Chicago
Case Types We Handle
Personal Injuries
Car Accidents
Truck Accidents
Motorcycle Accidents
Bicycle Accidents
Construction Accidents
Nursing Home Abuse
Wrongful Death
Slip and Fall Accidents
Daycare Injury & Abuse
Edwardsville
Case Types We Handle
Personal Injuries
Car Accidents
Truck Accidents
Motorcycle Accidents
Bicycle Accidents
Nursing Home Abuse
Wrongful Death
Slip and Fall Accidents
Daycare Injury & Abuse
Premises Liability
St. Louis
Case Types We Handle
Personal Injuries
Car Accidents
Truck Accidents
Motorcycle Accidents
Bicycle Accidents
Construction Accidents
Nursing Home Abuse
Wrongful Death
Slip and Fall Accidents
Daycare Injury & Abuse
Dangerous Drugs
Defective Products
Chemical Exposure

Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit [2024 Update] | Legal Action for Uber Sexual Assault Victims

Use the confidential chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation.

Contact our lawyers today for a free consultation and to find out if you qualify for the Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit.

Key takeaways:

  • The Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit is a consolidation of claims filed by individuals who were sexually assaulted by Uber drivers.

  • The Uber Technologies, Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation MDL No. 3084 was centralized in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in October 2023.

  • The lawsuit is in its early stages, and lawyers are helping survivors file claims.

Most Recent Updates:

  • More than 3,000 total Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuits have been filed against the rideshare company in both state and federal courts, with the majority of claims consolidated into multidistrict litigation.

  • The central allegation against Uber relates to the company's failure to implement adequate safety measures and background checks to prevent sexual assault by its drivers.

  • Our law firm provides free and confidential consultations to those who have experienced sexual assault and other forms of misconduct from an Uber driver.

Overview of the Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit

On this page, we’ll discuss the Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit, current developments regarding the sexual assault claims filed against Uber, how survivors can seek compensation and justice, and much more.

Lawsuits for Individuals Sexually Assaulted by Uber Drivers

Between 2017 and 2020, nearly 10,000 sexual assaults were reported to Uber.

Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuits are being filed by individuals across the country who have experienced sexual assault and other forms of sexual misconduct from Uber drivers.

The lawsuit claims that Uber Technologies, Inc. failed to implement adequate safety measures and conduct proper background checks, leading to numerous incidents of sexual assault and misconduct by its drivers against passengers.

Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit; Uber Sexual Assaults; Uber Sexual Assault Lawyer; Uber Sexual Assault Reports; Uber Sexual Assault Claim

Sexual assault is a horrific crime that deserves full accountability from all responsible parties.

These serious incidents necessitate thorough investigations into both the perpetrator’s actions and the company’s responsibility for rider safety.

Victims of sexual assault by an Uber driver may have the right to sue Uber.

If you or a loved one were sexually assaulted, sexually battered, or faced any other form of sexual misconduct from an Uber driver, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit.

Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

Use the free and confidential chatbot on this page to find if you qualify to file a claim instantly.

Our law firm is sensitive to the needs of our clients, and we recognize the difficult time you are going through.

We are here to support you and handle the legal process so that you can focus on your mental, emotional, and physical recovery.

Reach out to our team with any questions or concerns you may have.

Table of Contents

Lawsuit Updates

December 2, 2024

The Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit is ongoing. 

The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) reported 1,411 case filings for the Uber Sexual Assault lawsuit in November.

By December, the number of case filings increased to 1,459, reflecting a growth of 48 cases.

The Uber Sexual Assault lawsuit involves claims that passengers were sexually assaulted by Uber drivers, with allegations that the company failed to implement adequate safety measures or properly vet drivers.

The increase in filings may result from heightened awareness of these issues, media coverage, or individuals coming forward with additional claims of abuse.

The Uber Sexual Assault multidistrict litigation continues to grow as more individuals seek justice for the alleged harm caused by the company’s failure to protect its passengers.

If you or a loved one were sexually assaulted, sexually battered, or faced any other form of sexual misconduct from an Uber driver, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit.

Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

Use the free and confidential chatbot on this page to find if you qualify to file a claim instantly.

December 2, 2024

Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit Overview

A troubling pattern of sexual assault and violence perpetrated by Uber drivers has resulted in numerous people suing Uber.

Thousands of female passengers using the Uber platform have reported incidents of rape, sexual assault, false imprisonment, harassment, and other forms of sexual violence.

Over 10,000 incidents of sexual assault occurred according to Uber’s safety reports from 2017-2020.

The Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit represents aims to address numerous incidents of sexual assault and extreme misconduct by Uber drivers, and the company’s alleged failure to implement appropriate safety precautions to protect passengers.

As a result of litigation, survivors of sexual abuse may be eligible for compensation.

If you or a loved one were sexually assaulted or faced other forms of sexual misconduct or abuse as an Uber passenger, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit claim.

Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

Use the confidential chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a lawsuit claim instantly.

What is the Uber Sexual Assault MDL?

The Uber Sexual Assault MDL is a consolidation of sexual assault lawsuits filed against Uber Technologies, Inc.

The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) consolidated the Uber Sexual Assault MDL in October 2023 due to the common factual questions raised in allegations of safety precautions.

From the transfer order filed on October 4th, 2023:

“These actions share complex factual questions arising from allegations that Uber failed to implement appropriate safety precautions to protect passengers, and that plaintiffs suffered sexual assault or harassment as a result.

Common factual questions include Uber’s knowledge about the prevalence of sexual assault by Uber drivers, and whether Uber failed to conduct adequate background checks of its drivers, train drivers regarding sexual assault and harassment, implement adequate safety measures to protect passengers from sexual assault, and adequately respond to complaints about drivers.”

The Uber sexual assault cases are centralized in California federal court as Uber Technologies, Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation MDL No. 3084.

How Many Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuits Have Been Filed? Current Status of the Uber Sexual Assault MDL

The Uber Sexual Assault MDL continues to grow, with nearly 1,500 pending Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuits filed as of December 2024.

New Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuits are currently being filed by lawyers across the country.

If you or a loved one were sexually assaulted, sexually battered, or faced any other form of sexual misconduct from an Uber driver, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit.

Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

Use the free and confidential chatbot on this page to find if you qualify to file a claim instantly.

Reasons for the Uber Sexual Assault MDL

The Panel decided to centralize the cases in the Northern District of California due to common factual questions among the cases, such as:

Consolidating claims into one federal court aims to prevent inconsistent pretrial rulings and save time and money.

The Panel recognized individual and state-specific issues but found enough common questions to warrant centralization.

Uber’s concerns about varying state laws and potential third-party claims against drivers were noted but did not outweigh the benefits of centralizing the Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit under a single federal court.

Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit; Uber Sexual Assaults; Uber Sexual Assault Lawyer; Uber Sexual Assault Reports; Uber Sexual Assault Claim; Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit Overview; What Is The Uber Sexual Assault MDL; Lawsuits For Uber Drivers Assaulted By Passengers; Uber's Safety Record_ Sexual Assault Claims And Accountability; Do You Qualify For The Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit; Reasons For The Uber Sexual Assault MDL

The company has been in opposition to the consolidation of sexual assault cases, filing several motions to dismiss and arguing that the company:

“…did not owe a duty to Plaintiff to protect against the criminal conduct” and these lawsuits “have little in common.”

Uber also argued that its Terms of Use precludes the motion for consolidation, but the court denied this argument.

At a November pretrial hearing, Judge Breyer said that the victims who have been sexually assaulted deserve to have their cases resolved as quickly as possible.

What is MDL and How is it Different from a Class Action Lawsuit?

Multidistrict litigation (MDL) is a federal legal process that consolidates similar individual lawsuits from across various states into one federal court.

This approach streamlines complex cases by handling all pretrial activities, like discovery, in one place, thereby saving time and resources and ensuring consistent court rulings.

Unlike class action lawsuits, where everyone receives equal compensation, MDL allows each plaintiff to receive a settlement based on their specific claim and damages.

In addition to consolidating cases, MDL often involves bellwether trials, which are test cases that help both parties gauge the response to evidence and arguments.

Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit; Uber Sexual Assaults; Uber Sexual Assault Lawyer; Uber Sexual Assault Reports; Uber Sexual Assault Claim; Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit Overview; What Is The Uber Sexual Assault MDL

The representative trial may shape the course of the lawsuit, impacting a company’s willingness to settle claims and influence its strategy in litigation.

Other important processes in MDL include coordinated discovery and pretrial motions, which streamline the legal proceedings and help in reaching more efficient resolutions for all involved parties.

Lawsuits for Uber Drivers Assaulted by Passengers

It’s worth noting that of the sexual assault incidents reported to Uber, over 40% included the passenger as the perpetrator of the assault.

Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit; Uber Sexual Assaults; Uber Sexual Assault Lawyer; Uber Sexual Assault Reports; Uber Sexual Assault Claim; Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit Overview; What Is The Uber Sexual Assault MDL; Lawsuits For Uber Drivers Assaulted By Passengers

If you were sexually assaulted as an Uber driver, you may still be eligible to file a lawsuit separate from the consolidated cases in California federal court.

Cases involving the sexual assault of a driver are typically handled individually.

Reach out to our legal team for more information if you were assaulted as an Uber driver.

Developments in the Uber Sexual Assault MDL

The Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit is in its early stages, with pretrial orders and other documents establishing processes for the litigation to move forward.

Here’s a summary of the documents filed in the Uber Sexual Assault MDL so far:

  • Pretrial Order No. 1 (10/6/2023):  Outlined the initial procedures and guidelines for the consolidated pretrial proceedings in the Northern District of California. Main points in the order included the establishment of the master docket file, outlining filing requirements, and more.
  • Pretrial Order No. 2 (11/3/2023):  Outlined the procedures for preserving information relevant to the litigation. This included the scope of preservation, electronically stored information (ESI), the duty to preserve evidence, and more.
  • Pretrial Order No. 3 (11/6/2023):  Established the procedure for the appointment of a Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee (PLC). A Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in MDL is a selected group of attorneys who coordinate and manage the consolidated cases on behalf of all plaintiffs.
  • Pretrial Order No. 4 (12/6/2023): Details the appointment of Plaintiffs’ Co-Lead Counsel and the Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee (PSC) following the court’s receipt of 22 applications for positions within the plaintiffs’ leadership structure. The order outlines the roles of other appointed members to the PSC and emphasizes the responsibilities of Co-Lead Counsel and the PSC in managing pretrial proceedings efficiently, including case management tasks and the encouragement for plaintiffs’ counsel to file their cases promptly.
  • Stipulation and Order re Plaintiffs Who Wish to Proceed Anonymously (12/28/2023): Allows plaintiffs who wish to remain anonymous to proceed with their cases under pseudonyms. According to the order, plaintiffs may file complaints using initials or pseudonyms like “Jane Doe,” must disclose their true names to defendants upon request (to be kept confidential), and efforts should be made to use pseudonyms in all filings, with documents requiring real names to be filed under seal.
  • Pretrial Order No. 5 (12/28/2023): Sets forth a comprehensive discovery schedule and guidelines for initial motions, lifts the previous stay on discovery, and allows discovery requests authorized by Co-Lead Counsel to proceed.
    • It outlines specific disclosure obligations for all plaintiffs, including the provision of ride receipts or detailed information related to Uber trips connected to alleged incidents by February 15, 2024.
    • The order also schedules Defendants’ Rule 26 initial disclosures for February 29, 2024, and details procedures for the production of government documents and other case documents by Defendants.
    • Additionally, it establishes deadlines for the filing of a Master Long-Form Complaint by Plaintiffs, the submission of Short Form Complaints proposals, and the scheduling of initial motions, including motions regarding Uber’s Terms of Use and Rule 12 motions.
  • Protective Order (12/28/2023): Establishes guidelines for handling confidential information during the litigation, specifying who may access privileged information and under what conditions.
    • The order outlines procedures for designating, challenging, and inadvertently disclosing protected material, and it sets forth obligations for parties when confidential information is subpoenaed or produced in other litigation.
    • Non-parties providing protected material must adhere to the order’s terms, and the order includes provisions for the final disposition of protected materials after the case’s conclusion.
  • Pretrial Order No. 6 (1/2/2024): Facilitates direct filing of actions within the Northern District of California to streamline case management. This order allows plaintiffs alleging sexual assault by Uber drivers in the United States to file their actions directly in this district as part of the MDL, rather than filing elsewhere and awaiting transfer.
  • Pretrial Order No. 7 (2/9/2024): Addresses Uber’s motion to stay proceedings pending the Ninth Circuit’s decision on a petition for a writ of mandamus. The court decided to deny Uber’s motion for a stay.
    • This decision was influenced by several factors, including the potential harm to plaintiffs from delaying the litigation, the uncertain duration of the proposed stay, the continued relevance of discovery and pretrial work regardless of the Ninth Circuit’s eventual decision, and the specific interest in advancing claims related to alleged sexual assaults
  • Pretrial Order No. 8 (3/1/2024): Outlines specific procedures for resolving discovery disputes in the MDL. This order, given by the assigned magistrate judge, builds upon and clarifies previous guidelines set forth in Pretrial Order No. 5. It establishes a clear framework to ensure disputes related to discovery—the process of exchanging information between parties in litigation—are addressed efficiently and fairly.
  • Pretrial Order No. 9 (3/15/2024): Resolves disputes over ESI protocols, including definitions, cooperation language, document accessibility, and search methodologies. It adopts the plaintiffs’ definitions for “parent-child” relationships and outlines procedures for inaccessible documents and search queries, favoring transparency and collaboration. The Court approves specific criteria for TAR validation but leaves unresolved issues on cloud-stored documents for further discussion. The parties are instructed to meet and confer on outstanding matters and report back by March 27, 2024.
  • Pretrial Order No. 10 (3/19/2024): Sets guidelines for the submission and management of Plaintiff Fact Sheets (PFS) and Defendant Fact Sheets (DFS) in the MDL involving Uber and its related parties. It addresses the format, schedule, and service requirements for these fact sheets. The Court has resolved disputes over their content, balancing between plaintiffs’ and Uber’s proposals, to streamline discovery.
  • Pretrial Order No. 11 (3/20/2024): Allows plaintiffs to streamline their filings by referencing the Master Long-Form Complaint. The Short-Form Complaint includes sections to identify the court, parties, and specific allegations. Plaintiffs provide their details, the basis for the lawsuit, and the relevant ride information related to the alleged incident.
  • Pretrial Order No. 12 (3/26/2024): Details various aspects of managing the litigation. It outlines orders for the production and exchange of evidence, including specific deadlines for submissions and discovery responses. The memorandum updates case management, covering hearing schedules, pre-trial motions, and procedural organization. It notes ongoing settlement discussions and provides guidance on the process and deadlines. It specifies the obligations of both plaintiffs and defendants regarding documentation, discovery, and compliance with court orders. The document sets forth instructions for upcoming litigation stages and deadlines.
  • Pretrial Order No. 13 (3/29/2024): Includes detailed billing and expense reports related to the Uber Technologies, Inc. passenger sexual assault litigation. It covers various aspects such as time and expense tracking for legal work. The time report lists categories of legal services, including document review, legal research, motions, and trial preparation, specifying professional levels, billing rates, and descriptions of work performed.
  • Amended Pretrial Order No. 12 (4/1/2024): Establishes updated guidelines for the submission of time and expense reports in the litigation. The order specifies the format and content requirements for all reports submitted by counsel, including details about contemporaneous timekeeping, the categorization of expenses, and submission deadlines. It emphasizes the need for accuracy and transparency to ensure fair allocation of costs and compensation among involved parties.
  • Pretrial Order No. 14 (4/4/2024): Establishes procedures under Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) for handling privileged and protected materials in the litigation. The order outlines the rules for inadvertent disclosure of privileged information, including the notification process, “clawback” procedures, and protocols for contesting claims of privilege. It emphasizes that production of such materials does not constitute a waiver of privilege and provides detailed steps for resolving disputes, ensuring compliance with confidentiality standards during litigation.
  • Pretrial Order No. 15 (5/20/2024): Denies Uber’s motion to enforce provisions in its Terms of Use that sought to prevent plaintiffs from participating in coordinated or consolidated proceedings in the litigation. The court ruled that such clauses conflict with the purpose of 28 U.S.C. § 1407, which empowers the judiciary to manage multidistrict litigation for efficiency and justice. While Uber’s Forum Selection Clause may be considered later, the Non-Consolidation Clause was deemed unenforceable as it undermines judicial case management authority and the public interest.
  • Second Amended Pretrial Order No. 12 (5/23/2024): Updates protocols for the submission and management of common benefit work in the litigation. The order addresses numerical corrections in task codes and incorporates vendor-specific information for tracking submissions. It emphasizes requirements for detailed timekeeping, expense reporting, and adherence to guidelines for compensable work. Only work authorized by Co-Lead Counsel for the common benefit of plaintiffs will be reimbursed.
  • Pretrial Order No. 16 (8/9/2024): Establishes a detailed deposition protocol for the litigation. The order governs depositions in all related cases under MDL No. 3084, addressing procedures for noticing depositions, third-party subpoenas, scheduling, custodial file production, and privilege logs. It specifies location guidelines for depositions, including those for defendants, former employees, and expert witnesses. The protocol aims to streamline pretrial discovery while safeguarding confidentiality and fairness.
  • Pretrial Order No. 17 (8/15/2024): Rules on Uber’s motions to dismiss claims under California and Texas law in the litigation. The order reviews allegations that Uber prioritized rapid growth over passenger safety, failed to implement effective safeguards against foreseeable risks of sexual assault, and misrepresented safety in its marketing. It acknowledges claims that Uber maintained significant control over its platform and failed to adopt reasonable safety measures, while focusing on protecting its reputation rather than passenger welfare.

Uber's Safety Record: Sexual Assault Claims and Accountability

Uber’s safety record has been critically scrutinized due to numerous sexual assault claims involving its drivers, raising serious concerns about passenger safety in the rideshare industry.

These incidents have highlighted a potential gap in Uber’s responsibility and accountability mechanisms, especially regarding the behavior of its drivers.

The company has faced criticism for not doing enough to prevent and address sexual assaults, pointing to a need for more stringent and effective safety measures.

Background checks of drivers emerge as a significant factor in this context, with demands for more thorough vetting processes to ensure passenger safety.

There is an essential need for rideshare companies like Uber to implement comprehensive and robust safety protocols to protect passengers from potential harm.

Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit; Uber Sexual Assaults; Uber Sexual Assault Lawyer; Uber Sexual Assault Reports; Uber Sexual Assault Claim; Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit Overview; What Is The Uber Sexual Assault MDL; Lawsuits For Uber Drivers Assaulted By Passengers; Uber's Safety Record_ Sexual Assault Claims And Accountability

Strengthening accountability and transparency in responding to such incidents is crucial.

The responsibility of rideshare companies like Uber extends beyond just providing transportation; it encompasses ensuring the utmost safety and security of its passengers at all times.

Sexual violence committed against passengers must be actively investigated and comprehensively addressed.

The voices of survivors must be heard, and their legal rights protected.

Uber Safety Report on Sexual Assaults

According to Uber’s own safety report, nearly 4,000 sexual assaults were reported on the company’s app in 2019-2020.

The number of reported sexual assaults committed by Uber drivers declined from the previous report by 38% from nearly 6,000 sexual assault reports recorded in 2017-2018.

Despite this 38% decrease in reported sexual assaults, nearly 10,000 sexual assaults in a three year period is horrible.

The reported numbers of Uber sexual assaults are shocking, yet only include the five “most severe categories” of sexual assault as determined by the ride hailing platform:

  • “Non consensual sexual penetration”
  • “Non consensual kissing of a sexual body part”
  • “Non consensual touching of a sexual body part”
  • “Attempted non consensual sexual penetration”
  • “Non consensual kissing of a non sexual body part”

Critics of the categories of sexual assault reported by Uber claim that the company is not reporting on everything that consumers and regulators have a right to know.

Lawsuits against Uber claim that the company has the ability to prioritize rider safety further, but its response to reports of sexual assault have been slow and inadequate, allowing for Uber drivers with sketchy background checks and previous allegations of sexual assault and sexual harassment to continue working.

Uber Released New Safety Features to Combat Sexual Violence by Uber Drivers

In response to reports of sexual assault on the Uber platform, the company has attempted to increase safety features on the Uber app a number of times.

Platform changes to increase passenger safety include:

  • 2022: Text-to-911, allowing users to discretely request emergency help.
  • 2018: Release of the Uber Safety Toolkit, integrating features such as emergency assistance, “trusted contacts” features to share trip details, improved criminal background checks of Uber drivers, and independent vehicle inspections.

Despite these changes, drivers sexually assaulting female passengers is still a pervasive issue.

Does Uber Mandate Mediation for Sexual Assault Claims?

Uber mandated mediation and arbitration for individuals sexually assaulted by Uber drivers until 2018, when the company’s board received a letter from 14 female victims that highlighted the significance of arbitration agreements.

Before 2018, survivors of sexual assault perpetrated by Uber drivers were required to undergo independent arbitration rather than pursuing lawsuits and contacting authorities.

This process served as a means to prevent survivors from speaking out and filing civil lawsuits for what they had experienced, requiring them to sign nondisclosure agreements.

Do You Qualify for the Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit?

Survivors of sexual assault deserve justice and accountability.

The Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit aims to hold the company liable for failing to protect riders from serious incidents and harm.

Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit; Uber Sexual Assaults; Uber Sexual Assault Lawyer; Uber Sexual Assault Reports; Uber Sexual Assault Claim; Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit Overview; What Is The Uber Sexual Assault MDL; Lawsuits For Uber Drivers Assaulted By Passengers; Uber's Safety Record_ Sexual Assault Claims And Accountability; Do You Qualify For The Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit

If you or a loved one have experienced sexual assault or other forms of sexual misconduct as an Uber passenger, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit claim.

Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

Use the confidential chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit claim instantly.

Experienced lawyers handle every aspect of the civil litigation process, helping survivors of sexual assault build their case and representing their best interests.

TorHoerman Law: Uber Sexual Assault Attorneys

Sexual assault is a horrific crime, and survivors deserve justice, compensation, and an adequate recovery.

Perpetrators of sexual abuse, both the perpetrator themself and the potentially liable third parties, deserve a swift and complete investigation that results in appropriate legal consequences and accountability to prevent further harm.

The Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit aims to hold the company accountable for alleged lapses in safety measures and to seek justice for the survivors of such egregious acts.

This legal action underscores the importance of robust safety protocols in the rideshare industry.

Having an experienced lawyer represent you in such cases can be incredibly beneficial, as they bring expertise in navigating the legal process and can effectively advocate for the rights and compensation due to survivors.

If you or a loved one were sexually assaulted, sexually battered, or faced any other form of sexual misconduct from an Uber driver, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit.

Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

Use the free and confidential chatbot on this page to find if you qualify to file a claim instantly.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • Can I Sue Uber If I Was Sexually Assaulted by an Uber Driver?

    Yes, you may be eligible to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit if you were sexually assaulted or faced other forms of sexual misconduct as an Uber passenger.

    Contact our law firm for a free consultation.

    Use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file an Uber sexual assault case instantly.

  • How Many People Have Sued Uber for Sexual Assault?

    According to the most recent filings in the Uber Sexual Assault MDL, there are nearly 150 sexual assault cases consolidated into the litigation.

    We expect numerous other cases to be filed into the MDL in the coming months.

    Contact us if you believe you have a case.

    We’re here to help you.

  • What Types of Sexual Assault and Misconduct Can You Sue Uber For?

    Individuals who have suffered sexual assault and non-consensual sexual conduct may be eligible to file a claim.

    Incidents that may qualify an individual to take legal action include:

    • Inappropriate sexual contact
    • Forced sexual activity
      • Non consensual sexual penetration or rape
      • Non consensual touching
      • Non consensual kissing
    • Indecent exposure
    • Abduction or kidnapping with sexual abuse or threats of physical assaults
    • Other sexual abuse

  • Can I Sue Uber If the Abuser Was Criminally Charged?

    Yes, you may be able to file an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit if criminal charges were pursued against the perpetrator.

    Criminal proceedings are not filed by the victim of a sexual assault, but are filed by the State.

    Individuals who have suffered sexual assault or sexual abuse from an Uber driver may be eligible to file a civil lawsuit claim against the rideshare company.

    Civil lawsuits aim to compensate victims according to the damages they have incurred as a result of negligence.

    Contact an experienced lawyer for insight on your potential case.

  • How Long Do I Have to File an Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit?

    Statute of limitations for sexual abuse and assault as an Uber passenger may depend on the state in which the incident occurred.

    Generally, statute of limitations are between 2 and 10 years.

    It’s highly recommended to consult with an experienced lawyer about filing deadlines in your potential case, as these limitations can vary between situations and circumstances.

    Contact our law firm today for a free consultation.

Published By:
Tor Hoerman

Tor Hoerman

Owner & Attorney - TorHoerman Law

Do You
Have A Case?

Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.

Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.

Would you like our help?

About TorHoerman Law

At TorHoerman Law, we believe that if we continue to focus on the people that we represent, and continue to be true to the people that we are – justice will always be served.

Do you believe you’re entitled to compensation?

Use our Instant Case Evaluator to find out in as little as 60 seconds!

$495 Million
Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit

In this case, we obtained a verdict of $495 Million for our client’s child who was diagnosed with Necrotizing Enterocolitis after consuming baby formula manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.

$20 Million
Toxic Tort Injury

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $20 Million for our client after they suffered a Toxic Tort Injury due to chemical exposure.

$103.8 Million
COX-2 Inhibitors Injury

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $103.8 Million for our client after they suffered a COX-2 Inhibitors Injury.

$4 Million
Traumatic Brain Injury

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $4 Million for our client after they suffered a Traumatic Brain Injury while at daycare.

$2.8 Million
Defective Heart Device

In this case, we were able to successfully recover $2.8 Million for our client after they suffered an injury due to a Defective Heart Device.

Guides & Resources
Do You
Have A Case?

Here, at TorHoerman Law, we’re committed to helping victims get the justice they deserve.

Since 2009, we have successfully collected over $4 Billion in verdicts and settlements on behalf of injured individuals.

Would you like our help?

You can learn more about the Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit by visiting any of our pages listed below:

All
FAQs
Injuries & Conditions
Legal Help
Settlements & Compensation
Other Resources

Share

Related Posts

What Our Clients Have To Say