsible parties accountable for the harm caused.
Working with an experienced attorney can help plaintiffs accurately document their losses and pursue maximum compensation.
Depo-Provera, used by millions of women worldwide, has been linked to a higher risk of developing a type of brain tumor called intracranial meningioma.
Recent studies have shown that women who used Depo-Provera (medroxyprogesterone acetate) for over 12 months faced a 5.6-fold increased risk of developing these tumors.
Meningiomas are typically benign but can become serious if they grow unchecked, potentially requiring surgical removal and causing neurological complications such as headaches, seizures, and vision problems.
The research, primarily conducted in France, analyzed data from over 18,000 women who underwent surgery for meningiomas between 2009 and 2018.
This study was among the first to highlight the risks specifically associated with injectable progestogens like Depo-Provera, although similar risks were noted for other hormone-based medications used for birth control and menopause management.
Given the widespread use of Depo-Provera, researchers suggest further investigation is necessary to fully understand the risks and their implications on public health.
This growing body of evidence has spurred the investigation of lawsuits against Pfizer, the manufacturer of Depo-Provera, from individuals who developed meningiomas after prolonged use of the drug.
For women using Depo-Provera, it’s essential to consult with healthcare providers to evaluate the benefits and risks associated with continued use, especially if used long-term.
The study findings also raise broader questions about the safety of hormone-based contraceptives and the need for better-informed decisions in women’s healthcare.
The use of Depo-Provera has been associated with the development of intracranial meningiomas, which are tumors that arise from the meninges, the protective layers around the brain and spinal cord.
Although typically benign, these tumors can cause significant health problems, particularly when they grow large enough to put pressure on brain structures.
The risk increases with prolonged use of Depo-Provera, particularly when used for over 12 months.
Recent studies have also found a potential link between Depo-Provera and other health issues, further raising concerns about its safety.
Here is a breakdown of the specific types of tumors and complications associated with long-term use of Depo-Provera:
The Depo-Provera shot is a hormonal contraceptive used to prevent pregnancy.
It contains the active ingredient medroxyprogesterone acetate, a synthetic form of the hormone progesterone, often referred to as the hormone progestin.
The shot is typically administered by healthcare providers every three months.
Depo-Provera works by preventing ovulation, meaning it stops the ovaries from releasing eggs.
The shot thickens cervical mucus, which makes it more difficult for sperm to reach any eggs, and also thins the lining of the uterus, reducing the chances of a fertilized egg being able to implant.
It is a highly effective form of birth control when used consistently, offering over 99% protection against pregnancy.
However, its effects on the body can last for months, so fertility may not return immediately after stopping Depo Provera injections.
The Depo Provera shot has been associated with potential side effects like bone density loss and an increased risk of developing conditions like brain tumors in long-term users.
The FDA had issued a Black Box Warning in 2004 about the risk of bone mineral density loss, and subsequent lawsuits have claimed that Pfizer failed to provide adequate warnings to consumers and healthcare providers
The current Depo-Provera Lawsuit filed is in its early stages.
TorHoerman Law’s team of Depo-Provera Lawyers are reviewing medical records and personal stories from women who have developed brain tumors linked to Depo-Provera usage.
We are committed to holding Pfizer and other responsible parties accountable for the harm caused by their failure to warn about the risks of this contraceptive.
Our firm is dedicated to ensuring that victims of Depo-Provera receive the compensation they deserve for their injuries and related damages.
If you or a loved one have developed a brain tumor after prolonged use of Depo-Provera, you may be eligible to file a Depo-Provera Lawsuit.
Contact us today for a free consultation.
Use the chat feature on this page for a free case evaluation to find out if you’re eligible to file a Depo-Provera Lawsuit instantly.
Women who used Depo-Provera and were diagnosed with a meningioma or another brain tumor may qualify for the lawsuit.
To strengthen their case, plaintiffs typically need a history of prolonged Depo-Provera use, documented diagnosis of a brain tumor, and supporting medical records.
Eligibility also depends on meeting the legal deadlines in their state to file a claim.
Potential criteria for qualification include:
An experienced attorney can evaluate individual circumstances to determine if a potential plaintiff qualifies for the lawsuit.
If you believe that Depo-Provera caused your brain tumor, it’s important to take steps to protect your health and legal rights.
Start by seeking medical advice to ensure you receive proper diagnosis and treatment for your condition.
Gather documentation, including medical records and proof of Depo-Provera use, to support your potential claim.
Consulting with an experienced attorney can help you understand your legal options and evaluate the strength of your case.
Acting promptly is essential to meet legal deadlines and ensure your claim is properly filed.
Here’s what you should do:
The Depo-Provera lawsuits primarily name Pfizer Inc., the manufacturer of the drug, as the key defendant.
Other companies involved include Viatris Inc., Greenstone LLC, and Prasco Labs, which distributed “authorized generic” versions of Depo-Provera.
Pharmacia & Upjohn Co. LLC, a predecessor of Pfizer, is also named for its role in the development and marketing of the drug.
Plaintiffs allege these companies failed to provide adequate warnings about the risks of meningiomas and other brain tumors linked to Depo-Provera use.
Depo-Provera is available in two main formulations, both of which contain the active ingredient medroxyprogesterone acetate, a type of synthetic progestin used for contraception.
Depo-SubQ Provera 104 is often marketed as being less painful to administer and having fewer side effects related to weight gain compared to the original formula.
The Depo-Provera shot is an injectable form of hormonal contraception, given every three months, that primarily works by preventing ovulation and thereby preventing pregnancy.
Depo Provera contains medroxyprogesterone acetate, a synthetic form of the hormone progesterone, which stops the ovaries from releasing eggs.
Thickening cervical mucus works to create a barrier, making it more difficult for sperm to travel through the cervix and fertilize an egg.
The shot also causes the uterine lining to thin, which helps prevent a fertilized egg from implanting.
While Depo-Provera is generally safe, some women may experience more serious side effects.
These risks are typically associated with long-term use, and it’s important for individuals to be aware of potential complications.
If any of these symptoms occur, it is recommended that you seek the treatment of a doctor immediately.
It’s crucial for women to monitor their health closely while using Depo-Provera and discuss any serious side effects with a doctor.
If you have suffered from serious side effects related to taking Depo Provera and were not warned about them, you may be eligible to file a Depo Provera Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free case evaluation.
Use the chatbot on this page to get in touch with our attorneys today.
In regard to minor side effects, Depo-Provera has been known to cause a variety of mild, temporary symptoms.
These side effects typically diminish over time as the body adjusts to the hormonal changes caused by the injection.
While many women experience little to no discomfort, some common minor side effects include:
These side effects are typically not long-lasting, and most women find them manageable.
However, it’s important to discuss any concerns with a healthcare provider to weigh the benefits and risks of continuing Depo-Provera and whether this shot is the right birth control method for you.
Approximately 2 million women in the United States regularly receive the Depo-Provera shot, with about 74 million women using injectable contraceptives (not exclusive to Depo Provera) globally.
No, there is currently no class action lawsuit for Depo-Provera.
Instead, cases related to injuries such as brain tumors and bone density loss are likely to be handled under the framework of multidistrict litigation (MDL).
In an MDL, individual lawsuits are consolidated for pretrial proceedings under one judge, which helps streamline complex cases that share common issues.
Unlike a class action, where all plaintiffs are grouped together and treated as a single entity, MDL cases allow each plaintiff to retain their own attorney and pursue individual compensation based on the specific facts of their case.
The key difference is that in a class action, all plaintiffs share the same outcome, meaning any settlement or judgment is divided equally among the group.
In contrast, MDL cases are tried individually, and damages are awarded based on the personal injuries and evidence in each case.
MDL consolidations offer efficiency while still allowing plaintiffs to maintain control over their unique claims.
This approach is common in large-scale product liability lawsuits, including those involving pharmaceutical drugs.
Pfizer has faced allegations in recent lawsuits that it was aware of the increased risk of brain tumors associated with Depo-Provera for decades but failed to provide adequate warnings.
Scientific studies dating back to the 1980s suggested that progesterone-based drugs, including Depo-Provera, could contribute to the development of meningiomas due to their hormonal effects on brain tissues.
In Europe and Canada, Pfizer updated its warning labels to include the risk of meningiomas, but these warnings were never added to the U.S. labels.
A March 2024 British Medical Journal study further reinforced the association, finding a 550% increased risk of intracranial meningiomas in women who used the drug long-term.
Pfizer’s handling of the information, failure to warn patients in the U.S., and allegations that Pfizer knew about the increased risk are central issues in the ongoing lawsuits.
Owner & Attorney - TorHoerman Law
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
In this case, we obtained a verdict of $495 Million for our client’s child who was diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis after consuming baby formula manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $20 Million for our client after they suffered a Toxic Tort Injury due to chemical exposure.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $103.8 Million for our client after they suffered a COX-2 Inhibitors Injury.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $4 Million for our client after they suffered a Traumatic Brain Injury while at daycare.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $2.8 Million for our client after they suffered an injury due to a Defective Heart Device.
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
You can learn more about the Depo-Provera Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
They helped my elderly uncle receive compensation for the loss of his wife who was administered a dangerous drug. He consulted with this firm because of my personal recommendation and was very pleased with the compassion, attention to detail and response he received. Definitely recommend this firm for their 5 star service.
When I wanted to join the Xarelto class action lawsuit, I chose TorrHoerman Law from a search of a dozen or so law firm websites. I was impressed with the clarity of the information they presented. I gave them a call, and was again impressed, this time with the quality of our interactions.
TorHoerman Law is an awesome firm to represent anyone that has been involved in a case that someone has stated that it's too difficult to win. The entire firm makes you feel like you’re part of the family, Tor, Eric, Jake, Kristie, Chad, Tyler, Kathy and Steven are the best at what they do.
TorHorman Law is awesome
I can’t say enough how grateful I was to have TorHoerman Law help with my case. Jacob Plattenberger is very knowledgeable and an amazing lawyer. Jillian Pileczka was so patient and kind, helping me with questions that would come up. Even making sure my special needs were taken care of for meetings.
TorHoerman Law fights for justice with their hardworking and dedicated staff. Not only do they help their clients achieve positive outcomes, but they are also generous and important pillars of the community with their outreach and local support. Thank you THL!
Hands down one of the greatest group of people I had the pleasure of dealing with!
A very kind and professional staff.
Very positive experience. Would recommend them to anyone.
A very respectful firm.
Edwardsville, IL
Chicago, IL
St. Louis, MO
Clayton, MO
Naperville, IL