If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced Chicago personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation Chicago personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in Chicago, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced Chicago auto accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in Chicago, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our Chicago truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in Chicago or the greater Chicagoland area – you may be eligible to file a Chicago motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Chicago motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in Chicago at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file a Chicago bike accident lawsuit.
Contact a Chicago bicycle accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
Chicago is one of the nation’s largest construction centers.
Thousands of men and women work on sites across the city and metropolitan area on tasks ranging from skilled trades to administrative operations.
Unfortunately, construction site accidents are fairly common.
Contact TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options with an experienced Chicago construction accident lawyer, free of charge and no obligation required.
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced Chicago nursing home abuse attorney from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of Chicago, or the greater Chicagoland area, and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact a Chicago wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in Chicago you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact a Chicago slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact a Chicago daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced Edwardsville personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation Edwardsville personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in Edwardsville, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville car accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in Edwardsville, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our Edwardsville truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in Edwardsville – you may be eligible to file an Edwardsville motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in Edwardsville at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file an Edwardsville bike accident lawsuit.
Contact an Edwardsville bicycle accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville nursing home abuse attorney from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of Edwardsville and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact an Edwardsville wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in Edwardsville you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact an Edwardsville slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact an Edwardsville daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
If you or a loved one suffered injuries on someone else’s property in Edwardsville IL, you may be entitled to financial compensation.
If property owners fail to keep their premises safe, and their negligence leads to injuries, property damages or other losses as a result of an accident or incident, a premises liability lawsuit may be possible.
Contact an Edwardsville premises liability lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation case consultation.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced St. Louis personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation St. Louis personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in St. Louis, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced St. Louis auto accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in St. Louis, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our St. Louis truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in St. Louis or the greater St. Louis area – you may be eligible to file a St. Louis motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced St. Louis motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in St. Louis at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file a St. Louis bike accident lawsuit.
Contact a St. Louis bicycle accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
St. Louis is one of the nation’s largest construction centers.
Thousands of men and women work on sites across the city and metropolitan area on tasks ranging from skilled trades to administrative operations.
Unfortunately, construction site accidents are fairly common.
Contact TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options with an experienced St. Louis construction accident lawyer, free of charge and no obligation required.
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced St. Louis nursing home abuse attorney from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of St. Louis, or the greater St. Louis area, and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact a St. Louis wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in St. Louis you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact a St. Louis slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact a St. Louis daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
Suboxone, a medication often used to treat opioid use disorder (OUD), has become a vital tool which offers a safer and more controlled approach to managing opioid addiction.
Despite its widespread use, Suboxone has been linked to severe tooth decay and dental injuries.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuits claim that the companies failed to warn about the risks of tooth decay and other dental injuries associated with Suboxone sublingual films.
Depo-Provera, a contraceptive injection, has been linked to an increased risk of developing brain tumors (including glioblastoma and meningioma).
Women who have used Depo-Provera and subsequently been diagnosed with brain tumors are filing lawsuits against Pfizer (the manufacturer), alleging that the company failed to adequately warn about the risks associated with the drug.
Despite the claims, Pfizer maintains that Depo-Provera is safe and effective, citing FDA approval and arguing that the scientific evidence does not support a causal link between the drug and brain tumors.
You may be eligible to file a Depo Provera Lawsuit if you used Depo-Provera and were diagnosed with a brain tumor.
Tepezza, approved by the FDA in 2020, is used to treat Thyroid Eye Disease (TED), but some patients have reported hearing issues after its use.
The Tepezza lawsuit claims that Horizon Therapeutics failed to warn patients about the potential risks and side effects of the drug, leading to hearing loss and other problems, such as tinnitus.
You may be eligible to file a Tepezza Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Tepezza and subsequently suffered permanent hearing loss or tinnitus.
Elmiron, a drug prescribed for interstitial cystitis, has been linked to serious eye damage and vision problems in scientific studies.
Thousands of Elmiron Lawsuits have been filed against Janssen Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturer, alleging that the company failed to warn patients about the potential risks.
You may be eligible to file an Elmiron Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Elmiron and subsequently suffered vision loss, blindness, or any other eye injury linked to the prescription drug.
The chemotherapy drug Taxotere, commonly used for breast cancer treatment, has been linked to severe eye injuries, permanent vision loss, and permanent hair loss.
Taxotere Lawsuits are being filed by breast cancer patients and others who have taken the chemotherapy drug and subsequently developed vision problems.
If you or a loved one used Taxotere and subsequently developed vision damage or other related medical problems, you may be eligible to file a Taxotere Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Although pressure cookers were designed to be safe and easy to use, a number of these devices have been found to have a defect that can lead to excessive buildup of internal pressure.
The excessive pressure may result in an explosion that puts users at risk of serious injuries such as burns, lacerations, an even electrocution.
If your pressure cooker exploded and caused substantial burn injuries or other serious injuries, you may be eligible to file a Pressure Cooker Lawsuit and secure financial compensation for your injuries and damages.
Several studies have found a correlation between heavy social media use and mental health challenges, especially among younger users.
Social media harm lawsuits claim that social media companies are responsible for onsetting or heightening mental health problems, eating disorders, mood disorders, and other negative experiences of teens and children
You may be eligible to file a Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit if you are the parents of a teen, or teens, who attribute their use of social media platforms to their mental health problems.
The Paragard IUD, a non-hormonal birth control device, has been linked to serious complications, including device breakage during removal.
Numerous lawsuits have been filed against Teva Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturer of Paragard, alleging that the company failed to warn about the potential risks.
If you or a loved one used a Paragard IUD and subsequently suffered complications and/or injuries, you may qualify for a Paragard Lawsuit.
Patients with the PowerPort devices may possibly be at a higher risk of serious complications or injury due to a catheter failure, according to lawsuits filed against the manufacturers of the Bard PowerPort Device.
If you or a loved one have been injured by a Bard PowerPort Device, you may be eligible to file a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products for injuries, pain and suffering, and financial costs related to complications and injuries of these medical devices.
Over 100,000 Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits have been filed on behalf of women injured by vaginal mesh and pelvic mesh products.
If you or a loved one have suffered serious complications or injuries from vaginal mesh, you may be eligible to file a Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit.
Parents and guardians are filing lawsuits against major video game companies (including Epic Games, Activision Blizzard, and Microsoft), alleging that they intentionally designed their games to be addictive — leading to severe mental and physical health issues in minors.
The lawsuits claim that these companies used psychological tactics and manipulative game designs to keep players engaged for extended periods — causing problems such as anxiety, depression, and social withdrawal.
You may be eligible to file a Video Game Addiction Lawsuit if your child has been diagnosed with gaming addiction or has experienced negative effects from excessive gaming.
Above ground pool accidents have led to lawsuits against manufacturers due to defective restraining belts that pose serious safety risks to children.
These belts, designed to provide structural stability, can inadvertently act as footholds, allowing children to climb into the pool unsupervised, increasing the risk of drownings and injuries.
Parents and guardians are filing lawsuits against pool manufacturers, alleging that the defective design has caused severe injuries and deaths.
If your child was injured or drowned in an above ground pool accident involving a defective restraining belt, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.
Recent scientific studies have found that the use of chemical hair straightening products, hair relaxers, and other hair products present an increased risk of uterine cancer, endometrial cancer, breast cancer, and other health problems.
Legal action is being taken against manufacturers and producers of these hair products for their failure to properly warn consumers of potential health risks.
You may be eligible to file a Hair Straightener Cancer Lawsuit if you or a loved one used chemical hair straighteners, hair relaxers, or other similar hair products, and subsequently were diagnosed with:
AFFF (Aqueous Film Forming Foam) is a firefighting foam that has been linked to various health issues, including cancer, due to its PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) content.
Numerous AFFF Lawsuits have been filed against AFFF manufacturers, alleging that they knew about the health risks but failed to warn the public.
AFFF Firefighting Foam lawsuits aim to hold manufacturers accountable for putting peoples’ health at risk.
You may be eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit if you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer.
Paraquat, a widely-used herbicide, has been linked to Parkinson’s disease, leading to numerous Paraquat Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits against its manufacturers for failing to warn about the risks of chronic exposure.
Due to its toxicity, the EPA has restricted the use of Paraquat and it is currently banned in over 30 countries.
You may be eligible to file a Paraquat Lawsuit if you or a loved one were exposed to Paraquat and subsequently diagnosed with Parkinson’s Disease or other related health conditions.
Mesothelioma is an aggressive form of cancer primarily caused by exposure to asbestos.
Asbestos trust funds were established in the 1970s to compensate workers harmed by asbestos-containing products.
These funds are designed to pay out claims to those who developed mesothelioma or other asbestos-related diseases due to exposure.
Those exposed to asbestos and diagnosed with mesothelioma may be eligible to file a Mesothelioma Lawsuit.
Studies have found a link between toxic baby formula and Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) — a severe intestinal condition in premature infants.
Parents and guardians are filing NEC Lawsuits against baby formula manufacturers, alleging that the formulas contain harmful ingredients leading to NEC.
Despite the claims, Abbott and Mead Johnson deny the allegations, arguing that their products are thoroughly researched and dismissing the scientific evidence linking their formulas to NEC, while the FDA issued a warning to Abbott regarding safety concerns of a formula product.
You may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit if your child received baby bovine-based (cow’s milk) baby formula in the maternity ward or NICU of a hospital and was subsequently diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC).
PFAS contamination lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers and suppliers of PFAS chemicals, alleging that these substances have contaminated water sources and products, leading to severe health issues.
Plaintiffs claim that prolonged exposure to PFAS through contaminated drinking water and products has caused cancers, thyroid disease, and other health problems.
The lawsuits target companies like 3M, DuPont, and Chemours, accusing them of knowingly contaminating the environment with PFAS and failing to warn about the risks.
If you or a loved one has been exposed to PFAS-contaminated water or products and has developed health issues, you may be eligible to file a PFAS lawsuit.
The Roundup Lawsuit claims that Monsanto’s popular weed killer, Roundup, causes cancer.
Numerous studies have linked the main ingredient, glyphosate, to Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, Leukemia, and other Lymphatic cancers.
Despite this, Monsanto continues to deny these claims.
Victims of Roundup exposure who developed cancer are filing Roundup Lawsuits against Monsanto, seeking compensation for medical expenses, pain, and suffering.
Our firm is about people. That is our motto and that will always be our reality.
We do our best to get to know our clients, understand their situations, and get them the compensation they deserve.
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Without our team, we would’nt be able to provide our clients with anything close to the level of service they receive when they work with us.
The THL Team commits to the sincere belief that those injured by the misconduct of others, especially large corporate profit mongers, deserve justice for their injuries.
Our team is what has made TorHoerman Law a very special place since 2009.
Use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Above-Ground Swimming Pool Lawsuit Claim.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
On this page, we’ll provide an overview of Above-Ground Pool Barrier Requirements, investigations into defective aboveground pools, how parents can keep their children safe around an above ground swimming pool, and much more.
As more families file lawsuits for above-ground pool accidents, questions about compliance surface.
In particular, more and more pool owners and concerned families are posing questions on whether or not backyard pool manufacturers follow regulations to keep their inflatable pools safe from unrestricted access.
The lawsuits and growing number of accidents underscore the need for above-ground pool safety requirements.
These requirements vary from one state to another and govern every aspect of inflatable, above-ground, and kiddie pools, from their dimensions to the materials comprising their support bands.
Local jurisdictions may also have specific guidance on above ground pool safety.
Above ground pools, while popular for family recreation, require stringent safety measures and manufacturers may face liability for any defective designs that pose a risk, especially to children.
Our law firm is currently investigating defects present in certain aboveground pools, specifically the use of support bands that can be used as a foothold by children to enter the pool without supervision.
If your child was injured or tragically passed away due to the design flaws present in certain above ground swimming pools, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.
Find out if you qualify for a lawsuit. Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the above-ground swimming pool accident lawsuit instantly.
Above-ground pools come in various designs and dimensions.
Nevertheless, certain above ground swimming pools contain design flaws that may have been overlooked during the manufacturing and quality assurance stages.
Here are some of the design flaws and safety risks that are inherent to above-ground pools:
Inflatable pools often consist of flexible materials that enable pools to expand to accommodate volumes of water.
Unfortunately, these materials are prone to damage from sharp objects, leading to punctures or tears.
Even minor damage compromises the pool’s stability and can cause rapid deflation.
Sudden deflation can potentially result in accidents, especially if small children are present.
Unlike in-ground pools, inflatable pools typically lack designated entry points with secure barriers.
This absence of defined access points increases the risk of unsupervised entry, particularly by curious children or pets.
Due to the absence of safe ladders and entry points, unsuspecting children become more vulnerable to submersion incidents like drowning.
When not installed or positioned correctly on level ground, most inflatable pools lack stability.
This instability heightens the risk of the pool tipping over, potentially causing injuries or even submersion incidents, especially for younger users.
To offset instabilities, manufacturers have resorted to outfitting their portable pools with support barriers.
These help retain the shape of an entire pool, keeping it stable and safe.
Unfortunately, the barriers become another design flaw that has caused numerous drowning accidents in recent years.
Support bands in some above ground pools, intended to maintain structural integrity, can inadvertently serve as footholds for children, enabling them to climb into the pool unsupervised.
This design flaw significantly elevates the risk of accidental drownings, as young children may gain easy access to the pool water without adult supervision.
The presence of these bands, therefore, not only poses a serious safety hazard but also places a heightened responsibility on manufacturers to ensure their pool designs prioritize child safety.
Overcrowding is a concern, particularly with smaller kiddie pools.
Smaller inflatable pools might inadvertently encourage overcrowding, surpassing their intended capacity.
This overcrowding heightens the risk of collisions among users, increasing the likelihood of accidents and making it more challenging to maintain proper supervision.
Inflatable pool manufacturers may not consistently provide comprehensive warning labels regarding potential risks and necessary safety precautions.
This lack of clear, standardized warnings can result in users being unaware of the inherent dangers associated with these pools, inadvertently increasing the likelihood of accidents.
The lack of clear warning labels is one of the oversights that might render manufacturers liable.
Unlike an in-ground pool, an inflatable pool could lack essential safety features, such as non-slip surfaces or easily accessible emergency steps.
The absence of these features heightens the risk of accidents, especially slips and falls, and may contribute to entrapment incidents.
To minimize above-ground swimming pool accidents, the Consumer Product Safety Commission released a booklet containing guidelines for pool safety.
The 20-page booklet covers above and in-ground swimming pool guidelines.
The guidelines for above-ground pools include:
The CPSC underscores the importance of establishing precise barrier standards for above-ground pools.
According to these guidelines, the maximum clearance at the bottom of any pool barrier should not exceed four inches above the surface or ground, particularly when measured on the side of the barrier facing away from the pool.
Also, the industry recommendation specifies that if the bottom of the gate or fence rests on a non-solid surface, such as grass or gravel, the maximum clearance should be further limited to not exceed two inches.
This adjustment accounts for the variation in surface types to ensure a consistent and secure barrier, regardless of the ground conditions.
Methods to deter unauthorized entry include designing steps or ladders that are secured, locked, or removable.
Also, surrounding these access points with specified barriers, as outlined in the guidelines, is recommended to effectively discourage climbing into the pool area.
By limiting access, pool owners can prevent young children from accessing the pool area, protecting them from serious injuries and accidents.
To prevent unauthorized access underneath the pool barrier, guidelines state that the maximum clearance at the bottom of the barrier should not exceed four inches above the surface or ground away from the pool.
Further specifications are provided for barriers on non-solid surfaces.
Guidelines emphasize the importance of all openings being small enough to prevent a four-inch diameter sphere from passing through.
This restriction is crucial to prevent children from passing through the barrier.
Also, the measurements ensure that the gaps would be too small to be used as a foothold.
Lastly, the CPSC guidelines have additional precautionary measures.
According to the manual, added measures include fencing, covering, emptying, or storing pools when not in use.
Besides safety measures, the CPSC also encourages pool owners to educate others about the presence of safety hazards.
Doing so is crucial to prevent accidents, injuries, and drowning.
While the CPSC has set guidelines that apply in multiple states, regulations concerning above-ground pool safety barriers vary significantly across different states in the U.S.
These regulations are often dictated at the state level and can differ in their specifics, including barrier height, material requirements, and specifications for access points.
While most states follow the guidelines set by the CPSC, here are some states that have slightly different safety regulations:
Other states were not included in the list because their safety guidelines apply to in-ground pools and public swimming pools.
Other states not mentioned in the list allowed local counties to develop and enforce safety barrier guidelines within their respective jurisdictions.
The guidelines for above-ground pools in California are contained within the 2022 California Residential Code.
According to the Residential Code, the safety barrier must follow the guidelines set by the CPSC.
However, the Residential Code differs in its guidelines for self-latching gates and alarms.
According to the Residential Code, a self-latching device for restricting pool access must be no lower than 54 inches above the floor.
Also, the latch must be accompanied by an alarm that emits either a noise or verbal warning that the pool area has been accessed.
The Texas Health and Safety Code is more flexible in its safety barrier requirements.
However, according to the Health and Safety Code, all pool owners must have self-closing gates, whether they own in-ground pools or above-ground swimming pools.
Besides the self-latching gates, the Texas Health and Safety Code also requires the gates’ latches to be no lower than 42 inches above the ground.
In New York, the dimensions of safety barriers are in the 2020 Property Maintenance Code.
The Code requires safety barriers of above-ground pools to be at least 48 inches high.
The Code also allows alternative barriers as long as they meet the following requirements:
Washington State’s Department of Health also has guidelines for safety barriers.
The barriers of inflatable or above-ground swimming pools must be at least 48 inches high to prevent access by children.
The top of the barrier must be unreachable to children.
There must also be a self-closing latch that is high enough to be inaccessible to children.
The safety barrier guidelines in Arizona are contained within Arizona Legislature 36-1681.
According to the legislature, safety barriers for above-ground residential pools must be five feet high. As in other states, there must be self-closing gates for limiting pool access.
In Connecticut, safety barriers must also be 48 inches or four feet above ground.
However, the guidelines in the state indicate that if there’s any difference between ground levels, the barrier must be measured on the side that’s highest above the above-ground pool.
The Code of Virginia outlines several criteria for safety barriers.
According to the Code, safety barriers must have a minimum height of four feet.
The clearance between the bottom of the barrier and the ground should be no more than two inches to prevent access.
Besides the dimensions of safety barriers, the Code also outlines guidelines for the distance between the barrier and the pool.
According to the Code, barriers should be five feet away from the edge of the pool.
Based on the New Jersey Construction Code, safety barriers must be at least four feet high and be a mesh or chain link fence.
The gaps between the meshing or links must be small enough to prevent a four-inch sphere or object from passing through.
Also, the Construction Code mentions what to do in the event of back-to-back barriers.
According to the Code, barriers should be apart from neighboring barriers.
If the situation is unavoidable, the neighboring barriers should not be climbable from either side.
Illinois’s safety guidelines cover all types of pool facilities.
The one that contains safety barrier guidelines for residential above-ground pools is the Private Swimming Pool Enclosure Act.
Per the Act, safety barriers for above-ground pools must be at least 3.5 feet high.
For pools that are already 3.5 feet, the barriers must be higher.
Also, the barriers must fully enclose pools.
The barriers must have no large gaps or holes that can be used as footholds.
The barriers must also be accessible through just one entry point.
Iowa’s Administrative Code contains safety barrier guidelines that follow those set by the CPSC.
Besides the dimensions mentioned in the CPSC, the Administrative Code also requires all barriers to consist of durable materials.
The Administrative Code identifies several materials deemed “durable.”
Among these materials are chain links and mesh.
Two materials not included in the list were nylon and rubber as these materials are inherently bendable and pose safety risks.
Safety barrier guidelines in Kentucky are in the Kentucky Building Code.
The Code requires safety barriers for all residential pools — both in-ground and above-ground pools — to be at least four feet high.
Also, self-closing latches must be the same height as the safety barrier.
The Kentucky Building Code also has weight-bearing standards for above-pool safety barriers.
According to the Building Code, safety barriers must be able to withstand at least 200 pounds.
Maine’s Revised Statutes require private pools to be surrounded by safety barriers with self-closing latches to limit pool access.
However, pools that are two feet or lower when filled up are exempted from having barriers.
When it comes to safety barriers, Maryland follows international and state guidelines like the 2012 International Building Code and CPSC safety barrier guidelines.
However, safety barrier guidelines change almost yearly in Maryland.
For this reason, above-ground pool owners must keep abreast with the local changes in safety barrier standards.
Pool barriers are among the most critical safety features of above-ground swimming pools.
These barriers keep young children from falling into the pool and sustaining severe injuries or drowning.
Due to the pivotal roles they play in pool safety, safety barriers must meet stringent standards.
Any failure to meet standards can lead to a severe injury or drowning incident.
Most importantly, failing to meet safety barrier standards represents a manufacturer’s negligence and oversight.
Negligence and oversight render manufacturers liable for any injuries or deaths from the design flaws of their products.
Safety barrier guidelines are more than boxes to tick off.
These guidelines are criteria that, when met, lead to a safer pool experience.
Everything from dimensions to the requirement of latches ensures that children who use the pool are protected from injuries and drowning.
The material standards with safety barrier guidelines ensure that these barriers and enclosures stay in place and keep children from unauthorized access to the pool.
The consequences of not meeting safety barrier standards are profound and potentially devastating.
Failure to adhere to these standards increases the inherent risks associated with pool areas.
Without adequate barriers, the likelihood of unintended entry rises substantially, amplifying the threat of accidents and injuries.
Non-compliance significantly heightens the risk of drowning incidents, submersion injuries, or other pool-related accidents.
Subpar barriers place individuals, especially children, in potentially life-threatening situations.
Manufacturers play a pivotal role in ensuring their pool designs align with and exceed safety standards.
Failing to comply with these critical safety benchmarks not only jeopardizes lives but also invites legal repercussions.
Non-compliance can lead to legal actions, including litigation, product recalls, or severe penalties.
Manufacturers carry the legal responsibility of guaranteeing their products meet stringent safety criteria to avert accidents and mitigate potential legal ramifications that could arise due to non-compliance.
Instances of legal action regarding above-ground pools highlight the serious implications of safety breaches.
These legal actions often emphasize the consequences of inadequate barriers or design flaws, revealing the potential dangers of non-compliant or defective pool structures.
One feature that has come under scrutiny is the support band.
In numerous above-ground pool products, support bands act as necessary structural enhancements.
Unfortunately, children can use these bands as an alternate foothold to gain pool access even when the ladder is removed or secured.
The CSPS has documented multiple accidents involving children using the support bands and falling victim to pool-related accidents.
If your or a loved one’s child accessed an above ground pool using this design flaw, and were subsequently injured or died, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit against the pool manufacturer.
Contact TorHoerman Law’s team of personal injury and product liability lawyers for a free consultation.
Numerous manufacturers contain the design choice of nylon or rubber support bands to enhance the structural integrity of the above ground pool.
Among these manufacturers are:
These companies are facing legal action due to the design flaws of their above-ground pools.
The design flaws involve the nylon and rubber support bands of their inflatable and above-ground pools.
The support bands have been used by young children as an alternate access point.
As a result, children have gained unauthorized access to the pools, with many either drowning or sustaining severe injuries.
Manufacturers have a duty to ensure the safety of their above-ground pool products.
If your child sustained injuries or drowned due to their poorly designed pools and safety bands, you need to take legal action with an experienced product liability attorney.
Find out if you’re eligible today.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
The main defect our law firm is investigating involves support bands in certain above ground pools.
These bands, meant to reinforce the pool’s structure, can be used by children as footholds to climb over the pool walls, leading to unsupervised access and increased drowning risks.
Support bands are dangerous because they can unintentionally provide a step-like feature for children.
This design flaw makes it easier for children, especially those too young to understand the risks, to climb into the pool without adult supervision, significantly increasing the risk of accidents and drownings.
Yes, if your child is injured due to a defective design in an above ground pool, such as the support band flaw, you may have grounds to file a product liability lawsuit.
These cases typically argue that the pool’s design was inherently dangerous and led to the injury.
In lawsuits concerning above ground pool injuries, damages can include medical expenses, pain and suffering, emotional distress, and in severe cases, wrongful death compensation.
The specifics depend on the nature of the injury and the extent of the impact on the child’s and the family’s life.
Owner & Attorney - TorHoerman Law
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
In this case, we obtained a verdict of $495 Million for our client’s child who was diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis after consuming baby formula manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $20 Million for our client after they suffered a Toxic Tort Injury due to chemical exposure.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $103.8 Million for our client after they suffered a COX-2 Inhibitors Injury.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $4 Million for our client after they suffered a Traumatic Brain Injury while at daycare.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $2.8 Million for our client after they suffered an injury due to a Defective Heart Device.
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
You can learn more about the Above Ground Pool Accident Lawsuits by visiting any of our pages listed below:
They helped my elderly uncle receive compensation for the loss of his wife who was administered a dangerous drug. He consulted with this firm because of my personal recommendation and was very pleased with the compassion, attention to detail and response he received. Definitely recommend this firm for their 5 star service.
When I wanted to join the Xarelto class action lawsuit, I chose TorrHoerman Law from a search of a dozen or so law firm websites. I was impressed with the clarity of the information they presented. I gave them a call, and was again impressed, this time with the quality of our interactions.
TorHoerman Law is an awesome firm to represent anyone that has been involved in a case that someone has stated that it's too difficult to win. The entire firm makes you feel like you’re part of the family, Tor, Eric, Jake, Kristie, Chad, Tyler, Kathy and Steven are the best at what they do.
TorHorman Law is awesome
I can’t say enough how grateful I was to have TorHoerman Law help with my case. Jacob Plattenberger is very knowledgeable and an amazing lawyer. Jillian Pileczka was so patient and kind, helping me with questions that would come up. Even making sure my special needs were taken care of for meetings.
TorHoerman Law fights for justice with their hardworking and dedicated staff. Not only do they help their clients achieve positive outcomes, but they are also generous and important pillars of the community with their outreach and local support. Thank you THL!
Hands down one of the greatest group of people I had the pleasure of dealing with!
A very kind and professional staff.
Very positive experience. Would recommend them to anyone.
A very respectful firm.
Edwardsville, IL
Chicago, IL
St. Louis, MO
Clayton, MO
Naperville, IL