If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced Chicago personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation Chicago personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in Chicago, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced Chicago auto accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in Chicago, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our Chicago truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in Chicago or the greater Chicagoland area – you may be eligible to file a Chicago motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Chicago motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in Chicago at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file a Chicago bike accident lawsuit.
Contact a Chicago bicycle accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
Chicago is one of the nation’s largest construction centers.
Thousands of men and women work on sites across the city and metropolitan area on tasks ranging from skilled trades to administrative operations.
Unfortunately, construction site accidents are fairly common.
Contact TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options with an experienced Chicago construction accident lawyer, free of charge and no obligation required.
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced Chicago nursing home abuse attorney from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of Chicago, or the greater Chicagoland area, and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact a Chicago wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in Chicago you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact a Chicago slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact a Chicago daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced Edwardsville personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation Edwardsville personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in Edwardsville, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville car accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in Edwardsville, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our Edwardsville truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in Edwardsville – you may be eligible to file an Edwardsville motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in Edwardsville at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file an Edwardsville bike accident lawsuit.
Contact an Edwardsville bicycle accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced Edwardsville nursing home abuse attorney from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of Edwardsville and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact an Edwardsville wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in Edwardsville you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact an Edwardsville slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact an Edwardsville daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
If you or a loved one suffered injuries on someone else’s property in Edwardsville IL, you may be entitled to financial compensation.
If property owners fail to keep their premises safe, and their negligence leads to injuries, property damages or other losses as a result of an accident or incident, a premises liability lawsuit may be possible.
Contact an Edwardsville premises liability lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation case consultation.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to another party’s actions, you may be entitled to compensation for those losses.
Contact the experienced St. Louis personal injury lawyers from TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation St. Louis personal injury lawsuit case consultation today.
If you or a loved one suffered a personal injury or financial loss due to a car accident in St. Louis, IL – you may be entitled to compensation for those damages.
Contact an experienced St. Louis auto accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law today to see how our firm can serve you!
If you or a loved one have suffered injuries, property damage, or other financial losses due to a truck accident in St. Louis, IL – you may qualify to take legal action to gain compensation for those injuries and losses.
Contact TorHoerman Law today for a free, no-obligation consultation with our St. Louis truck accident lawyers!
If you or a loved one suffered an injury in a motorcycle accident in St. Louis or the greater St. Louis area – you may be eligible to file a St. Louis motorcycle accident lawsuit.
Contact an experienced St. Louis motorcycle accident lawyer at TorHoerman Law today to find out how we can help.
If you have been involved in a bicycle accident in St. Louis at no fault of your own and you suffered injuries as a result, you may qualify to file a St. Louis bike accident lawsuit.
Contact a St. Louis bicycle accident lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
St. Louis is one of the nation’s largest construction centers.
Thousands of men and women work on sites across the city and metropolitan area on tasks ranging from skilled trades to administrative operations.
Unfortunately, construction site accidents are fairly common.
Contact TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options with an experienced St. Louis construction accident lawyer, free of charge and no obligation required.
Nursing homes and nursing facilities should provide a safe, supportive environment for senior citizens, with qualified staff, nurses, and aids administering quality care.
Unfortunately, nursing home abuse and neglect can occur, leaving residents at risk and vulnerable.
Contact an experienced St. Louis nursing home abuse attorney from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your legal options.
If you are a resident of St. Louis, or the greater St. Louis area, and you have a loved one who suffered a fatal injury due to another party’s negligence or malpractice – you may qualify to file a wrongful death lawsuit on your loved one’s behalf.
Contact a St. Louis wrongful death lawyer from TorHoerman Law to discuss your legal options today!
If you have suffered a slip and fall injury in St. Louis you may be eligible for compensation through legal action.
Contact a St. Louis slip and fall lawyer at TorHoerman Law today!
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for all potential clients.
When a child is injured at a daycare center, parents are left wondering who can be held liable, who to contact for legal help, and how a lawsuit may pan out for them.
If your child has suffered an injury at a daycare facility, you may be eligible to file a daycare injury lawsuit.
Contact a St. Louis daycare injury lawyer from TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation to discuss your case and potential legal action!
Suboxone, a medication often used to treat opioid use disorder (OUD), has become a vital tool which offers a safer and more controlled approach to managing opioid addiction.
Despite its widespread use, Suboxone has been linked to severe tooth decay and dental injuries.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuits claim that the companies failed to warn about the risks of tooth decay and other dental injuries associated with Suboxone sublingual films.
Depo-Provera, a contraceptive injection, has been linked to an increased risk of developing brain tumors (including glioblastoma and meningioma).
Women who have used Depo-Provera and subsequently been diagnosed with brain tumors are filing lawsuits against Pfizer (the manufacturer), alleging that the company failed to adequately warn about the risks associated with the drug.
Despite the claims, Pfizer maintains that Depo-Provera is safe and effective, citing FDA approval and arguing that the scientific evidence does not support a causal link between the drug and brain tumors.
You may be eligible to file a Depo Provera Lawsuit if you used Depo-Provera and were diagnosed with a brain tumor.
Tepezza, approved by the FDA in 2020, is used to treat Thyroid Eye Disease (TED), but some patients have reported hearing issues after its use.
The Tepezza lawsuit claims that Horizon Therapeutics failed to warn patients about the potential risks and side effects of the drug, leading to hearing loss and other problems, such as tinnitus.
You may be eligible to file a Tepezza Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Tepezza and subsequently suffered permanent hearing loss or tinnitus.
Elmiron, a drug prescribed for interstitial cystitis, has been linked to serious eye damage and vision problems in scientific studies.
Thousands of Elmiron Lawsuits have been filed against Janssen Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturer, alleging that the company failed to warn patients about the potential risks.
You may be eligible to file an Elmiron Lawsuit if you or a loved one took Elmiron and subsequently suffered vision loss, blindness, or any other eye injury linked to the prescription drug.
The chemotherapy drug Taxotere, commonly used for breast cancer treatment, has been linked to severe eye injuries, permanent vision loss, and permanent hair loss.
Taxotere Lawsuits are being filed by breast cancer patients and others who have taken the chemotherapy drug and subsequently developed vision problems.
If you or a loved one used Taxotere and subsequently developed vision damage or other related medical problems, you may be eligible to file a Taxotere Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Although pressure cookers were designed to be safe and easy to use, a number of these devices have been found to have a defect that can lead to excessive buildup of internal pressure.
The excessive pressure may result in an explosion that puts users at risk of serious injuries such as burns, lacerations, an even electrocution.
If your pressure cooker exploded and caused substantial burn injuries or other serious injuries, you may be eligible to file a Pressure Cooker Lawsuit and secure financial compensation for your injuries and damages.
Several studies have found a correlation between heavy social media use and mental health challenges, especially among younger users.
Social media harm lawsuits claim that social media companies are responsible for onsetting or heightening mental health problems, eating disorders, mood disorders, and other negative experiences of teens and children
You may be eligible to file a Social Media Mental Health Lawsuit if you are the parents of a teen, or teens, who attribute their use of social media platforms to their mental health problems.
The Paragard IUD, a non-hormonal birth control device, has been linked to serious complications, including device breakage during removal.
Numerous lawsuits have been filed against Teva Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturer of Paragard, alleging that the company failed to warn about the potential risks.
If you or a loved one used a Paragard IUD and subsequently suffered complications and/or injuries, you may qualify for a Paragard Lawsuit.
Patients with the PowerPort devices may possibly be at a higher risk of serious complications or injury due to a catheter failure, according to lawsuits filed against the manufacturers of the Bard PowerPort Device.
If you or a loved one have been injured by a Bard PowerPort Device, you may be eligible to file a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit and seek financial compensation.
Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products for injuries, pain and suffering, and financial costs related to complications and injuries of these medical devices.
Over 100,000 Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits have been filed on behalf of women injured by vaginal mesh and pelvic mesh products.
If you or a loved one have suffered serious complications or injuries from vaginal mesh, you may be eligible to file a Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit.
Parents and guardians are filing lawsuits against major video game companies (including Epic Games, Activision Blizzard, and Microsoft), alleging that they intentionally designed their games to be addictive — leading to severe mental and physical health issues in minors.
The lawsuits claim that these companies used psychological tactics and manipulative game designs to keep players engaged for extended periods — causing problems such as anxiety, depression, and social withdrawal.
You may be eligible to file a Video Game Addiction Lawsuit if your child has been diagnosed with gaming addiction or has experienced negative effects from excessive gaming.
Above ground pool accidents have led to lawsuits against manufacturers due to defective restraining belts that pose serious safety risks to children.
These belts, designed to provide structural stability, can inadvertently act as footholds, allowing children to climb into the pool unsupervised, increasing the risk of drownings and injuries.
Parents and guardians are filing lawsuits against pool manufacturers, alleging that the defective design has caused severe injuries and deaths.
If your child was injured or drowned in an above ground pool accident involving a defective restraining belt, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.
Recent scientific studies have found that the use of chemical hair straightening products, hair relaxers, and other hair products present an increased risk of uterine cancer, endometrial cancer, breast cancer, and other health problems.
Legal action is being taken against manufacturers and producers of these hair products for their failure to properly warn consumers of potential health risks.
You may be eligible to file a Hair Straightener Cancer Lawsuit if you or a loved one used chemical hair straighteners, hair relaxers, or other similar hair products, and subsequently were diagnosed with:
AFFF (Aqueous Film Forming Foam) is a firefighting foam that has been linked to various health issues, including cancer, due to its PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) content.
Numerous AFFF Lawsuits have been filed against AFFF manufacturers, alleging that they knew about the health risks but failed to warn the public.
AFFF Firefighting Foam lawsuits aim to hold manufacturers accountable for putting peoples’ health at risk.
You may be eligible to file an AFFF Lawsuit if you or a loved one was exposed to firefighting foam and subsequently developed cancer.
Paraquat, a widely-used herbicide, has been linked to Parkinson’s disease, leading to numerous Paraquat Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits against its manufacturers for failing to warn about the risks of chronic exposure.
Due to its toxicity, the EPA has restricted the use of Paraquat and it is currently banned in over 30 countries.
You may be eligible to file a Paraquat Lawsuit if you or a loved one were exposed to Paraquat and subsequently diagnosed with Parkinson’s Disease or other related health conditions.
Mesothelioma is an aggressive form of cancer primarily caused by exposure to asbestos.
Asbestos trust funds were established in the 1970s to compensate workers harmed by asbestos-containing products.
These funds are designed to pay out claims to those who developed mesothelioma or other asbestos-related diseases due to exposure.
Those exposed to asbestos and diagnosed with mesothelioma may be eligible to file a Mesothelioma Lawsuit.
Studies have found a link between toxic baby formula and Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) — a severe intestinal condition in premature infants.
Parents and guardians are filing NEC Lawsuits against baby formula manufacturers, alleging that the formulas contain harmful ingredients leading to NEC.
Despite the claims, Abbott and Mead Johnson deny the allegations, arguing that their products are thoroughly researched and dismissing the scientific evidence linking their formulas to NEC, while the FDA issued a warning to Abbott regarding safety concerns of a formula product.
You may be eligible to file a Toxic Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit if your child received baby bovine-based (cow’s milk) baby formula in the maternity ward or NICU of a hospital and was subsequently diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC).
PFAS contamination lawsuits are being filed against manufacturers and suppliers of PFAS chemicals, alleging that these substances have contaminated water sources and products, leading to severe health issues.
Plaintiffs claim that prolonged exposure to PFAS through contaminated drinking water and products has caused cancers, thyroid disease, and other health problems.
The lawsuits target companies like 3M, DuPont, and Chemours, accusing them of knowingly contaminating the environment with PFAS and failing to warn about the risks.
If you or a loved one has been exposed to PFAS-contaminated water or products and has developed health issues, you may be eligible to file a PFAS lawsuit.
The Roundup Lawsuit claims that Monsanto’s popular weed killer, Roundup, causes cancer.
Numerous studies have linked the main ingredient, glyphosate, to Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, Leukemia, and other Lymphatic cancers.
Despite this, Monsanto continues to deny these claims.
Victims of Roundup exposure who developed cancer are filing Roundup Lawsuits against Monsanto, seeking compensation for medical expenses, pain, and suffering.
Our firm is about people. That is our motto and that will always be our reality.
We do our best to get to know our clients, understand their situations, and get them the compensation they deserve.
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Without our team, we would’nt be able to provide our clients with anything close to the level of service they receive when they work with us.
The THL Team commits to the sincere belief that those injured by the misconduct of others, especially large corporate profit mongers, deserve justice for their injuries.
Our team is what has made TorHoerman Law a very special place since 2009.
Use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for a Roundup Lawsuit instantly. You can also contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
The Roundup lawsuit claims that Monsanto's popular weed killer, Roundup, causes cancer. The main ingredient, glyphosate, has been linked to Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma.
Numerous studies and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) have classified glyphosate as a probable human carcinogen. Despite this, Monsanto continues to deny these claims.
Victims of Roundup exposure who developed cancer are filing lawsuits against Monsanto, seeking compensation for medical expenses, pain, and suffering.
The Roundup multidistrict litigation contains more than 4,300 lawsuits, mainly from farm workers and landscapers claiming health issues from glyphosate exposure.
Bayer is seeking state legislation to obtain legal immunity from cancer claims related to Roundup, arguing that compliance with EPA regulations should suffice.
Our Roundup Lawyers are reviewing potential claims from individuals diagnosed with non-hodgkin's lymphoma and other diseases potentially caused by Roundup exposure.
The active ingredient in Roundup (Glyphosate) has been linked to an increased cancer risk, specifically Non Hodgkin’s Lymphoma.
Roundup Lawsuits are being filed against BayerAG and Monsanto for failing to warn consumers about the dangers of Roundup exposure.
Over 80% of Roundup Lawsuits, which amount to over 100,000 cases, have been settled.
The landmark $10 billion settlement agreement includes $1.25 billion for future Roundup claims.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries resulting from Roundup weed killer exposure, you may qualify to participate in a Roundup lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Roundup lawyer to discuss your legal options today, free of charge and no obligation required.
The Roundup Lawsuit is ongoing.
Monsanto, a subsidiary of Bayer AG, secured another courtroom victory in Philadelphia as a jury ruled in its favor in a lawsuit alleging its weedkiller, Roundup, caused cancer.
This marks Monsanto’s third win in Philadelphia court and its 15th favorable verdict out of 22 trials nationwide.
The case claimed that Roundup exposure caused the plaintiff to develop non-Hodgkin lymphoma after using the product more than ten times since 2015.
However, after over two weeks of trial and six hours of deliberation, the jury rejected the plaintiff’s claims, siding with Monsanto.
Monsanto has faced mixed outcomes in Philadelphia courts.
Previous jury awards against the company included $2.25 billion (later reduced to $404 million), $3.5 million, $175 million, and $78 million.
However, recent verdicts in July and September also found Monsanto not liable.
The case was heard in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, presided over by Judge Michael Erdos.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries resulting from Roundup weed killer exposure, you may qualify to participate in a Roundup lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Roundup lawyer to discuss your legal options today, free of charge and no obligation required.
The Roundup Lawsuit is ongoing.
The Roundup Lawsuit involves claims that the popular weed killer contains glyphosate, a chemical linked to non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and other cancers.
Plaintiffs argue that Monsanto, the manufacturer, failed to adequately warn users of the cancer risks associated with prolonged exposure to Roundup.
In October, the Roundup lawsuit had 4,349 cases filed, which increased slightly to 4,355 in November, adding six new cases.
This steady increase reflects ongoing concerns among users regarding the health risks associated with glyphosate exposure.
Roundup exposure has been linked to non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, causing serious health challenges for those affected, including high medical costs and long-term treatment needs.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries resulting from Roundup weed killer exposure, you may qualify to participate in a Roundup lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Roundup lawyer to discuss your legal options today, free of charge and no obligation required.
The Roundup litigation is ongoing.
In the latest Roundup cancer trial, Bayer has been ordered to pay $78 million to a Pennsylvania resident, who claimed he developed cancer after using the company’s Roundup weedkiller.
A Philadelphia state court jury awarded the plaintiff $3 million in compensatory damages and $75 million in punitive damages.
This marks a setback for Bayer, which had won 14 of the previous 20 Roundup trials.
The Plaintiff, who used Roundup both at home and work from 1992 to 2020, was diagnosed with cancer, which he alleges was caused by glyphosate and another chemical in the product.
Bayer, which acquired Roundup through its $63 billion purchase of Monsanto, maintains that glyphosate does not cause cancer and disagreed with the verdict, citing scientific evidence and regulatory assessments that support its stance.
Although Bayer settled the majority of Roundup claims in 2020 for $10.9 billion, the company still faces 58,000 lawsuits.
It recently scored a legal victory in August when a 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling shielded it from state law claims.
Bayer plans to seek further clarity from the U.S. Supreme Court, which could potentially end the ongoing litigation.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries resulting from Roundup weed killer exposure, you may qualify to participate in a Roundup lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Roundup lawyer to discuss your legal options today, free of charge and no obligation required.
The Roundup litigation, centered around claims that exposure to the herbicide’s active ingredient, glyphosate, causes non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, continues to grow.
Roundup lawsuits allege that the manufacturers of the product failed to adequately warn users of the cancer risks associated with glyphosate.
In September, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) reported 4,337 active Roundup lawsuits.
By October, this number had increased to 4,349, reflecting a slight rise of 12 cases.
Although the increase is minimal, it shows the ongoing concerns over glyphosate exposure and its impact on public health.
If you or a loved one developed non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma or another type of cancer due to Roundup weed killer exposure, you may qualify to participate in a Roundup Lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Roundup lawyer to discuss your legal options today, free of charge and no obligation required.
Monsanto, the maker of Roundup weed killer, has settled nearly 100,000 lawsuits, paying approximately $11 billion to resolve claims alleging that Roundup causes cancer.
Despite these settlements, around 54,000 lawsuits remain active, with over 4,000 cases still pending in the MDL (Multidistrict Litigation) in California.
In Philadelphia, the Melissen v. Monsanto trial has officially begun, with plaintiffs holding high expectations.
However, recent outcomes show that not all cases result in victories for plaintiffs.
In the Young v. Monsanto case, a Philadelphia jury ruled in favor of Monsanto, finding insufficient evidence to link Roundup to the plaintiff’s cancer.
Despite this loss, plaintiffs have won three of the five Philadelphia Roundup trials, with verdicts as high as $404 million.
The average verdict in these cases, factoring in both wins and losses, stands at approximately $194.17 million.
If you or a loved one developed non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma or another type of cancer due to Roundup weed killer exposure, you may qualify to participate in a Roundup Lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Roundup lawyer to discuss your legal options today, free of charge and no obligation required.
A Philadelphia jury ruled that Bayer, the manufacturer of Roundup, is not liable for causing a plaintiff’s cancer in the most recent trial, marking the second defense victory in five trials in Philadelphia related to Roundup lawsuits.
Plaintiffs have won three of these cases, resulting in significant compensation, with two of the last three trials decided in favor of the defense.
The recent verdict comes after a 3rd Circuit ruling that favored Bayer, further strengthening the company’s defense in ongoing litigation.
However, another Roundup trial is expected to begin in Philadelphia soon, with a verdict anticipated by the end of the year.
If the plaintiffs secure a victory in this upcoming trial, it may reignite discussions about a potential settlement.
Roundup Lawsuits claim that exposure to glyphosate, the primary ingredient in Roundup, leads to the development of cancer.
Thousands of plaintiffs across the country have filed lawsuits against Bayer, following the company’s acquisition of Monsanto, the original manufacturer of Roundup.
If you or a loved one developed non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma or another type of cancer due to Roundup weed killer exposure, you may qualify to participate in a Roundup Lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Roundup lawyer to discuss your legal options today, free of charge and no obligation required.
The Roundup Lawsuit, which claims that exposure to the herbicide Roundup has led to the development of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and other serious health conditions, continues to see an increase in filings.
In August 2024, there were 4,311 active cases within the Roundup lawsuit.
As of September 2024, this number has risen to 4,337, reflecting a slight but notable increase in new filings.
The gradual increase in filings reflect the growing concerns about the potential health risks associated with glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup.
Glyphosate has been linked to non-Hodgkin lymphoma, with research suggesting that prolonged exposure to the chemical may significantly elevate the risk of developing this type of cancer.
Victims allege that Monsanto, the manufacturer of Roundup, failed to adequately warn consumers about these risks.
If you or a loved one developed non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma or another type of cancer due to Roundup weed killer exposure, you may qualify to participate in a Roundup Lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Roundup lawyer to discuss your legal options today, free of charge and no obligation required.
A new Roundup trial commenced this week in Philadelphia, marking the fifth Roundup case to be heard in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas.
Plaintiffs are aiming to secure their fourth victory out of five trials in this venue.
The trial is particularly significant as it follows a previous loss in Philadelphia, which plaintiffs attribute to an evidentiary ruling that excluded key evidence, including a study from the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) linking glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, to cancer.
Judge Roberts, who is presiding over the current trial, has reconsidered his earlier decision and will now allow the plaintiffs to present the IARC study as evidence.
This ruling is expected to play a pivotal role in the trial, potentially influencing the outcome in favor of the plaintiffs.
The trial’s proceedings are being closely watched, given the broader implications for ongoing and future Roundup lawsuits, where the admissibility of scientific evidence remains a contentious issue.
The trial is expected to conclude in the coming weeks.
If you or a loved one developed non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma or another type of cancer due to Roundup weed killer exposure, you may qualify to participate in a Roundup Lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Roundup lawyer to discuss your legal options today, free of charge and no obligation required.
Bayer recently won a significant legal decision in the Third Circuit Court, which ruled that federal regulations on pesticide labeling take precedence over state laws.
Pesticide labeling refers to the information provided on the packaging of pesticide products, which includes instructions on how to use the product safely and effectively.
The label typically includes details like the ingredients, health and environmental warnings, proper application methods, storage and disposal instructions, and first aid measures.
This decision is particularly important because it involves the widely used herbicide Roundup, which has been the subject of numerous lawsuits claiming it causes cancer.
The case arose in Pennsylvania, where state laws could have required cancer warnings on Roundup labels.
However, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had already reviewed the scientific evidence and decided not to include a cancer warning on the Roundup label.
The court ruled that because the EPA had approved the label without a cancer warning, state laws demanding such warnings are overridden by federal law.
This ruling strengthens Bayer’s legal position in defending Roundup against similar claims.
Although there are differing opinions in other federal courts about whether state or federal regulations should be the final authority.
The ruling has caused Bayer’s stock to rise by 10%, reflecting investor confidence in the outcome.
However, this issue might not be settled entirely, as the disagreement among courts increases the chance that it could eventually be reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court.
For now, though, Bayer has won a crucial battle in its ongoing legal challenges related to Roundup.
Despite this, lawsuits are still being filed against Monsanto (Bayer) by individuals who claim that exposure to Roundup caused their cancer.
If you or a loved one developed non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma or another type of cancer due to Roundup weed killer exposure, you may qualify to participate in a Roundup Lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Roundup lawyer to discuss your legal options today, free of charge and no obligation required.
The Roundup Lawsuit is ongoing.
The Attorneys General of Iowa and Nebraska are advocating for a national standard for glyphosate labels, urging the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to establish a rule that would prevent states from mandating labels falsely claiming that glyphosate causes cancer.
This push comes amid ongoing litigation and controversy surrounding the safety of glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, a widely used herbicide.
Kevin Ross, a former president of the National Corn Growers Association, supports the call for a national standard, arguing that it would eliminate misleading labels and create uniformity across states.
He pointed out that California, in particular, has implemented laws that impact agriculture in other states, creating a patchwork of regulations that complicate compliance for farmers and producers.
In addition to Iowa and Nebraska, nine other states have joined the petition, including Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Louisiana, Montana, North Dakota, South Carolina, and South Dakota.
The ongoing debate over glyphosate’s safety has led to numerous lawsuits against Bayer, the manufacturer of Roundup, with plaintiffs claiming that exposure to the herbicide caused cancer.
If you or a loved one suffered health problems resulting from Roundup weed killer exposure, you may qualify to participate in a Roundup Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Roundup Lawsuit instantly.
The Roundup Lawsuit is ongoing.
The Roundup Lawsuit focuses on claims against Monsanto regarding the herbicide Roundup, which contains glyphosate.
Plaintiffs allege that glyphosate exposure leads to serious health conditions, including non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
In July, there were 4,305 filings in the Roundup lawsuit.
By August, this number slightly increased to 4,311 filings.
The consistent number of new filings indicates ongoing concerns and awareness regarding the health risks posed by glyphosate in Roundup.
Glyphosate, a key ingredient in Roundup, has been linked to non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Research suggests that glyphosate disrupts cellular processes, leading to the development of cancerous cells.
This has prompted many affected individuals to seek legal action against Monsanto, contributing to the steady stream of lawsuit filings.
If you or a loved one suffered health problems resulting from Roundup weed killer exposure, you may qualify to participate in a Roundup lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Roundup lawyer to discuss your legal options today, free of charge and no obligation required.
The Roundup lawsuit is ongoing.
A comprehensive study published in Frontiers in Cancer Control and Society has established a significant link between agricultural pesticide use and increased cancer risk across various types.
The study used county-level data to analyze pesticide usage patterns and their correlation with cancer incidence.
The study found strong associations between pesticide exposure and cancers such as leukemia, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, bladder, colon, lung, and pancreatic cancers.
Glyphosate, commonly known as Roundup, was frequently identified as a significant contributor to increased cancer risks, including non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.
Other pesticides like Atrazine, Boscalid, and Dicamba were also linked to higher incidences of various cancers.
Glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, has been classified as a probable carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer.
The study emphasizes the need for more stringent regulations and policies to manage pesticide use to mitigate cancer risks.
It also calls for greater public awareness and healthcare initiatives to address the risks associated with pesticide exposure, particularly in heavily agricultural regions.
There have been numerous lawsuits against Monsanto, the maker of Roundup, with plaintiffs claiming that glyphosate exposure led to their cancer diagnoses.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries resulting from Roundup weed killer exposure, you may qualify to participate in a Roundup lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Roundup lawyer to discuss your legal options today, free of charge and no obligation required.
A newly published study reveals that glyphosate, the active ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup, is present in human sperm.
Conducted at a French infertility clinic, the study found that over 55 percent of sperm samples contained high levels of glyphosate.
The recent study, published in Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, examined 128 men from an area in France known for heavy Roundup use, particularly in grain and wine production.
Researchers warn that this could contribute to infertility, damage DNA in sperm, and cause health issues in offspring.
The study aligns with broader concerns about declining global fertility rates.
A 2020 Lancet analysis highlighted that exposure to toxic chemicals like glyphosate may significantly drive this decline.
Researchers tested blood and semen samples, finding glyphosate in the seminal plasma of 73 men.
Levels in semen were nearly four times higher than in blood.
The study indicated a positive correlation between glyphosate and oxidative stress, which damages cells and can lead to infertility.
Glyphosate appears to disrupt the Blood-Testis Barrier, leading to increased production of anti-sperm antibodies and autoimmune responses, further contributing to male infertility.
The study’s lead researcher, Claudine Vasseur, suggested that glyphosate negatively impacts human reproductive health and could affect progeny.
Despite the EPA’s stance that glyphosate does not cause cancer, thousands of lawsuits and settlements are still being actively filed.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries resulting from Roundup weed killer exposure, you may qualify to participate in a Roundup Lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Roundup lawyer to discuss your legal options today, free of charge and no obligation required.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Roundup Lawsuit instantly.
In a recent multidistrict litigation (MDL) filing, parties requested the court to initiate the wind-down process for the Roundup MDL.
The proposal includes advancing the final wave of cases, designated as wave 9, with no additional waves for case workup and expert reports.
While defendants support continuing the mediation, plaintiffs advocate for a new process, citing inadequate settlement offers.
Currently, less than 2% of cases remain in the MDL, with litigation predominantly transitioning to state courts in Missouri, Pennsylvania, and other jurisdictions.
Despite low new MDL filings, approximately 40,000 cases are pending in Missouri courts.
The MDL court is expected to begin winding down the main Roundup litigation, potentially closing it by 2025.
The overall impact of these efforts on Roundup litigation is minimal, as plaintiffs have identified jurisdictions such as California, Missouri, and Pennsylvania, which allow for mass consolidated actions.
Cases are progressing towards trial in these venues, with several jury verdicts anticipated before the end of 2024.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries resulting from Roundup weed killer exposure, you may qualify to participate in a Roundup lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Roundup lawyer to discuss your legal options today, free of charge and no obligation required.
The Roundup lawsuit is ongoing and our Roundup lawyers are accepting new cases.
An Oregon appeals court overturned a trial victory for Monsanto owner Bayer AG.
The court found the trial judge improperly barred key evidence about the EPA, which could have swayed the jury in favor of the plaintiff, Larry Johnson, who claims long-term Roundup use caused his non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).
The court rejected Monsanto’s argument that EPA approval preempts state law claims.
This decision aligns with other courts’ rejections of Monsanto’s “preemption” defense.
Excluding testimony from Charles Benbrook, a critic of the EPA’s handling of glyphosate herbicides, was deemed a significant error.
His testimony would have clarified the regulatory framework and EPA oversight.
The ruling means Monsanto may face a new trial with the previously excluded evidence.
This could affect the outcomes of over 100,000 similar lawsuits alleging Roundup causes cancer.
Bayer AG can request reconsideration by the appellate court or seek review by the Oregon Supreme Court.
If unsuccessful, the case will proceed to a new trial.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries resulting from Roundup weed killer exposure, you may qualify to participate in a Roundup lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Roundup lawyer to discuss your legal options today, free of charge and no obligation required.
The Roundup lawsuit is ongoing and our lawyers are continuing to accept cases.
The Roundup lawsuit involves claims related to the herbicide Roundup, which contains the toxic chemical glyphosate linked to non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
In June, there were 4,285 Roundup lawsuit filings.
By July, this number increased to 4,305, reflecting ongoing concerns about glyphosate.
Glyphosate in Roundup causes lymphoma by disrupting cellular processes.
Many exposed individuals have developed non-Hodgkin lymphoma, leading to more Roundup lawsuit filings.
The Roundup lawsuit seeks to hold the manufacturer accountable for glyphosate-related harm.
Affected individuals should consult a Roundup lawsuit lawyer.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries resulting from Roundup weed killer exposure, you may qualify to participate in a Roundup lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Roundup lawyer to discuss your legal options today, free of charge and no obligation required.
Bayer has intensified its lobbying efforts in Congress to introduce legislation that could shield the company from thousands of lawsuits which claim that Roundup causes cancer.
This initiative aims to mitigate Bayer’s financial exposure and prevent substantial payouts to plaintiffs.
Central to this campaign is the Roundup’s primary ingredient, glyphosate, which several health authorities classify as a carcinogen.
Bayer’s lobbying targets the upcoming farm bill, a comprehensive piece of legislation essential for federal agriculture and nutrition programs.
If Bayer’s efforts are successful, lawsuits alleging Roundup’s health risks could be prevented, protecting Bayer from future liabilities.
The Roundup Lawsuits claim that users were not adequately warned about the potential health risks linked to Roundup exposure, including non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.
Bayer maintains the safety of Roundup, but the company already settled thousands of cases for around $10 billion in 2020 and is facing thousands more cases yet to be resolved.
Bayer’s acquisition of Monsanto in 2018 for $63 billion included inheriting Roundup Lawsuits, significantly impacting its finances.
The company has faced approximately 170,000 claims, some with substantial settlement awards.
The outcome of these legislative efforts holds significant implications for future claims and regulatory practices concerning pesticide safety.
Our law firm is still accepting new clients for the Roundup Lawsuit.
Contact us today for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Roundup Lawsuit instantly.
The Roundup Lawsuit is ongoing.
A study published in Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety revealed glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, is present in human sperm at levels higher than typically found in blood.
French researchers warn that glyphosate could damage the blood test barrier, leading to infertility and DNA damage that might affect future generations.
This finding raises concerns about the widespread use of Roundup in agriculture and residential settings.
The CDC found that 80% of Americans tested positive for glyphosate.
Glyphosate has faced scrutiny since the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer classified it as a probable carcinogen in 2015.
This classification led to numerous global restrictions on Roundup, driven by concerns over increased risks of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and other cancers.
Additionally, a report from Salon highlighted that 98% of adolescents in Pedro Moncayo, Ecuador, had high concentrations of glyphosate in their urine, with links to neurobehavioral issues.
These findings suggest glyphosate could have long-term effects on human reproductive health, necessitating a precautionary approach to its use.
Bayer and its subsidiary Monsanto have faced over 100,000 lawsuits from users claiming exposure to Roundup caused their cancer.
Despite paying over $10 billion in settlements, Bayer continues to face thousands more Roundup Lawsuits in the U.S. court system.
In 2023, Bayer committed to replacing glyphosate-based products in the U.S. residential market with formulations using alternative ingredients.
Our law firm is still accepting new clients for the Roundup Lawsuit.
Contact us today for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Roundup Lawsuit instantly.
The Roundup Lawsuit is ongoing.
Bayer AG is intensifying its efforts to establish a legal safeguard against ongoing lawsuits that allege its Roundup weedkiller causes cancer and other serious health effects.
Roundup is used widely by farmers to manage weeds, reduce tilling, and prevent soil erosion.
Despite disputing claims that glyphosate causes cancer, Bayer has faced approximately 170,000 lawsuits and has allocated $16 billion for settlements.
The company asserts that continuing the legal battle is unsustainable and is seeking legislative relief.
The legislation Bayer supports would shield pesticide manufacturers from cancer-related claims if their product labeling complies with EPA standards.
This move has sparked debate among lawmakers, with some expressing concerns about the implications for farmer alternatives and Bayer’s potential withdrawal from the U.S. market.
Bayer has pushed for laws in Missouri, Iowa, and Idaho that would prevent plaintiffs from claiming that the company failed to warn about cancer risks associated with Roundup.
Although legislation progressed in Iowa and Missouri, it ultimately did not pass in any of the states.
Our law firm is still accepting new clients for the Roundup Lawsuit.
Contact us today for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Roundup Lawsuit instantly.
A Philadelphia court has reduced the payout that Monsanto, now owned by Bayer, must provide in damages related to a lawsuit from $2.25 billion to $400 million.
This decision decreases the company’s financial burden by approximately 82%, or nearly $1.9 billion.
The court ruled that Monsanto is now ordered to pay $350 million in punitive damages and a little over $50 million in compensatory damages, although the original ruling earlier this year had mandated a considerably higher sum.
The decision for reduction comes amidst Monsanto’s plans to appeal the liability verdict in the Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
The case centers around claims from a plaintiff who alleges that his cancer was caused by exposure to Roundup, a herbicide that contains glyphosate.
Glyphosate has been reported to increase the risk of cancer and other serious health issues.
Glyphosate was reclassified in 2015 as ‘probably carcinogenic’ by the International Agency for Cancer Research (IARC).
Our law firm is still accepting new clients for the Roundup Lawsuit.
Contact us today for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Roundup Lawsuit instantly.
The Roundup Lawsuit is ongoing.
The multidistrict litigation concerning Roundup, Monsanto’s widely used herbicide, has grown from 4,279 to 4,285 pending cases in the past month, according to the latest JPML filings.
Plaintiffs, predominantly farm workers, landscapers, and gardeners, allege that prolonged exposure to glyphosate, Roundup’s active ingredient, has led to serious health issues, including non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.
Monsanto, a subsidiary of Bayer AG, faces increasing scrutiny as these legal challenges escalate.
Plaintiffs are urged to seek legal advice to understand their options and possibly hold responsible parties accountable.
Our law firm is still accepting new clients for the Roundup Lawsuit.
Contact us today for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Roundup Lawsuit instantly.
The Roundup Lawsuit is ongoing.
Bayer AG is escalating its legal defense as it faces a mounting number of lawsuits alleging that its Roundup weedkiller causes cancer.
The chemical giant, which firmly disputes these cancer claims, has encountered approximately 170,000 legal actions related to Roundup and has allocated $16 billion to settle these cases.
The CEO reported that the chemical conglomerate is spending more on lawsuits than the $2.6 billion annually allocated to R&D, stating that continuing the legal battle in its current form is unsustainable.
In an effort to establish a legal buffer, Bayer lobbied for legislation this year in Missouri, Iowa, and Idaho that would prevent claims that the company failed to warn about cancer risks if their products adhere to existing EPA regulations.
Bayer’s plan includes a renewed push in upcoming legislative sessions and potentially expanding efforts to other states.
The company faces significant internal changes as well, having reduced its global workforce by over 1,500 employees, with additional layoffs forthcoming at its Iowa facility, which Bayer attributes to broader restructuring rather than the legislative setbacks alone.
Additionally, Bayer is reinforcing its stance by supporting legislation aimed at protection, especially in Missouri—the location of the original manufacturer of Roundup, Monsanto, which Bayer acquired in 2018.
Legal experts indicate that while new legislation may not affect existing lawsuits, it could curtail future claims.
Our law firm is still accepting new clients for the Roundup Lawsuit.
Contact us today for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Roundup Lawsuit instantly.
The Missouri Senate faces significant contention over proposed legislation designed to protect pesticide manufacturers from litigation alleging their products cause cancer.
Specifically targeting Roundup’s active ingredient, glyphosate, the bill would shield Bayer, Roundup’s manufacturer, from failure to warn lawsuits if their products carry labels approved by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Despite clearance in the House, the bill’s progress in the Senate remains uncertain due to a deadlock particularly caused by a filibuster.
Bayer advocates for the bill, arguing that glyphosate is unlikely to cause cancer in humans.
The legislation asserts that adherence to EPA’s labeling guidelines fulfills Bayer’s duty to warn consumers, providing substantial legal protection against claims.
Conversely, opposition from a team including the Missouri Association of Trial Attorneys and the Missouri Freedom Caucus GOP members highlight concerns over prioritizing corporate interests above public health.
Critics argue that the bill would restrict Missourians’ rights to pursue legal action for health damages such as non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, which some attribute exposure to glyphosate-based pesticides like Roundup.
The financial stakes for Bayer are high, having already moved approximately $16 billion towards handling Roundup Lawsuits, including over $10 billion paid out in settlements and jury verdicts.
The proposed legislation follows several legal defeats for Bayer, with recent jury awards reaching billions in favor of plaintiffs.
The legislative outcome could dramatically influence both future litigation and the availability of Roundup nationwide.
Missouri farm groups have backed the pesticide labeling legislation, saying farmers need assurance Roundup will be available for the long term.
Our law firm is still accepting new clients for the Roundup Lawsuit.
Contact us today for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Roundup Lawsuit instantly.
The Roundup Lawsuit is ongoing.
A total of 4,279 lawsuits are pending in the multidistrict litigation established for plaintiffs claiming that exposure to Roundup’s active ingredient, glyphosate, caused them to develop non-hodgkin’s lymphoma and other health problems.
Roundup Lawsuit plaintiffs are commonly individuals such as farm workers, landscapers, and gardeners, who claim that long-term exposure to glyphosate has adversely affected their health.
Bayer is pushing for state legislation that would protect it from lawsuits claiming that Roundup causes cancer, arguing that compliance with U.S. EPA regulations should offer legal immunity.
This move has sparked controversy, with opponents arguing it could shield companies from accountability for not fully informing consumers about potential risks.
If you or a loved one were exposed to Roundup and subsequently developed non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma or other related cancers, you may be eligible to file a Roundup Lawsuit.
Contact us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Roundup Lawsuit instantly.
Bayer, the manufacturer of the widely-used weedkiller Roundup, is actively lobbying for legislation in Iowa, Missouri, and Idaho that would shield it from lawsuits alleging that Roundup causes cancer.
The proposed bills, which have been influenced directly by Bayer, aim to grant pesticide companies immunity from claims if their product labels comply with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standards, despite ongoing disputes about the safety of these products.
Legal experts suggest that the involvement of such legislation could be far-reaching, potentially affecting all product liability claims and, in Iowa, potentially granting immunity from all lawsuits.
The concern is that this could set a precedent that potentially could be adopted by other states.
Critics of the legislation argue that it undermines government accountability and consumer safety.
Bayer defends the legislative push as a necessity to manage the defense of a product they assert is safe when used as directed.
The company has faced about 167,000 legal claims tying Roundup to non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, a type of cancer, resulting in substantial financial settlements and several court losses.
Bayer contends that the EPA has consistently found glyphosate, Roundup’s active ingredient, unlikely to cause cancer, a stance supported by many global regulatory bodies.
The debate over glyphosate escalated when a 2015 report by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, part of the World Health Organization, said it’s “probably carcinogenic to humans” based on “limited” evidence of cancer in people and “sufficient” evidence in study animals.
The legislative outcomes vary: it has passed the Iowa Senate, is pending in the Missouri House, and was defeated in Idaho.
The defeat in Idaho reflects broader concerns about over-reliance on federal safety standards and restricting individuals’ rights to seek compensation through legal action.
This legislative effort by Bayer raises critical questions about the balance between protecting business interests and ensuring consumer safety, especially given precedents where substances initially deemed safe are later proved harmful.
Our law firm is still accepting clients for the Roundup Lawsuit.
Contact us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Roundup Lawsuit instantly.
Bayer is currently seeking legal protections in Iowa, Missouri, and Idaho to shield itself from future lawsuits claiming that its herbicide, Roundup, causes cancer.
The proposed legislation in these states would exempt pesticide companies from claims about failing to warn users of cancer risks if their product labeling complies with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations.
Despite this, critics argue that such laws could inhibit product liability claims, potentially setting a precedent nationwide.
The legislation has passed in the Iowa Senate and awaits debate in the Missouri House, while it was defeated in Idaho.
The company has faced about 167,000 claims linking Roundup to non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, leading to settlements and judgments costing approximately $10 billion.
Experts and critics of the legislation express concerns about its implications for consumer safety and legal rights.
The legislation’s potential to prevent lawsuits beyond product liability is highlighted by experts who warn of its extensive reach, potentially impacting various types of legal claims.
This legislative push by Bayer underscores the company’s ongoing battle over the safety and labeling of Roundup.
The outcome of these legislative efforts could significantly influence future litigation and regulatory approaches to product safety and corporate liability.
A Missouri judge reduced a $1.56 billion verdict against Bayer to $611 million.
A Cole County jury determined Monsanto liable in November, citing negligence, design defects, and a failure to warn about the product’s risks adequately.
The jury awarded $61.1 million in compensatory damages and $1.5 billion in punitive damages, the latter divided equally among the plaintiffs.
On March 15, the Judge adjusted the punitive damages to $549.9 million, in line with the U.S. Supreme Court’s guidance.
Bayer contests the revised verdict, planning to appeal both the damages and the initial liability ruling.
The company maintains that extensive scientific studies demonstrate the safety of Roundup and its active ingredient, glyphosate.
The plaintiff’s lawyers supported the court’s adjustment, labeling it “unassailably constitutional” and reflective of Monsanto’s “willful, malicious, and reckless disregard” for consumer safety.
This ruling is part of a broader legal battle Bayer has been waging since it acquired Monsanto in 2018 for $63 billion.
Despite agreeing to a $10.9 billion settlement for a large portion of the claims in 2020, about 113,000 of the 167,000 cases have been resolved, with the rest continuing to press forward.
Bayer has achieved more successes in recent trials, but the plaintiffs have secured over $4 billion in verdicts, including a $2.25 billion verdict in January, which Bayer is also appealing.
Our law firm is still accepting new clients for the Roundup Lawsuit.
Reach out to us today for a free consultation.
Use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Roundup Lawsuit instantly.
The Roundup litigation continues to unfold, with the number of lawsuits steadily increasing.
According to the latest JPML filings, there are currently 4,281 Roundup Lawsuits consolidated into the multidistrict litigation.
An increase in the number of cases filed can be attributed to growing awareness among individuals who have been exposed to Roundup and are now experiencing health concerns.
Apart from consolidated litigation, other Roundup Lawsuits are ongoing across the country.
New Jersey is considering the establishment of a multi-county litigation (MCL) for Roundup cancer claims in the state, and other individual lawsuits filed in state courts have resulted in significant verdicts.
Produced by Monsanto, a subsidiary of Bayer AG, Roundup has been widely used by farm workers, landscapers, and gardeners.
These individuals, who have been exposed to the herbicide over extended periods, have been at the forefront of raising concerns regarding the potential health risks associated with glyphosate.
For those who have been exposed to Roundup and are now facing health issues, it’s crucial to understand the legal options available.
Seek legal advice and hold these companies accountable today.
If you or someone you know is in this situation, reach out to TorHoerman law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation and to find out if you qualify for a Roundup Lawsuit instantly.
Bayer AG and Monsanto face continued legal challenges despite having settled billions in claims related to Roundup exposure.
The U.S. Court of Appeals ruled in February 2024 that federal insecticide laws do not exempt the companies from lawsuits alleging failures to warn about Roundup’s risks.
The roundup herbicide have been linked to the following risks in individuals:
The Court of Appeals decision comes amid Bayer’s consideration of employing the “Texas Two-Step,” a legal strategy aimed at channeling current and future claims through the U.S. bankruptcy system.
Bayer’s exploration of the Texas Two-Step follows a series of jury verdicts awarding approximately $4 billion to plaintiffs alleging harm from Roundup exposure.
The company, in light of these costly judgments, is reportedly seeking advice on how to convince a bankruptcy judge to halt upcoming trials within the year, aiming to settle over 50,000 pending cases.
The Texas Two-Step involves a company dividing itself to isolate liabilities in one entity while maintaining assets in another.
Essentially, Bayer is trying to establish another company to force into bankruptcy in order to release the liability from themselves.
This tactic has been scrutinized and previously attempted by other corporations, such as Johnson & Johnson and 3M Company, with varying degrees of success.
Legal experts, including former federal bankruptcy judge Bruce Markell, view Bayer’s consideration of this strategy as a desperate measure given recent judicial skepticism towards the Texas Two-Step in bankruptcy cases.
Bayer’s attempt to consolidate and settle the litigation through a settlement program in 2021 was thwarted when a federal judge dismissed the company’s proposal.
Since acquiring Monsanto in 2018 for $63 billion and inheriting the Roundup lawsuits, Bayer has experienced a significant decline in market value, losing approximately 70 percent.
The Roundup litigation is ongoing and our lawyers are still accepting more cases.
A request has been submitted for the centralization of ten Roundup cases, previously filed across four New Jersey counties, to be managed collectively in The Superior Court of New Jersey, the Atlantic County Vicinage.
The request is for Multicounty Litigation (MCL) Designation of Roundup cases in New Jersey.
The Atlantic County Vicinage refers to the administrative division of the New Jersey Superior Court that has jurisdiction over Atlantic County, which provides a structured system for the resolution of legal disputes.
A group of ten plaintiffs is seeking centralized management of their Roundup cases, with expectations to encompass over a hundred related lawsuits.
Plaintiffs argue that centralization will save judicial resources and prevent inconsistent rulings, given the cases share common legal and factual issues related to Roundup’s alleged harmful effects.
The request is made under New Jersey Rule 4:38A and the Multicounty Litigation Guidelines, allowing for the central management of cases that share common factual and legal issues.
The allegations against Monsanto, the manufacturer of Roundup, center on claims of negligence due to the company’s failure to warn users about the potential carcinogenic effects of glyphosate, the active ingredient in roundup.
Plaintiffs in numerous lawsuits argue that exposure to glyphosate has contributed to the development of Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL) and other health issues, asserting that Monsanto had knowledge of the risks associated with its product but did not provide adequate warnings or safety instructions.
If you or a loved one has been exposed to Roundup and are experiencing health complications as a result, contact us today to explore your legal options for free.
You can also use the free chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Roundup Lawsuit.
The Roundup litigation is ongoing
Currently, a total of 4,253 Roundup lawsuits are pending consolidation according to the most recent JPML filings.
The increase from 4,203 Roundup lawsuits reported on February 1st to 4,253 lawsuits this past month can be attributed to more individuals coming forward to seek action against the makers of Roundup, due to health concerns surrounding the product.
Roundup is produced by Monsanto, which is now a subsidiary of Bayer AG.
The lawsuits claim that exposure to glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, has caused or contributed to the development of cancer.
Individuals who have been exposed to Roundup over extended periods, such as farm workers, landscapers, and gardeners, have raised issues about a potential link between glyphosate exposure and roundup.
If you or a loved one has been exposed to Roundup and are experiencing health issues, it may be important to seek legal advice.
Contact us today for a free consultation or use the chatbot on this page for immediate feedback.
The Roundup litigation is still ongoing and our lawyers are accepting more cases.
A Philadelphia jury imposed a hefty penalty of $2.25 billion on Bayer this year, in a case that implicated the popular Monsanto weed killer, Roundup, as cause for a cable technician’s blood cancer.
This is the largest verdict to date in the ongoing legal feud regarding Roundup.
The litigation started in 2020 when Bayer allocated over $10 billion to settle approximately 125,000 cases.
The controversy around Roundup is its link to non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Plaintiffs have started winning large verdicts from juries since last year and thousands of Roundup cases still remain with more being filed.
The attorneys argued Bayer failed to warn consumers about glyphosate, a known pesticide in Roundup.
Despite these settlements, Bayer, the parent company of Monsanto, continues to assert the safety of Roundup.
They have, however, reformulated the consumer version to exclude glyphosate.
Bayer has plans to contest the cases, relying on extensive scientific findings and endorsements from leading health and scientific regulators globally that validate the safety and non-carcinogenic nature of Roundup.
John McKivison, a plaintiff in a recent Roundup case, testified that he used Roundup for 20 years which led to it frequently making contact with his skin.
He has been diagnosed with remission cancer but constantly worries about a recurrence.
The jury ruled in favor of McKivison, awarding him $250 million in actual damages and an added $2 billion for punitive damages.
Bayer filed a post-trial motion against the verdict, they claim the award and the grounds of the Philadelphia courts are unfair.
The company believes there isn’t evidence of McKivison incurring hundreds of millions of dollars in actual losses.
Bayer disputes the claim that glyphosate contributes to non-Hodgkin lymphoma, referring to studies that report incidents of the cancer at similar rates in Roundup users and the general population.
Roundup exposure legal proceedings began after the World Health Organization (WHO) voiced concerns about glyphosate in 2015.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), a division of WHO, classified glyphosate as “probably carcinogenic to humans.”
This was based on evidence from studies that pointed to an increased risk of cancer among glyphosate-exposed agricultural workers.
The IARC also cited strong evidence that glyphosate caused genetic and cellular damage in laboratory studies, all of which suggested potential cancer risks for people.
If you believe you may be impacted by exposure to Roundup, we recommend contacting TorHoerman Law for a complimentary consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to learn if you qualify for a Roundup lawsuit.
A U.S. appeals court declined to dismiss a Georgia doctor’s lawsuit against Bayer AG, claiming that its Roundup weedkiller caused cancer.
The court rejected Bayer’s argument that federal approval shielded it from state lawsuits over the product’s risks.
Bayer intends to continue defending its product despite investor pressure for settlements.
The ruling reduces the likelihood of the U.S. Supreme Court intervening.
Bayer had hoped for a favorable Supreme Court ruling to limit its liability.
The company faces over 50,000 claims related to Roundup despite settling most pending claims in 2020.
The plaintiff in this particular case, David Carson, alleges he developed cancer after using Roundup for years.
The appeals court revived Carson’s case, rejecting Bayer’s defense.
Bayer has experienced mixed success in previous trials but has also substantial verdicts, including a $2.25 billion verdict handed down in Philadelphia court last month.
If you or a loved one were exposed to Roundup weed killer and subsequently were diagnosed with related health problems, you may be eligible to file a Roundup Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
Use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation.
As of February 2024, there are a total of 4,203 Roundup Lawsuits pending in the Roundup MDL according to the most recent JPML filings.
Many Roundup Lawsuits have already been settled, and there have been recent and major jury verdicts awarded to victims who have filed individual Roundup Lawsuits.
Last month, Bayer was ordered to pay $2.25 billion to a Pennsylvania man who developed cancer after being exposed to Roundup.
If you or a loved one were exposed to Roundup weed killer and subsequently were diagnosed with related health problems, you may be eligible to file a Roundup Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
Use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation.
Bayer has been ordered to pay $2.25 billion to a Pennsylvania man who claimed he developed cancer from using the company’s Roundup weedkiller.
The verdict includes $250 million in compensatory damages and $2 billion in punitive damages.
Bayer disputes the verdict and plans to appeal, arguing that it conflicts with scientific evidence and regulatory assessments.
This decision follows several other wins by plaintiffs suing Bayer over Roundup, but the company has also won some recent trials.
Around 165,000 claims have been filed against Bayer in the U.S. related to Roundup, most alleging a link to non-Hodgkins lymphoma.
Bayer acquired Roundup as part of its purchase of Monsanto in 2018.
The company had previously settled most cases for up to $9.6 billion but failed to secure a settlement for future cases, with over 50,000 claims remaining pending.
Despite significant losses in court, Bayer has insisted on fighting the cases rather than settling.
The company had considered breaking off its crop science business due to concerns about Roundup liability but recently decided to focus on internal reorganization instead.
If you or a loved one were exposed to Roundup weed killer and subsequently were diagnosed with related health problems, you may be eligible to file a Roundup Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
Use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation.
In the most recent Roundup Trial located in Philadelphia, the trial judge granted Nouryon Chemicals’ motion to dismiss, making Monsanto the sole defendant in the case.
This marks the beginning of Monsanto’s defense, and a verdict is expected late next week.
In an attempt to improve their chances after a series of losses, Monsanto introduced a new toxicologist in the trial.
This move did not work in their favor, as they tried to turn a fact witness into an expert witness, combining opinions in his testimony.
Plaintiff’s attorneys and the trial judge were not pleased with this tactic and moved to stop the testimony.
If you or a loved one were exposed to Roundup weed killer and subsequently were diagnosed with related health problems, you may be eligible to file a Roundup Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
Use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation.
A coalition of environmental and farmworkers groups, citing research from the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), has accused the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of allowing the continued use of the herbicide glyphosate, despite evidence linking it to cancer.
The Center for Food Safety (CFS) filed a petition on behalf of several groups, challenging the legality of glyphosate’s registration in the U.S.
The petition comes after an NIH study found genotoxic markers in male farmers exposed to high levels of glyphosate.
Glyphosate is the active ingredient in the widely used weedkiller Roundup, and the World Health Organization warned it is “probably carcinogenic to humans” in 2015.
Despite mounting evidence, the EPA has not taken action, lacking a legal human health assessment of glyphosate.
The coalition calls for the suspension of glyphosate use until it meets required safety standards or is canceled under federal law.
Glyphosate is banned for household use in some countries and for public use in others.
Critics argue that the EPA ignored glyphosate’s adverse effects in the past, facilitating its widespread use.
If you or a loved one were exposed to Roundup weed killer and subsequently were diagnosed with related health problems, you may be eligible to file a Roundup Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
Use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation.
The Roundup Lawsuit is ongoing, and the Roundup Lawyers at TorHoerman Law are still speaking to potential clients about their circumstances.
A new scientific paper reveals that pregnant women residing near farm fields have significantly higher levels of glyphosate weedkiller in their urine when farmers are spraying their fields with the herbicide.
This finding is concerning, given previous research linking gestational exposure to glyphosate with reduced fetal growth and other fetal issues.
Glyphosate has also been associated with cancer and other health problems.
The study, conducted by researchers from the University of California, Berkeley; the University of Washington; Boise State University; and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), is surprising because none of the women studied worked with glyphosate or herbicides, and none had household members using weedkillers.
The research collected 453 urine samples biweekly from 40 pregnant women in southern Idaho throughout 2021.
Glyphosate was detected more frequently and at higher concentrations in the urine of women living near fields during the months of glyphosate spraying.
Those living farther away still had glyphosate in their urine, but the levels remained relatively consistent throughout the year.
The study raises questions about how glyphosate exposure occurs, such as through drifting, adhering to soil particles, or entering drinking water.
Further research will aim to identify the sources of exposure by collecting household dust and water samples.
Glyphosate, the world’s most widely used herbicide, is the active ingredient in products like Roundup, originally developed by Monsanto and now owned by Bayer.
Researchers have only recently begun to document the extent of human exposure to glyphosate, with previous studies showing detectable traces of glyphosate in urine samples from a significant percentage of participants.
If you or a loved one were exposed to Roundup weed killer and subsequently were diagnosed with related health problems, you may be eligible to file a Roundup Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
Use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation.
The Roundup Lawsuit is ongoing, and the Roundup Lawyers at TorHoerman Law are still speaking to potential clients about their circumstances.
A Missouri jury ordered Monsanto to pay $1.56 billion to three individuals exposed to Roundup weedkiller.
The jury found Bayer’s Monsanto business liable for negligence, design defects, and failing to warn about Roundup’s potential dangers.
Three plaintiffs received $61.1 million in compensatory damages and $500 million each in punitive damages for non-Hodgkin lymphoma linked to Roundup exposure.
This verdict marks Bayer’s fourth consecutive court loss, and a top Bayer shareholder suggested the company should consider settling more cases.
If you or a loved one were exposed to Roundup weed killer and subsequently were diagnosed with related health problems, you may be eligible to file a Roundup Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
Use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation.
A California jury awarded $332 million to a man, Mike Dennis, who sued Monsanto, claiming that his cancer resulted from long-term use of the Roundup weedkiller.
Diagnosed with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in 2020, Dennis linked his illness to Roundup’s active ingredient, glyphosate.
Although in remission, his condition is incurable.
The jury held Monsanto responsible for failing to warn about Roundup’s risks but ruled partially in Bayer’s favor, Monsanto’s parent company, stating the product design wasn’t defective, and the company wasn’t negligent.
Dennis was granted $7 million in compensatory damages and $325 million in punitive damages.
Bayer intends to appeal, citing legal errors and an excessive damage award.
If you or a loved one were exposed to Roundup weed killer and subsequently were diagnosed with related health problems, you may be eligible to file a Roundup Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
Use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation.
In a significant legal outcome, a St. Louis jury granted a plaintiff $1.25 million in a case where he alleged that Monsanto’s Roundup was responsible for his non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
The jury’s decision was based on the finding that Monsanto failed to provide sufficient warnings about the potential risks associated with Roundup and its key component, glyphosate.
Furthermore, a separate Philadelphia jury recently handed Monsanto a substantial $175 million verdict in a lawsuit brought by a cancer patient who argued that the company inadequately informed consumers about the presence of carcinogenic substances in the weed killer Roundup.
This verdict concludes the first trial in Philadelphia involving tort claims related to Bayer’s flagship product.
If you or a loved one were exposed to Roundup weed killer and subsequently were diagnosed with related health problems, you may be eligible to file a Roundup Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
Use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation.
Glyphosate, the main ingredient in Roundup, interferes with amino acid production in plants and was patented by Monsanto in the 1970s.
Legal challenges arose in 2015 after the World Health Organization’s IARC classified glyphosate as “probably carcinogenic to humans.”
This classification was based on evidence of cancer in animal experiments and limited evidence from human exposure.
Bayer, which owns Monsanto, has faced numerous lawsuits, paying billions in settlements.
An Australian court case features expert testimonies on epidemiological studies, mechanistic evidence, and animal experiments to determine glyphosate’s carcinogenicity and whether it can be absorbed in quantities through herbicide use to cause cancer.
Monsanto argues that glyphosate is safe when used as directed and that other factors may cause non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
If you or a loved one were exposed to Roundup weed killer and subsequently were diagnosed with related health problems, you may be eligible to file a Roundup Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
Use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation.
The McCostlin Roundup trial is ongoing in St. Louis County.
Because of the significant connections Monsanto has in St. Louis, a ruling in favor of the plaintiff could potentially promote favorable rulings across many other parts of the country.
One of the biggest challenges and disputes in this specific case regards whether the plaintiff’s suit was brought within the statute of limitations.
In many states, the timeline to file suit starts when an injured individual becomes aware that their injury resulted from another’s mistake or negligence.
The plaintiff argues that they realized their non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma could be from Roundup in 2019, but the defendants argue that the plaintiff learned about this connection in 2017 after viewing a commercial about the ties between non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and Roundup.
The determination of whether this suit is within the statute of limitations is up to the jury, but it is unclear when this decision will be made.
If you or a loved one were exposed to Roundup weed killer and subsequently were diagnosed with related health problems, you may be eligible to file a Roundup Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
Use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation.
The Roundup lawsuit is ongoing and TorHoerman Law’s team of Roundup lawyers are still accepting clients.
Two Roundup Lawsuit trials in St. Louis county are set to begin within the next few months, and it appears they both involve plaintiffs who used Roundup for more than 10 years and were subsequently diagnosed with non-hodgkin’s lymphoma.
The Roundup MDL (centralized in the US District Court for the Northern District of California) is still active, with over 4,000 individual Roundup Lawsuits consolidated.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries resulting from Roundup weed killer exposure, you may qualify to participate in a Roundup lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Roundup lawyer to discuss your legal options today, free of charge and no obligation required.
The Missouri Supreme Court rejected plaintiffs’ attempt to have a trial held in the City of St. Louis for cases alleging cancer caused by Roundup exposure.
Although none of the plaintiffs reside in Missouri, the trial court had consolidated their cases into a single trial in the City of St. Louis.
BCLP, serving as legal and appellate counsel, successfully halted this move by recommending an emergency writ petition that the Supreme Court ultimately granted.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries resulting from Roundup weed killer exposure, you may qualify to participate in a Roundup lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Roundup lawyer to discuss your legal options today, free of charge and no obligation required.
As of August 2023, Monsanto has settled over 100,000 Roundup lawsuits, paying out approximately $11 billion.
This represents about 80% of all filed Roundup claims.
There are still 30,000 lawsuits pending, and this number continues to rise.
In the $11 billion settlement for all past cases, $2 billion was set aside for all future cases.
Roundup lawyers are still accepting clients every day.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries resulting from Roundup weed killer exposure, you may qualify to participate in a Roundup lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Roundup lawyer to discuss your legal options today, free of charge and no obligation required.
Monsanto has recently filed a motion seeking to exclude the viewpoints of Dr. Ron Schiff, an expert witness representing one of the plaintiffs in the Roundup case.
Dr. Schiff has played a substantial role by offering his expert medical opinion regarding the link between glyphosate exposure and lymphoma in the Roundup litigation.
However, Monsanto is currently asserting that Dr. Schiff’s opinions should be considered unreliable and excluded due to flawed methodology.
It’s worth noting that Monsanto’s prior endeavors to exclude expert witness testimonies have achieved limited success.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries resulting from Roundup weed killer exposure, you may qualify to participate in a Roundup lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Roundup lawyer to discuss your legal options today, free of charge and no obligation required.
Bayer AG has agreed to pay $6.9 million to settle claims made by New York Attorney General Letitia James, who accused the company of misleading consumers with its advertising of Roundup weedkiller.
The settlement resolves allegations that Bayer and its Monsanto unit failed to provide evidence for their claims that Roundup, which contains the active ingredient glyphosate, was environmentally safe.
The advertising statements that were deemed misleading included assertions that Roundup only harmed weeds and not animal wildlife, as well as suggestions that Roundup was safer than detergent and soap.
The settlement requires Bayer to stop advertising Roundup as a safe and non-toxic product.
The $6.9 million will be used to mitigate the impact of pesticides on pollinators and aquatic species.
Bayer did not admit or deny wrongdoing but expressed satisfaction with the settlement.
The attorney general’s investigation did not draw scientific conclusions about Roundup’s safety.
Bayer has faced extensive litigation over the alleged cancer-causing effects of Roundup since its acquisition of Monsanto in 2018, settling a significant portion of the claims for $10.9 billion in 2020.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries resulting from Roundup weed killer exposure, you may qualify to participate in a Roundup lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Roundup lawyer to discuss your legal options today, free of charge and no obligation required.
Monsanto has won the past seven Roundup trials, including the most recent trial in St. Louis County, but our lawyers are still accepting cases and speaking to clients daily about their situations.
The defendants’ victories in recent Roundup trials might dissuade those diagnosed with Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma from seeking legal action, but it is imperative that you consult with an experienced Roundup Lawyer who can assess your eligibility and provide you with options for your Roundup Lawsuit.
It is also to be considered that the defendants’ recent victories are a part of their overall legal strategy regarding the Roundup Lawsuit:
There are three additional Roundup trials scheduled for next month.
Visit this page for more updates.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries resulting from Roundup weed killer exposure, you may qualify to participate in a Roundup lawsuit.
Contact an experienced Roundup lawyer to discuss your legal options today, free of charge and no obligation required.
The Roundup Lawsuit is ongoing.
Our Roundup Lawyers are speaking to potential clients and assessing their eligibility to file a Roundup Lawsuit.
Several Roundup Lawsuits have gone to trial in front of a jury, with the most recent Roundup trial beginning on April 26th in St. Louis court.
Successful Roundup Lawsuits may be entitled to monetary compensation for the damages incurred by Roundup exposure.
Damages in a Roundup Lawsuit for Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma may include demands of payment for the following:
Visit this page for more updates on the Roundup Lawsuit, and contact our law firm to speak to one of our Roundup Lawyers today.
If you or a loved one were exposed to Roundup and subsequently developed Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma or another related health problem, you may be eligible to file a Roundup Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Roundup Lawsuit instantly.
The Roundup Litigation is ongoing, and our Roundup Lawyers are still accepting new clients. Although there was a settlement reached and most claims have been paid, there is a fund available for future lawsuits.
If you were exposed to Roundup at work or while using it at home, it’s important that you retain evidence such as the following:
If you or a loved one used Roundup and subsequently developed medical conditions related to exposure, you may be eligible to file a Roundup Lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation. You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Roundup Lawsuit instantly.
Roundup Lawsuits continue to be filed in courts across the country, and lawyers are still accepting clients.
Monsanto and Bayer have been on the offensive and are attempting to have cases dismissed, but many of their actions have been halted by state and federal courts.
If you or a loved one were exposed to Roundup and subsequently developed cancer or another related illness, you may be eligible for legal action.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free, no-obligation consultation. You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Roundup Lawsuit instantly.
The Roundup Lawsuit is ongoing and lawyers are accepting clients from across the country.
The pace of lawsuits being added to the multidistrict litigation has slowed in the past year, but there are more people out there that do qualify for compensation and should contact an attorney as soon as possible.
TorHoerman Law is accepting new clients for the Roundup MDL.
If you or a loved one have been exposed to Roundup and subsequently suffered related health problems, you may be eligible for a lawsuit.
Contact us for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation.
Bayer is still attempting to have Roundup Lawsuits dismissed, despite the Supreme Court refusing to hear its appeal to dismiss legal action surrounding the weed killer in June 2022.
The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals will review its previous ruling that deals with the issue of whether federal pesticide law takes precedence over state failure-to-warn claims.
Though this is a win for Bayer, it does not guarantee by any means that Roundup Lawsuits will be dismissed any time soon.
Visit this page for more updates on the Roundup litigation as they become available.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for a Roundup lawsuit instantly.
Attorneys are still accepting clients and filing claims for Roundup Lawsuits. Recently, several lawsuits have settled for plaintiffs, and others have gone to trial.
Cases are still being consolidated into multidistrict litigation.
Visit this page for more updates on the Roundup litigation as they become available.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for a Roundup lawsuit instantly.
The Roundup litigation is ongoing and lawyers across the country are still accepting new clients and filing claims on their behalf.
Visit this page for more updates on the Roundup litigation as they become available.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for a Roundup lawsuit instantly.
The Roundup Lawsuit is ongoing and lawyers across the country are still accepting clients and filing cases.
More and more scientific evidence has come out as of late on the harmful effects of glyphosate, the toxic ingredient in Roundup:
If you or a loved one were exposed to Roundup and subsequently developed health problems, you may qualify for a lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for legal action instantly.
Visit this page for more updates on the Roundup Lawsuit as news becomes available.
Roundup lawsuits are ongoing and lawyers across the country are still accepting cases.
To date, Monsanto has settled over 100,000 Roundup lawsuits worth over $10 billion. Over 30,000 lawsuits are still pending.
If you or a loved one were exposed to Roundup in a work or home gardening setting, and subsequently developed cancer, you may qualify for a lawsuit.
Contact us for a free consultation or use the chatbot on this page to see if you qualify for legal action instantly.
Visit this page for more updates on Roundup Lawsuits as they become available.
The Roundup Lawsuit is ongoing and lawyers across the country are still accepting cases.
Last month, news came out that spoke to how widespread Roundup contamination may be in the United States.
A CDC study, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, found that Glyphosate, the chemical in Roundup linked to cancer, was present in 80% (1,885 of 2,310) of urine samples from test subjects.
The study included participants representative of the U.S. population, with around one third of participants being children aged 6 and older.
Cases are continually being added to the Roundup multidistrict litigation (MDL 2741).
Visit this page for more updates as they become available.
The Supreme Court rejected an appeal from Bayer in the most recent Roundup Bellwether Trial, a move that may have major implications on the remaining Roundup lawsuits that have yet to be tried.
Bayer’s appeal argued that an EPA filing that declared Roundup safe to use superseded California’s failure-to-warn law, where the lawsuits are consolidated.
If the appeal was accepted, thousands of Roundup lawsuits would have likely been thrown out.
A panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the EPA report and ordered the agency to reexamine its findings.
The Supreme Court decision means that Bayer/Monsanto is liable to pay the $25 million settlement decided in the bellwether and preemption cannot be used as an argument by the defense.
The Roundup litigation is ongoing, and lawyers are still accepting cases across the country.
On June 13, 2022, the Supreme Court took no action on Bayer’s bid to dismiss Roundup legal claims.
It was expected that the Supreme Court would dismiss Bayer’s appeal, but it instead took no action.
It’s difficult to tell what may happen next with the Roundup Litigation.
The Supreme Court may even decide to rule on the case.
Visit this page for further updates as they come available.
Most recently, Monsanto appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court to dismiss Roundup Lawsuits based on the argument that legal action for injuries caused by Roundup are preempted by the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.
Agricultural groups across America reacted to the rejection: 54 agricultural groups want President Biden to “withdraw a brief to the Supreme Court over Bayer AG’s petition for the court to review a verdict in a Roundup cancer lawsuit.”
An Ex-Monsanto CEO has been ordered to testify in the trial of a suit filed in Missouri State Court by a former Roundup user.
The suit alleges that the herbicide is responsible for his Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma diagnosis.
Many cases have been consolidated into MDL 2741 in the US District Court: Northern District of California, which is still in progress.
Bayer is still dealing with tens of thousands of lawsuits filed in both state and federal courts over claims that Roundup, the discontinued weed killer, is linked to cancer.
In 2018 Bayer acquired Monsanto, which developed and patented Roundup, and has assumed the legal responsibilities tied to the weed killer.
On April 7th, Bayer reached a settlement with a number of claims that were scheduled to go to trial in front of a St. Louis court.
The cases, filed in 2017, join the nearly 100,000 others settled by Bayer.
Over 4,000 cases are still pending in the Roundup Multidistrict Litigation (MDL 2741).
There has been a push by plaintiffs’ attorneys to file Roundup cases in state court, as many people have been waiting far too long for a trial or settlement.
Roundup Lawsuits concern the links between chronic exposure to the weed killer and cancer, specifically Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma.
A 2015 report from the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) showed that there was “sufficient evidence” glyphosate causes cancer in animals as well as damaging effects on human cells.
A 2015 report from the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) bridged the potential link between the chemical component, glyphosate, and cancer.
The report referenced studies that showed that there was “sufficient evidence” glyphosate causes cancer in animals as well as damaging effects on human cells.
Recent studies suggest that the popular Roundup weedkiller could be deadly to more than just unwanted plants.
In relation to these studies and IARC’s findings, lawsuits were filed against Roundup manufacturer, Monsanto.
The Roundup lawsuit claims that exposure to a chemical component of the herbicide, glyphosate, causes Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma.
Glyphosate, a common agent in herbicides, targets specific enzymes in weeds to eradicate them without damaging other plants.
Glyphosate is the active ingredient in Monsanto Co.’s Roundup weed killer.
On a yearly average, American farmers spray nearly a pound of glyphosate on every acre of cropland.
Farmers and landscapers who use Roundup regularly are often exposed to high levels of glyphosate.
Because of the herbicide’s popularity in the agricultural industry, trace amounts of glyphosate have been found in corn, soy, and wheat-based products.
Alarmingly, the chemical has also been detected in human urine samples and women’s breast milk.
Monsanto claims that the chemical is completely harmless to humans, citing years of in-house studies conducted on glyphosate.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has backed up Monsanto’s claim, citing their own findings which show no link between glyphosate and increased risk of cancer for humans.
The Environmental Protection Agency’s long-standing position is that glyphosate exposure and low-level consumption does not pose any risk to humans.
According to their website, Monsanto supports these claims with their own in-house studies, which have found glyphosate to be “more than 10 times less toxic than caffeine.”
Despite Monsanto’s statements, a number of U.S. agricultural workers and landscapers are currently suing Monsanto, claiming that by using Roundup they were exposed to high levels of glyphosate which caused them to develop Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma.
Monsanto stands by their safety claims, stating “in more than 700 studies, no one has associated cancer with the use of glyphosate.”
However, information obtained through the first cases against Monsanto shows that the EPA reports are likely compromised.
Within the documents lies a chain of Monsanto internal emails, and email communications between the company and EPA staff, suggesting that the EPA research had been ghostwritten by Monsanto, and later signed off by EPA academics.
In one such email, Monsanto executive William F. Heydens wrote:
“We would be keeping the cost down by us doing the writing and they [EPA] would just edit & sign their names so to speak.”
There is also evidence that one EPA senior official had worked directly with Monsanto directors to put a halt to further investigations by other federal health agencies into the potential adverse effects of glyphosate.
Other documents indicate that an EPA senior officials had worked with Monsanto to hide a U.S. Department of Health and Human Services study reviewing glyphosate, which suggested the herbicide could be a carcinogen.
A series of EPA internal emails revealed a great level of dispute among employees about the safety of glyphosate.
Even within the EPA, there seems to be a polarizing disagreement of whether glyphosate is hazardous for humans.
The agency is currently conducting a scheduled evaluation of the chemical though there is no indication of when the results of the evaluation will be published.
Roundup weed killers have been banned in:
On April 11, 2019, Vietnam removed herbicides containing glyphosate from the market because of the damaging effects it has on the environment and severe health consequences for the population.
“The decision to remove herbicides containing glyphosate from the list of plant protection chemicals permitted for use in Vietnam is in accordance with the current law, international regulations and in line with Vietnam’s socio-economic conditions,” Hoang Trung, head of the Plant Protection Department under Vietnam’s Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development said in the statement.
The herbicide is Monsanto’s flagship product.
Being sold internationally for both mass agricultural purposes and as an at-home gardening applicant, it is the most widely used herbicide in the world.
There are currently more than 700 roundup cancer lawsuits filed against Monsanto related to Roundup weedkillers.
The people claiming injuries are made up of agricultural labourers, lawn care workers, and gardeners who have developed Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma because of their high levels of exposure to glyphosate.
Monsanto continues to assert that Roundoff is safe for consumers.
In December 2016, the EPA constructed a panel to review the possible health effects of glyphosate.
The panel consisted of 15 outside experts, composed of:
The review was not a consequence of the lawsuits, but rather the EPA is required to review health-effects for every pesticide once every 15 years.
Glyphosate had not been reviewed since 1991.
At that time, the EPA determined that the herbicide did not pose a threat to consumers.
In a puzzling move, the December conference began with the Chief of the Office of Pesticides Programs, Jack Housenger, laying out an array of evidence – in the form of a 227-page issue paper –explaining why glyphosate is an unlikely carcinogen.
Housenger then requested the panel review the analysis.
More than half of the expert panelists were concerned with the EPA’s findings.
During the conference, panelist Eric Johnson, an epidemiologist at the University of Arkansas, expressed his concerns.
Johnson said that if any study suggested a positive connection between glyphosate and Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma, the EPA would quickly minimize the findings, citing alleged flaws in the study.
Panelist Lianne Sheppard, a biostatistician at the University of Washington-Seattle, explained that there was a “consensus” on the panel that “the available evidence did not fit with the conclusions drawn in the issue paper, particularly when put in the context of guidelines.”
Three of the experts even expressed concern regarding the Office of Pesticides Programs’ integrity and ability to conduct unbiased studies.
In 2016, approximately 30% of the Office of Pesticides Programs operating budget was funded by the pesticide manufacturing industry.
The office relies on studies and tests conducted by the pesticide manufacturers for much of their data.
After the conference, the EPA publicly released the issue paper.
By law, the EPA had to include any concerns expressed by the panelists.
Using ambiguous language and vague information, the EPA downplayed the severity of the panel’s concerns.
When a majority of the panelists disagreed with the EPA’s findings, the release paper would simply state “some panelists expressed doubt.”
If the panelists denied the data, the release would only explain that “panelists had some concerns.”
The issue paper did not distinguish how many or which panelists were concerned with which specific data sets.
Following the conference, a group of environmental health scientists came together to voice their concerns in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.
The researchers argued that more unbiased safety reviews of glyphosate are needed for market approval.
The study’s authors write that:
“It is incongruous that safety assessments of the most widely used herbicide on the planet rely largely on fewer than 300 unpublished, non-peer-reviewed studies while excluding the vast modern literature on glyphosate effects.”
On July 7, California was the first state to list glyphosate as a known carcinogen, contrasting the EPA’s federal approval of the herbicide.
The chances of a federal glyphosate ban are slim.
The 2016 election cycle brought a change in bureaucratic leadership, including a new EPA administrator, Scott Pruitt.
Pruitt previously served as Oklahoma’s Attorney General.
During his tenure as Attorney General, Pruitt sued the EPA on 13 separate occasions, all of which were attempts to end federal regulations on behalf of corporations.
Since taking over the EPA, Pruitt has already reversed a ban on chlorpyrifos, a pesticide similar to glyphosate, which is believed to cause brain damage in agricultural workers and children.
A national group of pediatricians said that they were “deeply alarmed by EPA’s decision not to finalize the proposed rule to end chlorpyrifos uses on food,” saying it puts children at significant risk.
Despite this, Pruitt took the side of chlorpyrifos manufacturer, DOW Chemical, arguing that the data did not directly link chlorpyrifos exposure to brain damage.
Pruitt is in a position now to decide whether to increase regulations on or completely ban glyphosate.
Based on Pruitt’s past history and aggressive attitude towards deregulation, it is unlikely that the new EPA administrator will go against corporate interest.
A lot rides on the EPA’s market approval of glyphosate.
Last September, Bayer AG agreed to buy Monsanto for $66 billion, pending regulatory approvals.
Since 2015, Monsanto has spent more than $10.3 million in lobbying, developing advantageous relationships with political heads and bureaucrats that control agricultural policies and regulations.
With political influence and financial power, as well as a new EPA head administrator favoring environmental deregulation, there is little to hinder Monsanto’s merger with Bayer AG.
The corporate giant will see to it that Roundup stays on the market, even if it is at the expense of the thousands of agricultural workers who are exposed to its dangerous product every day.
As research on the effects of glyphosate continues to indicate that the chemical is a carcinogen, more product liability Roundup lawsuit cases will be filed across federal and state courts.
Federal multidistrict litigation is proceeding under the direction of U.S. District Court Judge Vince Chhabria.
During the first bellwether trial, Judge Chhabria made the following comment relating to Monsanto’s carelessness.
Judge Chhabria said:
“Although the evidence that Roundup causes cancer is quite equivocal, there is strong evidence from which a jury could conclude that Monsanto does not particularly care whether its product is, in fact, giving people cancer, focusing instead on manipulating public opinion and undermining anyone who raises genuine and legitimate concerns about the issue.”
Participation is not limited to just farmworkers.
Any individual who has been consistently exposed to Roundup weed killer may be eligible to participate in a Roundup lawsuit.
If you have been exposed to Roundup weed killers and have developed Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, contact a knowledgeable Roundup injury lawyer to explore your options.
TorHoerman Law offers free, no-obligation case consultations for any potential Roundup lawsuit case.
Call today to speak to an experienced Roundup injury lawyer from our law firm.
Though there have been several Roundup verdicts and settlements in the past, the average Roundup settlement is not consistent across every lawsuit.
Average Roundup settlement amounts for the June 2020 $11 billion settlement were over $150,000 each. This landmark settlement included $1.25 for future Roundup claims.
Our Roundup lawyers estimate that average Roundup settlement amounts fall between $5,000 to $200,000+.
As mentioned previously, the Roundup settlement amounts will depend on a variety of factors, including the strength of the plaintiff’s case, quality of evidence, severity of the injury or illness, extent of medical treatment, and amount of damages sought.
Our chemical exposure legal team is prepared to help you in filing a Roundup Lawsuit and securing compensation for the injuries you’ve suffered.
We have secured over $4 billion for people harmed at no fault of their own, and we aren’t afraid to take on large corporations for their negligence.
If you or a loved one suffered injuries resulting from Roundup weed killer exposure, you may qualify to participate in a Roundup lawsuit.
Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.
You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Roundup Lawsuit instantly.
We’re here to help.
Your attorney will help you to gather evidence to prove that you were in fact exposed to Roundup.
Some evidence might include:
If you or a loved one was exposed to Roundup regularly and subsequently was diagnosed with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma or another form of cancer – you may qualify to file a Roundup lawsuit.
The best way to determine if you qualify is to speak with an experienced Roundup lawyer.
The average payout for an individual who has been diagnosed with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma or other cancers is between $5,000 to $250,000 in compensation.
One report stated that the average amount per client suffering from cancer is $160,000.
Exposure to Roundup has been linked to a number of adverse health effects, including cancer.
The active ingredient in Roundup, glyphosate, has been classified as a “probable human carcinogen” by the World Health Organization.
The statute of limitations may vary depending on the state in which you live.
However, it is generally two (2) to three (3) years from the date of diagnosis or one year from the date of death.
You should speak with an experienced Roundup attorney to determine the applicable statute of limitations in your case.
Roundup lawyers typically take between 33-40% of the total amount recovered in a personal injury lawsuit.
Contingency fee agreements may vary depending on the circumstances of each case.
The attorneys’ fees in a Roundup lawsuit will be contingent upon whether the case is resolved through settlement or trial.
If the case settles, the attorney’s fees will generally be a percentage of the total settlement amount.
If the case goes to trial, the roundup attorneys fees will be charged hourly.
You should discuss this with your attorney prior to signing any legal documents.
It is important that you understand all of the terms of your agreement before moving forward.
Yes, there have been a number of people who have received money as part of a Roundup verdict or settlement.
Bayer/Monsanto reached an $11 billion settlement with most of the plaintiffs.
Approximately 80% of all filed Roundup claims have been settled.
Victims of Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma received compensation in 2021 and 2022.
Yes, the Roundup lawsuits are legitimate.
There have been a number of people who have been diagnosed with cancer after being exposed to Roundup.
These individuals have filed lawsuits against Monsanto/Bayer, the manufacturer of Roundup.
The Roundup lawsuits claim that Bayer knew or should have known that Roundup was dangerous and failed to warn consumers of the risks associated with its use.
Bayer denies these claims and is currently appealing a number of Roundup verdicts.
The Roundup litigation is currently in the appeals process.
It is unclear how long the appeals will take or what the final outcome will be.
The Roundup Lawsuit claims that the herbicide Roundup causes cancer and that the company knew about this risk but did not warn consumers.
The Roundup Lawsuit is consolidated into multidistrict litigation (MDL).
The Roundup MDL is consolidated in the US District Court for the Northern District of California as MDL 2741.
Approximately 80% of all filed Roundup claims have been settled.
The total amount of the roundup settlements is approximately $11 billion.
No, you do not have to pay taxes on Roundup settlement checks.
This is because the settlements are considered to be compensatory damages, which are not taxable.
Owner & Attorney - TorHoerman Law
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.
Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?
Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!
In this case, we obtained a verdict of $495 Million for our client’s child who was diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis after consuming baby formula manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $20 Million for our client after they suffered a Toxic Tort Injury due to chemical exposure.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $103.8 Million for our client after they suffered a COX-2 Inhibitors Injury.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $4 Million for our client after they suffered a Traumatic Brain Injury while at daycare.
In this case, we were able to successfully recover $2.8 Million for our client after they suffered an injury due to a Defective Heart Device.
Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.
Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.
Would you like our help?
You can learn more about the Roundup Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:
They helped my elderly uncle receive compensation for the loss of his wife who was administered a dangerous drug. He consulted with this firm because of my personal recommendation and was very pleased with the compassion, attention to detail and response he received. Definitely recommend this firm for their 5 star service.
When I wanted to join the Xarelto class action lawsuit, I chose TorrHoerman Law from a search of a dozen or so law firm websites. I was impressed with the clarity of the information they presented. I gave them a call, and was again impressed, this time with the quality of our interactions.
TorHoerman Law is an awesome firm to represent anyone that has been involved in a case that someone has stated that it's too difficult to win. The entire firm makes you feel like you’re part of the family, Tor, Eric, Jake, Kristie, Chad, Tyler, Kathy and Steven are the best at what they do.
TorHorman Law is awesome
I can’t say enough how grateful I was to have TorHoerman Law help with my case. Jacob Plattenberger is very knowledgeable and an amazing lawyer. Jillian Pileczka was so patient and kind, helping me with questions that would come up. Even making sure my special needs were taken care of for meetings.
TorHoerman Law fights for justice with their hardworking and dedicated staff. Not only do they help their clients achieve positive outcomes, but they are also generous and important pillars of the community with their outreach and local support. Thank you THL!
Hands down one of the greatest group of people I had the pleasure of dealing with!
A very kind and professional staff.
Very positive experience. Would recommend them to anyone.
A very respectful firm.
Edwardsville, IL
Chicago, IL
St. Louis, MO
Clayton, MO
Naperville, IL