If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced Chicago personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation Chicago personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in Chicago, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced Chicago auto accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in Chicago, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our Chicago truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in Chicago or the greater Chicagoland area – you may be eligible to file a Chicago motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Chicago motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in Chicago at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file a Chicago bike accident lawsuit.
Contact a Chicago bicycle accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
Chicago is one of the nation’s largest construction centers.
Thousands of men and women work on sites across the city and metropolitan area on tasks ranging from skilled trades to administrative operations.
Unfortunately, construction site accidents are fairly common.
Contact TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options with an experienced Chicago construction accident lawyer, free of charge and no obligation required.
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced Chicago nursing home abuse attorney from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of Chicago, or the greater Chicagoland area, and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact a Chicago wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in Chicago you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact a Chicago slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact a Chicago daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced Edwardsville personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation Edwardsville personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in Edwardsville, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville car accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in Edwardsville, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our Edwardsville truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in Edwardsville – you may be eligible to file an Edwardsville motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in Edwardsville at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file an Edwardsville bike accident lawsuit.
Contact an Edwardsville bicycle accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville nursing home abuse attorney from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of Edwardsville and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact an Edwardsville wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in Edwardsville you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact an Edwardsville slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact an Edwardsville daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
If you or a loved one suffered injuries on someone else’s property in Edwardsville IL, you may be entitled to financial compensation.
If property owners fail to keep their premises safe, and their negligence leads to injuries, property damages or other losses as a result of an accident or incident, a premises liability lawsuit may be possible.
Contact an Edwardsville premises liability lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation case consultation.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced St. Louis personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation St. Louis personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in St. Louis, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced St. Louis auto accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in St. Louis, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our St. Louis truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in St. Louis or the greater St. Louis area – you may be eligible to file a St. Louis motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced St. Louis motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in St. Louis at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file a St. Louis bike accident lawsuit.
Contact a St. Louis bicycle accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
St. Louis is one of the nation’s largest construction centers.
Thousands of men and women work on sites across the city and metropolitan area on tasks ranging from skilled trades to administrative operations.
Unfortunately, construction site accidents are fairly common.
Contact TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options with an experienced St. Louis construction accident lawyer, free of charge and no obligation required.
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced St. Louis nursing home abuse attorney from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of St. Louis, or the greater St. Louis area, and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact a St. Louis wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in St. Louis you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact a St. Louis slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact a St. Louis daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
Suboxone, a medication often used to treat opioid use disorder (OUD), has become a vital tool which offers a safer and more controlled approach to managing opioid addiction.
Despite its widespread use, Suboxone has been linked to severe tooth decay and dental injuries.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuits claim that the companies failed to warn about the risks of tooth decay and other dental injuries associated with Suboxone sublingual films.
Depo-Provera, a contraceptive injection, has been linked to an increased risk of developing brain tumors (including glioblastoma and meningioma).
Women who have used Depo-Provera and subsequently been diagnosed with brain tumors are filing lawsuits against Pfizer (the manufacturer), alleging that the company failed to adequately warn about the risks associated with the drug.
Despite the claims, Pfizer maintains that Depo-Provera is safe and effective, citing FDA approval and arguing that the scientific evidence does not support a causal link between the drug and brain tumors.
You may be eligible to file a Depo Provera Lawsuit if you used Depo-Provera and were diagnosed with a brain tumor.
Tepezza, approved by the FDA in 2020, is used to treat Thyroid Eye Disease (TED), but some patients have reported hearing issues after its use.
The Tepezza lawsuit claims that Horizon Therapeutics failed to warn patients about the potential risks and side effects of the drug, leading to hearing loss and other problems, such as tinnitus.
You may be eligible to file a Tepezza Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Tepezza and subsequently suffered permanent hearing loss or tinnitus.
Elmiron, a drug prescribed for interstitial cystitis, has been linked to serious eye damage and vision problems in scientific studies.
Thousands of Elmiron Lawsuits have been filed against Janssen Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturer, alleging that the company failed to warn patients about the potential risks.
You may be eligible to file an Elmiron Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Elmiron and subsequently suffered vision loss, blindness, or any other eye injury linked to the prescription drug.
The chemotherapy drug Taxotere, commonly used for breast cancer treatment, has been linked to severe eye injuries, permanent vision loss, and permanent hair loss.
Taxotere Lawsuits are being filed by breast cancer patients and others who have taken the chemotherapy drug and subsequently developed vision problems.
If you or a loved one used Taxotere and subsequently developed vision damage or other related medical problems, you may be eligible to file a Taxotere Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Although pressure cookers were designed to be safe and easy to use, a number of these devices have been found to have a defect that can lead to excessive buildup of internal pressure.
The excessive pressure may result in an explosion that puts users at risk of serious injuries such as burns, lacerations, an even electrocution.
If your pressure cooker exploded and caused substantial burn injuries or other serious injuries, you may be eligible to file a Pressure Cooker Lawsuit and secure financial compensation for your injuries and damages.
Several studies have found a correlation between heavy social media use and mental health challenges, especially among younger users.
Social media harm lawsuits claim that social media companies are responsible for onsetting or heightening mental health problems, eating disorders, mood disorders, and other negative experiences of teens and children
You may be eligible to file a Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit if you are the parents of a teen, or teens, who attribute their use of social media platforms to their mental health problems.
The Paragard IUD, a non-hormonal birth control device, has been linked to serious complications, including device breakage during removal.
Numerous lawsuits have been filed against Teva Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturer of Paragard, alleging that the company failed to warn about the potential risks.
If you or a loved one used a Paragard IUD and subsequently suffered complications and/or injuries, you may qualify for a Paragard Lawsuit.
Patients with the PowerPort devices may possibly be at a higher risk of serious complications or injury due to a catheter failure, according to lawsuits filed against the manufacturers of the Bard PowerPort Device.
If you or a loved one have been injured by a Bard PowerPort Device, you may be eligible to file a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products for injuries, pain and suffering, and financial costs related to complications and injuries of these medical devices.
Over 100,000 Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits have been filed on behalf of women injured by vaginal mesh and pelvic mesh products.
If you or a loved one have suffered serious complications or injuries from vaginal mesh, you may be eligible to file a Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit.
Parents and guardians are filing lawsuits against major video game companies (including Epic Games, Activision Blizzard, and Microsoft), alleging that they intentionally designed their games to be addictive — leading to severe mental and physical health issues in minors.
The lawsuits claim that these companies used psychological tactics and manipulative game designs to keep players engaged for extended periods — causing problems such as anxiety, depression, and social withdrawal.
You may be eligible to file a Video Game Addiction Lawsuit if your child has been diagnosed with gaming addiction or has experienced negative effects from excessive gaming.
Above ground pool accidents have led to lawsuits against manufacturers due to defective restraining belts that pose serious safety risks to children.
These belts, designed to provide structural stability, can inadvertently act as footholds, allowing children to climb into the pool unsupervised, increasing the risk of drownings and injuries.
Parents and guardians are filing lawsuits against pool manufacturers, alleging that the defective design has caused severe injuries and deaths.
If your child was injured or drowned in an above ground pool accident involving a defective restraining belt, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.
Recent scientific studies have found that the use of chemical hair straightening products, hair relaxers, and other hair products present an increased risk of uterine cancer, endometrial cancer, breast cancer, and other health problems.
Legal action is being taken against manufacturers and producers of these hair products for their failure to properly warn consumers of potential health risks.
You may be eligible to file a Hair Straightener Cancer Lawsuit if you or a loved one used chemical hair straighteners, hair relaxers, or other similar hair products, and subsequently were diagnosed with:
AFFF (Aqueous Film Forming Foam) is a firefighting foam that has been linked to various health issues, including cancer, due to its PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) content.
Numerous AFFF Lawsuits have been filed against AFFF manufacturers, alleging that they knew about the health risks but failed to warn the public.
AFFF Firefighting Foam lawsuits aim to hold manufacturers accountable for putting peoples’ health at risk.
You may be eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit if you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer.
Paraquat, a widely-used herbicide, has been linked to Parkinson’s disease, leading to numerous Paraquat Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits against its manufacturers for failing to warn about the risks of chronic exposure.
Due to its toxicity, the EPA has restricted the use of Paraquat and it is currently banned in over 30 countries.
You may be eligible to file a Paraquat Lawsuit if you or a loved one were exposed to Paraquat and subsequently diagnosed with Parkinson’s Disease or other related health conditions.
Mesothelioma is an aggressive form of cancer primarily caused by exposure to asbestos.
Asbestos trust funds were established in the 1970s to compensate workers harmed by asbestos-containing products.
These funds are designed to pay out claims to those who developed mesothelioma or other asbestos-related diseases due to exposure.
Those exposed to asbestos and diagnosed with mesothelioma may be eligible to file a Mesothelioma Lawsuit.
Studies have found a link between toxic baby formula and Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) — a severe intestinal condition in premature infants.
Parents and guardians are filing NEC Lawsuits against baby formula manufacturers, alleging that the formulas contain harmful ingredients leading to NEC.
Despite the claims, Abbott and Mead Johnson deny the allegations, arguing that their products are thoroughly researched and dismissing the scientific evidence linking their formulas to NEC, while the FDA issued a warning to Abbott regarding safety concerns of a formula product.
You may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit if your child received baby bovine-based (cow’s milk) baby formula in the maternity ward or NICU of a hospital and was subsequently diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC).
PFAS contamination lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers and suppliers of PFAS chemicals, alleging that these substances have contaminated water sources and products, leading to severe health issues.
Plaintiffs claim that prolonged exposure to PFAS through contaminated drinking water and products has caused cancers, thyroid disease, and other health problems.
The lawsuits target companies like 3M, DuPont, and Chemours, accusing them of knowingly contaminating the environment with PFAS and failing to warn about the risks.
If you or a loved one has been exposed to PFAS-contaminated water or products and has developed health issues, you may be eligible to file a PFAS lawsuit.
The Roundup Lawsuit claims that Monsanto’s popular weed killer, Roundup, causes cancer.
Numerous studies have linked the main ingredient, glyphosate, to Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, Leukemia, and other Lymphatic cancers.
Despite this, Monsanto continues to deny these claims.
Victims of Roundup exposure who developed cancer are filing Roundup Lawsuits against Monsanto, seeking compensation for medical expenses, pain, and suffering.
Our firm is about people. That is our motto and that will always be our reality.
We do our best to get to know our clients, understand their situations, and get them the compensation they deserve.
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Without our team, we would’nt be able to provide our clients with anything close to the level of service they receive when they work with us.
The THL Team commits to the sincere belief that those injured by the misconduct of others, especially large corporate profit mongers, deserve justice for their injuries.
Our team is what has made TorHoerman Law a very special place since 2009.
The Scott Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit investigation concerns forever chemicals in drinking water and groundwater in and around the Illinois Air Force Base.
TorHoerman Law is currently investigating a potential Scott Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit.
On this page, we’ll discuss the Scott Air Force Base PFAS Lawsuit investigation, the levels of PFAS chemicals in groundwater at Scott Air Force Base, the dangers of PFAS chemicals in drinking water and groundwater, health risks linked to PFAS exposure, and much more.
Scott Air Force Base (AFB) in Illinois has been identified as a site of concern for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) contamination, primarily due to the historical use of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) in firefighting activities.
PFAS are synthetic chemicals known for their persistence in the environment and potential adverse health effects.
The primary source of PFAS contamination at Scott AFB is the use of AFFF, a firefighting foam employed since the 1970s to extinguish petroleum-based fires.
This foam contains PFAS compounds, which can leach into soil and groundwater — leading to environmental contamination.
In 2015, the Air Force Civil Engineer Center (AFCEC) conducted preliminary PFAS testing at Scott AFB, identifying areas with potentially elevated levels due to past firefighting activities.
Subsequent investigations included sampling of on-base and off-base water sources.
In 2020, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency recommended testing public water supplies up to 15 miles south and east of the base, as well as privately owned wells within four miles, to assess potential PFAS contamination.
Under the EPA’s updated 2024 regulations on PFAS in drinking water, the acceptable levels for PFOS and PFOA are now set at just 4 parts per trillion (ppt) due to the growing body of evidence linking even minimal exposure to serious health risks.
When comparing this regulatory limit to the levels found at Scott Air Force Base, the discrepancy is alarming.
According to the Environmental Working Group, PFOS levels at Scott Air Force Base are 20,250 times higher than the EPA’s standard — while PFOA levels are 15,500 times higher.
The combined PFOS and PFOA levels are 26,000 times above the EPA’s threshold.
Legal action is being investigated for individuals, including military service members and others, who consumed PFAS contaminated drinking water at Scott Air Force Base and subsequently suffered health problems.
If you or a loved one experienced health effects due to PFAS drinking water contamination at Scott AFB, contact us for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page for a free and instant case evaluation.
Exposure to PFAS in water has led to serious health consequences for many, with individuals experiencing conditions such as cancer, thyroid disease, and immune disorders that disrupt their daily lives and well-being.
PFAS chemicals accumulate in the body, compounding their effects over time and leaving families to deal with the long-term health risks of exposure.
Lawyers are actively investigating the potential for PFAS litigation relating to water contamination at and around military bases in the United States.
Contact us for more information.
Certain PFAS have been found at detectable levels in the groundwater at Scott Air Force Base in St. Clair County, Illinois, raising serious concerns for the health and safety of those in the surrounding communities.
Scott Air Force Base (AFB) has historically utilized Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) for firefighting purposes.
AFFF, containing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), has been employed since the 1970s to effectively extinguish petroleum-based fires, such as those involving aircraft.
The use of AFFF at Scott Air Force Base has resulted in PFAS seeping into the ground during firefighting training exercises and actual fire emergencies.
Firefighting foam was commonly sprayed from hoses during training drills and deployed through automated systems in aircraft hangars, where it coated large areas to suppress fuel fires.
Over time, these chemicals have migrated through the soil, reaching the base’s groundwater and potentially contaminating drinking water sources both on and off the base.
Because PFAS are highly persistent and do not easily break down, they remain in the water supply for extended periods, raising significant concerns and health risks for those relying on nearby wells or water systems.
The widespread contamination underscores the risks posed by decades of PFAS use, with health implications for anyone exposed to the polluted water.
According to data collected by the Environmental Working Group (EWG), PFAS levels at Scott Air Force Base are as follows:
In April 2024, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established the first-ever national, legally enforceable drinking water standards for six PFAS chemicals.
The limits for the specific chemicals found at Scott AFB (PFOA and PFOS) are at a mere 4 parts per trillion (ppt).
As mentioned above, PFOS levels at Scott Air Force Base are 20,250 times higher than the new rule implemented by the EPA, while PFOA levels are 15,500 times higher.
The combined PFOS and PFOA levels at Scott AFB are 26,000 times above the EPA’s threshold, underscoring the severity of PFAS contamination at the site.
Individuals exposed to PFAS in drinking water at Scott AFB include those living on or near the base who rely on local water supplies.
Military personnel and their families stationed at Scott AFB may have been exposed, as well as civilian employees and contractors who worked on base.
Residents in nearby communities with private wells are at risk, especially in areas where PFAS levels have exceeded EPA health advisories.
The following groups may suffer from PFAS exposure resulting from AFFF at Scott AFB:
Testing has detected PFAS chemicals in public drinking water systems and private wells near Scott Air Force Base (AFB).
In 2020, the Air Force began sampling off-base wells to assess potential contamination from PFAS, particularly perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA).
At least one off-base residential well was found to have PFAS levels exceeding the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) lifetime health advisory of 70 parts per trillion (ppt).
In response, the Air Force provided alternative drinking water sources to affected residents and initiated further investigations to determine the extent of contamination.
The presence of PFAS in nearby private wells raises concerns about potential exposure for residents in the surrounding communities.
Ongoing monitoring and remediation efforts are essential to ensure the safety of drinking water sources near Scott AFB.
Scott Air Force Base (AFB) in Illinois is among numerous U.S. military installations grappling with significant PFAS contamination.
The Department of Defense has identified over 700 military sites with known or suspected releases of these toxic chemicals, primarily from the extensive use of firefighting foams.
At Scott AFB, testing has revealed PFAS levels in groundwater that far exceed the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) health advisory limits, raising concerns for both military personnel and nearby residents.
The health implications of PFAS exposure suffered by military service members are severe, with links to cancers, thyroid disease, liver damage, and immune system suppression.
Communities surrounding military bases, including Scott AFB, have reported contaminated drinking water supplies, leading to increased health risks and prompting legal actions against manufacturers and the military.
Cleanup efforts are underway at many sites, but the persistence of PFAS in the environment makes remediation challenging and costly.
The ongoing contamination at military bases like Scott AFB underscores the urgent need for comprehensive strategies to address PFAS pollution and protect public health.
In April 2024, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) established the first national, legally enforceable drinking water standards for six specific per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).
EPA Issued PFAS Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) are:
The Hazard Index is a tool used to evaluate the combined risk of exposure to multiple PFAS when they co-occur in drinking water.
It accounts for the additive effects of these chemicals, ensuring that the total exposure does not exceed safe levels.
These regulations aim to protect public health by reducing exposure to these persistent chemicals, which have been linked to various adverse health effects, including certain cancers, liver damage, and immune system impacts.
Public water systems are required to monitor for these PFAS and take necessary actions to comply with the established MCLs.
PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are a group of synthetic chemicals used in various industries due to their resistance to heat, water, and oil.
Often called “forever chemicals,” PFAS do not break down naturally and can remain in the environment and human body for decades.
These chemicals were initially used in products like non-stick cookware, water-resistant clothing, and firefighting foams, particularly in high-risk areas like military bases and airports.
The stability of PFAS means they easily enter and persist in soil, water, and air.
When used in firefighting foams, PFAS can seep into groundwater, contaminating drinking supplies for surrounding communities.
People exposed to PFAS through contaminated water face elevated health risks, including certain cancers, liver damage, thyroid disease, immune system suppression, and reproductive issues.
These health risks come from the ability of PFAS to accumulate in the body over time, compounding their toxic effects.
The dangers of PFAS go beyond personal health; they disrupt entire ecosystems.
Animals exposed to PFAS experience similar health impacts, which can then transfer up the food chain to humans.
This cycle makes PFAS not only an immediate health risk but also an ongoing environmental threat.
Addressing PFAS contamination requires extensive cleanup efforts that are costly and technically challenging.
Exposure to PFAS chemicals in water has been linked to an increased risk of various serious health conditions, even at low levels. PFAS are known to accumulate in the body over time, gradually intensifying their impact on human health.
Research has shown that PFAS can interfere with hormone function, weaken the immune system, and cause long-lasting damage to major organs.
Individuals exposed to PFAS through drinking water may face a greater likelihood of developing cancers and chronic diseases.
Vulnerable groups, such as pregnant women and children, are at particularly high risk of health issues due to PFAS exposure.
Given PFAS’s persistence in the body, even brief exposure can lead to prolonged health effects, posing significant risks to public health.
Potential health effects of PFAS exposure in water include:
Independent studies have linked exposure to perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) and other PFAS to several adverse health effects, including increased cholesterol levels, thyroid disease, liver damage, and certain cancers.
The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) has detected PFAS in the blood of the vast majority of the U.S. population, indicating widespread exposure.
PFAS manufacturers and chemical companies are facing lawsuits from individuals and governmental agencies due to the widespread health and environmental impacts of these chemicals.
Plaintiffs in these cases argue that companies failed to warn the public about the dangers of PFAS, despite being aware of their toxicity and persistence.
Lawsuits often seek compensation for medical expenses, environmental cleanup costs, and damages related to property devaluation.
Contaminated drinking water has been a primary focus of PFAS litigation.
DuPont, the first major PFAS manufacturer, settled over 3,000 personal injury claims from residents living near the Washington Works factory in Parkersburg, West Virginia for more than $670 million.
Communities near military bases face similar struggles as those in Parkersburg, West Virginia, as PFAS from firefighting foam continues to contaminate local water sources.
The extensive use of AFFF on military installations has left a lasting impact, with PFAS seeping into groundwater and posing long-term health risks to both service members and nearby residents.
Legal actions are not only aiming to secure compensation for affected individuals but also to drive change in how these chemicals are managed and regulated.
Potential defendants in PFAS lawsuits include some of the largest chemical and manufacturing companies that produced, supplied, or used PFAS in consumer products and firefighting foam.
These companies are being sued for the alleged harm their products have caused to public health and the environment, particularly through contamination of drinking water sources.
Plaintiffs argue that these companies knew of PFAS’s toxicity yet continued to manufacture and distribute these chemicals.
Notably, lawsuits are targeting companies involved in the production of AFFF, widely used at military bases and industrial sites.
Key Potential Defendants in PFAS and AFFF Litigation include:
Exposure to PFAS in water brings serious health risks, as these persistent chemicals accumulate in the body over time, leading to increased chances of cancers, immune disorders, and liver damage.
The presence of PFAS in drinking water means that families and entire communities may be unknowingly affected, facing potential long-term health issues from daily use.
This ongoing exposure, especially in vulnerable populations, underscores the urgent need for clean, safe water and immediate action to reduce PFAS contamination in our environments.
If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS-contaminated drinking water at or around Scott Air Force Base (AFB), contact our law firm today for a free consultation.
Use the chat feature on this page to get in touch with our law firm and for a free case evaluation.
Lawyers are actively investigating the potential for PFAS Litigation against manufacturers who may be responsible for rampant contamination at and around military sites.
Building a strong PFAS claim requires thorough and organized evidence to demonstrate exposure and its effects.
Key documents, such as medical records and water testing results, help establish the link between
PFAS contamination and health issues.
Gathering this evidence is essential to support your claim and increase the likelihood of a successful outcome.
Evidence in a PFAS Lawsuit may include:
Toxic PFAS chemicals have been detected in water in and around Scott Air Force Base.
PFAS pollution is a national health concern, and is especially relevant near military sites where firefighting foam was used.
Exposure to PFAS contaminated water has been linked to a number of human health problems and environmental damage.
Our PFAS Lawyers are currently investigating lawsuits against chemical companies and PFAS manufacturers who knew about the risks of health effects but failed to warn the public.
If you’ve suffered from the serious health risks of exposure to PFAS at Scott AFB, you may be eligible to file a claim.
Contact our law firm today for a free consultation.
Use the chat feature on this page for an instant case evaluation to find out if you qualify for a PFAS claim instantly.
Symptoms of exposure to PFAS can vary widely and often depend on the duration and level of exposure.
Common health issues linked to PFAS include immune system suppression, hormonal imbalances, and various cancers.
People with prolonged exposure may also experience higher cholesterol levels and liver damage.
While some symptoms are general, others are specific and may require medical testing for confirmation.
Common Symptoms of PFAS Exposure:
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and other trusted agencies, human exposure to PFAS contamination in drinking water has been linked to a number of serious health effects.
PFAS chemicals accumulate in the body over time, increasing the risk of developing chronic and potentially life-threatening conditions.
Studies have shown that PFAS can interfere with hormone function, damage organs, and weaken the immune system, making individuals more susceptible to illnesses.
Because PFAS do not easily break down, even low levels of exposure can lead to long-term health issues that may affect multiple generations.
Health Issues Associated with PFAS Exposure:
Yes, testing for PFAS in tap water is possible, though it often requires specialized methods.
Many public water utilities are beginning to conduct regular PFAS testing in compliance with new EPA guidelines, providing results to local residents if PFAS are detected.
For those on private wells or interested in testing their own tap water, professional testing services are available through certified environmental labs.
While at-home PFAS testing kits are emerging on the market, these kits may lack the sensitivity and accuracy of laboratory testing, which can detect even trace amounts.
People relying on well water, especially near industrial sites or military bases, are advised to test for PFAS due to the higher likelihood of contamination in unmonitored sources.
Laboratory testing can provide a detailed report on the specific PFAS chemicals present, allowing individuals to understand their exposure levels more accurately.
To ensure reliable results, residents should seek out labs certified by the EPA or their state environmental agencies for PFAS testing.
The EPA’s Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR) mandates that public water systems monitor specific unregulated contaminants, including per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), to assess their presence in drinking water.
This data collection aids in understanding the prevalence of PFAS across various regions and informs potential regulatory actions.
The UCMR has revealed that a significant number of public water systems contain PFAS at varying levels, highlighting the need for comprehensive strategies to address these hazardous substances.
Manufacturers of defective products containing PFAS have faced numerous legal actions, including class action lawsuits and multidistrict litigation (MDL).
For instance, in 2017, DuPont and Chemours agreed to a settlement amount of $671 million to resolve thousands of lawsuits alleging PFAS contamination.
Recently filed cases continue to emerge as more communities discover PFAS in their environment.
These legal proceedings aim to hold companies accountable for environmental damage and health issues linked to PFAS exposure.
One of the most prominent areas of PFAS litigation involves Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF), a firefighting foam widely used at military bases and airports that contains high levels of PFAS.
Thousands of firefighters, military personnel, and nearby residents have filed AFFF lawsuits, alleging they were exposed to PFAS through AFFF, leading to health issues like cancer and immune disorders.
The AFFF lawsuits have been consolidated into multi-district litigation (MDL) to streamline the legal process and address similar claims collectively.
Plaintiffs argue that manufacturers were aware of the dangers posed by PFAS in AFFF yet continued its distribution without proper warnings or efforts to remove PFAS from their products.
These cases seek to secure compensation for medical expenses and remediation efforts, while also pushing for stricter regulations on PFAS in firefighting products to prevent further harm.
Owner & Attorney - TorHoerman Law
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
In this case, we obtained a verdict of $495 Million for our client’s child who was diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis after consuming baby formula manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $20 Million for our client after they suffered a Toxic Tort Injury due to chemical exposure.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $103.8 Million for our client after they suffered a COX-2 Inhibitors Injury.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $4 Million for our client after they suffered a Traumatic Brain Injury while at daycare.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $2.8 Million for our client after they suffered an injury due to a Defective Heart Device.
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
You can learn more about the PFAS Contamination Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
They helped my elderly uncle receive compensation for the loss of his wife who was administered a dangerous drug. He consulted with this firm because of my personal recommendation and was very pleased with the compassion, attention to detail and response he received. Definitely recommend this firm for their 5 star service.
When I wanted to join the Xarelto class action lawsuit, I chose TorrHoerman Law from a search of a dozen or so law firm websites. I was impressed with the clarity of the information they presented. I gave them a call, and was again impressed, this time with the quality of our interactions.
TorHoerman Law is an awesome firm to represent anyone that has been involved in a case that someone has stated that it's too difficult to win. The entire firm makes you feel like you’re part of the family, Tor, Eric, Jake, Kristie, Chad, Tyler, Kathy and Steven are the best at what they do.
TorHorman Law is awesome
I can’t say enough how grateful I was to have TorHoerman Law help with my case. Jacob Plattenberger is very knowledgeable and an amazing lawyer. Jillian Pileczka was so patient and kind, helping me with questions that would come up. Even making sure my special needs were taken care of for meetings.
TorHoerman Law fights for justice with their hardworking and dedicated staff. Not only do they help their clients achieve positive outcomes, but they are also generous and important pillars of the community with their outreach and local support. Thank you THL!
Hands down one of the greatest group of people I had the pleasure of dealing with!
A very kind and professional staff.
Very positive experience. Would recommend them to anyone.
A very respectful firm.
Edwardsville, IL
Chicago, IL
St. Louis, MO
Clayton, MO
Naperville, IL