If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced Chicago personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation Chicago personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in Chicago, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced Chicago auto accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in Chicago, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our Chicago truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in Chicago or the greater Chicagoland area – you may be eligible to file a Chicago motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Chicago motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in Chicago at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file a Chicago bike accident lawsuit.
Contact a Chicago bicycle accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
Chicago is one of the nation’s largest construction centers.
Thousands of men and women work on sites across the city and metropolitan area on tasks ranging from skilled trades to administrative operations.
Unfortunately, construction site accidents are fairly common.
Contact TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options with an experienced Chicago construction accident lawyer, free of charge and no obligation required.
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced Chicago nursing home abuse attorney from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of Chicago, or the greater Chicagoland area, and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact a Chicago wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in Chicago you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact a Chicago slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact a Chicago daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced Edwardsville personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation Edwardsville personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in Edwardsville, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville car accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in Edwardsville, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our Edwardsville truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in Edwardsville – you may be eligible to file an Edwardsville motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in Edwardsville at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file an Edwardsville bike accident lawsuit.
Contact an Edwardsville bicycle accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville nursing home abuse attorney from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of Edwardsville and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact an Edwardsville wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in Edwardsville you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact an Edwardsville slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact an Edwardsville daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
If you or a loved one suffered injuries on someone else’s property in Edwardsville IL, you may be entitled to financial compensation.
If property owners fail to keep their premises safe, and their negligence leads to injuries, property damages or other losses as a result of an accident or incident, a premises liability lawsuit may be possible.
Contact an Edwardsville premises liability lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation case consultation.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced St. Louis personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation St. Louis personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in St. Louis, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced St. Louis auto accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in St. Louis, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our St. Louis truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in St. Louis or the greater St. Louis area – you may be eligible to file a St. Louis motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced St. Louis motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in St. Louis at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file a St. Louis bike accident lawsuit.
Contact a St. Louis bicycle accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
St. Louis is one of the nation’s largest construction centers.
Thousands of men and women work on sites across the city and metropolitan area on tasks ranging from skilled trades to administrative operations.
Unfortunately, construction site accidents are fairly common.
Contact TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options with an experienced St. Louis construction accident lawyer, free of charge and no obligation required.
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced St. Louis nursing home abuse attorney from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of St. Louis, or the greater St. Louis area, and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact a St. Louis wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in St. Louis you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact a St. Louis slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact a St. Louis daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
Suboxone, a medication often used to treat opioid use disorder (OUD), has become a vital tool which offers a safer and more controlled approach to managing opioid addiction.
Despite its widespread use, Suboxone has been linked to severe tooth decay and dental injuries.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuits claim that the companies failed to warn about the risks of tooth decay and other dental injuries associated with Suboxone sublingual films.
Depo-Provera, a contraceptive injection, has been linked to an increased risk of developing brain tumors (including glioblastoma and meningioma).
Women who have used Depo-Provera and subsequently been diagnosed with brain tumors are filing lawsuits against Pfizer (the manufacturer), alleging that the company failed to adequately warn about the risks associated with the drug.
Despite the claims, Pfizer maintains that Depo-Provera is safe and effective, citing FDA approval and arguing that the scientific evidence does not support a causal link between the drug and brain tumors.
You may be eligible to file a Depo Provera Lawsuit if you used Depo-Provera and were diagnosed with a brain tumor.
Tepezza, approved by the FDA in 2020, is used to treat Thyroid Eye Disease (TED), but some patients have reported hearing issues after its use.
The Tepezza lawsuit claims that Horizon Therapeutics failed to warn patients about the potential risks and side effects of the drug, leading to hearing loss and other problems, such as tinnitus.
You may be eligible to file a Tepezza Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Tepezza and subsequently suffered permanent hearing loss or tinnitus.
Elmiron, a drug prescribed for interstitial cystitis, has been linked to serious eye damage and vision problems in scientific studies.
Thousands of Elmiron Lawsuits have been filed against Janssen Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturer, alleging that the company failed to warn patients about the potential risks.
You may be eligible to file an Elmiron Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Elmiron and subsequently suffered vision loss, blindness, or any other eye injury linked to the prescription drug.
The chemotherapy drug Taxotere, commonly used for breast cancer treatment, has been linked to severe eye injuries, permanent vision loss, and permanent hair loss.
Taxotere Lawsuits are being filed by breast cancer patients and others who have taken the chemotherapy drug and subsequently developed vision problems.
If you or a loved one used Taxotere and subsequently developed vision damage or other related medical problems, you may be eligible to file a Taxotere Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Although pressure cookers were designed to be safe and easy to use, a number of these devices have been found to have a defect that can lead to excessive buildup of internal pressure.
The excessive pressure may result in an explosion that puts users at risk of serious injuries such as burns, lacerations, an even electrocution.
If your pressure cooker exploded and caused substantial burn injuries or other serious injuries, you may be eligible to file a Pressure Cooker Lawsuit and secure financial compensation for your injuries and damages.
Several studies have found a correlation between heavy social media use and mental health challenges, especially among younger users.
Social media harm lawsuits claim that social media companies are responsible for onsetting or heightening mental health problems, eating disorders, mood disorders, and other negative experiences of teens and children
You may be eligible to file a Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit if you are the parents of a teen, or teens, who attribute their use of social media platforms to their mental health problems.
The Paragard IUD, a non-hormonal birth control device, has been linked to serious complications, including device breakage during removal.
Numerous lawsuits have been filed against Teva Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturer of Paragard, alleging that the company failed to warn about the potential risks.
If you or a loved one used a Paragard IUD and subsequently suffered complications and/or injuries, you may qualify for a Paragard Lawsuit.
Patients with the PowerPort devices may possibly be at a higher risk of serious complications or injury due to a catheter failure, according to lawsuits filed against the manufacturers of the Bard PowerPort Device.
If you or a loved one have been injured by a Bard PowerPort Device, you may be eligible to file a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products for injuries, pain and suffering, and financial costs related to complications and injuries of these medical devices.
Over 100,000 Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits have been filed on behalf of women injured by vaginal mesh and pelvic mesh products.
If you or a loved one have suffered serious complications or injuries from vaginal mesh, you may be eligible to file a Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit.
Parents and guardians are filing lawsuits against major video game companies (including Epic Games, Activision Blizzard, and Microsoft), alleging that they intentionally designed their games to be addictive — leading to severe mental and physical health issues in minors.
The lawsuits claim that these companies used psychological tactics and manipulative game designs to keep players engaged for extended periods — causing problems such as anxiety, depression, and social withdrawal.
You may be eligible to file a Video Game Addiction Lawsuit if your child has been diagnosed with gaming addiction or has experienced negative effects from excessive gaming.
Above ground pool accidents have led to lawsuits against manufacturers due to defective restraining belts that pose serious safety risks to children.
These belts, designed to provide structural stability, can inadvertently act as footholds, allowing children to climb into the pool unsupervised, increasing the risk of drownings and injuries.
Parents and guardians are filing lawsuits against pool manufacturers, alleging that the defective design has caused severe injuries and deaths.
If your child was injured or drowned in an above ground pool accident involving a defective restraining belt, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.
Recent scientific studies have found that the use of chemical hair straightening products, hair relaxers, and other hair products present an increased risk of uterine cancer, endometrial cancer, breast cancer, and other health problems.
Legal action is being taken against manufacturers and producers of these hair products for their failure to properly warn consumers of potential health risks.
You may be eligible to file a Hair Straightener Cancer Lawsuit if you or a loved one used chemical hair straighteners, hair relaxers, or other similar hair products, and subsequently were diagnosed with:
AFFF (Aqueous Film Forming Foam) is a firefighting foam that has been linked to various health issues, including cancer, due to its PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) content.
Numerous AFFF Lawsuits have been filed against AFFF manufacturers, alleging that they knew about the health risks but failed to warn the public.
AFFF Firefighting Foam lawsuits aim to hold manufacturers accountable for putting peoples’ health at risk.
You may be eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit if you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer.
Paraquat, a widely-used herbicide, has been linked to Parkinson’s disease, leading to numerous Paraquat Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits against its manufacturers for failing to warn about the risks of chronic exposure.
Due to its toxicity, the EPA has restricted the use of Paraquat and it is currently banned in over 30 countries.
You may be eligible to file a Paraquat Lawsuit if you or a loved one were exposed to Paraquat and subsequently diagnosed with Parkinson’s Disease or other related health conditions.
Mesothelioma is an aggressive form of cancer primarily caused by exposure to asbestos.
Asbestos trust funds were established in the 1970s to compensate workers harmed by asbestos-containing products.
These funds are designed to pay out claims to those who developed mesothelioma or other asbestos-related diseases due to exposure.
Those exposed to asbestos and diagnosed with mesothelioma may be eligible to file a Mesothelioma Lawsuit.
Studies have found a link between toxic baby formula and Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) — a severe intestinal condition in premature infants.
Parents and guardians are filing NEC Lawsuits against baby formula manufacturers, alleging that the formulas contain harmful ingredients leading to NEC.
Despite the claims, Abbott and Mead Johnson deny the allegations, arguing that their products are thoroughly researched and dismissing the scientific evidence linking their formulas to NEC, while the FDA issued a warning to Abbott regarding safety concerns of a formula product.
You may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit if your child received baby bovine-based (cow’s milk) baby formula in the maternity ward or NICU of a hospital and was subsequently diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC).
PFAS contamination lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers and suppliers of PFAS chemicals, alleging that these substances have contaminated water sources and products, leading to severe health issues.
Plaintiffs claim that prolonged exposure to PFAS through contaminated drinking water and products has caused cancers, thyroid disease, and other health problems.
The lawsuits target companies like 3M, DuPont, and Chemours, accusing them of knowingly contaminating the environment with PFAS and failing to warn about the risks.
If you or a loved one has been exposed to PFAS-contaminated water or products and has developed health issues, you may be eligible to file a PFAS lawsuit.
The Roundup Lawsuit claims that Monsanto’s popular weed killer, Roundup, causes cancer.
Numerous studies have linked the main ingredient, glyphosate, to Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, Leukemia, and other Lymphatic cancers.
Despite this, Monsanto continues to deny these claims.
Victims of Roundup exposure who developed cancer are filing Roundup Lawsuits against Monsanto, seeking compensation for medical expenses, pain, and suffering.
Our firm is about people. That is our motto and that will always be our reality.
We do our best to get to know our clients, understand their situations, and get them the compensation they deserve.
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Without our team, we would’nt be able to provide our clients with anything close to the level of service they receive when they work with us.
The THL Team commits to the sincere belief that those injured by the misconduct of others, especially large corporate profit mongers, deserve justice for their injuries.
Our team is what has made TorHoerman Law a very special place since 2009.
Do You Qualify for the Philips CPAP Lawsuit?
Use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify instantly.
Philips has recalled millions of its CPAP, BiPAP, and ventilator devices due to potential health risks associated with the polyester-based polyurethane (PE-PUR) foam used in these devices.
The foam degradation can release toxic chemicals, potentially leading to cancer, respiratory issues, and other serious health problems.
TorHoerman Law is currently accepting Philips CPAP cancer lawsuit cases, offering free, no-obligation case consultations for individuals who believe they may have been harmed by these devices.
Philips has agreed to a substantial $1.1 billion settlement to resolve ongoing personal injury and medical monitoring class action lawsuits related to its DreamStation sleep apnea devices.
The pending court approval of this settlement aims to conclude the litigation involving devices previously recalled by Philips Respironics, a subsidiary of Philips.
Our law firm continues to actively accept new clients for the Philips CPAP lawsuit, offering free consultations and instant eligibility checks via our chatbot.
On this page, we’ll discuss the Philips CPAP Lawsuit, the current status of CPAP litigation for defective devices and related injuries, what to do if you’ve been injured by a defective CPAP machine, how Philips CPAP Lawyers can help you, and much more.
Sleep apnea machines, including ventilators, BiPAP, and CPAP machines, are designed to provide a continuous stream of air to help individuals with sleep apnea breathe more easily during sleep.
Defects in Philips sleep apnea devices, specifically the degradation of PE-PUR sound abatement foam, have been linked to serious injuries, including various forms of cancer due to inhalation or ingestion of toxic particles.
Polyester-based polyurethane (PE-PUR) sound abatement foam in recalled Philips CPAP machines can degrade, potentially leading to the development of lung cancer and other serious health conditions.
In response to these health risks, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) facilitated a massive CPAP recall of millions of Philips devices in 2021.
Lawsuits have been filed on behalf of people harmed by the recalled Philips CPAP devices, seeking compensation for the victims’ suffering, medical expenses, and other related damages.
If you or a loved one have developed cancer or other serious health problems from using a recalled Philips CPAP machine or other recalled product, you may be eligible to join others filing Philips CPAP Machine Lawsuits.
Contact a Philips CPAP Lawyer from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation case consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Philips CPAP Lawsuit instantly.
Injuries and health conditions linked to Philips sleep apnea machines can drastically impact a person’s life.
Lawsuits are still being filed against CPAP manufacturer Philips for failing to adequately warn users about the potential risks associated with the PE-PUR sound abatement foam in their devices and not taking sufficient actions to rectify the issue once it was identified.
Contact us if you have any questions about the Philips CPAP Lawsuit or are wondering if you might be eligible to file a CPAP Lawsuit.
We’re here to help you.
TorHoerman Law is no longer accepting clients for this litigation.
The Philips CPAP Lawsuit is ongoing.
Philips has agreed to a $1.1 billion settlement to resolve personal injury claims over its DreamStation sleep apnea devices.
Pending court approval, the settlement will resolve both the ongoing personal injury litigation and medical monitoring class action related to the devices, which Philips Respironics, a subsidiary, had previously recalled.
Earlier this year, the company said it would halt new sales of the machines in the United States following a series of recalls of the devices made by subsidiary Philips Respironics.
Our law firm is still accepting new clients for the Philips CPAP Lawsuit.
Contact us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Philips CPAP Lawsuit instantly.
Today, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania approved a consent decree against Philips Respironics, restricting the company’s operations following the recall of CPAP and BiPAP machines.
The decree mandates that Philips halt the production and sale of new respiratory therapy devices at certain U.S. facilities until compliance with federal safety standards are met.
Philips Respironics, along with Respironics California LLC and Philips Holding USA Inc., faces allegations from the Department of Justice, asserting violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act).
The complaint details that these violations involve the manufacturing of devices not up to good manufacturing practices, particularly regarding the PE-PUR foam used for sound abatement in CPAP and BiPAP machines, which can degrade and potentially cause harm to consumers.
The foam degradation could lead to the inhalation or ingestion of harmful particles or chemicals by the device user, prompting urgent FDA warnings and a substantial recall alert.
The consent decree includes several crucial measures:
This decree not only seeks to rectify the current compliance failures by Philips Respironics but also aims to establish rigorous safeguards to prevent future violations.
The decree is a significant enforcement action by federal authorities to protect public health and ensure the integrity of medical devices on the market.
Our lawyers are still investigating claims of cancer and other health problems in users of recalled Philips Respironics CPAP, BiPAP, and Ventilator devices.
If you’ve been injured or developed cancer after using a recalled Philips CPAP machine, contact our law firm for a free consultation.
Use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Philips CPAP Lawsuit instantly.
The Philips CPAP lawsuit, involving allegations of defective devices posing health risks, remains active.
The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) recently reported a slight increase in the total number of lawsuits filed against Philips, with 762 cases now pending consolidation in the multidistrict litigation (MDL).
The Philips CPAP Lawsuits center around claims that the foam used in these devices can deteriorate, potentially releasing harmful particles entering into users’ lungs.
Plaintiffs argue this defect increases the risk of cancer, respiratory problems, and other serious health issues.
More and more lawsuits are being filed against Philips for defective CPAP, BiPAP, and Ventilator devices, and a settlement has not been reached with the company.
In June 2021, Philips recalled up to 15 million CPAP devices manufactured and distributed to consumers between 2009 and 2021.
Since then, hundreds of people have come forward with complaints about health issues potentially linked to these devices.
If you’ve been diagnosed with cancer or other health problems related to a defective Philips CPAP, BiPAP, or Ventilator device, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Philips CPAP Lawsuit instantly.
The Philips CPAP Lawsuit is ongoing.
Concerns over health issues arising from Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) and Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) machines extend beyond Philips’ CPAP devices.
Sleepnet, a manufacturer of CPAP and BiPAP machines, has recalled a number of its devices due to potential health hazards.
The products malfunction when magnets are brought into close proximity to the mask, interfering with the performance.
This interference with the performance and position of the device can potentially result in serious injury or death.
The affected Sleepnet CPAP and BiPAP products include:
Philips, another CPAP device maker, is still facing lawsuits over its similar devices.
The lawsuit alleges that Philips’ CPAP and BiPAP machines, used by patients suffering from sleep apnea, may increase the risk of cancer.
Individuals have claimed that dangerous levels of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and other toxic particles are being released during the use of these devices, leading to severe health issues including cancer.
Turning the focus back to Sleepnet’s recall, it is crucial to understand that the safety concerns involving Sleepnet are separate and distinct from those associated with Philips’ devices.
The exact nature of the potential health hazards related to Sleepnet’s recall has not been fully disclosed.
In light of these recalls, users of CPAP and BiPAP machines are advised to check the recall status of their devices and to consult with their healthcare providers for alternative treatment options if necessary.
Those who have used Philips’ CPAP or BiPAP machines and have subsequently experienced health issues, including cancer, should seek guidance.
If you or someone you know has been negatively affected by any CPAP or BiPAP machine, call TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation.
You can also utilize the ChatBot on this page for immediate feedback.
The Philips CPAP Lawsuit is ongoing.
A total of 748 Philips CPAP Lawsuits are pending consolidation according to the most recent JPML filings.
This is a decrease from the previous months total of 760 lawsuits consolidated in the multidistrict litigation (MDL).
Multidistrict Litigations (MDLs) are legal procedures in the United States designed to handle multiple related civil lawsuits that involve similar issues, facts, or defendants.
Allegations raised in the lawsuits include claims that the abatement foam within the devices can degrade and release particles into the lungs, leading to an increased risk of cancer, respiratory issues, and other health problems.
Philips CPAP Lawsuits seek compensation for damages including medical expenses, pain and suffering, lost wages, and, in some cases, punitive damages.
Despite the slight decrease in lawsuits, the number of cases in the MDL remains high, suggesting continued legal challenges for Philips as it faces allegations of product liability and potential damages to patients using these devices.
If you or a loved one has been affected by the Philips CPAP machine, call today for a free consultation
You can also use the chatbot on this page for immediate feedback.
Medical manufacturers, including Philips, are mandated by law to present medical device reports (MDRs) when they identify incidents suggesting their devices might have instigated or contributed to severe injuries or fatalities.
Between 2011 and April 2021, Philips submitted 30 MDRs related to the PE-PUR foam breakdown in their CPAP, BiPAP machines, and ventilators.
PE-PUr foam breakdown refers to the process where the polyester-based polyurethane foam used in medical devices deteriorates, potentially releasing particles or chemicals that could be inhaled or swallowed by the user.
However, no patient injuries or deaths were reported within these MDRs.
Philips initiated communication with the FDA about intended corrective action in April 2021 due to foam deterioration concerns.
From April 2021 to September 2023, the FDA received over 116,000 MDRs, including 561 reports of death, associated with the PE-PUR foam breakdown.
Specifically, in 2023, the FDA received more than 17,000 MDRs for Philips CPAP and BiPAP devices, with 187 deaths reported within these MDRs.
The injuries recorded in these MDRs varied greatly ranging from cancer, pneumonia, headaches, coughs, to dyspnea (difficulty breathing), nodules, and chest pain.
In an effort to manage the situation, Philips Respironics has agreed to cease U.S. sales of their ventilators and CPAP breathing machines, pending a settlement with the FDA, according to a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Philips will continue servicing the machines already in use but will halt new sales until specific conditions are met.
The company has established a provision of approximately $392 million in anticipation of claims, remediation, and other associated costs in 2024.
This decision follows a voluntary recall initiated by Philips in June 2021 of certain ventilators due to concerns about the polyester-based foam.
Ingestion or inhalation of the deteriorated PE-PUR foam could lead to various health risks, including respiratory issues such as coughing, difficult breathing, or asthma, as well as other conditions like headaches, dizziness, and chest pain.
In severe cases, it could also contribute to more serious health problems like cancer or pneumonia.
Despite Philips’ assertion that the particulate matter levels released into users’ airways were within safety limits, the FDA expressed dissatisfaction with Philips’ testing and analysis and remained concerned about the risks posed to users from the recalled devices.
Should you or a family member have used a recalled Philips CPAP machine and developed cancer or sustained other injuries, you can seek justice now through the Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuit.
Reach out to TorHoerman Law for a complimentary consultation.
Utilize the chatbot on this page for immediate assessment of your eligibility for a Philips CPAP Lawsuit.
Currently, there are a total of 760 Philips CPAP Lawsuits consolidated into MDL according to the most recent JPML filings.
Multi-District Litigations (MDLs) are legal procedures in the United States designed to handle multiple related civil lawsuits that involve similar issues, facts, or defendants.
When numerous individuals or entities file lawsuits related to a common set of circumstances, such as product liability, pharmaceuticals, or mass tort cases, these cases can be consolidated into a single federal district court for pretrial proceedings.
MDLs aim to streamline the litigation process by centralizing the discovery process, reducing duplication of efforts, and ensuring consistent rulings on key legal issues.
If you or a loved one used a recalled Philips CPAP machine and subsequently developed cancer or other injuries, you may be eligible to file a Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation. You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Philips CPAP Lawsuit instantly.
Dutch health technology company Philips has announced that it will not sell new devices to treat sleep apnea in the U.S. for the foreseeable future as it works to comply with a settlement with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
This settlement came after the recall of millions of breathing devices and ventilators used to treat sleep apnea in 2021 due to concerns about toxic foam.
Philips stated that they have reached a consent decree outlining the improvements needed at their Respironics plants in the U.S., and until these conditions are met, no new Respironics devices will be sold in the U.S.
Philips’ shares declined by 8.3% following the announcement, and analysts believe it will be challenging for Philips to recover its U.S. market position.
The consent decree’s specific conditions and timeline for approval are yet to be determined, but the company anticipates the costs to be about 1% of total revenues in 2024.
Philips still faces ongoing cases from patients affected by the recalled devices and an investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice regarding the recall’s handling.
If you or a loved one used a recalled Philips CPAP machine and subsequently developed cancer or other injuries, you may be eligible to file a Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation. You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Philips CPAP Lawsuit instantly.
On January 5th, Philips filed a counter lawsuit against SoClean and its private equity owner, DWHP.
Philips alleges that SoClean had recklessly and unlawfully marketed its ozone cleaning devices as compatible with Philips’ CPAP and BiPAP devices, despite knowing that these ozone cleaners could potentially harm Philips Respironics’ devices from the inside.
This lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania.
The counter lawsuit comes after SoClean issued an urgent medical device field correction in November, informing users about a hose and mask adapter to mitigate risks associated with the previous device design and labeling.
Philips claims that it has suffered significant reputational damage and economic losses due to SoClean and DWHP’s actions.
They are seeking an injunction to prevent further false advertising, trademark dilution, and deceptive trade practices under New Hampshire state law.
Philips also seeks damages.
This legal action follows SoClean’s initial lawsuit against Philips in 2021, where SoClean sought $200 million in damages, alleging that Philips had blamed SoClean’s cleaners for problems related to the recall of certain Philips respiratory devices due to foam degradation issues.
Philips has since conducted extensive testing, suggesting that ozone significantly increases the risk of foam degradation in the recalled devices.
Although it is separate from the economic loss suit, the Philips CPAP injury lawsuit is still ongoing, and our lawyers are accepting clients from all 50 states.
If you or a loved one used a recalled Philips CPAP machine and subsequently developed cancer or other injuries, you may be eligible to file a Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation. You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Philips CPAP Lawsuit instantly.
After years of concerns regarding potential side effects, a recall has been initiated for SoClean CPAP cleaning devices, which utilize high levels of ozone, potentially harming users’ health.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced the recall on November 21, in response to a field correction letter from the manufacturer.
The devices will not be removed from the market but will come with a new User Manual and a hose and mask adapter to reduce ozone-related health risks.
SoClean, Inc. markets these devices to sterilize and deodorize CPAP machines, commonly used to treat sleep apnea.
However, the high ozone levels used have raised health concerns.
The FDA cautioned against using ozone or UV devices to clean CPAP units without the adapter.
Consumers with underlying lung diseases should consult their healthcare provider before using the CPAP cleaning device.
Despite the recall, SoClean faces legal actions from consumers.
They allege that SoClean did not adequately warn about the high ozone levels and marketed it as “activated oxygen.”
SoClean also sued Philips in October 2021, claiming that the CPAP foam recall was an attempt to shift blame for design flaws in Philips’ sleep apnea machines.
All SoClean lawsuits have been consolidated before U.S. District Judge Joy Flowers Conti, who also oversees the Philips CPAP lawsuits.
Early trials are expected to set precedents for potential settlements in both cases, although they won’t have a binding impact on other claims.
Although it is separate from the economic loss suit, the Philips CPAP injury lawsuit is still ongoing, and our lawyers are accepting clients from all 50 states.
If you or a loved one used a recalled Philips CPAP machine and subsequently developed cancer or other injuries, you may be eligible to file a Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation. You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Philips CPAP Lawsuit instantly.
Earlier this year, Philips set aside $615 million to help settle an influx of lawsuits related to its CPAP machines, biPAP machines, and ventilators.
On September 7th, Philips reached a deal to settle some of these cases—it must pay a baseline of $479 million to settle economic loss claims, and this number is subject to rise as the number of recalled devices increases.
The $479 million will only be used to settle economic loss claims — hundreds of injury claims and medical monitoring requests are still in ongoing legal proceedings and unaffected by this decision.
Also, the amount each individual receives from this settlement is dependent on what Philips device they filed economic loss claims for.
Although it is separate from the economic loss suit, the Philips CPAP injury lawsuit is still ongoing, and our lawyers are accepting clients from all 50 states.
If you or a loved one used a recalled Philips CPAP machine and subsequently developed cancer or other injuries, you may be eligible to file a Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Philips CPAP Lawsuit instantly.
The Philips CPAP Lawsuit is ongoing and our lawyers are still listening to potential clients’ stories from all 50 states.
Due to shared questions of fact and law present in lawsuits concerning Philips CPAP devices, these cases have been consolidated under the oversight of Senior U.S. District Judge Joy Flowers Conti in the Western District of Pennsylvania.
Nearly 700 Philips CPAP Lawsuits have been consolidated into the multidistrict litigation (MDL), which aims for organized discovery and pretrial procedures.
In the process of managing this consolidated litigation, Judge Conti has instructed the involved parties to implement a bellwether approach.
This involves selecting a small number of representative claims that will be readied for potential early trials in case widespread settlements for Philips CPAP claims are not achieved.
If you or a loved one used a recalled Philips CPAP machine and subsequently developed cancer or other injuries, you may be eligible to file a Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Philips CPAP Lawsuit instantly.
The ongoing multidistrict litigation involving CPAP lawsuits includes a component related to medical monitoring.
In the past two days, Philips, the defendant in these lawsuits, has challenged these claims in a federal court.
They argue that the CPAP lawsuits have not provided sufficient evidence of the plaintiffs’ exposure to the toxins in the insulating foam or the resulting injuries that would justify long-term monitoring.
The main argument put forth by Philips’ lawyers is that the “medical monitoring” complaint is based on speculation.
They contend that the complaint lacks a specific plan to monitor individuals who may have been exposed to the deteriorated sound-insulating foam in CPAP and BiPAP machines and ventilators, with the goal of detecting potential future illnesses at an early stage.
As part of a larger multidistrict litigation consolidated in Pittsburgh, the lawsuits are categorized into different groups.
These categories include claims for economic losses, personal injuries, and demands for long-term medical monitoring to anticipate potential diseases.
Koninklijke Philips NV has allocated $633.17 million as a provision, anticipating a settlement for the economic class action lawsuit in the United States related to the company’s recalled sleep apnea devices and respirators.
If you or a loved one used a recalled Philips CPAP machine and subsequently developed cancer or other injuries, you may be eligible to file a Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Philips CPAP Lawsuit instantly.
The Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuit is ongoing.
Our Philips CPAP Lawyers are available to speak with potential clients about their eligibility.
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) last month warned that repaired Philips CPAP machines may still pose a risk.
The FDA recalled certain Philips CPAP machines in 2021, but has now recalled all devices that were repaired by Philips and sent back to consumers.
The CEO of Philips said in an interview that he expects the Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuits to be settled by this year.
Estimates for Philips CPAP settlement amounts range between $100,000 to $500,000 per claim.
These numbers are by no means a guarantee of financial compensation for the Philips CPAP Lawsuit, and are merely estimations based on previous mass tort cases and product liability lawsuits involving cancer.
Visit this page for more updates on the Philips CPAP Lawsuit as they become available.
If you or a loved one used a recalled Philips CPAP machine and subsequently developed cancer or other injuries, you may be eligible to file a Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Philips CPAP Lawsuit instantly.
The Philips CPAP Cancer Lawsuit is ongoing and lawyers across the country are still accepting clients.
The Philips CPAP MDL is located in the Western District of Pennsylvania.
Hundreds of cases have been consolidated in the MDL, and more are expected to be included as time goes on.
If you or a loved one were injured by a recalled Philips CPAP device, you may be eligible to file a claim.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Philips CPAP Lawsuit instantly.
The FDA and Philips has updated the medical device reports (MDRs) related to the CPAP machine.
In these updated reports, it has been found that nearly 350 people have died from complications linked to the Philips CPAP, and there have been over 98,000 MDRs.
These deaths and injuries have resulted from the breakdown of PE-PUR foam in the CPAP machine, leading to patients swallowing or inhaling foam and chemicals.
The Philips CPAP Lawsuit is ongoing, and our lawyers are still accepting clients.
Contact us for a free consultation or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for a Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuit instantly.
The Philips CPAP Lawsuit is ongoing and lawyers across the country are still accepting clients.
Last month, a new claim registry program was established in the Philips CPAP MDL.
This allows victims and family members of victims to file a product liability claim without formally filing suit against the company.
The registry allows the court to understand the scope of potential claims against Philips and strategize how to proceed with the MDL.
Visit this page for more updates as they become available.
Reach out to TorHoerman Law for a free consultation or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for a Philips CPAP Lawsuit instantly.
The Philips CPAP litigation is ongoing and lawyers across the country are still accepting clients.
The Science Day for the Philips CPAP multidistrict litigation (MDL 3014), which allows plaintiff’s lawyers and the defense to establish scientific evidence, is scheduled for Thursday September 1st, 2022.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) also updated its information and medical device reporting for the Philips CPAP and BiPAP machines in question.
The FDA report mentions the following statistics:
These statistics from the FDA paint a troubling picture for both the company and those who have used the device.
If you or a loved one used the Philips CPAP or BiPAP machines and subsequently were or injured or killed, you may qualify for legal action.
Contact us for a free consultation or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for a lawsuit instantly.
The Philips CPAP Lawsuit is ongoing and lawyers across the country are still accepting cases.
The multidistrict litigation (MDL 3014) is going through pretrial discovery.
Most recently, a date for a “Science Show and Tell” has been set for September 1, 2022.
Visit this page for more updates as they become available.
The Philips CPAP litigation is ongoing and lawyers across the country are still accepting cases.
There are over 250 cases consolidated in multidistrict litigation (MDL 3014), and more added every month.
24 additional cases have been consolidated since May 2022.
Last month, the court filed an Initial Discovery Plan that established deadlines for the filing of important documents, written discovery, device inspection, fact sheets, and more.
Visit this page for more updates as they become available.
Recently, the US Department of Justice issued a subpoena to Philips regarding the CPAP recall, signaling that the government is seriously investigating the details of the recall.
Lawyers are also investigating whether even more medical conditions can be caused by the CPAP machine, such as skin cancer.
In June 2021, Philips Respironics initiated a recall that included an estimated 15 million ventilator, BiPAP, and CPAP devices worldwide due to safety concerns related to the breakdown of PE-PUR sound abatement foam used in these machines.
Recalled devices were manufactured between 2009 and April 26, 2021.
The Philips CPAP Lawsuit claims that PE PUR sound abatement foam in certain Philips Respironics ventilators, CPAP machines and BiPAP machines can degrade, putting users at risk for ingestion or inhalation of toxic foam.
The degradation of sound abatement foam can be accelerated by factors such as exposure to high temperatures, humidity, cleaning methods, and more.
Particles and chemicals released by the disintegrating foam pose serious health risks, including respiratory issues and chemical exposure that could lead to serious and long-term health problems.
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is requiring independent testing of the foam to understand the extent to which these emissions can potentially impact users.
PE PUR foam in Philips Respironics CPAP Machines may be linked to potential health risks, including:
Lawsuits have been filed on behalf of consumers harmed by the recalled Philips Respironics CPAP machine, ventilators and other products.
These lawsuits have been consolidated in the Philips CPAP MDL.
If you or a loved one used a Philips CPAP Machine, BiPAP Machine, or other recalled Philips devices, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Philips CPAP Lawsuit instantly.
Yes, there is a Philips CPAP Class Action Lawsuit but the consumer action does not consider personal injury or wrongful death claims, which have not been resolved.
The recently settled consumer class action lawsuit is only concerned with the purchase of defective CPAP machines recalled by the company.
The Philips CPAP Class Action Lawsuit was settled for nearly $500 million, and plaintiffs may receive up to $2,000 each for their recalled CPAP devices.
Again, the Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuit for injuries and cancer is ongoing and has not yet been resolved.
The Philips CPAP Lawsuit for cancer and other injuries is consolidated into multidistrict litigation (MDL).
The Philips CPAP Recall MDL is consolidated in the US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania.
This federal court is handling all personal injury cases related to the Philips Sleep Apnea Machine, Philips Respironics CPAP Machines, and other recalled CPAP and BiPAP machines.
MDL centralizes individual lawsuits to one court for pre-trial proceedings, yet allows each plaintiff to retain their individual case and potentially unique outcomes based on their specific circumstances.
If you’ve developed cancer or have suffered injuries linked to a recalled CPAP machine, you may be eligible to file a CPAP Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law’s Philips CPAP Lawyers for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Philips CPAP Lawsuit instantly.
The Philips CPAP Recall MDL is ongoing, and there has not been a global settlement reached.
However, lawyers estimate that average Philips CPAP settlement amounts may range from $50,000 to over $500,000.
These projections are by no means a guarantee of compensation in the Philips CPAP Lawsuit.
Philips CPAP Lawsuit settlement amounts are estimations based on prior mass tort lawsuits for defective medical devices.
It is essential that you contact a lawyer for a personalized and in-depth consultation to understand the circumstances of your case.
Reach out to our Philips CPAP Lawyers for a free consultation today, or use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation.
The time frame to file a Philips CPAP machine lawsuit, known as the statute of limitations, varies by state and can range from one to several years from the date the injury was discovered or should have been discovered.
For the Philips CPAP machine recall specifically, the statute of limitations began ticking on the date the recall was announced in June 2021, which serves as a potential start date for the discovery of injuries related to the use of these devices.
It’s crucial to consult with a lawyer as soon as possible to determine the specific statute of limitations applicable in your case to ensure your lawsuit is filed within the required time frame.
Failing to file within this period may result in losing the right to seek compensation for injuries caused by the recalled CPAP machines.
Philips, one of the leading manufacturers of CPAP, BiPAP, and ventilator devices, issued a recall in June 2021, affecting millions of its products.
The recall was due to degraded PE-PUR foam that could release black particles and toxic gases, putting users at risk of inhaling or swallowing them.
Philips announced a repair or replacement program for the recalled devices, but warned that it could take up to a year to complete.
In November 2021, the FDA found that the new foam used in replacement machines could also pose a safety risk.
Philips attributed some foam degradation to ozone cleaning machines made by SoClean, which led to the latter company suing Philips for blaming them.
In January 2022, Philips added the Trilogy Evo ventilators and repair kits to the originally recalled devices.
In September and October 2022, Philips issued additional warnings and recalls for sleep apnea machines, speficially CPAP masks with magnets that could interfere with metallic implants and contaminated plastic parts in BiPAP machines.
It is important for those who rely on Philips CPAP devices to stay informed of any updates or recalls and to seek alternative options if necessary to ensure their health and safety.
On June 14, 2021, Philips issued a voluntary recall of three types of devices.
These products all contributed to a potential increased risk of lung cancer in its users.
Recalled Philips CPAP products include:
According to Philips’ recall announcement, recalled Philips CPAP machines include:
Philips also recalled certain Trilogy Evo ventilators distributed from April 15, 2021 to May 24, 2021 with specific serial numbers (Trilogy 100 and 200).
PE PUR foam used for sound dampening in Philips CPAP devices can potentially break down and be inhaled or ingested by users.
Toxic chemical emissions may also be emanating from Philips CPAP Machines recalled by the company.
In both scenarios, all the products recalled were manufactured prior to April 26, 2021, and caused a variety of adverse health effects, including lung cancer.
The polyester-based polyurethane (PE-PUR) sound abatement foam inside the affected/recalled devices is one of the main causes for the recall.
The PE-PUR foam inside the CPAP machines can deteriorate and particles can then travel through the machine tubes and into the lungs.
It’s likely that heat, humidity, and improper cleaning can all contribute to accelerating the deterioration of this foam.
The other primary cause for the recall was the chemical emissions that contributed to the increase in lung cancer diagnosis among users.
This occurred because when newly opened, the chemicals released into the air could combine with other chemicals in the room in a process called off-gassing, and create harmful toxins.
In turn, these toxins may lead to lung cancer among other harmful side effects.
Philips produces several products that use a different foam or may have the foam located in a different, non-threatening location.
They may also not have the same chemical emissions as Philips’s recalled products.
These machines have been deemed safe and are not included in any recall.
These machines have been deemed safe and are not included in any recall:
Users of recalled devices should contact their primary care doctor or a medical professional immediately.
Using a recalled Philips CPAP device can put users at risk for serious injury.
All users of Philips’ recalled CPAP devices should have received a CPAP safety recall notice from Philips.
It’s important that you consider your use of Philips CPAP and BiPAP devices before stopping use.
Many people use certain Philips Respironics Ventilators for vital airflow during sleep.
If you have been using BiLevel PAP And CPAP Devices, discontinue use of the device and consult with a physician.
If you are using Life-Sustaining Ventilator Devices, DO NOT stop or alter therapy until consulting with a physician.
Philips CPAP and BiPAP devices have been linked to serious injury and death.
The degradation of the PE-PUR sound abatement foam in these devices has been linked to a range of potential health issues, from minor irritations to serious medical conditions.
Users may experience immediate symptoms or develop long-term health problems as a result of exposure to degraded foam particles or toxic chemicals.
It’s essential for individuals who have used these recalled devices to be aware of the possible injuries and to monitor their health closely.
Possible injuries linked to the Philips Ventilators, BiPAP, and CPAP machines include:
If you’ve suffered injuries from a defective Philips CPAP machine, it’s crucial to take immediate and appropriate steps to address your health concerns and legal rights.
Actionable steps to consider include:
Filing a lawsuit requires extreme attention to detail as well as a comprehensive understanding of the litigation process in order to reach your end goal.
To navigate this while suffering a major injury can be overwhelming to many.
With the help of your lawyer, you will begin one of the most important steps:
The amount of compensation you can receive from such a case as the Philips lung cancer case can fluctuate greatly, but in order to receive the maximum, it is pertinent that you gather evidence, prove injury mitigation attempts, and find a lawyer right for you.
You may be rewarded a much higher compensation if you did your best to treat an injury that was not your fault.
A TorHoerman Philips CPAP Lawyer can help you do this.
Evidence is important in any personal injury or product liability lawsuit, especially the Philips CPAP Lawsuit.
Evidence for Philips CPAP Lawsuits may include:
If you are filing a wrongful death lawsuit on behalf of a loved one who passed away due to injuries from a recalled Philips CPAP Device, you may be eligible to receive compensation.
Compensation for a Philips CPAP Lawsuit for Wrongful Death may include:
Damages are the total losses, economic and non-economic, incurred from using a Philips CPAP machine under recall.
Damages in Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuits may include:
Hiring a lawyer and filing a lawsuit can be a difficult thing to navigate, but our Philips CPAP Lawyers will do everything in our power to make it seamless and easy for you.
We can help you.
If you or a loved one experienced an injury related to a recalled Philips CPAP Machine, you may be eligible for a lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation and to discuss your legal options today.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Philips CPAP Lawsuit instantly.
Philips Respironics recalled several models of its CPAP, BiPAP, and ventilator devices manufactured between 2009 and April 26, 2021, due to potential health risks posed by the breakdown of PE-PUR sound abatement foam.
Below is a list of the recalled devices:
Additionally, certain Trilogy Evo ventilators distributed from April 15, 2021, to May 24, 2021, with specific serial numbers were also recalled.
In June 2021, Philips Respironics issued a recall for an estimated 15 million CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure), BiPAP (Bi-level Positive Airway Pressure), and mechanical ventilator devices worldwide.
The recalled devices were manufactured between 2009 and April 26, 2021.
Philips CPAP devices were recalled due to the discovery that polyester-based polyurethane (PE-PUR) sound abatement foam used in these devices could degrade over time.
When this foam degrades, it can release black particles and potentially harmful chemicals that users might inhale or ingest during use, posing significant health risks.
The potential health problems linked to the inhalation or ingestion of these particles and chemicals include serious respiratory issues, various forms of cancer, and other toxicological effects.
As of April 2024, the FDA Safety Communication on the Philips CPAP recall states that 561 deaths have been reported from the 100,000+ medical device reports related to the recalled CPAP machines.
The FDA collects this data through its Medical Device Reporting (MDR) system, which allows healthcare professionals, manufacturers, and the public to report adverse events and problems encountered with medical devices.
To find out if your Philips CPAP or BiPAP Machine is impacted by the recall, check the list of recalled devices on this page and also contact your primary care doctor or another medical professional who had detailed information on your CPAP device immediately.
You may have also received a recall notice from Philips about your CPAP machine.
If you’ve been using a device effected by the Philips CPAP Machine recall, taking prompt action is crucial to protect your health and legal rights.
Here’s what you should do:
Yes, there is a class action lawsuit related to the Philips CPAP recall, but it’s important to distinguish between this and individual personal injury claims.
The class action lawsuit, settled for at least $479 million, specifically addresses financial damages suffered by consumers due to the purchase of defective CPAP machines recalled by Philips.
This settlement does not cover personal injury or wrongful death claims, which are being handled separately through multidistrict litigation (MDL).
Individuals who suffered health issues such as cancer or other serious injuries due to the recalled devices may pursue compensation through the MDL rather than the class action lawsuit for economic damages.
CPAP machines are used primarily to treat sleep apnea, a sleep disorder where breathing repeatedly stops and starts during sleep, preventing deep, restful sleep.
They work by providing a continuous stream of air through a mask to keep the airways open, improving breathing and reducing the health risks associated with sleep apnea.
In addition to treating sleep apnea, CPAP machines can also be beneficial for individuals with other respiratory conditions, such as Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), by assisting in more effective breathing during sleep.
Benefits of using CPAP machines include:
Sleep apnea machines are designed to treat various forms of sleep apnea by ensuring continuous or variable air pressure to keep airways open during sleep.
There are several types, each suited to specific needs and conditions:
Owner & Attorney - TorHoerman Law
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
In this case, we obtained a verdict of $495 Million for our client’s child who was diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis after consuming baby formula manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $20 Million for our client after they suffered a Toxic Tort Injury due to chemical exposure.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $103.8 Million for our client after they suffered a COX-2 Inhibitors Injury.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $4 Million for our client after they suffered a Traumatic Brain Injury while at daycare.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $2.8 Million for our client after they suffered an injury due to a Defective Heart Device.
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
You can learn more about the Philips CPAP Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
They helped my elderly uncle receive compensation for the loss of his wife who was administered a dangerous drug. He consulted with this firm because of my personal recommendation and was very pleased with the compassion, attention to detail and response he received. Definitely recommend this firm for their 5 star service.
When I wanted to join the Xarelto class action lawsuit, I chose TorrHoerman Law from a search of a dozen or so law firm websites. I was impressed with the clarity of the information they presented. I gave them a call, and was again impressed, this time with the quality of our interactions.
TorHoerman Law is an awesome firm to represent anyone that has been involved in a case that someone has stated that it's too difficult to win. The entire firm makes you feel like you’re part of the family, Tor, Eric, Jake, Kristie, Chad, Tyler, Kathy and Steven are the best at what they do.
TorHorman Law is awesome
I can’t say enough how grateful I was to have TorHoerman Law help with my case. Jacob Plattenberger is very knowledgeable and an amazing lawyer. Jillian Pileczka was so patient and kind, helping me with questions that would come up. Even making sure my special needs were taken care of for meetings.
TorHoerman Law fights for justice with their hardworking and dedicated staff. Not only do they help their clients achieve positive outcomes, but they are also generous and important pillars of the community with their outreach and local support. Thank you THL!
Hands down one of the greatest group of people I had the pleasure of dealing with!
A very kind and professional staff.
Very positive experience. Would recommend them to anyone.
A very respectful firm.
Edwardsville, IL
Chicago, IL
St. Louis, MO
Clayton, MO
Naperville, IL