If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced Chicago personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation Chicago personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in Chicago, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced Chicago auto accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in Chicago, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our Chicago truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in Chicago or the greater Chicagoland area – you may be eligible to file a Chicago motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Chicago motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in Chicago at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file a Chicago bike accident lawsuit.
Contact a Chicago bicycle accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
Chicago is one of the nation’s largest construction centers.
Thousands of men and women work on sites across the city and metropolitan area on tasks ranging from skilled trades to administrative operations.
Unfortunately, construction site accidents are fairly common.
Contact TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options with an experienced Chicago construction accident lawyer, free of charge and no obligation required.
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced Chicago nursing home abuse attorney from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of Chicago, or the greater Chicagoland area, and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact a Chicago wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in Chicago you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact a Chicago slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact a Chicago daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced Edwardsville personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation Edwardsville personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in Edwardsville, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville car accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in Edwardsville, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our Edwardsville truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in Edwardsville – you may be eligible to file an Edwardsville motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in Edwardsville at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file an Edwardsville bike accident lawsuit.
Contact an Edwardsville bicycle accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville nursing home abuse attorney from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of Edwardsville and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact an Edwardsville wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in Edwardsville you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact an Edwardsville slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact an Edwardsville daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
If you or a loved one suffered injuries on someone else’s property in Edwardsville IL, you may be entitled to financial compensation.
If property owners fail to keep their premises safe, and their negligence leads to injuries, property damages or other losses as a result of an accident or incident, a premises liability lawsuit may be possible.
Contact an Edwardsville premises liability lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation case consultation.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced St. Louis personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation St. Louis personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in St. Louis, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced St. Louis auto accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in St. Louis, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our St. Louis truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in St. Louis or the greater St. Louis area – you may be eligible to file a St. Louis motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced St. Louis motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in St. Louis at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file a St. Louis bike accident lawsuit.
Contact a St. Louis bicycle accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
St. Louis is one of the nation’s largest construction centers.
Thousands of men and women work on sites across the city and metropolitan area on tasks ranging from skilled trades to administrative operations.
Unfortunately, construction site accidents are fairly common.
Contact TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options with an experienced St. Louis construction accident lawyer, free of charge and no obligation required.
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced St. Louis nursing home abuse attorney from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of St. Louis, or the greater St. Louis area, and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact a St. Louis wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in St. Louis you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact a St. Louis slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact a St. Louis daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
Suboxone, a medication often used to treat opioid use disorder (OUD), has become a vital tool which offers a safer and more controlled approach to managing opioid addiction.
Despite its widespread use, Suboxone has been linked to severe tooth decay and dental injuries.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuits claim that the companies failed to warn about the risks of tooth decay and other dental injuries associated with Suboxone sublingual films.
Depo-Provera, a contraceptive injection, has been linked to an increased risk of developing brain tumors (including glioblastoma and meningioma).
Women who have used Depo-Provera and subsequently been diagnosed with brain tumors are filing lawsuits against Pfizer (the manufacturer), alleging that the company failed to adequately warn about the risks associated with the drug.
Despite the claims, Pfizer maintains that Depo-Provera is safe and effective, citing FDA approval and arguing that the scientific evidence does not support a causal link between the drug and brain tumors.
You may be eligible to file a Depo Provera Lawsuit if you used Depo-Provera and were diagnosed with a brain tumor.
Tepezza, approved by the FDA in 2020, is used to treat Thyroid Eye Disease (TED), but some patients have reported hearing issues after its use.
The Tepezza lawsuit claims that Horizon Therapeutics failed to warn patients about the potential risks and side effects of the drug, leading to hearing loss and other problems, such as tinnitus.
You may be eligible to file a Tepezza Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Tepezza and subsequently suffered permanent hearing loss or tinnitus.
Elmiron, a drug prescribed for interstitial cystitis, has been linked to serious eye damage and vision problems in scientific studies.
Thousands of Elmiron Lawsuits have been filed against Janssen Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturer, alleging that the company failed to warn patients about the potential risks.
You may be eligible to file an Elmiron Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Elmiron and subsequently suffered vision loss, blindness, or any other eye injury linked to the prescription drug.
The chemotherapy drug Taxotere, commonly used for breast cancer treatment, has been linked to severe eye injuries, permanent vision loss, and permanent hair loss.
Taxotere Lawsuits are being filed by breast cancer patients and others who have taken the chemotherapy drug and subsequently developed vision problems.
If you or a loved one used Taxotere and subsequently developed vision damage or other related medical problems, you may be eligible to file a Taxotere Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Although pressure cookers were designed to be safe and easy to use, a number of these devices have been found to have a defect that can lead to excessive buildup of internal pressure.
The excessive pressure may result in an explosion that puts users at risk of serious injuries such as burns, lacerations, an even electrocution.
If your pressure cooker exploded and caused substantial burn injuries or other serious injuries, you may be eligible to file a Pressure Cooker Lawsuit and secure financial compensation for your injuries and damages.
Several studies have found a correlation between heavy social media use and mental health challenges, especially among younger users.
Social media harm lawsuits claim that social media companies are responsible for onsetting or heightening mental health problems, eating disorders, mood disorders, and other negative experiences of teens and children
You may be eligible to file a Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit if you are the parents of a teen, or teens, who attribute their use of social media platforms to their mental health problems.
The Paragard IUD, a non-hormonal birth control device, has been linked to serious complications, including device breakage during removal.
Numerous lawsuits have been filed against Teva Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturer of Paragard, alleging that the company failed to warn about the potential risks.
If you or a loved one used a Paragard IUD and subsequently suffered complications and/or injuries, you may qualify for a Paragard Lawsuit.
Patients with the PowerPort devices may possibly be at a higher risk of serious complications or injury due to a catheter failure, according to lawsuits filed against the manufacturers of the Bard PowerPort Device.
If you or a loved one have been injured by a Bard PowerPort Device, you may be eligible to file a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products for injuries, pain and suffering, and financial costs related to complications and injuries of these medical devices.
Over 100,000 Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits have been filed on behalf of women injured by vaginal mesh and pelvic mesh products.
If you or a loved one have suffered serious complications or injuries from vaginal mesh, you may be eligible to file a Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit.
Parents and guardians are filing lawsuits against major video game companies (including Epic Games, Activision Blizzard, and Microsoft), alleging that they intentionally designed their games to be addictive — leading to severe mental and physical health issues in minors.
The lawsuits claim that these companies used psychological tactics and manipulative game designs to keep players engaged for extended periods — causing problems such as anxiety, depression, and social withdrawal.
You may be eligible to file a Video Game Addiction Lawsuit if your child has been diagnosed with gaming addiction or has experienced negative effects from excessive gaming.
Above ground pool accidents have led to lawsuits against manufacturers due to defective restraining belts that pose serious safety risks to children.
These belts, designed to provide structural stability, can inadvertently act as footholds, allowing children to climb into the pool unsupervised, increasing the risk of drownings and injuries.
Parents and guardians are filing lawsuits against pool manufacturers, alleging that the defective design has caused severe injuries and deaths.
If your child was injured or drowned in an above ground pool accident involving a defective restraining belt, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.
Recent scientific studies have found that the use of chemical hair straightening products, hair relaxers, and other hair products present an increased risk of uterine cancer, endometrial cancer, breast cancer, and other health problems.
Legal action is being taken against manufacturers and producers of these hair products for their failure to properly warn consumers of potential health risks.
You may be eligible to file a Hair Straightener Cancer Lawsuit if you or a loved one used chemical hair straighteners, hair relaxers, or other similar hair products, and subsequently were diagnosed with:
AFFF (Aqueous Film Forming Foam) is a firefighting foam that has been linked to various health issues, including cancer, due to its PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) content.
Numerous AFFF Lawsuits have been filed against AFFF manufacturers, alleging that they knew about the health risks but failed to warn the public.
AFFF Firefighting Foam lawsuits aim to hold manufacturers accountable for putting peoples’ health at risk.
You may be eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit if you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer.
Paraquat, a widely-used herbicide, has been linked to Parkinson’s disease, leading to numerous Paraquat Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits against its manufacturers for failing to warn about the risks of chronic exposure.
Due to its toxicity, the EPA has restricted the use of Paraquat and it is currently banned in over 30 countries.
You may be eligible to file a Paraquat Lawsuit if you or a loved one were exposed to Paraquat and subsequently diagnosed with Parkinson’s Disease or other related health conditions.
Mesothelioma is an aggressive form of cancer primarily caused by exposure to asbestos.
Asbestos trust funds were established in the 1970s to compensate workers harmed by asbestos-containing products.
These funds are designed to pay out claims to those who developed mesothelioma or other asbestos-related diseases due to exposure.
Those exposed to asbestos and diagnosed with mesothelioma may be eligible to file a Mesothelioma Lawsuit.
Studies have found a link between toxic baby formula and Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) — a severe intestinal condition in premature infants.
Parents and guardians are filing NEC Lawsuits against baby formula manufacturers, alleging that the formulas contain harmful ingredients leading to NEC.
Despite the claims, Abbott and Mead Johnson deny the allegations, arguing that their products are thoroughly researched and dismissing the scientific evidence linking their formulas to NEC, while the FDA issued a warning to Abbott regarding safety concerns of a formula product.
You may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit if your child received baby bovine-based (cow’s milk) baby formula in the maternity ward or NICU of a hospital and was subsequently diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC).
PFAS contamination lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers and suppliers of PFAS chemicals, alleging that these substances have contaminated water sources and products, leading to severe health issues.
Plaintiffs claim that prolonged exposure to PFAS through contaminated drinking water and products has caused cancers, thyroid disease, and other health problems.
The lawsuits target companies like 3M, DuPont, and Chemours, accusing them of knowingly contaminating the environment with PFAS and failing to warn about the risks.
If you or a loved one has been exposed to PFAS-contaminated water or products and has developed health issues, you may be eligible to file a PFAS lawsuit.
The Roundup Lawsuit claims that Monsanto’s popular weed killer, Roundup, causes cancer.
Numerous studies have linked the main ingredient, glyphosate, to Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, Leukemia, and other Lymphatic cancers.
Despite this, Monsanto continues to deny these claims.
Victims of Roundup exposure who developed cancer are filing Roundup Lawsuits against Monsanto, seeking compensation for medical expenses, pain, and suffering.
Our firm is about people. That is our motto and that will always be our reality.
We do our best to get to know our clients, understand their situations, and get them the compensation they deserve.
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Without our team, we would’nt be able to provide our clients with anything close to the level of service they receive when they work with us.
The THL Team commits to the sincere belief that those injured by the misconduct of others, especially large corporate profit mongers, deserve justice for their injuries.
Our team is what has made TorHoerman Law a very special place since 2009.
Lawyers are investigating health problems resulting from exposure to PCBs in schools.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls) are man-made chemicals that were widely used in various industries until they were banned in 1979 due to their toxic nature and potential health risks.
Exposure to PCBs can lead to serious health issues, including cancer, reproductive problems, and immune system disorders.
Lawsuits related to PCB exposure claim that manufacturers knew about the dangers but failed to warn the public, leading to numerous settlements and verdicts in favor of the victims.
The punitive damages against Monsanto in the Washington PCB lawsuit were halved from $857 million to $438 million, following legal scrutiny on excessive punitive awards.
The court maintained $73 million in compensatory damages for neurological and endocrine disorders among PCB-exposed individuals at a Seattle school.
Our firm continues to investigate PCB exposure cases in St. Louis area schools and welcomes new clients seeking to file claims related to PCB-related health issues.
On this page, we‘ll discuss the PCB lawsuit investigation, estimated PCB Lawsuit settlement amounts, health problems linked to PCB exposures, eligibility for PCB Exposure Lawsuit claims, and much more.
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are toxic substances that were historically used in industrial and commercial applications until their production was banned or restricted.
PCBs are often found in building materials, electrical equipment (transformers, capacitors), hydraulic fluids, heat transfer fluids, lubricants, plasticizers, pigments, and carbonless copy paper.
These chemicals have been used in some building materials and old fluorescent lighting fixtures that have been found in school buildings across the United States.
School children and educators may be among those most chronically exposed to PCBs.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), PCBs tend to accumulate in the body with extended and chronic exposure.
If you or a loved one were exposed to PCBs in a work or school setting and subsequently suffered health problems, you may be eligible to file a PCB Exposure Lawsuit claim.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation.
Our law firm is committed to helping people harmed at no fault of their own seek financial compensation for what they’ve experienced.
Reach out to us for more information and to find out how our PCB Lawyers can help you.
After over ten years of litigation, the EPA has announced a new plan to limit carcinogenic PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls) in the Spokane River.
This plan, called a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL), sets strict pollution limits to reduce PCB levels, currently 20 to 100 times above the allowable threshold of 1.3 picograms per liter, down from Washington State’s 7 picograms per liter limit.
PCBs still enter rivers through industrial waste, stormwater runoff, and groundwater, affecting waterways nationwide.
Ecology’s Water Quality Manager, Adriane Borgias, notes that reaching the EPA’s goal will be a gradual process due to these technological constraints.
To make progress, Ecology plans to gradually reduce PCB concentrations by improving wastewater treatment and controlling stormwater runoff.
Local groups like Spokane Riverkeeper and the Sierra Club, who have advocated for these pollution limits, expressed disappointment with the EPA’s approach.
The plan primarily relies on water sample testing, overlooking fish tissue and sediment testing, PCBs often accumulate in fish and river sediment, posing long-term risks.
Spokane Riverkeeper’s Water Protector, Katelyn Scott, warns that without comprehensive testing, the plan may fall short of reducing PCB exposure effectively.
If you or a loved one were exposed to PCBs in a work or school setting and subsequently suffered health problems, you may be eligible to file a PCB Exposure Lawsuit claim.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation.
A coalition of activists is seeking current and former students and staff from six Hartford public schools to join a lawsuit alleging a connection between cancer diagnoses and prolonged exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), toxic chemicals found in the schools.
The lawsuit focuses on PCB contamination in schools such as John C. Clark Elementary, which was shut down in 2015 after PCB levels were found to exceed U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) safety limits.
Middle School, Environmental Sciences Magnet School, and several others underwent renovations to remove PCBs during the 2010s.
Attorney Aaron Romano emphasized the severity of the case, noting that some people may have faced years of exposure to PCBs, which have been linked to cancer, immune issues, and other serious health problems.
In 2015, the city of Hartford sued chemical manufacturer Monsanto, now owned by Bayer, over PCB cleanup costs at Clark Elementary.
The EPA had found extensive contamination in the school’s air systems and building materials, leading to a complete shutdown of the facility.
Although the district has since completed renovations, many former employees and students continue to express concerns about their health.
If you or a loved one were exposed to PCBs in a work or school setting and subsequently suffered health problems, you may be eligible to file a PCB Exposure Lawsuit claim.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation.
A recent investigation by a North Carolina news outlet has revealed that more than 240 schools in the local area may contain Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs), a chemical linked to cancer and other serious health issues.
PCBs were widely used in building materials before being banned by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 1979.
Scientists estimate that 50,000 K-12 schools nationwide, including approximately one-third of all K-12 schools, may have been constructed with materials containing PCBs.
The discovery of high PCB levels at N.C. State’s Poe Hall, which led to the closure of the building, has heightened concerns.
Over 200 individuals who worked or studied at Poe Hall have reported cancer diagnoses, prompting further scrutiny of other buildings constructed before the PCB ban.
In Vermont, a similar situation at Burlington High School led to a statewide mandate requiring PCB testing in schools built or renovated before 1979.
Vermont’s testing program has identified PCB contamination in nearly one-third of schools tested, with some areas deemed unusable due to elevated levels.
Despite the significant risks associated with PCB exposure, many states, including North Carolina, do not require schools to test for PCBs.
As the awareness of PCB contamination in schools grows, the legal landscape is likely to evolve.
Schools, municipalities, and possibly construction and manufacturing companies could face litigation for failing to identify and mitigate PCB risks.
The precedent set by recent lawsuits involving PCB exposure in schools and other buildings underscores the potential for significant legal actions as more cases of PCB-related illnesses come to light.
If you or a loved one were exposed to PCBs in a work or school setting and subsequently suffered health problems, you may be eligible to file a PCB Exposure Lawsuit claim.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation.
A recent study highlights the dangers of exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), specifically PCB 126, as a significant contributor to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and more severe conditions like non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH).
The study involved exposing adult male mice to PCB 126, which resulted in lipid accumulation in the liver and the development of steatosis and fibrosis, key indicators of NASH.
Researchers discovered that PCB 126 exposure upregulated specific microRNAs, miR-155, and miR-34a, which play crucial roles in promoting inflammation and impairing lipid metabolism in the liver.
These findings suggest that PCBs not only disrupt normal liver function but also contribute to the progression of serious hepatic conditions.
This research could pave the way for developing new diagnostic markers and therapeutic strategies for diseases associated with PCB exposure.
If you or a loved one were exposed to PCBs in a work or school setting and subsequently suffered health problems, you may be eligible to file a PCB Exposure Lawsuit claim.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation.
Vermont’s statewide PCB testing initiative continues to pose significant logistical and financial challenges for schools.
This program, mandated to identify and mitigate PCB contamination in schools built before 1980, has revealed high levels of toxic chemicals in numerous school buildings, leading to extensive and costly remediation efforts.
Many schools, including North Country Union High School, are grappling with high levels of airborne PCBs.
These toxic chemicals, found in materials like caulk and paint, pose serious health risks.
North Country is undergoing a $5 million remediation project, yet uncertainty remains as test results won’t be available until after the school year begins.
This delay forces administrators to prepare alternative plans if parts of the building remain unsafe.
The PCB testing program has impacted several districts across Vermont.
Schools have faced classroom closures, limited use of facilities, and significant disruptions to normal operations.
The delays in receiving test results and authorization for remediation work have compounded these challenges, leaving many schools in a state of limbo.
The cost of PCB mitigation is straining school budgets.
Vermont’s legislature allocated funds for PCB remediation, but these are quickly depleting.
North Country’s recent project will consume a significant portion of the remaining funds, leaving limited resources for other affected schools.
If you or a loved one were exposed to PCBs in a work or school setting and subsequently suffered health problems, you may be eligible to file a PCB Exposure Lawsuit claim.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed an $85.2 million plan to remediate PCB contamination in Choccolocco Creek, Alabama.
The cleanup will involve removing contaminated soil and creek bed sediments where the creek flows into the Coosa River at Logan Martin Lake.
PCBs, which are known carcinogens, were manufactured by a chemical plant in Anniston, Alabama, from 1929 until 1971.
The plant was initially operated by Monsanto and is now run by Solutia, a subsidiary of Eastman Chemical Company.
The plan includes digging out contaminated soil from industrial and residential properties and dredging sediments from Choccolocco Creek and its banks.
Public input is crucial for advocating comprehensive removal of PCBs and effective public notifications.
The cleanup is expected to take years, with estimates ranging from 10 to 40 years depending on various factors, including property access and the thoroughness of the remediation efforts.
The EPA’s proposed plan for cleaning up PCB contamination in Choccolocco Creek aims to address a long-standing environmental and public health issue.
The community and environmental groups are actively participating in the process to ensure a thorough cleanup and ongoing protection of the environment.
PCB production resulted in widespread environmental and health problems for the community of Anniston.
Monsanto agreed to a settlement of $700 million in 2003, aimed at compensating the affected residents and funding environmental cleanup efforts.
Bayer AG has agreed to pay $160 million to settle a lawsuit brought by the city of Seattle over polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) contamination.
This settlement resolves claims that Monsanto, a Bayer subsidiary, polluted Seattle’s storm-water drainage system and the Duwamish River with PCBs, which have been banned in the United States since 1979 due to their environmental and health hazards.
Seattle accused Monsanto of creating a public nuisance by manufacturing and marketing PCBs, which led to the contamination.
The settlement, announced on Thursday, preempts a federal court trial scheduled for September in Seattle.
The company emphasized that it did not manufacture PCBs in Seattle and had ceased PCB production nearly five decades ago.
The settlement includes $35 million allocated for contamination cleanup and $125 million to reimburse Seattle for its contributions to the Superfund cleanup of the Duwamish River.
This settlement is part of Bayer’s broader efforts to address PCB contamination claims across the United States.
Estimates include Bayer’s potential exposure in PCB-related claims could exceed $2.5 billion.
To date, Bayer has paid approximately $650 million to resolve similar cases involving polluted waterways.
TorHoerman Law is actively investigating PCB exposure in schools, addressing similar contamination concerns.
If you or a loved one were exposed to PCBs in a work or school setting and subsequently suffered health problems, you may be eligible to file a PCB Exposure Lawsuit claim.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation.
NC State Chancellor Randy Woodson announced his retirement at the end of the 2024-25 school year; this decision comes amid ongoing issues related to PCB contamination at Poe Hall.
In November 2023, Poe Hall was closed after testing revealed high levels of PCBs, chemicals linked to cancer.
N.C. State University is actively addressing the PCB contamination at Poe Hall.
Efforts include extensive testing, air quality assessments, and thorough cleaning to ensure campus safety.
The university has improved communication with affected individuals through a dedicated website for updates and resources.
A February health study in collaboration with the CDC and NIOSH is ongoing to assess the potential health impacts on Poe Hall occupants.
In June, the university announced plans to renovate Poe Hall.
WRAL 5 On Your Side reported that over 210 individuals, including former students and staff, believe their cancer is linked to time spent in Poe Hall.
Testing in 2023 found PCB levels 38 times higher than EPA safety standards.
The university failed to respond to EPA efforts to address the contamination and did not test the interior of Poe Hall until 2023, despite knowing about exterior contamination since 2018.
The university also withdrew from a federal health investigation, prompting a vote of no confidence against Woodson.
Woodson stated that the university is working with the EPA and NIOSH to remediate the building.
However, he did not provide a cost estimate for repairs.
NIOSH is conducting a Health Hazard Evaluation of Poe Hall, but concerns remain for students affected by the contamination.
The handling of the Poe Hall contamination has led to public outrage and demands for accountability.
Students and staff continue to seek justice and remediation for the health impacts they have experienced.
TorHoerman Law is actively investigating PCB exposure in schools, addressing similar contamination concerns.
If you or a loved one were exposed to PCBs in a work or school setting and subsequently suffered health problems, you may be eligible to file a PCB Exposure Lawsuit claim.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation.
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), harmful industrial chemicals, have been found in several school buildings constructed before 1980, posing significant health risks.
These chemicals were commonly used in building materials like caulk and fluorescent light fixtures.
As these materials degrade, PCBs are released as vapor or dust, which can be inhaled by students and staff.
In Hartford, Vermont, state air quality testing revealed PCB contamination in 28 rooms across Hartford High School and the career and technical center buildings.
Nine rooms exceeded the safety threshold, necessitating evacuation, while 19 others required restricted use and increased airflow to minimize exposure.
This follows Act 74, a 2021 Vermont mandate requiring all pre-1980 school buildings to be tested for PCBs. Over 40 schools in Vermont have reported unsafe PCB levels.
PCBs are linked to cancer, reproductive issues, immune system suppression, and thyroid hormone disruptions.
The health risks are substantial for both children and adults, with the highest concerns in environments like schools where exposure can be prolonged and continuous.
TorHoerman Law is actively investigating PCB exposure in schools, addressing similar contamination concerns.
If you or a loved one were exposed to PCBs in a work or school setting and subsequently suffered health problems, you may be eligible to file a PCB Exposure Lawsuit claim.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation.
Significant steps are being taken to address the contamination in response to the discovery of toxic polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) at NC State University’s Poe Hall.
Detected during preliminary tests in November, PCBs—banned in the U.S. since 1979 due to their cancer risk—necessitated the closure of the building out of caution.
The potential health effects of PCB exposure include cancer, immune effects, reproductive risks, neurological issues, and endocrine effects.
While PCBs were originally used in construction materials, they have since led to large legislative action.
The North Carolina House recently proposed allocating up to $180 million for renovations, starting with an initial $5 million for design and engineering in the 2024-25 fiscal year.
Chancellor Randy Woodson of NC State has highlighted ongoing costs for testing and anticipates the building will remain closed through the year’s end.
Further testing identified the PCBs within the building’s HVAC system’s insulation, with concentrations ranging widely from 0.91 to 53,000 ppm.
Federal regulations mandate the removal of materials containing PCB concentrations over 500 ppm once identified.
The university is committed to complying with all Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requirements, balancing the costs of extensive renovations against the potential need for new construction.
Chancellor Woodson remarked on the financial challenges, noting the lack of substantial funds for either scenario.
As NC State plans its next steps, including possible expedited renovations, the university community and stakeholders await further updates on the remediation efforts and the future of Poe Hall.
If you or a loved one has suffered from health problems as a result of PCB exposure in a school building, you may be eligible to file a claim.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the PCB Exposure Lawsuit instantly.
In a recent ruling, a North Carolina state appeals court ordered North Carolina State University to permit an independent investigation into Poe Hall, following persistent concerns over air quality and potential PCB (polychlorinated biphenyls) contamination.
This decision, rendered on June 5, 2024, mandates thorough testing by an independent investigator, particularly focusing on the building’s HVAC supply ducts, identified as a primary source of PCB exposure.
Polychlorinated biphenyls, commonly known as PCBs, are industrial chemicals linked to Cancer, Reproductive and developmental toxicity, Fatty liver, Genotoxicity, and other Immunosuppressive effects.
Although recent tests indicated that PCB levels in Poe Hall do not surpass the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) safety thresholds, the university took preemptive action by closing the facility in November of the previous year after initial tests confirmed the presence of these carcinogens.
The forthcoming independent investigation will aim to provide a conclusive analysis of the contamination levels and potential health risks posed by prolonged exposure to PCBs within Poe Hall.
As the investigation progresses, the findings could have considerable implications for future regulatory actions and health safety standards, not only for North Carolina State University but for similar institutions facing related challenges.
If you or a loved one has suffered from health problems as a result of PCB exposure in a school building, you may be eligible to file a claim.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the PCB Exposure Lawsuit instantly.
Recent testing at Poe Hall on the campus of North Carolina State University, conducted with the HVAC system operational, confirms that levels of the PCB compound Aroclor-1262 remain below the EPA’s safety thresholds for school indoor environments, despite a detectable increase from earlier measures.
This second phase of testing identified a gold-colored insulation sealant used in the supply ducts as the likely primary source of these PCBs.
PCBs disrupt thyroid and reproductive function in both men and women and elevate the risk of cardiovascular and liver diseases, as well as diabetes, women exposed to PCBs face an increased likelihood of delivering low-birth-weight infants.
PCBs were used in the construction materials of school buildings nationwide, from elementary schools to universities.
These chemicals were often placed in caulking, sealants, window glazings, fluorescent light ballasts, and other materials due to their strength and elasticity.
Despite their widespread use and purpose in construction, PCBs have been associated with serious health issues.
PCBs were banned by the government in the late 1970s but remain a health risk to this day.
If you or a loved one has suffered from health problems as a result of PCB exposure in a school building, you may be eligible to file a claim.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the PCB Exposure Lawsuit instantly.
Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge Glenn Yamahiro recently ruled in favor of continuing the City of Milwaukee’s lawsuit against Monsanto and several other companies.
The litigation centers on allegations that these companies contaminated Milwaukee’s water systems with PCBs—polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs).
PCBs, banned in the late 1970s, have been linked to various cancers and other severe health issues in humans and animals.
The lawsuit, initiated by the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District and the city in September, accuses Monsanto of hiding the dangers of PCBs despite knowing their toxic effects since the 1930s.
The city alleges that PCBs were introduced into the environment through various industrial activities, including the use of Milorganite, a fertilizer previously employed in county parks and school fields.
Monsanto has dismissed the lawsuit as baseless, asserting that they ceased PCB production nearly half a century ago and were not involved in manufacturing or disposing of PCBs in the Milwaukee area.
During the court proceedings, Monsanto’s defense attorney argued that the claims were not only untimely but also misapplied, suggesting no liability for Monsanto due to the absence of new conduct or harm.
The Judge rejected the motion to dismiss emphasizing that the case concerns the inherent dangers of PCBs, not their design.
He also challenged the defense’s interpretation of nuisance law, indicating that the inability to detect contamination through the senses does not invalidate the nuisance claim.
The city and the sewerage district, representing about 1.1 million residents, are seeking substantial compensation for the costs of cleaning up PCB contamination.
Cleanup efforts have been extensive, involving the EPA and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, and have nearly exhausted a local disposal facility.
A status conference for the lawsuit is scheduled for June 17, as the city continues to argue for the ongoing harm caused by PCB contamination, which they claim makes each day a new cause of action..
The PCB lawsuit is ongoing.
Vermont’s statewide initiative to test and mitigate PCB contamination in public schools continues to reveal concerning levels of the toxic chemical, especially at schools built or renovated before 1980.
The initiative is an ongoing effort mandated by the state legislature in 2021.
The program specifically targets schools constructed or renovated prior to 1980, following the discovery of PCBs at Burlington High School.
The Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation has conducted PCB air quality tests in 19 schools.
Out of these, seven schools have been identified with PCB contamination in various spaces, with two of these schools showing levels of PCBs that necessitated immediate intervention.
Recently, PCB testing at Bellows Falls Union High School revealed elevated PCB levels that exceed state safety thresholds.
Bellows Falls Union High School has encountered significant PCB contamination in various parts of the building, prompting immediate and extensive remediation efforts.
The Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation, which is overseeing the PCB testing program, has indicated that the contamination at Bellows Falls is among the highest recorded in the state’s ongoing environmental initiative.
The PCB lawsuit is ongoing.
The judge overseeing the PCB Lawsuits filed against Monsanto in Washington State has reduced the punitive damages awarded to several students and parents who were exposed to PCBs in a Seattle area school from $857 million to $438 million.
The original judgment included $73 million in compensatory damages and $784 million in punitive damages, awarded to seven former students and parent volunteers who experienced neurological and endocrine system disorders attributed to PCB exposure.
Despite maintaining the compensatory damages, the court reduced the punitive damages to $365 million, approximately five times the compensatory amount, and adjusted the total by an additional $1.5 million to reflect a related settlement.
This adjustment follows Monsanto’s argument that the initial punitive damages were unconstitutionally excessive, referencing U.S. Supreme Court guidelines that punitive damages should not exceed nine times the compensatory damages.
A company spokesperson indicated plans to appeal, arguing that the awarded sum is still disproportionate and that the plaintiffs were not exposed to unsafe PCB levels.
This legal stance comes amid ongoing lawsuits alleging that PCB exposure at the Sky Valley center has led to severe health issues, including cancer and thyroid conditions.
Our law firm is currently investigating PCB exposure in St. Louis area schools.
If you’ve been exposed to PCBs and developed related health problems, you may be eligible to file a claim.
Contact our law firm for more information
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has initiated the removal of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) contamination at the North Austin Community Center in Chicago.
This cleanup process, which began last week, is anticipated to last four to six weeks.
PCBs, hazardous chemical compounds previously used in various industrial applications, have been linked to numerous health risks, prompting their ban in the United States in 1979.
The contamination at the North Austin Community Center, which opened its doors in early 2023, poses potential health risks.
The cleanup involves excavating contaminated areas and placing clean stone, concrete, asphalt, and topsoil to restore the surfaces.
The extracted contaminated material will be transported to permitted landfills for safe disposal.
To ensure public safety, the EPA has fenced off the site to restrict access and is actively monitoring the air quality around the area.
Maine has filed a lawsuit against Monsanto in Cumberland County Superior Court, alleging that the company knowingly sold products containing polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) that have significantly contaminated the environment.
This legal action adds to a growing list of cases targeting Monsanto for its role in producing PCB-laden products.
PCBs, used in various building materials and electrical components, have been linked to serious health risks, including cancer and various other issues.
Despite being banned by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in the 1970s, the presence of PCBs in Maine has led to widespread fish consumption advisories due to ongoing environmental hazards.
The lawsuit claims that Monsanto was aware of the detrimental effects of PCBs long before the ban but continued to profit from their sale.
Maine’s Attorney General emphasized that evidence points to Monsanto’s deliberate disregard for public health and the environment by continuing to market harmful chemicals.
In response, Monsanto contends that the lawsuit is without merit, stating that it had ceased PCB production fifty years ago.
The company also clarified that any PCB-containing products found in Maine would have originated from third-party manufacturers, as Monsanto did not directly manufacture or dispose of PCBs within the state.
Previous cases include Vermont’s lawsuit against Monsanto last year concerning natural resource contamination, which marked the beginning of state-level legal challenges.
In a notable settlement, Bayer agreed to pay Oregon $698 million in 2022 to resolve similar allegations of PCB pollution.
Maine seeks to recover damages for the extensive cleanup required for 400 miles of its rivers and streams, as well as 1.8 million ocean acres, currently affected by PCB contamination.
The State of Oregon has achieved a historic settlement with Bayer, the parent company of Monsanto, resolving a lawsuit over PCB contamination for $698 million.
This settlement marks the largest environmental damage recovery in Oregon’s history, according to Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum.
The lawsuit, initiated in 2018, addressed Monsanto’s PCB production which lasted until 1977, two years before the chemicals were banned due to their environmental and health risks.
Monsanto’s PCBs, used in various products such as paint and hydraulic fluids, have left a lasting impact on Oregon’s environment, contaminating landfills, riverbeds, and affecting local wildlife.
This contamination persists, posing risks to fish and, subsequently, to larger predators and humans who consume these fish, reflecting the chemicals’ enduring presence in the ecosystem.
The settlement is the largest environmental damage recovery in Oregon’s history and “magnitudes larger” than any other state settlement.
This settlement significantly surpasses previous PCB Lawsuit resolutions with other states, emphasizing Oregon’s severe PCB pollution challenges.
Portland’s harbor area was particularly heavily utilized for industrial activities reliant on PCBs.
The funds from this settlement are earmarked for comprehensive environmental remediation efforts across the state, including projects for natural resource damage assessment, air and water quality improvement, contaminated site cleanups, as well as wildlife habitat protection.
The city of Los Angeles has filed a lawsuit against Monsanto, now owned by Bayer Co., claiming the company is responsible for PCB contamination in the city’s waterways.
The lawsuit filed in the L.A. County Superior Court aims to compel Monsanto to remediate the pollution and reimburse the city for prior cleanup expenses.
PCBs (Polychlorinated Biphenyls) are synthetic chemicals previously used across various industrial applications including hydraulic fluids and fireproofing materials.
PCBs were banned in 1979 under the Toxic Substances Control Act due to significant health and environmental hazards.
Monsanto’s production history of PCBs spans from 1929 to 1977, during which it reportedly manufactured over 99% of all PCBs used or sold in the U.S.
The lawsuit claims that Monsanto failed to disclose the environmental dangers of PCBs, leading to widespread contamination of stormwater, wastewater systems, and surface waters in Los Angeles.
In response, Bayer contends the lawsuit lacks merit, emphasizing that Monsanto voluntarily ceased PCB production over four decades ago.
Bayer argues that Monsanto never directly discharged PCBs into Los Angeles’ waters and should not be held liable for the alleged contamination.
More than 150 cancer cases may be potentially linked to PCB contamination at Poe Hall, a building on the campus of North Carolina State University.
PCBs were first discovered during the 2018 Waterproofing Project of the building.
PCBs, classified as “probable human carcinogens” by the EPA, were found in the building’s materials, prompting closures and comprehensive testing.
Initial concerns were raised in August 2023, with further tests revealing high levels of PCB in caulk samples from a 2018 project.
The university, working with the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, is conducting a health evaluation while providing updates via a dedicated website.
In March of 2024 N.C. State hosted an informational webinar for its faculty, staff and students in the College of Education and Department of Psychology.
Poe Hall, constructed in 1971, is facing scrutiny due to its historical PCB usage and its potential impact on the health of past students and staff.
Our law firm is currently investigating PCB exposure in St. Louis area schools.
If you’ve been exposed to PCBs and developed related health problems, you may be eligible to file a claim.
Contact our law firm for more information.
North Carolina State University is facing scrutiny over the presence of cancer-causing PCBs in Poe Hall and D.H. Hill Jr. Library.
Contamination in Poe Hall was only publicized in the past year, but reports have indicated that the University knew about PCB contamination in its buildings since 2018.
These toxic contaminants, detected above EPA limits, pose severe health risks.
PCB exposure has been linked to cancer, immune system damage, and reproductive issues, among other serious health issues.
The University hired consultants to conduct testing during renovations, with findings indicating high PCB concentrations in exterior caulk.
Experts criticize NC State’s response, suggesting more action should have been taken upon initial detection.
PCB mixtures Aroclor-1254 and Aroclor-1268 were found, raising concerns about indoor air contamination.
NC State’s assertion that the HVAC system is the source of PCB contamination has been challenged.
Exterior caulk containing PCBs may lead to indoor pollution, persisting in building materials over time.
The lack of comprehensive testing in other areas of the buildings raises further concerns about potential health hazards.
Despite these findings, NC State does not routinely test for PCBs in buildings.
The recent PCB testing of Holladay Hall underscores ongoing efforts to address potential contamination risks.
Poe Hall has been associated with a breast cancer cluster potentially due to the presence of PCBs.
A memo revealed that over a 20-year period, among 100 to 200 employees, there were six reported cases of cancer, with four being breast cancer cases, one lung cancer case, and one papillary thyroid carcinoma case.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation if you have been exposed to PCBs in a school setting.
PCB contamination at Poe Hall on North Carolina State University’s campus continues to make news headlines.
Inside Higher Ed has published an in-depth report on PCB contamination at Poe Hall, interviewing faculty, university spokespersons, and people who worked and went to class in the Poe Hall building.
N.C. State University has made significant strides in addressing the PCB contamination discovered at Poe Hall.
Extensive testing and remediation efforts are underway, including air quality assessments and deep cleaning to ensure the safety of the campus community.
The university has improved communication with affected individuals, launching a dedicated website for updates and support resources.
A collaborative health study with the CDC and NIOSH is in progress to evaluate the potential health impacts on Poe Hall occupants.
Legal inquiries have just begun, focusing on the university’s handling of the contamination.
Chancellor Randy Woodson reaffirmed the university’s commitment to transparency and the health and safety of the N.C. State community.
Poe Hall will remain closed for remediation, with the university reviewing its environmental health protocols to prevent future incidents from occurring.
These actions reflect N.C. State’s dedication to resolving the contamination issue and safeguarding its community.
The City of East St. Louis is seeking more than $3 billion from Monsanto for contamination resulting from Monsanto’s manufacturing and disposal in Sauget, with claims of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) leaking into the environment..
In 2021, the city filed nine public nuisance complaints against Monsanto and its affiliates seeking fines of $500 per day per parcel owned by the city from 1973 to 2003, and $750 per day per parcel after 2003.
“Per day per parcel” means that the fines sought are calculated based on a daily rate for each individual property owned by the City of East St. Louis.
Monsanto removed the citations to U.S. District Court, where Magistrate Judge Gilbert Sison consolidated the claims, which District Judge David Dugan will now oversee.
Monsanto has requested specific amounts from the city for damages related to injury to land and natural resources, costs of remediation and abatement, unjust enrichment and penalties.
City counsel noted that calculations for damages require expert testimony.
Monsanto had previously moved to disqualify the city’s outside counsel due to a claimed conflict of interest, but a ruling is pending from Judge Dugan.
Individuals in the East St. Louis/Sauget area may be affected by PCBs through environmental contaminants.
The investigation into PCB Lawsuits continues, and our attorneys are focused on PCB exposure in schools that used fluorescent lighting fixtures that contained these toxic chemicals.
North Carolina State University recently detected hazardous levels of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in Poe Hall, prompting an immediate shutdown of the building and relocation of activities.
PCBs are common in buildings built before 1979, such as schools, due to their extensive use in old electrical equipment and construction materials.
In response to the discovery, the university engaged Geosyntec, an environmental consulting and engineering firm, revealing that indoor air PCB levels fell below EPA exposure guidelines.
However, samples showed detectable PCB levels, with higher concentrations found between the third and seventh floors.
Additional testing will focus on the building’s ventilation system and construction materials to better understand potential exposure risks.
Moreover, university officials were asking the CDC to conduct an evaluation regarding a breast cancer cluster at the Universities poe hall.
A breast cancer cluster refers to a situation where a higher than expected number of breast cancer cases occur within a specific geographic area within a specific time frame.
The term “cluster” suggests that the cases are not random but may be linked due to a common environmental factor such as PCB exposure.
Long term PCB exposure results in a significant accumulation within the body, leading to an increased chance of developing cancer and other adverse health risks.
Individuals affected by PCB exposure may qualify for legal support.
If you or a loved one were exposed to PCBs in a work or school setting and subsequently suffered health problems, you may be eligible to file a PCB Exposure Lawsuit claim.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation.
The Lee Select Board plans to refile a lawsuit against the current owners of the former PCB manufacturer, Monsanto, and has presented compelling evidence to support its case.
The town points to a 1972 agreement in which General Electric (GE) agreed not to sue Monsanto for claims arising from environmental and health harm caused by the chemicals used in power transformers in Pittsfield, Massachusetts, and dumped into the Housatonic River.
This agreement is seen as evidence that GE and Monsanto may be liable for engaging in a civil conspiracy under state law.
The Lee Select Board argues that both companies knew of the harmful effects of PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls) on humans and the environment but continued to profit from their use.
This discovery was shared with state and federal officials, including President Joe Biden, local and national media, and is expected to be used in the upcoming lawsuit.
The town alleges that this agreement was not disclosed during negotiations for a 2020 cleanup plan with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Rest of River Municipal Committee.
They also believe that the agreement was not known to the U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals when it denied activists’ attempts to halt the cleanup and landfill plans in Lee.
The Lee Select Board’s assertion of a conspiracy involving the GE-Monsanto agreement has not yet received a response from the state Attorney General’s Office.
However, the EPA has stated that the cleanup permit is final and affirmed by the courts, emphasizing that the toxicity of PCBs is the primary reason for the cleanup.
Monsanto has defended the 1972 agreement as a routine commercial agreement between two companies.
Monsanto contends that the agreement does not release any party from liability to third parties and has no impact on legal liability determined by courts or administrative agencies like the EPA.
If you or a loved one were exposed to PCBs in a work or school setting and subsequently suffered health problems, you may be eligible to file a PCB Exposure Lawsuit claim.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation.
The investigation into PCB Lawsuits continues, and our attorneys are focused on PCB exposure in schools that used fluorescent lighting fixtures that contained these toxic chemicals.
In a recent legal verdict, a Seattle jury has ordered Monsanto to pay a substantial sum of $857 million in damages to seven women.
These women had filed a lawsuit alleging that they had become ill due to exposure to Monsanto’s PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls) at a school site in Washington state.
This verdict significantly adds to Monsanto’s already substantial financial losses in litigation related to the same school, now totaling $1.74 billion.
The women in this case claimed that their health problems were a direct result of exposure to PCBs at the school site.
If you or a loved one were exposed to PCBs in a work or school setting and subsequently suffered health problems, you may be eligible to file a PCB Exposure Lawsuit claim.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation.
A Washington State jury has ruled that Monsanto must pay $857 million in a lawsuit involving PCB exposure at Sky Valley Education Center.
The verdict includes $73 million in compensatory and $784 million in punitive damages to former students and parent volunteers.
Monsanto has faced multiple prior jury verdicts for PCB exposure at Sky Valley Education Center, Monroe, Washington, including a $185 million verdict for three teachers, $21.4 million and $62 million verdicts for affected individuals, and a $275 million verdict for 13 students and their families.
This most recent verdict almost doubles the prior $870 million in combined compensation for similar PCB exposure claims at the same school.
Plaintiffs claim neurological and endocrine system issues due to PCB leakage from fluorescent light fixtures.
Monsanto plans to appeal the verdict, denying unsafe PCB exposure levels.
If you or a loved one were exposed to PCBs in a work or school setting and subsequently suffered health problems, you may be eligible to file a PCB Exposure Lawsuit claim.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation.
Chancellor Woodson of North Carolina State University recently announced the temporary closure of Poe Hall at the university due to the presence of environmental contaminants known as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) discovered through preliminary testing.
The university’s response to concerns about indoor air quality initiated an internal environmental assessment, which initially included testing for asbestos and heavy metals, all of which were within acceptable limits.
Consultation with health authorities and organizations like the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) was part of the process.
In October and November, surface samples from the building were collected and analyzed for asbestos, heavy metals (lead and mercury), and PCBs.
Preliminary tests primarily detected levels of Aroclor 1262, a type of PCB compound, which requires further investigation.
To ensure safety, Poe Hall will remain closed at the start of the spring semester, and efforts are underway to relocate classes, research areas, offices, and services.
More comprehensive environmental testing by an external consultant is planned to gain a better understanding of the building’s environment.
North Carolina State University has hired a consulting firm, Geosyntec Consultants, to investigate hazardous chemicals, specifically polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), in Poe Hall.
The university temporarily closed Poe Hall in November after the presence of toxic PCBs was discovered.
The move followed reports of illnesses and poor conditions from students and staff who spent time in the building.
Geosyntec Consultants will conduct comprehensive testing of Poe Hall starting in December and continuing into January.
They will also oversee essential maintenance projects and provide guidance to individuals requiring limited access to the building.
The university has nearly secured alternative space on campus for classes traditionally held in Poe Hall during the upcoming spring semester.
Chancellor Randy Woodson’s message addressed concerns and offered updates three weeks after the initial closure of Poe Hall. PCBs, including Aroclor 1262, were found in the building.
High levels of PCBs are associated with cancer, and they were banned in the United States in the late 1970s.
The university declined to provide information about the specific risk posed by the PCBs detected in Poe Hall and stated that it would not test other university buildings for PCBs.
Poe Hall, constructed in 1971, will undergo further testing of its air conditioning, heating, and ventilation systems, with no clear timeline for reopening.
The investigation into PCB Lawsuits continues, and our attorneys are focused on PCB exposure in schools that used fluorescent lighting fixtures that contained these toxic chemicals.
A Seattle jury has awarded $165 million in damages to a group of former school employees who claimed that Monsanto spinoff Pharmacia LLC, formerly linked to Monsanto, sold unsafe products, specifically polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), without adequate warnings.
The plaintiffs, including teachers and staff, alleged that exposure to PCBs from light fixtures on the school campus led to various health problems, including neurological injuries, respiratory conditions, hormonal disorders, and cancer.
The jury awarded $49.8 million in compensatory damages and $115.3 million in punitive damages to the former school workers.
Some of these damages were allocated to the estate of a deceased plaintiff.
Pharmacia plans to appeal the verdict, and the outcome of previous related cases is also under appeal.
The plaintiffs’ case centered on the health risks associated with PCB exposure, while the defense contended that PCBs served important purposes in electrical equipment and that adequate warnings had been provided.
This verdict marks another legal setback for Monsanto and its spinoff Pharmacia, with substantial financial implications.
The litigation involves multiple cases related to PCB exposure on a school campus, with several cases still pending trial or under appeal.
If you or a loved one were exposed to PCBs in a work or school setting and subsequently suffered health problems, you may be eligible to file a PCB Exposure Lawsuit claim.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation.
The investigation into PCB Lawsuits continues, and our attorneys are focused on PCB exposure in schools that used fluorescent lighting fixtures that contained these toxic chemicals.
Air testing conducted at Warren Elementary School in Vermont has revealed PCB contamination above a state action level in one location in the school’s basement.
The September testing found that none of the regularly occupied areas, such as classrooms and offices, exceeded the Vermont School Action Level for PCB levels.
PCBs, or polychlorinated biphenyls, are man-made chemicals used in building materials and electrical equipment prior to 1980, posing potential health and environmental risks.
The school’s administration is working with a contractor approved by state environmental and health officials to identify the source of the PCB contamination and recommend remediation steps.
The cost and recommendations are still being determined.
PCB testing is part of a statewide program funded by the state, initiated in 2022, to assess and address PCB contamination in Vermont schools built or renovated during the period when PCB-containing materials were used.
Additionally, the state of Vermont has filed a lawsuit against Monsanto, the manufacturer of PCBs, seeking compensation for damage caused by PCBs, including the costs of testing and remediation in schools.
Another lawsuit has been filed by multiple Vermont school districts, including Harwood Union, with similar objectives.
Both legal actions aim to hold Monsanto accountable for the impact of PCBs on the environment and schools.
If you or a loved one were exposed to PCBs in a work or school setting and subsequently suffered health problems, you may be eligible to file a PCB Exposure Lawsuit claim.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
The investigation into PCB Lawsuits continues, and our attorneys are focused on PCB exposure in schools that used fluorescent lighting fixtures that contained these toxic chemicals.
Vermont Attorney General Charity Clark, in the process of suing Monsanto for environmental contamination due to toxic chemicals, has asked a federal court to temporarily halt a similar lawsuit filed by multiple local school districts.
Clark filed her lawsuit in the state court, claiming Monsanto’s toxic PCBs polluted the environment and schools.
However, a federal lawsuit by attorney Pietro Lynn on behalf of 93 Vermont school districts for similar claims has prompted Clark to request a pause on the federal case.
In a 19-page amicus brief submitted to the federal court, Clark argues that the federal suit is duplicative and should be put on hold to avoid inefficient and piecemeal litigation.
She asserts that multiple lawsuits could lead to overlapping efforts, conflicting approaches, and potential strategic advantages in different court systems, ultimately causing delays and increased costs.
The legal actions were initiated amidst a statewide effort to test schools built before 1980 for PCB contamination.
If PCB levels exceed state limits, extensive and costly remediation efforts are required.
Clark’s brief highlights concerns regarding logistical issues caused by the federal suit, including delays in testing and potential extended exposure to PCBs due to legal provisions.
Furthermore, the federal suit has led to subpoenas for thousands of documents related to the state’s PCB testing program, creating administrative and logistical burdens for the state and involved parties.
Clark noted attempts to resolve conflicts with Lynn but stated ongoing disagreements between the parties.
Clark also mentioned the involvement of external law firms with varied compensation structures in the state’s lawsuit versus the federal case, potentially impacting the distribution of any financial settlements.
However, Clark clarified that the request for a stay on the federal case won’t affect the state’s ongoing PCB testing program, emphasizing that results for 73 Vermont schools have been published, with over 300 schools yet to be tested.
If you or a loved one were exposed to PCBs in a work or school setting and subsequently suffered health problems, you may be eligible to file a PCB Exposure Lawsuit claim.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation.
The investigation into PCB Lawsuits continues, and our attorneys are focused on PCB exposure in schools that used fluorescent lighting fixtures that contained these toxic chemicals.
Municipalities and governmental agencies have been filing PCB Lawsuits against Monsanto.
The city of Milwaukee has filed a lawsuit against Monsanto, now owned by Bayer, over ongoing contamination of its water systems by PCBs, toxic chemicals used in various industrial applications until their ban in 1979.
The city claims that about 99% of PCBs sold in the US were manufactured by Monsanto, which knowingly concealed the risks of these carcinogenic chemicals.
PCBs are resistant to degradation and accumulate in the environment, posing risks to humans who consume contaminated fish or shellfish.
The lawsuit filed by the City of Milwaukee seeks to recover the costs of investigating and remediating PCB contamination, which amount to millions of dollars.
PCBs entered Milwaukee’s environment through various sources and industrial uses, including construction materials and electrical equipment.
The city and the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District (MMSD) are the lead plaintiffs in the case and allege public and private nuisance, trespass, and products liability, among other claims.
The contamination has particularly affected the Milwaukee Estuary, including rivers in the area, leading to extensive sediment removal efforts, with costs estimated to be over $100 million for a new disposal facility.
Additionally, PCB contamination was linked to Milorganite, a fertilizer made from recycled biosolids from MMSD’s wastewater treatment plant, resulting in substantial financial losses.
Monsanto, now Bayer, denied responsibility for Milwaukee’s PCB contamination, stating that it never manufactured or disposed of PCBs in the area and ceased lawful manufacturing of PCBs over 45 years ago.
The lawsuit adds to a series of legal actions against Monsanto and its parent company over product-related claims, including Roundup weed killer.
If you or a loved one were exposed to PCBs in a work or school setting and subsequently suffered health problems, you may be eligible to file a PCB Exposure Lawsuit claim.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation.
Our attorneys are investigating the health effects of PCB exposure in schools that used fluorescent lighting fixtures that contained these toxic chemicals.
The city of Chicago has filed a lawsuit against Monsanto Co. alleging the company released PCBs into the city’s air, water, and soil.
According to the lawsuit, Monsanto and its co-defendants released these chemicals, knowing their hazardous nature, misleading the public about the associated risks.
Mayor Brandon Johnson stated that Monsanto’s actions have furthered environmental issues and disparities in Chicago’s neighborhoods, and the lawsuit showcases the city’s dedication to protecting residents and natural resources.
Monsanto, in response, has called the lawsuit “meritless,” emphasizing that they neither manufactured nor disposed of PCBs in the Chicago vicinity and ceased production over 45 years ago.
Furthermore, Monsanto suggests that the city of Chicago might be responsible for PCB releases, pointing to over 200 combined sewage outfalls discharging into the Great Lakes watershed.
PCBs, banned by the EPA in the late 1970s, were used in multiple applications like paint, electrical equipment, and sealants but persist in the environment.
Humans can encounter PCBs through various means, leading to potential health issues like changes to liver, thyroid, and reproductive systems, reduced birth weights, and even cancer links.
Chicago’s lawsuit is seeking damages for expenses related to cleaning and remediation of PCB contamination within its confines and waterways.
If you or a loved one were exposed to PCBs in a work or school setting and subsequently suffered health problems, you may be eligible to file a PCB Exposure Lawsuit claim.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation.
The State of Pennsylvania announced a $100 million settlement with the former agrochemical company Monsanto, now a part of Bayer, for contaminating substantial portions of its streams and lakes with PCBs over five decades.
This contamination spans 1,300 miles of streams and 3,600 acres of lakes.
Rich Negrin, secretary of Pennsylvania’s Department of Environmental Protection, expressed that the funds would be directed towards costs already incurred due to the contamination and for further cleanup.
Pennsylvania’s lawsuit against Monsanto stemmed from the company’s production of PCBs, chemicals which accumulate in small organisms and fish, leading to potential human exposure through fish consumption.
Executive director of the Fish and Boat Commission, Tim Schaeffer, highlighted how PCB pollution has affected the state’s aquatic resources for years.
It’s worth noting that Bayer has faced multiple lawsuits from various states concerning Monsanto’s PCBs, settling with Oregon for a substantial $698 million.
In response to the settlement, Monsanto agreed to settle all claims without admitting liability or wrongdoing.
Their statement emphasized that they stopped producing PCBs in 1977 and did not manufacture or dispose of them in Pennsylvania.
Historical documents indicate Monsanto knew about the persistent nature and potential harm of PCBs as early as 1937.
The chemicals were utilized in numerous products like paints, sealants, and electrical equipment.
Notably, they were valued and at times mandated in building codes until their US ban in 1979.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released a summary of how funds were distributed to clean up PCB contamination at a Superfund Site in Georgia.
On July 29, 2016, the EPA announced a settlement with Honeywell International Inc. and Georgia Power Company to commit nearly $29 million for cleanup efforts at the 760-acre saltwater marsh, the LCP Chemicals Superfund Site in Brunswick, GA.
A significant objective of this cleanup is the potential lifting of the existing commercial fishing ban and fish consumption advisories.
Honeywell International Inc., headquartered in Morris Plains, NJ, is a global conglomerate, while Georgia Power Co. is a regional electric power company based in Atlanta, GA.
Historical background reveals that between 1919 and 1994, the LCP Chemicals Superfund Site hosted a range of industrial operations.
This led to contamination from mercury, PCBs, and other hazardous substances.
The site was subsequently added to the National Priorities List in 1996.
Cleanup initiatives began in 1994, with efforts including demolition of contaminated infrastructure, marsh dredging, and contaminated soil removal.
The latest settlement aims at intensifying cleanup in the site’s tidal marsh and creeks.
Under the agreement, the companies are mandated to dredge and place protective caps in certain tidal creeks, introduce clean sediment across 11 acres of marsh, and rehabilitate areas affected by construction.
This will notably decrease the concentration of harmful contaminants in the marsh’s sediments and protect its wildlife.
To ensure the lasting success of these efforts, Honeywell and Georgia Power will continue to monitor the cleanup’s long-term impact on health and the environment.
A new lawsuit was filed on August 24th in Berkshire County (MA) Superior Court, alleging that General Electric Company (GE), together with Monsanto Company, knowingly and intentionally caused cancer through exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs).
The claim comes from the husband of a longtime teacher at Allendale Elementary School, who died in February 2022 after battling multiple cancers.
It’s alleged that her illnesses resulted from exposure to hazardous waste, including PCBs, originating from nearby GE plant locations.
The current lawsuit is the sixth of its kind in the county, with previous claims coming from Allendale-area mothers, a business owner, and other individuals associating their cancer diagnoses with PCB exposure from the same locations.
In response, Monsanto issued a statement denying responsibility, emphasizing that they neither manufactured nor disposed of PCBs near the Allendale Elementary School or in the broader Pittsfield region.
If you or a loved one were exposed to PCBs in a work or school setting and subsequently suffered health problems, you may be eligible to file a PCB Exposure Lawsuit claim.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has agreed to test fish for toxic contaminants in two Maryland rivers, the Gunpowder and its two creeks, following a lawsuit filed by the Gunpowder Riverkeeper in 2020.
Despite the Maryland Department of the Environment identifying the Gunpowder and Bird rivers as having PCB contamination in fish tissue in 2006 and 2008, they attributed the source to the Susquehanna River, suggesting the issue was beyond local control.
The EPA approved this stance in 2016.
The current lawsuit by Gunpowder Riverkeeper Theaux LeGardeur challenges the EPA’s approval, suggesting local sources of PCBs, including the old C.P. Crane power plant and Aberdeen Proving Ground, were overlooked.
Though the proposed settlement doesn’t force a reconsideration of the state’s cleanup plans, it intends to enhance public understanding of fish contamination risks in the affected regions.
Past reports have highlighted high PCB levels in areas connected to the Gunpowder.
With the new settlement, the EPA is committed to publicly sharing findings on PCB contamination in the designated regions.
They also aim to hold a public meeting by 2026 regarding the cleanup plans if neither state nor local authorities take the initiative.
A federal judge has ruled that biotech giant Monsanto cannot avoid a public nuisance claim related to PCB contamination in Seattle’s Duwamish River.
Seattle filed a lawsuit in 2016, alleging that Monsanto concealed the dangers of PCBs for decades.
The chemicals entered the Duwamish River through stormwater and wastewater, making them the most common contaminant in the area, and leading to the area being designated as an EPA Superfund site.
Seattle claims that cleaning up the river will require a costly wastewater treatment plant.
However, Judge Jones agreed that this settlement did not release Monsanto from Seattle’s public nuisance claims.
He noted ambiguities in the settlement agreement regarding the release of state agencies, which led Seattle to argue that it was not intended to be included in the agreement.
Monsanto maintains that it is not liable for the damages claimed by Seattle, arguing that federal statutes authorized the sale and lawful manufacture of PCBs and that Washington law exempts them from being deemed a nuisance.
They also attribute the pollution of the Duwamish River to Seattle’s own historical industrial practices.
The ruling on summary judgment is still pending for several other claims, including future damages.
More than 90 Vermont school districts have filed a lawsuit against chemical giant Monsanto over toxic contamination in educational buildings caused by PCBs.
Vermont became the first state in the U.S. to require older schools to test indoor air for PCBs.
The districts seek to recover costs and damages as they must reduce PCB exposure, which is expensive and may require demolishing and replacing buildings, potentially costing “hundreds of millions, if not billions, of dollars.”
Monsanto denies responsibility, stating they did not manufacture PCBs in Vermont and have not done so for over 45 years.
The company is seeking an emergency hearing, the preservation of evidence, and participation in environmental testing and remediation work.
In Vermont, PCB contamination has led to the relocation of an entire high school to a closed department store.
The Vermont attorney general has also sued Monsanto over PCB contamination in schools and natural resources, including lakes and rivers.
Vermont Attorney General Charity Clark has filed a lawsuit against Monsanto, aiming to safeguard Vermont’s natural resources and schools affected by PCB contamination.
This lawsuit alleges that Monsanto knowingly produced highly toxic PCB formulations that have caused significant harm.
Clark accuses Monsanto of misleading the public and seeks to hold the company accountable for the cleanup costs, rather than burdening Vermont taxpayers.
PCBs, toxic chemical compounds, were manufactured and distributed by Monsanto in the U.S. from 1929 to 1977, with Monsanto being the major producer.
Although PCBs were banned in the late 1970s, they persist in Vermont’s environment, particularly in Lake Champlain.
In response, Vermont passed Act 74, requiring schools built or renovated before 1980 to test for PCBs.
The lawsuit aims to secure resources for a comprehensive cleanup and prevention effort, protecting both current and future generations and compensating for damages to Vermont’s natural resources.
Monsanto Co. is still facing most of the claims that it polluted Illinois waterways with PCBs, despite a federal judge reducing the lawsuit.
Illinois sued Monsanto, along with Solutia Inc. and Pharmacia LLC, accusing them of causing contamination of the state’s natural resources through the sale and distribution of PCBs.
The judge rejected Monsanto’s argument that Illinois law doesn’t recognize public nuisance liability, stating that Monsanto knew its products would inevitably pollute state waters.
The company also can’t escape strict liability or negligence claims.
The judge dismissed Illinois’ claims for a medical monitoring fund, stating no present physical injury had resulted from Monsanto’s actions.
Monsanto has faced similar lawsuits in other states.
Elevated levels of airborne PCBs were found at Twin Valley Elementary School in Vermont, leading to the installation of carbon air filtration units.
A second round of testing revealed even higher PCB levels in every room, suggesting a potential source in the school’s HVAC system.
Vermont initiated statewide PCB testing in schools due to health risks posed by these chemicals.
Twin Valley spent over $18,000 on air filters, and some lawmakers are pushing to pause the testing program due to its costs and disruption to learning.
However, health experts support continuing the testing to address PCB contamination.
Twin Valley plans to use affected rooms cautiously for the remainder of the school year.
Multiple cities and villages in Lake County, Illinois, have filed a lawsuit against Monsanto and other chemical companies, including Solutia Inc. and Pharmacia LLC, over the contamination of Lake Michigan with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs).
The lawsuit, filed in Cook County Circuit Court by Seeger Weiss LLP, represents nine municipalities, namely Evanston, Lake Forest, North Chicago, Zion, Beach Park, Glencoe, Lake Bluff, Winnetka, and Winthrop Harbor.
These communities allege that Monsanto intentionally misled the public for decades about the environmental and health hazards of PCBs, resulting in widespread contamination.
Due to PCB pollution in Lake Michigan, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency now requires affected communities to reduce PCB discharges into the lake by an estimated 99.6%.
The lawsuit aims to shift the costs of eliminating PCB contamination from these communities to the defendants, though the exact costs remain unclear.
PCBs are highly toxic and harmful to both humans and animals, with children and adolescents being particularly vulnerable.
The complaint filed in court alleges that Monsanto was aware of the toxicity of its PCB formulations but deliberately misled the public about their safety.
Bayer AG, which acquired Monsanto in 2018, has stated that they believe the case is “meritless” since Monsanto ceased PCB manufacturing over 45 years ago.
They argue that, under applicable law, they are not responsible for downstream risks associated with a product introduced into commerce many years ago.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency banned the use of PCBs in 1979, but contamination from them remains a significant issue, according to the plaintiffs’ law firm.
The town of Lee, Massachusetts, is suing Bayer, the owner of Monsanto, over the contamination of the Housatonic River with PCBs.
The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court, alleges that Monsanto knew about the toxicity of PCBs since the 1950s but continued to profit by selling them to companies like General Electric.
GE used PCBs at a Pittsfield plant until the 1970s, contaminating the river.
Lee is opposing the EPA’s plan to build a disposal site in the town for sediment with lower levels of PCBs, which could result in ongoing exposure.
The lawsuit seeks damages and funding to relocate PCB waste to an out-of-state facility.
Bayer argues that there is no legal basis to hold Monsanto liable for selling PCBs legally decades ago.
In a prolonged legal battle, the city of Seattle is in a heated dispute with Monsanto over PCB contamination in the Duwamish River in Washington.
Seattle sued Monsanto in 2016, holding them responsible for PCB contamination, alleging the company knew about the toxicity but continued production until PCBs were banned in 1979.
Seattle claims that this contamination has led to substantial cleanup expenses, and the lawsuit mirrors similar costly settlements Monsanto has had with Washington state and Spokane.
Seattle argues its claims were not waived during the state settlement, while Monsanto contends that the state’s agreement extinguished Seattle’s claims.
The recent hearing saw legal arguments where Monsanto claimed the prior settlement resolved Seattle’s claims, citing the legal principle of “res judicata,” which prohibits multiple lawsuits over the same claims.
Seattle’s attorney disputed this, emphasizing that the state did not waive the city’s claims, indicating that significant work remains for the Lower Duwamish River’s cleanup.
The judge expressed surprise at the lack of legal precedent in such a situation where both city and state concurrently litigated similar issues.
The magistrate judge aims to provide recommendations within ten days, but the situation’s complexity was humorously likened to “clear as mud.”
The decision now lies with U.S. District Judge Richard Jones, who will determine the trial schedule. Monsanto declined to comment on the ongoing issue.
Professor David Carpenter of the University at Albany, a frequent expert witness against Monsanto in lawsuits involving PCBs, faced university investigation and subsequent restrictions after a Monsanto lawyer requested records regarding his research activities and funding.
Monsanto stated that its request aimed to ensure transparency about potential conflicts related to Dr. Carpenter’s research, yet the University’s actions played into Monsanto’s legal strategy, providing more leverage in ongoing court cases.
The legal battle, centered in a St. Louis court, involves the Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe suing Monsanto over alleged harm caused by PCBs.
Monsanto disputes the claims, arguing they haven’t caused the reported harm.
Carpenter, a tenured professor, explained that Monsanto’s records request triggered the investigation and altered his university duties, resulting in an alternative assignment.
The university refused to comment on specific reasons for its investigation but stated it had a general obligation to comply with laws and regulations.
While university authorities suggested Carpenter remained employed and could still perform his academic duties, documents shared by Carpenter revealed restrictions placed on his outside consulting activities and university resources.
The professor viewed these limitations as an infringement on his academic freedom.
The offer for his resignation, which included a waiver of his right to sue over age discrimination, was deemed unacceptable by Carpenter, leading to a standoff between him and the university.
The University’s Faculty Senate chair, Sydney Faught, confirmed being unaware of Carpenter’s situation until it was reported in the media.
A letter of support and a petition were organized in solidarity with Carpenter, emphasizing the academic freedom and rights of the professor.
The conflict has escalated, with Carpenter refusing the resignation offer and the university maintaining its position, creating a divide between the professor, the university, and supporters advocating for his rights.
A group of activists in Hartford, led by Black Lives Matter 860, is raising concerns about a potential link between toxic school construction materials, specifically Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs), and an apparent increase in cancer diagnoses among former students, faculty, and staff of certain Hartford schools.
They’re urging individuals associated with these schools to undergo medical screenings due to potential PCB exposure.
The activists highlight a lawsuit filed by the city of Hartford against Monsanto in 2015 regarding PCB removal from Clark Elementary School, the only known manufacturer of these substances.
They express worry about the impact on health, particularly in individuals associated with elementary schools that may have had PCBs in their construction materials.
Concerns arose despite state health authorities claiming exposure levels were below the threshold for health problems.
Recent cancer diagnoses among individuals associated with these schools have heightened these concerns, prompting calls for medical screenings, financial support for health expenses, and a health survey for those possibly exposed.
The Hartford Public Schools have responded, emphasizing their compliance with state and federal guidelines, especially in schools built or fully renovated after 1979 (when PCBs were outlawed).
The district claims proactive measures were taken, such as relocating students and staff during testing at Clark Elementary, offering resources, information, and community meetings to address concerns.
The activists, however, are advocating for medical screenings and financial support from the city and school district for those who may have been exposed to PCBs, stressing the importance of addressing potential health risks associated with past school construction materials.
Monsanto is responding to a lawsuit filed by the City of East St. Louis, claiming the penalties sought for pollution violations are unconstitutional.
The company has filed a counterclaim against the city, alleging violations of due process, equal protection, and excessive fines.
The city’s lawsuit seeks significant penalties up to $2.7 billion for Monsanto’s production of PCBs.
Monsanto argues that the city’s legal action arose from an unconventional interpretation of ordinances related to PCB detection on city-owned properties, depriving the company of its constitutional rights.
The counterclaim asserts that the city’s use of ordinances in this manner lacks clarity and fairness, violating due process.
Monsanto’s counsel argues that the fines sought by the city are disproportionate and exceed the alleged offense’s severity, highlighting that the penalties would be financially burdensome for the city’s residents.
The legal dispute between Monsanto and East St. Louis revolves around the interpretation and application of ordinances related to PCBs, and it raises concerns about the potential financial impact of the fines on the city’s population.
Snohomish County’s insurer agreed to pay $415,000 in a settlement for alleged land contamination near Lake Goodwin.
Luxury home builder Robinett Brothers purchased land near an old landfill owned by the county.
Robinett filed a lawsuit against Snohomish County in 2021, claiming the landfill’s waste, which may have included toxic substances like PCBs, pesticides, and PAHs, contaminated their newly acquired property.
The Department of Ecology suspected soil and groundwater contamination at the landfill site, with confirmed levels of pollutants exceeding state cleanup standards.
The lawsuit alleged nitrate, sodium, and arsenic contamination, claiming the polluted groundwater flowed onto Robinett’s land.
The settlement agreement, facilitated by the county’s insurer, didn’t admit liability.
The payment wasn’t from taxpayer funds.
As part of the deal, Robinett returned the property to the county as a buffer to the former landfill, restricting future development.
The county sees the land acquisition as a positive step, offering a protective buffer zone. Robinett’s attorney declined to comment on the matter.
Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul filed a pollution suit against Monsanto and Solutia, alleging the release of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) into Illinois waterways, causing environmental harm.
The suit sought damages in Cook County Circuit Court, but U.S. District Judge Robert Gettleman rejected Raoul’s attempt to transfer the case back to state court.
The federal judge determined federal jurisdiction applied because Monsanto’s actions were under U.S. government direction during World War II and the Vietnam War.
Monsanto operated a plant in Sauget, St. Louis, that allegedly released chemicals into the environment.
Gettleman accepted the companies’ argument for a “government contractor defense,” stating that their actions were at the government’s request, providing immunity from state tort laws.
Raoul argued that the pollution wasn’t compliant with federal directives, disqualifying the contractor defense, but the judge clarified the jurisdictional issue.
The case’s venue shift from state to federal court was based on the nature of federal involvement in the defendants’ activities.
The judge’s decision prevented the case from returning to Cook County courts, known for plaintiff-friendly laws and evidence rules.
Fort McClellan, an Army base closed in 1999, potentially exposed service members to hazardous materials.
Exposures at the base might have included radioactive compounds, chemical warfare agents used in decontamination activities, and airborne polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) from a nearby Monsanto plant.
Investigations into PCB exposure in the neighboring Anniston community have been ongoing since the 1990s.
The VA collaborates with federal agencies to assess public health risks at Fort McClellan and plans to conduct an epidemiological study on Veterans who served there from 1935 to 1999.
However, the VA currently does not presume any health conditions are linked to service at Fort McClellan.
Veterans concerned about health issues related to their service at the base should seek medical care but should note that there is no specific VA environmental health registry associated with Fort McClellan service.
Veterans can file disability compensation claims, but determinations are made on a case-by-case basis.
Our attorneys are currently investigating the potential PCB Litigation, conducting free consultations with students and workers exposed to PCBs.
As we’ll discuss further in this piece, PCBs have been linked to several adverse health effects and are labeled as probable human carcinogens.
PCB concentrations are high in older school buildings and other buildings that use old fluorescent lighting fixtures.
Our lawyers are currently investigating PCB exposures in St. Louis area schools.
If you were exposed to PCBs at work or school and subsequently suffered health effects, you may be eligible to file a PCB Lawsuit claim.
Contact our law firm for a free consultation.
Use the chatbot on this page for a free and instant case evaluation.
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are a group of man-made organic chemicals consisting of carbon, hydrogen, and chlorine atoms, known for their chemical stability and resistance to heat.
PCBs were widely used in various industrial and commercial applications, including in electrical transformers and capacitors, due to their excellent insulation properties against electricity and heat.
PCBs were also used in hydraulic systems, lubricants, paints, plasticizers, and even fluorescent light ballasts, making them ubiquitous in mid-20th century manufacturing and building materials.
Monsanto began commercial production of the chemical in 1929, and was instrumental in the widespread distribution and use of PCBs globally.
Monsanto’s production practices led to significant environmental contamination, notably in places like Anniston, AL and Sauget, IL, where the disposal of PCBs resulted in extensive soil and water pollution.
PCBs are known to bioaccumulate in the environment, particularly in the fatty tissues of living organisms, leading to their presence in food chains and a significant ecological impact.
Exposure to PCBs poses potential health risks to humans, including cancer, immune system suppression, reproductive and developmental problems, and endocrine disruption.
As a result of these hazards, PCB production was banned in the United States in 1976 under the Toxic Substances Control Act, but their persistence in the environment continues to be a concern.
Cleanup efforts for PCB contamination are complex and ongoing, as seen in EPA Superfund sites across the country, where extensive remediation is required to mitigate their impact.
PCBs remain a stark example of the long-term environmental and health consequences of widespread chemical use without adequate understanding of their ecological and human health effects.
Over the course of the 20th century, numerous companies used PCBs in electrical equipment, electrical devices, hydraulic systems, heat transfer fluids, paints and plastics, sealants, caulks, and various other industrial and commercial applications.
Monsanto was the primary manufacturer of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) from the 1930s until they were banned in the 1970s.
The only other company to have ever produced PCBs in the United States was Geneva Industries of Houston, TX, which manufactured PCBs for heat transfer applications from 1972-1974.
Monsanto has been named in countless lawsuits due to its role in the manufacture and distribution of PCBs in the United States.
Lawsuits filed against Monsanto for PCB contamination and exposures have centered on allegations that Monsanto was aware of the environmental and health risks associated with PCBs but continued to promote and sell them.
Apart from the recent legal actions for PCBs in schools, several PCB Lawsuits have been filed by government entities across the country have sought compensation for environmental contamination and remediation.
Individual PCB Lawsuits have also been filed by people who have suffered occupational exposure to PCBs.
PCBs can be found in various locations due to their historical use and persistence in the environment.
Here are some common sources where PCBs can be present:
According to research conducted by the Iowa Superfund Research Program (ISRP), the worst case for human exposure to PCBs is a school room.
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), while less widely known than other toxic substances like lead and asbestos, represent a significant health and environmental challenge, especially in the context of the United States’ aging school infrastructure.
The federal ban did not eliminate PCBs from existing structures; hence, many school buildings constructed or remodeled during this period are likely to still contain these hazardous chemicals.
PCBs in schools were primarily used to enhance the durability of building materials such as caulk and insulation and found utility in electrical equipment due to their insulating properties.
A 2016 study estimated that between 13,000 and 26,000 school buildings in the United States contain building caulk, fluorescent lights, or other materials laced with PCBs.
This widespread prevalence is alarming, considering the health risks to students and educators who spend considerable time in these environments.
The challenge of remediating PCBs in schools is daunting, often involving extensive renovations or complete building replacements, burdened by high costs.
This problem is exacerbated in underfunded districts, typically in low-income or minority communities, which may struggle to keep pace with necessary infrastructure updates, thereby widening health disparities.
The ambiguity surrounding the extent of PCB usage, due to unclear or lost historical records, adds another layer of complexity to identifying and addressing the issue.
At the federal level, there’s a significant gap in the mandate for PCB testing and remediation in schools, leaving the responsibility primarily to local authorities and states.
While some states, like Vermont, have initiated laws for mandatory PCB testing in older school buildings, a nationwide, unified approach is lacking.
With the potential cost of nationwide PCB remediation in schools estimated to be between $25 billion to $50 billion, the issue highlights the need for federal support and intervention.
Increasing awareness about the presence and dangers of PCBs in school environments, coupled with a push for comprehensive federal and state-level action, is imperative.
It’s crucial to protect the health and well-being of the nation’s children and educators, who remain vulnerable to the long-term effects of these toxic compounds.
In schools, particularly those constructed or renovated between the 1950s and 1980s, PCBs are often embedded in various materials due to their widespread use in the past.
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in schools are often found in:
Exposure to PCBs in schools occurs through various routes, primarily due to the degradation of materials.
Exposure to PCBs in school environments occurs through:
The discovery of PCBs in schools often occurs incidentally and can be triggered by several scenarios:
Schools built or renovated during the peak PCB production years should particularly be subject to testing and remediation efforts.
Effective detection and remediation are crucial to reduce PCB exposure risks in educational environments.
Exposure to PCBs has been linked to a number of potential health effects.
PCBs accumulate in the body, so chronic exposure to PCBs may be especially dangerous.
These health effects have been well-documented by scientific and governmental agencies for decades.
The first available data on the toxicity of PCBs was published in 1931, and studies throughout the following decades began to build a massive body of evidence to suggest that PCBs are extremely dangerous to human health and the environment.
Prolonged inhalation of PCBs in school environments, particularly from deteriorating materials, can lead to systemic health issues, affecting various bodily systems over time.
Direct skin contact with surfaces containing PCBs in educational settings, such as sealants and paints, poses risks of dermal absorption, potentially leading to skin-related conditions and other systemic health effects.
Indirect exposure to PCBs, through secondary contact with contaminated objects or surfaces within school premises, can contribute to cumulative health risks, especially in children whose developing bodies are more susceptible to toxic substances.
Potential Health Effects of PCB Exposure:
The diverse health effects associated with PCB exposure, ranging from cancer to immune and reproductive system impacts, continue to pose significant risks due to the compounds’ accumulation and persistence in the environment and within biological systems.
The insidious nature of PCBs in school environments extends beyond basic toxicity, revealing deeper, systemic concerns.
Advanced studies underscore the complexities of PCB interaction with human biology, particularly in younger populations who spend significant time in school settings.
Understanding the risks associated with PCBs in schools requires a focus on their unique impact on health, particularly in young and developing bodies:
If you’ve been exposed to PCBs in schools and suffered health effects, you may be eligible to file a PCB Lawsuit claim.
Contact us for a free consultation or use the chatbot on this page.
According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), exposure to PCBs has been linked to numerous health concerns including cancer.
Being chronically exposed to PCBs or eating contaminated food can result in several health problems.
Below are a number of scientific studies on PCB exposure and its related health effects:
PCBs present in electrical equipment, schools, and older buildings may be putting public health at risk.
If you or a loved one were exposed to PCBs and subsequently developed cancer or other health effects, you may be eligible to file a PCB Lawsuit claim.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation.
Our attorneys are here to help you through the lawsuit process and protect your rights.
Your PCB Lawyer can help you gather evidence for your claim and assess damages related to PCB exposure.
Evidence is important for any mass tort or personal injury case.
In a PCB exposure case, evidence could include the following:
Damages refer to the total amount of losses related to being exposed to PCBs and the health effects that may be related.
Damages in a potential PCB Lawsuit may include:
Our law firm is currently investigating potential litigation for those suffering from exposure to PCBs.
If you or a loved one were exposed to PCBs and subsequently developed health problems, you may be eligible to file a PCB Lawsuit claim.
Contact TorHoerman Law for more information.
You can also use the chatbot on this page for a free and instant case evaluation.
Reach out to us for more information.
We’re here to help.
There have been class actions lawsuits and personal injury claims filed against he manufacturers of PCBs.
While we haven’t seen a more widespread and noteworthy settlement or litigation for PCB exposures, our attorneys are still speaking to people who believe their health problems are linked to exposure to PCBs.
If you or a loved one were exposed to PCBs and subsequently developed health problems, you may be eligible to file a PCB Exposure Lawsuit claim.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a PCB Lawsuit claim.
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are a group of synthetic organic chemicals, called chlorinated hydrocarbons, that were manufactured and widely used in various industrial and commercial applications from the 1930s until their production was banned through the Toxic Substances Control Act in 1979.
PCBs are known for their toxic properties and environmental persistence.
They are composed of biphenyl molecules to which chlorine atoms are attached, resulting in different forms or congeners with varying degrees of chlorination.
PCBs were favored for their desirable physical and chemical properties, such as thermal stability, electrical insulation, and flame retardancy.
These chemicals were primarily used as coolants and lubricants in electrical equipment.
Their negative impact on human health and the environment led to the implementation of regulations to restrict their use and manage their disposal.
Exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) has been associated with various health effects.
Here are some of the known health effects linked to PCB exposure:
It’s important to note that the health effects of PCB exposure can vary depending on the level and duration of exposure, as well as individual susceptibility.
Yes, PCBs are banned in the United States.
PCBs were banned in 1979, and plans were made to properly dispose of these toxic substances and use alternatives.
However, PCBs are still found in some older buildings, products, manufacturing process, and other use cases.
The removal and disposal of PCB waste requires careful handling to prevent further contamination and potential health and environmental risks.
Here are the general steps involved in PCB removal and disposal:
Exposure to PCBs can occur through the workplace or environmental sources, such as PCB contaminated fish.
Those who have been exposed to PCBs tend to be the following groups:
PCB congeners are individual chemical compounds that belong to the group of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs).
PCB congeners are formed by varying the number and position of chlorine atoms attached to the biphenyl structure.
Different congeners have distinct combinations and arrangements of chlorine atoms, resulting in unique chemical properties and potential health effects.
The term “congener” is used to describe the specific variant of a chemical compound within a larger group or family.
In the case of PCBs, congeners refer to the different forms or types of PCB compounds that exist.
Each PCB congener has its own set of characteristics, such as its level of chlorination, stability, persistence in the environment, and potential for bioaccumulation.
Some congeners are more prevalent in the environment due to historical usage, while others may be more toxic or persistent.
It is important to note that different PCB congeners can have varying degrees of toxicity and environmental impact.
Some congeners have been found to be more harmful to human health and the environment than others, and their presence in PCB mixtures can influence the overall risk and potential effects associated with exposure to these chemicals.
PCB mixtures, commonly known by the trade name Aroclor Series, were typically manufactured as a combination of different PCB congeners.
These mixtures were created by gradually adding chlorine to batches of biphenyl until reaching a specific target chlorine percentage by weight.
While commercial mixtures with higher chlorine percentages contained a greater proportion of heavily chlorinated congeners, all mixtures were expected to contain various congeners at different levels.
Although PCBs were sold under different names, the Aroclor series was the most prevalent.
Aroclor, a well-known PCB mixture, was produced between approximately 1930 and 1979.
It encompasses various types, each distinguished by a suffix number representing the degree of chlorination. The numbering convention for different Aroclors follows this pattern:
The first two digits typically indicate the number of carbon atoms in the phenyl rings (in the case of PCBs, this is 12).
The second two numbers indicate the approximate chlorine percentage by weight in the mixture.
For example, Aroclor 1254 suggests that the mixture contains approximately 54% chlorine.
Owner & Attorney - TorHoerman Law
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
In this case, we obtained a verdict of $495 Million for our client’s child who was diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis after consuming baby formula manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $20 Million for our client after they suffered a Toxic Tort Injury due to chemical exposure.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $103.8 Million for our client after they suffered a COX-2 Inhibitors Injury.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $4 Million for our client after they suffered a Traumatic Brain Injury while at daycare.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $2.8 Million for our client after they suffered an injury due to a Defective Heart Device.
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
You can learn more about the PCB Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
They helped my elderly uncle receive compensation for the loss of his wife who was administered a dangerous drug. He consulted with this firm because of my personal recommendation and was very pleased with the compassion, attention to detail and response he received. Definitely recommend this firm for their 5 star service.
When I wanted to join the Xarelto class action lawsuit, I chose TorrHoerman Law from a search of a dozen or so law firm websites. I was impressed with the clarity of the information they presented. I gave them a call, and was again impressed, this time with the quality of our interactions.
TorHoerman Law is an awesome firm to represent anyone that has been involved in a case that someone has stated that it's too difficult to win. The entire firm makes you feel like you’re part of the family, Tor, Eric, Jake, Kristie, Chad, Tyler, Kathy and Steven are the best at what they do.
TorHorman Law is awesome
I can’t say enough how grateful I was to have TorHoerman Law help with my case. Jacob Plattenberger is very knowledgeable and an amazing lawyer. Jillian Pileczka was so patient and kind, helping me with questions that would come up. Even making sure my special needs were taken care of for meetings.
TorHoerman Law fights for justice with their hardworking and dedicated staff. Not only do they help their clients achieve positive outcomes, but they are also generous and important pillars of the community with their outreach and local support. Thank you THL!
Hands down one of the greatest group of people I had the pleasure of dealing with!
A very kind and professional staff.
Very positive experience. Would recommend them to anyone.
A very respectful firm.
Edwardsville, IL
Chicago, IL
St. Louis, MO
Clayton, MO
Naperville, IL