Snuga Swing Lawsuit [2024 Update] | Suffocation Risk Recall

About the Fisher-Price Snuga Swings Recall

The Fisher-Price Snuga Swings were introduced in October 2010, quickly becoming popular among parents for their design and features meant to soothe infants with gentle swinging motions.

With options to rock side-to-side or front-to-back, a soft plush body support, and soothing music, the swings promised to calm babies and give parents some peace of mind.

Marketed as a safe, comfortable place for infants to relax, Snuga Swings became a household staple, especially for new parents seeking trusted brands for infant care.

However, while the product’s intended purpose was to comfort, severe safety concerns began to surface over the years, prompting scrutiny and, ultimately, a recall of more than 2 million Snuga Swings.

Reports emerged linking the Fisher-Price Snuga Swings to suffocation incidents, raising alarms about potential design defects and hazardous elements within the product.

Between 2012 and 2022, at least five infant deaths were associated with these swings.

In these tragic cases, infants who were unrestrained or placed in the swing with bedding materials succumbed to suffocation.

Parents and caregivers were often unaware that even if the product wasn’t explicitly marketed as a sleep device, it posed a substantial risk when infants fell asleep while unrestrained.

Concerns also centered on the product’s headrest and body support insert, which could compress and obstruct a baby’s airway, creating a risk of suffocation if infants’ heads fell forward or to the side.

These tragic incidents underscore the dangers of inclined products for infant sleep, which have repeatedly shown unsafe sleeping conditions in studies and safety tests.

The recall has reignited discussions around the responsibility of manufacturers to prioritize safety over aesthetics or convenience, particularly in products designed for vulnerable infants.

The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) has reinforced its safe sleep guidelines, reminding parents to only use firm, flat surfaces like cribs or bassinets for infant sleep and to avoid inclined sleepers, swings, or products with added bedding.

Safety advocates continue to urge parents to stop using products like the Snuga Swing for unsupervised rest, emphasizing that infant sleep safety must remain the industry’s top priority.

If your child, or a loved one’s child, suffered injuries or tragically passed away due to defects on the Fisher-Price Snuga Infant Swings, you may be eligible to pursue legal action and financial compensation.

Contact our law firm for more information and a free consultation.

You can also use the chat feature on this page to get in touch with our legal team.

What Should Parents Do If They Have a Snuga Swing?

If you own a Fisher-Price Snuga Swing, you should take immediate steps to ensure the product is safe for any continued use.

Fisher-Price advises removing both the headrest and body support insert from the swing, as these components are linked to potential suffocation risks.

Parents should only use the swing when the child is awake and supervised, avoiding its use as a sleep product.

Parents can contact Fisher-Price for a $25 refund as part of the recall.

What Stores Sold the Snuga Infant Swings?

The Fisher-Price Snuga Infant Swings were sold through various major retailers across the United States, Canada, and Mexico.

These swings were available both in physical stores and online platforms.

The following is a list of retailers that sold the Snuga Infant Swings:

• Amazon
• Toys R Us
• Walmart
• Sam’s Club
• Target
• Other major retailers

These retailers offered the swings to a wide consumer base, contributing to the distribution of approximately 2.1 million units in the U.S., about 99,000 in Canada, and around 500 in Mexico.

What are the Specific Product Models of the Snuga Swing?

The Fisher-Price Snuga Swing recall encompasses 21 specific models, each identified by a unique product number.

These models, sold between October 2010 and January 2024, include:

• BGB32: My Little Snugakitty™ Cradle ‘n Swing
• CCF38: My Little Snugabunny™ Swing
• CHM56: My Little Snugabear Cradle ‘n Swing
• CHM69: My Little Snugabear Ballerina Cradle ‘n Swing
• CHM76: Safari Dreams Cradle ‘n Swing
• CHM78: Moonlight Meadow Swing
• DRG43: Sweet Snugapuppy™ Swing
• FKL21: Deluxe Swing – Surreal Serenity™
• GJB53: Sweet Snugamonkey Swing
• GKH44: Blooming Flowers Swing
• GNG38: Fawn Meadows Deluxe Swing
• GNG40: Peek-a-boo Fox Swing
• GVF83: Dots & Spots Puppy Swing
• HBM23: Snow Leopard Swing
• HDY10: Hearthstone Swing
• HGX49: Baby Raccoon Swing
• V0099: My Little Snugabunny Cradle ‘n Swing
• W9510: My Little Sweetie™ Deluxe Cradle ‘n Swing
• X7051: My Little SnugaMonkey™ Cradle ‘n Swing
• X7345: My Little Snugapuppy™ Cradle ‘n Swing
• X7347: My Little Snugabear Cradle ‘n Swing

For detailed information on each model and the recall, please refer to the official recall notice by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission.

What Has Been the Company’s Response to the Dangers and Subsequent Recall?

In response to the dangers associated with the infant swings, Fisher-Price collaborated with the US Consumer Product Safety Commission to initiate the recall on October 10, 2024.

The company advised consumers, as mentioned previously, to immediately remove both the headrest and body support insert from the seat pad before continuing to use the swing for awake-time activities.

Fisher-Price’s response has faced criticism from safety experts and consumer advocates.

William Wallace, associate director of safety policy at Consumer Reports, stated, “There should be a full refund, and Fisher-Price should be urging people to throw away these swings.”

Wallace also hit on the CPSC’s ability to enforce recalls, saying that “”The CPSC can’t easily force companies to issue a strong recall—typically, the agency can only get companies to carry out recalls that are voluntary and on the terms that the company agrees to.”

Richard Trumka Jr, commissioner of the US Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) expressed similar concerns, stating that the flawed recall and safety alerts were “doomed to fail and will keep many babies in harm’s way.”

Infant Deaths and Suffocation Linked to the Recalled Snuga Swings

Infant deaths associated with the Fisher-Price Snuga Swings primarily resulted from suffocation incidents, a tragic outcome when infants were placed in the swings, particularly if they fell asleep unrestrained.

These swings, while designed to comfort babies through a gentle rocking motion, have been found to pose significant risks, especially when used for unsupervised or overnight rest.

Reports from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) indicate that at least five infants aged between 1 and 3 months lost their lives between 2012 and 2022 due to positional asphyxiation in these swings.

The main suffocation risks stem from the product’s incline, soft padding, and infant head support components, all of which create an unsafe environment if an infant’s airway becomes obstructed.

Risk of Suffocation Explained

When infants are placed in an inclined position, as with the Snuga Swings, their heads can easily slump forward or to the side, compressing their airway and restricting breathing.

Without proper head control, infants under six months are particularly susceptible to this “chin-to-chest” positioning, which is known to cause positional asphyxiation.

The Snuga Swing’s design includes a headrest and body support insert meant to keep infants comfortable, but these components inadvertently increase the likelihood of dangerous slumping by creating a cradling effect.

If the infant is not securely restrained, they may slip into a dangerous position without warning, especially while sleeping.

The addition of bedding or other soft materials—an often tempting modification for parents wanting extra comfort for their child—can exacerbate these risks.

Any added blankets or padding may obstruct an infant’s nose and mouth if they shift during sleep, significantly increasing the chance of suffocation.

The American Academy of Pediatrics and CPSC have long advocated against placing infants in any inclined product for sleep, emphasizing that flat, firm surfaces in cribs or bassinets are the safest choices.

Fisher-Price's Recall is One of Many Infant Swing Recalls in Recent Years

Fisher-Price’s Snuga Swing recall joins a long list of recalls for infant swings and other inclined sleep products, raising concerns about the overall safety of these items.

These recalls often center on suffocation and asphyxiation risks associated with inclined products, which have been found to create unsafe sleep environments for infants.

Fisher-Price itself has faced scrutiny for other recalls, most notably the Rock ‘n Play Sleeper in 2019, which was pulled from shelves after being linked to over 30 infant deaths.

The company faced multiple lawsuits as a result, with families alleging that Fisher-Price’s design negligence contributed to these fatal incidents and that warnings were insufficient to prevent tragedy.

Settlements and ongoing litigation highlight the enduring legal ramifications for manufacturers who produce products that may pose hazards to infants.

Other manufacturers, such as Kids II and Graco, have also faced recalls for similar products.

In 2019, Kids II recalled approximately 700,000 units of its Rocking Sleepers after reports connected the product to infant deaths caused by positional asphyxiation.

Parents of affected infants filed lawsuits alleging that Kids II failed to warn consumers about the dangers posed by inclined sleepers and designed a product unsuitable for infant sleep.

Graco, another major player in the infant products industry, faced recalls and customer backlash for its Little Lounger Rocking Seats, although fewer incidents were reported.

Graco’s and Kids II’s recalls, like Fisher-Price’s, underscore how product designs across the industry have underestimated the risks associated with inclined infant sleep surfaces.

These recalls, compounded by numerous studies and CPSC investigations, led to heightened scrutiny and a shift in safety regulations for infant products.

In 2021, the Safe Sleep for Babies Act was introduced to address these issues, ultimately banning the sale of inclined sleepers and other hazardous products for infants.

This legislation aims to hold manufacturers accountable and prevent future tragedies by establishing a higher standard of safety.

Yet, despite these legal strides, companies like Fisher-Price continue to face class-action lawsuits and individual claims from affected families.

Do You Qualify for a Snuga Swing Lawsuit?

The risk of suffocation and even death in products like the Snuga Swings is a haunting reality that no family should ever have to face.

For parents who believed they were providing a safe, comforting space for their infant, the trauma of an unexpected tragedy is unimaginable and deeply heartbreaking.

Companies hold a profound responsibility to protect children by ensuring that every product is safe, and when that responsibility is overlooked, the consequences can devastate families forever.

If your child has been harmed by a product you trusted to keep them safe, know that taking legal action can help hold companies accountable, seek justice for your family, and bring about changes to protect others from the same heartache.

Our law firm is currently investigating Snuga Swing Lawsuits.

Reach out to us today.

TorHoerman Law: Investigating the Snuga Infant Swing Lawsuit

The tragic link between Snuga Swings and infant fatalities underscores the urgent need for manufacturers to prioritize safety above all else when designing products for newborns and toddlers.

Newborn to toddler rockers must be made with meticulous care, accounting for every potential risk to ensure a secure environment for the youngest and most vulnerable.

Fisher-Price’s recall of millions of Snuga Swings serves as a painful reminder that these responsibilities were not met, resulting in unthinkable losses.

This recall reveals gaps in oversight that demand better standards and more accountability from companies entrusted with the safety of children.

If your family has been affected, contact TorHoerman Law today.

We provide free, no-obligation consultations to any person who believes they may be eligible to file a claim.

We’re here to help you.