If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced Chicago personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation Chicago personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in Chicago, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced Chicago auto accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in Chicago, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our Chicago truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in Chicago or the greater Chicagoland area – you may be eligible to file a Chicago motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Chicago motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in Chicago at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file a Chicago bike accident lawsuit.
Contact a Chicago bicycle accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
Chicago is one of the nation’s largest construction centers.
Thousands of men and women work on sites across the city and metropolitan area on tasks ranging from skilled trades to administrative operations.
Unfortunately, construction site accidents are fairly common.
Contact TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options with an experienced Chicago construction accident lawyer, free of charge and no obligation required.
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced Chicago nursing home abuse attorney from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of Chicago, or the greater Chicagoland area, and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact a Chicago wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in Chicago you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact a Chicago slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact a Chicago daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced Edwardsville personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation Edwardsville personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in Edwardsville, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville car accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in Edwardsville, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our Edwardsville truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in Edwardsville – you may be eligible to file an Edwardsville motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in Edwardsville at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file an Edwardsville bike accident lawsuit.
Contact an Edwardsville bicycle accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville nursing home abuse attorney from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of Edwardsville and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact an Edwardsville wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in Edwardsville you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact an Edwardsville slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact an Edwardsville daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
If you or a loved one suffered injuries on someone else’s property in Edwardsville IL, you may be entitled to financial compensation.
If property owners fail to keep their premises safe, and their negligence leads to injuries, property damages or other losses as a result of an accident or incident, a premises liability lawsuit may be possible.
Contact an Edwardsville premises liability lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation case consultation.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced St. Louis personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation St. Louis personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in St. Louis, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced St. Louis auto accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in St. Louis, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our St. Louis truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in St. Louis or the greater St. Louis area – you may be eligible to file a St. Louis motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced St. Louis motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in St. Louis at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file a St. Louis bike accident lawsuit.
Contact a St. Louis bicycle accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
St. Louis is one of the nation’s largest construction centers.
Thousands of men and women work on sites across the city and metropolitan area on tasks ranging from skilled trades to administrative operations.
Unfortunately, construction site accidents are fairly common.
Contact TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options with an experienced St. Louis construction accident lawyer, free of charge and no obligation required.
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced St. Louis nursing home abuse attorney from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of St. Louis, or the greater St. Louis area, and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact a St. Louis wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in St. Louis you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact a St. Louis slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact a St. Louis daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
Suboxone, a medication often used to treat opioid use disorder (OUD), has become a vital tool which offers a safer and more controlled approach to managing opioid addiction.
Despite its widespread use, Suboxone has been linked to severe tooth decay and dental injuries.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuits claim that the companies failed to warn about the risks of tooth decay and other dental injuries associated with Suboxone sublingual films.
Depo-Provera, a contraceptive injection, has been linked to an increased risk of developing brain tumors (including glioblastoma and meningioma).
Women who have used Depo-Provera and subsequently been diagnosed with brain tumors are filing lawsuits against Pfizer (the manufacturer), alleging that the company failed to adequately warn about the risks associated with the drug.
Despite the claims, Pfizer maintains that Depo-Provera is safe and effective, citing FDA approval and arguing that the scientific evidence does not support a causal link between the drug and brain tumors.
You may be eligible to file a Depo Provera Lawsuit if you used Depo-Provera and were diagnosed with a brain tumor.
Tepezza, approved by the FDA in 2020, is used to treat Thyroid Eye Disease (TED), but some patients have reported hearing issues after its use.
The Tepezza lawsuit claims that Horizon Therapeutics failed to warn patients about the potential risks and side effects of the drug, leading to hearing loss and other problems, such as tinnitus.
You may be eligible to file a Tepezza Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Tepezza and subsequently suffered permanent hearing loss or tinnitus.
Elmiron, a drug prescribed for interstitial cystitis, has been linked to serious eye damage and vision problems in scientific studies.
Thousands of Elmiron Lawsuits have been filed against Janssen Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturer, alleging that the company failed to warn patients about the potential risks.
You may be eligible to file an Elmiron Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Elmiron and subsequently suffered vision loss, blindness, or any other eye injury linked to the prescription drug.
The chemotherapy drug Taxotere, commonly used for breast cancer treatment, has been linked to severe eye injuries, permanent vision loss, and permanent hair loss.
Taxotere Lawsuits are being filed by breast cancer patients and others who have taken the chemotherapy drug and subsequently developed vision problems.
If you or a loved one used Taxotere and subsequently developed vision damage or other related medical problems, you may be eligible to file a Taxotere Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Although pressure cookers were designed to be safe and easy to use, a number of these devices have been found to have a defect that can lead to excessive buildup of internal pressure.
The excessive pressure may result in an explosion that puts users at risk of serious injuries such as burns, lacerations, an even electrocution.
If your pressure cooker exploded and caused substantial burn injuries or other serious injuries, you may be eligible to file a Pressure Cooker Lawsuit and secure financial compensation for your injuries and damages.
Several studies have found a correlation between heavy social media use and mental health challenges, especially among younger users.
Social media harm lawsuits claim that social media companies are responsible for onsetting or heightening mental health problems, eating disorders, mood disorders, and other negative experiences of teens and children
You may be eligible to file a Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit if you are the parents of a teen, or teens, who attribute their use of social media platforms to their mental health problems.
The Paragard IUD, a non-hormonal birth control device, has been linked to serious complications, including device breakage during removal.
Numerous lawsuits have been filed against Teva Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturer of Paragard, alleging that the company failed to warn about the potential risks.
If you or a loved one used a Paragard IUD and subsequently suffered complications and/or injuries, you may qualify for a Paragard Lawsuit.
Patients with the PowerPort devices may possibly be at a higher risk of serious complications or injury due to a catheter failure, according to lawsuits filed against the manufacturers of the Bard PowerPort Device.
If you or a loved one have been injured by a Bard PowerPort Device, you may be eligible to file a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products for injuries, pain and suffering, and financial costs related to complications and injuries of these medical devices.
Over 100,000 Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits have been filed on behalf of women injured by vaginal mesh and pelvic mesh products.
If you or a loved one have suffered serious complications or injuries from vaginal mesh, you may be eligible to file a Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit.
Parents and guardians are filing lawsuits against major video game companies (including Epic Games, Activision Blizzard, and Microsoft), alleging that they intentionally designed their games to be addictive — leading to severe mental and physical health issues in minors.
The lawsuits claim that these companies used psychological tactics and manipulative game designs to keep players engaged for extended periods — causing problems such as anxiety, depression, and social withdrawal.
You may be eligible to file a Video Game Addiction Lawsuit if your child has been diagnosed with gaming addiction or has experienced negative effects from excessive gaming.
Above ground pool accidents have led to lawsuits against manufacturers due to defective restraining belts that pose serious safety risks to children.
These belts, designed to provide structural stability, can inadvertently act as footholds, allowing children to climb into the pool unsupervised, increasing the risk of drownings and injuries.
Parents and guardians are filing lawsuits against pool manufacturers, alleging that the defective design has caused severe injuries and deaths.
If your child was injured or drowned in an above ground pool accident involving a defective restraining belt, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.
Recent scientific studies have found that the use of chemical hair straightening products, hair relaxers, and other hair products present an increased risk of uterine cancer, endometrial cancer, breast cancer, and other health problems.
Legal action is being taken against manufacturers and producers of these hair products for their failure to properly warn consumers of potential health risks.
You may be eligible to file a Hair Straightener Cancer Lawsuit if you or a loved one used chemical hair straighteners, hair relaxers, or other similar hair products, and subsequently were diagnosed with:
AFFF (Aqueous Film Forming Foam) is a firefighting foam that has been linked to various health issues, including cancer, due to its PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) content.
Numerous AFFF Lawsuits have been filed against AFFF manufacturers, alleging that they knew about the health risks but failed to warn the public.
AFFF Firefighting Foam lawsuits aim to hold manufacturers accountable for putting peoples’ health at risk.
You may be eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit if you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer.
Paraquat, a widely-used herbicide, has been linked to Parkinson’s disease, leading to numerous Paraquat Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits against its manufacturers for failing to warn about the risks of chronic exposure.
Due to its toxicity, the EPA has restricted the use of Paraquat and it is currently banned in over 30 countries.
You may be eligible to file a Paraquat Lawsuit if you or a loved one were exposed to Paraquat and subsequently diagnosed with Parkinson’s Disease or other related health conditions.
Mesothelioma is an aggressive form of cancer primarily caused by exposure to asbestos.
Asbestos trust funds were established in the 1970s to compensate workers harmed by asbestos-containing products.
These funds are designed to pay out claims to those who developed mesothelioma or other asbestos-related diseases due to exposure.
Those exposed to asbestos and diagnosed with mesothelioma may be eligible to file a Mesothelioma Lawsuit.
Studies have found a link between toxic baby formula and Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) — a severe intestinal condition in premature infants.
Parents and guardians are filing NEC Lawsuits against baby formula manufacturers, alleging that the formulas contain harmful ingredients leading to NEC.
Despite the claims, Abbott and Mead Johnson deny the allegations, arguing that their products are thoroughly researched and dismissing the scientific evidence linking their formulas to NEC, while the FDA issued a warning to Abbott regarding safety concerns of a formula product.
You may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit if your child received baby bovine-based (cow’s milk) baby formula in the maternity ward or NICU of a hospital and was subsequently diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC).
PFAS contamination lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers and suppliers of PFAS chemicals, alleging that these substances have contaminated water sources and products, leading to severe health issues.
Plaintiffs claim that prolonged exposure to PFAS through contaminated drinking water and products has caused cancers, thyroid disease, and other health problems.
The lawsuits target companies like 3M, DuPont, and Chemours, accusing them of knowingly contaminating the environment with PFAS and failing to warn about the risks.
If you or a loved one has been exposed to PFAS-contaminated water or products and has developed health issues, you may be eligible to file a PFAS lawsuit.
The Roundup Lawsuit claims that Monsanto’s popular weed killer, Roundup, causes cancer.
Numerous studies have linked the main ingredient, glyphosate, to Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, Leukemia, and other Lymphatic cancers.
Despite this, Monsanto continues to deny these claims.
Victims of Roundup exposure who developed cancer are filing Roundup Lawsuits against Monsanto, seeking compensation for medical expenses, pain, and suffering.
Our firm is about people. That is our motto and that will always be our reality.
We do our best to get to know our clients, understand their situations, and get them the compensation they deserve.
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Without our team, we would’nt be able to provide our clients with anything close to the level of service they receive when they work with us.
The THL Team commits to the sincere belief that those injured by the misconduct of others, especially large corporate profit mongers, deserve justice for their injuries.
Our team is what has made TorHoerman Law a very special place since 2009.
Depo-Provera, an injectable contraceptive containing the synthetic hormone medroxyprogesterone acetate, has been widely used for decades despite ongoing concerns about its long-term health risks.
Lawsuits against Pfizer, the manufacturer of Depo-Provera, have emerged, alleging that the company failed to warn users about the increased risk of brain tumors and other serious health complications linked to prolonged use.
On this page, we’ll discuss the History of Depo-Provera, the current Depo Provera Lawsuit filed against Pfizer, potential health risks linked to Depo-Provera injections, and much more.
Depo-Provera was first developed in the 1950s by Upjohn (now part of Pfizer) as a high-dose synthetic progestin intended for use in cancer treatment before researchers discovered its effectiveness as a contraceptive.
Despite concerns about potential health risks, the drug was approved for birth control in numerous countries before gaining FDA approval in the United States in 1992.
Regulatory agencies initially hesitated due to studies suggesting links between Depo-Provera and bone density loss, breast cancer, and other long-term side effects.
Once approved, the injectable contraceptive became widely prescribed, particularly for women seeking a low-maintenance birth control option, with millions of doses administered worldwide each year.
However, concerns about its safety persisted, particularly regarding the effects of prolonged exposure to medroxyprogesterone acetate, its active ingredient.
Recent studies have identified a significant correlation between prolonged Depo-Provera use and an increased risk of developing intracranial meningiomas, a type of brain tumor.
This has led to a growing number of Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuits against Pfizer, alleging that the company failed to adequately warn patients and healthcare providers about these risks.
As investigations into Depo-Provera’s safety intensify, legal action is being pursued to hold the manufacturer accountable for potential failures in disclosing known health hazards.
Our lawyers are currently investigating the new Depo-Provera Lawsuit and accepting new clients.
If you or a loved one developed brain tumors after prolonged use of Depo-Provera, you may be eligible to file a Depo-Provera Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Contact the Depo Provera Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
Use the chat feature on this page to find out if you qualify to join the countless women pursuing legal action through the Depo-Provera Litigation.
A brain tumor diagnosis can drastically alter a woman’s life, leading to debilitating symptoms, invasive medical treatments, and lasting neurological damage that affects daily functioning, employment, and overall well-being.
Studies now show that prolonged use of the contraceptive drug Depo-Provera is linked to a significantly increased risk of developing intracranial meningiomas, leaving many women facing unexpected and life-changing health consequences.
Our lawyers are here to help those affected seek justice, hold Pfizer accountable, and pursue the compensation they deserve for the harm caused by this dangerous drug.
Reach out to us today.
Depo-Provera (medroxyprogesterone acetate) is a long-acting progestin contraceptive injection developed by Upjohn, a pharmaceutical company that later became part of Pfizer.
Originally formulated in the 1950s, medroxyprogesterone acetate was initially studied for potential use in treating endometrial and renal cancers due to its anti-proliferative effects on hormone-sensitive tissues.
However, researchers quickly recognized its ability to suppress ovulation and prevent pregnancy by inhibiting gonadotropin secretion, leading Upjohn to explore its use as a contraceptive.
Upjohn first sought U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for Depo-Provera as a contraceptive in the late 1960s, but the request was denied due to concerns about potential long-term health risks.
The primary reason for rejection was animal studies showing a link between medroxyprogesterone acetate and an increased risk of breast and endometrial cancers.
Despite these concerns, Depo-Provera gained approval in several international markets, including France in 1969 and later in developing countries, where it was widely promoted for population control efforts.
Upjohn continued pushing for U.S. approval throughout the 1970s, filing additional applications with the FDA in 1978 and 1983.
Each time, the FDA rejected the drug due to safety concerns, particularly over its potential carcinogenic effects and the risk of bone density loss.
However, in 1992—under mounting pressure from global health organizations and with additional safety studies in hand—the FDA finally approved Depo-Provera as an injectable contraceptive in the U.S.
The approval was controversial, as lingering concerns remained regarding its long-term safety profile, particularly for younger women who might use the drug for extended periods.
Depo-Provera became widely used due to its effectiveness and convenience, requiring only one injection every three months to prevent pregnancy.
By the early 2000s, millions of women worldwide were using Depo-Provera, with many health providers prescribing it as a first-line contraceptive option.
However, post-market surveillance studies and long-term clinical research began raising concerns about the drug’s safety.
In particular, studies linked Depo-Provera to significant bone mineral density loss, leading the FDA to issue a black box warning in 2004 cautioning against prolonged use beyond two years.
Further concerns emerged regarding its neurological and endocrine effects, particularly its influence on progesterone receptors in the brain.
While the drug was primarily marketed for contraception, it was also prescribed off-label for conditions such as endometriosis and menstrual suppression.
However, scientific research began drawing attention to the potential for high-dose progestins, like medroxyprogesterone acetate, to contribute to abnormal cell growth in hormone-sensitive tissues—including the meninges, the protective membranes surrounding the brain and spinal cord.
A groundbreaking study published in The British Medical Journal (BMJ) in March 2024 has revealed compelling evidence that prolonged Depo-Provera usage significantly increases the risk of developing intracranial meningiomas—tumors that form on the protective membranes surrounding the brain and spinal cord.
This study is one of the most comprehensive investigations to date examining the correlation between synthetic progestins and meningioma development, providing a statistical risk assessment that has fueled growing legal scrutiny and regulatory concerns surrounding Depo-Provera.
The BMJ study analyzed extensive patient data sourced from the French National Health Data System, a robust and centralized database tracking medical histories, prescription records, and health outcomes.
Researchers identified over 18,000 cases of women who had undergone surgery for meningiomas and compared their medical records with 90,000 control subjects to assess differences in contraceptive use.
The study focused specifically on women who had used synthetic progestins, including medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), the active ingredient in Depo-Provera.
Key risk factors—including age, duration of contraceptive use, and cumulative exposure to high-dose progestins—were carefully analyzed.
The findings demonstrated a direct dose-response relationship between prolonged Depo-Provera use and an increased likelihood of developing meningiomas, meaning that the longer a woman used the Depo shot, the higher her risk of developing a brain tumor.
Key Findings from the 2024 BMJ Study:
The BMJ study has sent shockwaves through the medical and legal communities, reinforcing long-held suspicions that Depo-Provera’s high-dose progestin formulation may pose serious health risks.
The 550% increased risk of meningiomas is an alarmingly high statistic that raises concerns about whether Pfizer failed to warn consumers and medical professionals despite mounting evidence of potential harm.
From a legal standpoint, the study provides critical scientific evidence that strengthens the claims of plaintiffs filing Depo-Provera Lawsuits.
The risk ratio is well beyond what is typically required to establish causation in pharmaceutical litigation, meaning that this research will likely play a central role in multidistrict litigation (MDL) proceedings.
On the medical front, this study raises serious concerns about how Depo-Provera should be prescribed moving forward.
Many experts now believe that healthcare providers should reconsider prescribing Depo-Provera for long-term contraception—especially given that Pfizer also manufactures a lower-dose alternative, Depo-SubQ Provera 104, which has not been associated with the same increased brain tumor risk.
Despite the BMJ study’s clear findings, Pfizer has yet to update Depo-Provera’s U.S. labeling to reflect the increased risk of meningiomas.
The company has stated that it is “reviewing emerging data” but has not taken proactive steps to warn consumers or restrict long-term prescribing of the drug.
The results of this study, combined with Pfizer’s failure to act, have bolstered legal arguments for negligence, defective drug design, and failure to warn.
As more lawsuits are filed, plaintiffs will argue that Pfizer prioritized profit over patient safety, failed to provide adequate warnings, and ignored scientific evidence that should have prompted label updates and patient warnings years ago.
The BMJ study will likely be a defining piece of evidence in the Depo-Provera MDL.
Long-term Depo-Provera usage has been linked to an heightened risk of developing brain tumors.
To qualify for a legal claim, Depo-Provera users must have received multiple injections of the contraceptive shot and later been diagnosed with an intracranial meningioma or another brain tumor.
Most attorneys handling these cases are focusing on women who have had at least two Depo-Provera injections due to the cumulative exposure risks outlined in the 2024 BMJ study.
In addition to a confirmed brain tumor diagnosis, qualifying claimants should have medical records showing their Depo-Provera usage and documentation of their tumor diagnosis, treatment history, and related health complications.
An experienced attorney will review individual medical histories to determine whether a strong case can be built based on duration of use, severity of health effects, and financial damages incurred.
Women who have suffered vision impairment, neurological complications, cognitive issues, or other life-altering effects due to a meningioma diagnosis may have stronger claims for compensation.
Family members of patients who have passed away due to Depo-Provera-related tumors may also be eligible to file a wrongful death lawsuit on behalf of their loved one.
If you or a loved one has developed a brain tumor after using Depo-Provera, contact TorHoerman Law today to discuss your eligibility for the Depo-Provera Lawsuit.
You can also use the chat feature on this page to find out if you qualify for the Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuit instantly.
Our legal team is actively investigating claims, gathering medical evidence, and fighting for justice on behalf of affected women.
Proving that Depo-Provera caused serious health complications requires strong medical and factual evidence.
Women filing claims must provide documentation that connects their use of the contraceptive shot to their brain tumor diagnosis and resulting medical treatment.
This includes records of medical appointments, imaging scans, and any prescribed treatments such as radiation or surgery.
In cases where plaintiffs have developed inoperable brain tumors, long-term monitoring and ongoing care must also be considered as part of the claim.
Additionally, lawsuits seek compensation for medical expenses related to diagnosis, treatment, and any necessary future care.
Gathering the right evidence is crucial for building a strong claim, and our legal team can assist in obtaining the necessary documentation.
Key pieces of evidence in a Depo-Provera Lawsuit include:
Our attorneys will help you gather and retain evidence to build a strong case and pursue the compensation you deserve.
Damages in a lawsuit refer to the compensation sought by victims for the harm they have suffered due to negligence or misconduct.
In the Depo-Provera Lawsuit, damages cover both economic and non-economic losses tied to the brain tumor linked to prolonged use of the birth control shot.
Plaintiffs who developed meningiomas or other severe health conditions after taking Depo-Provera may be entitled to financial recovery for their medical costs, lost wages, and the lasting impact on their quality of life.
Many of the women pursuing legal action used Depo-Provera as long-term birth control, unaware of the serious risks posed by high-dose progestin exposure.
Beyond the financial strain of treatment, they often experience emotional distress, cognitive impairments, and life-altering physical symptoms.
If successful, Depo-Provera settlements will likely address the full scope of damages, helping victims recover the financial, physical, and emotional losses they have endured.
Damages in a Depo-Provera Lawsuit may include:
Our attorneys will help calculate the full extent of your damages and fight for maximum compensation to ensure that you receive justice for the harm caused by taking Depo-Provera.
For years, Pfizer and other pharmaceutical companies have profited from recommending Depo-Provera as a safe and effective contraceptive, despite growing evidence of serious health risks.
Women who developed intracranial meningiomas and other brain tumors after prolonged use of Depo-Provera are now stepping forward to demand accountability.
At TorHoerman Law, we are committed to representing these victims and fighting for the compensation they deserve.
Our firm understands the life-altering impact that a brain tumor diagnosis can have on your health, financial stability, and overall well-being.
We believe that no one should suffer because a drug manufacturer failed to provide adequate warnings about its product’s risks.
By taking legal action, you can help hold Pfizer accountable and seek justice for the harm caused by recommending Depo-Provera without sufficient safety warnings.
If you or a loved one used Depo-Provera and were later diagnosed with a brain tumor, you may qualify for compensation.
Our legal team will handle every aspect of your case, from gathering medical evidence to negotiating potential Depo-Provera settlements.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and learn more about your legal options.
No, there is currently no class action lawsuit for brain tumors resulting from Depo-Provera use.
However, efforts are underway to consolidate individual lawsuits into a multidistrict litigation (MDL).
In late 2024, plaintiffs filed a motion with the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to centralize existing Depo-Provera lawsuits in the Northern District of California.
This motion aims to streamline pretrial proceedings and improve efficiency, given the common factual questions among the cases.
An MDL differs from a class action in that each plaintiff maintains an individual lawsuit, allowing for personalized consideration of damages and circumstances.
In contrast, a class action combines all plaintiffs into a single lawsuit, which may not account for individual differences in damages.
The proposed MDL for Depo-Provera cases is currently under review, and lawyers are advocating for cases to be sent to California federal court.
Brain tumors linked to taking Depo-Provera can cause a range of symptoms, often worsening over time as the tumor grows and presses on surrounding brain tissue.
Many of these tumors, such as meningiomas, are influenced by hormone receptors, meaning they may be exacerbated by long-term exposure to synthetic hormones like those in hormone replacement therapy or intramuscular injection contraceptives like Depo-Provera.
Common warning signs include severe headaches, cognitive issues, and vision changes, with some women also experiencing chronic headaches and unexplained weight gain.
Symptoms of brain tumors potentially linked to Depo-Provera include:
If you have experienced these symptoms and have a history of using Depo-Provera injections, it is important to consult a doctor and explore your legal options.
The time limit for filing a Depo-Provera lawsuit depends on the statute of limitations in your state. In most states, personal injury lawsuits, including those involving dangerous drugs, must be filed within two to three years from the date of injury or when the plaintiff reasonably should have discovered the injury.
However, many Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuits will likely rely on the discovery rule, which extends the deadline based on when a person became aware that taking Depo-Provera may have caused their brain tumor.
Because these cases are being consolidated into a multidistrict litigation (MDL), deadlines may also be influenced by pretrial proceedings in the California federal court where consolidation is being considered.
If you or a loved one were diagnosed with a brain tumor linked to long-term Depo-Provera use, it is critical to consult a Depo-Provera lawyer as soon as possible.
Missing the deadline could bar you from seeking compensation for medical costs, emotional distress, and other damages.
Yes, you may still be eligible to file a claim if you used a generic version of Depo-Provera.
In many cases, lawsuits target brand-name manufacturers when they are responsible for the drug’s design, labeling, and warnings, even if a patient used the generic equivalent.
Pfizer, the manufacturer of brand-name Depo-Provera, is being sued for failing to warn about the increased risk of intracranial meningiomas linked to the hormone receptors affected by the drug.
Some legal arguments may also involve Pfizer’s connection to authorized generics, which means even users of generic Depo-Provera injections may have a case.
If you received intramuscular injections of a generic version of Depo-Provera and later developed a brain tumor, you should speak with a Depo-Provera lawyer to explore your legal options.
Getting started with a Depo-Provera Lawsuit begins with determining your eligibility and gathering essential medical information.
If you have been diagnosed with a brain tumor, such as an intracranial meningioma, after taking Depo-Provera, you may qualify to file a claim.
The next step is to consult an experienced Depo-Provera attorney who can evaluate your case, explain the legal process, and help you understand what compensation you may be entitled to receive.
At TorHoerman Law, our legal team is dedicated to helping victims of dangerous drugs seek justice and financial compensation.
We will handle every aspect of your case, including gathering medical records, proving that Depo-Provera caused your condition, and pursuing compensation for medical costs, lost wages, and emotional distress.
Our firm provides free consultations, and we work on a contingency fee basis, meaning you pay nothing unless we win your case.
To begin your Depo-Provera lawsuit, contact TorHoerman Law today for a free case evaluation.
Our team is ready to answer your questions and guide you through the legal process so you can focus on your health and recovery.
As of now, specific settlement amounts for Depo-Provera Lawsuits have not been established, as the litigation is still in its early stages.
However, legal experts anticipate that individual settlements could range from $100,000 to $500,000 or more, depending on various factors.
Key considerations that may influence the settlement amounts include:
It’s important to note that these figures are projections, and actual settlement amounts will depend on the specifics of each case.
If you or a loved one has developed a brain tumor after using Depo-Provera, consulting with an experienced attorney can provide more personalized information regarding potential compensation.
Owner & Attorney - TorHoerman Law
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
In this case, we obtained a verdict of $495 Million for our client’s child who was diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis after consuming baby formula manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $20 Million for our client after they suffered a Toxic Tort Injury due to chemical exposure.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $103.8 Million for our client after they suffered a COX-2 Inhibitors Injury.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $4 Million for our client after they suffered a Traumatic Brain Injury while at daycare.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $2.8 Million for our client after they suffered an injury due to a Defective Heart Device.
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
You can learn more about the Depo-Provera Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
They helped my elderly uncle receive compensation for the loss of his wife who was administered a dangerous drug. He consulted with this firm because of my personal recommendation and was very pleased with the compassion, attention to detail and response he received. Definitely recommend this firm for their 5 star service.
When I wanted to join the Xarelto class action lawsuit, I chose TorrHoerman Law from a search of a dozen or so law firm websites. I was impressed with the clarity of the information they presented. I gave them a call, and was again impressed, this time with the quality of our interactions.
TorHoerman Law is an awesome firm to represent anyone that has been involved in a case that someone has stated that it's too difficult to win. The entire firm makes you feel like you’re part of the family, Tor, Eric, Jake, Kristie, Chad, Tyler, Kathy and Steven are the best at what they do.
TorHorman Law is awesome
I can’t say enough how grateful I was to have TorHoerman Law help with my case. Jacob Plattenberger is very knowledgeable and an amazing lawyer. Jillian Pileczka was so patient and kind, helping me with questions that would come up. Even making sure my special needs were taken care of for meetings.
TorHoerman Law fights for justice with their hardworking and dedicated staff. Not only do they help their clients achieve positive outcomes, but they are also generous and important pillars of the community with their outreach and local support. Thank you THL!
Hands down one of the greatest group of people I had the pleasure of dealing with!
A very kind and professional staff.
Very positive experience. Would recommend them to anyone.
A very respectful firm.
Edwardsville, IL
Chicago, IL
St. Louis, MO
Clayton, MO
Naperville, IL